Comments (7)
pixelsword  +   1077d ago
It doesn't matter because it doesn't affect he gameplay while in motion and you wouldn't even notice; as a matter of fact, the 360 version looks fuzzier when you slow it down, but again, when in full motion, you probably won't notice that, either.
#1 (Edited 1077d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
WrAiTh Sp3cTr3  +   1077d ago
That's called Motion-blur, lol.
pixelsword  +   1077d ago
No, it's fuzzier when images of the game that have no motion blur applied are viewed.

That's called fuzzy images, lol.
#1.1.1 (Edited 1077d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report
Siren30  +   1077d ago
I've played through mass effect on the 360 atleast 5 times. I've played about 7 hours on the ps3 now and my opinion is the ps3 version is better. Loading times are pretty close to the same, the graphics look cleaner and the framerate does drop a little but nowhere near as bad as the 360 version.
legionsoup  +   1077d ago
Good to know. Definitely picking up trilogy, but was waiting to see which version to get. Thanks!
nukeitall  +   1077d ago
One thing that isn't mentioned is content wise, the PS3 version will never get Pinnacle Station DLC. Apparently it is due to corrupted source code.

Bummer. So if you want the best version, PC is it with all the DLC and all the performance your PC can handle.
JAMurida  +   1077d ago
I was going to wait for the Digital Foundry report on the Mass Effect PS3 port, but gave in and bought it, (was only $15). Overall I'm happy to of just got to be able to play the first game, (I only own a PS3). It's not even funny though how the first is far greater then the other two installments IMO, but that's another topic...

I wonder though, if having a SSD installed into your PS3 would vastly improve the performance/loadtimes like it did with Gran Turismo 5.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login