Comments (7)
Neonridr  +   707d ago
Ouch, another bad review for the game. Doesn't help that they tried to rush this thing in 5 months, rather than taking some extra time to polish it off. Since it wasn't a port of Black Ops 2, they had no business trying to release it at the same time as the console versions.
#1 (Edited 707d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Godchild1020  +   707d ago
They charged 10 dollars for every month it was in development for at nihilitsic.

I still stick with my first impression and say this game is better than what professional reviewers are giving this game. The content, yes is shallow and short, but the MP and replayability is there. The game is better than Resistance Burning Skies. I think if this game didnt have the COD name, it might have reviewed better, but sell less.
#1.1 (Edited 707d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
cpayne93  +   707d ago
I agree, I've been looking at a lot of online gameplay videos and the online looks just like cod, for better or worst. The controls seem good too. It looks like there are a few technical issues and there isn't much content, but it doesn't deserve these low scores. Should have been priced lower tho.
StraightPath  +   707d ago
theres few kinds of people trying to defend this awful abomination.

1. people who dont have a ps vita but are loyal fanboy to sony, so anything on thier platform they must defend even if its the worst game this year worst game this generation or ever. Even if its a exclusive turd like this.

2. people who have a vita but know its lacking games, even thought they dont have this turd game they resulting to defending this title as it was hyped to be big deal for vita

3. people who brought this turd game but now are trying to justify their purchase. knowing this game is the worst ever.trying to promote a awful game rather then promoting a good game on thier handheld such as gravity rush or golden abyss. vita fans are actually promoting a turd with call of duty slapped on it.
searcam01  +   706d ago
Oh don't foget about the people like you who never even played it and say its an abomination. Who cares if people actually like it and defend it. Me personally think the game is ok and it don't deserve the score it got. I'm not a big fan of cod but this is a portable game made for a handheld. The price is to high for people, that I understand. Its not the best but to score it below Resistance BS is crazy. It should of got a 5.5/10 or 6/10. Yes I bought it for $50. I don't really care for price. Now let me ask you, how do you know this game is "turd"? Do you even own a Vita? Or did you fallow what other people say?

Nevermind don't answer those questions cause you can't. Wonder why you only have one bubble. Be gamer and try it out for yourself before judging. To everybody else who plays it see you on.
#1.2.1 (Edited 706d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report
The_Tr0ll17  +   707d ago
They should have just made it MP only if they weren't going to focus on SP.
Should have just ported COD4 over and called it a day.
From the user videos I've seen, it looks decent. Not as low as some of these reviews though. 1-4 out of 10 usually means the game is broken and unplayable.
#2 (Edited 707d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Kingthrash360  +   706d ago
Trash reviews everywhere.
The game is great play it.
Reviewers are busy playing things like wiiU and BO2 and halo and AC3 to give 2 fucks about handhelds right now. Especially a game they didn't get earlier than us for free.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember