Comments (28)
Blankman85  +   717d ago
My theory? Trying to keep retailers happy. It's easier to negotiate display preference with retailers when your platform does not compete with them via digital sales.
That's my theory and not an excuse for them. I couldn't be bothered either way, data costs way too much in South Africa for full game downloads to be viable for me.
The_Con-Sept  +   717d ago
Understanding the consumer is crucial in this business. In fact in any business. This is simply what consumers have always wanted and have been enjoying thoroughly on Steam. It is a no brainer to be honest.

Besides Wal Mart won't sell cd's unless the producer agrees to Wal Mart's terms. That may only be for the music industry but it's not a far cry from this happening to games.
#1.1 (Edited 717d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
nukeitall  +   717d ago
That is why I don't think MS cares to release digital only games. That market is rapidly growing, but the demand for it is still far far far far outpaced by retail disc sales.
NeverEnding1989  +   717d ago
Microsoft seemed to be leading when it game to full game digital downloads earlier this generation. I remember this distinctly because PS3 fanboys swore that digital downloads would NEVER replace the physical format.

I was impressed to see recently released games already available for download on the PSN store. Good for gamers I guess, but this will bring about the death of game stores much quicker than anticipated.

I'm good with digital downloads, but I want to see more Steam like sales on Xbox Live and PSN (looks at full priced 5 year old map packs)
sjaakiejj  +   717d ago
You seem to remember things incorrectly..

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1...

"In late 2007, Sony began releasing select PlayStation 3 titles as direct downloads. It was the first current-generation console to do so. "

As a side note - Digital versions of the game won't replace retail copies for a long time. We don't have enough bandwidth for it to be feasible, nor will we in at least the next 10 years.
#2.1 (Edited 717d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
NeverEnding1989  +   717d ago
The link you provided supports everything I have said. I didn't say Xbox 360 was first, I said Microsoft placed more of an emphasis on DD earlier on this gen. SONY has only just begun releasing games digitally on the first day as of September of this year, following Nintendo's lead.

http://www.engadget.com/201...

Thanks for the tip tho:)
Knight_Crawler  +   717d ago
@sjaak - you may now call NeverEnding Father.
ALLWRONG  +   717d ago
It is true PS3 fanboys talked up Blu-Ray and now they defend digital downloads. They tend to flip flop like that. It's the same when they say "we don't play sales" then send you PM's talking about sales.
sjaakiejj  +   717d ago
DD's are shitty on consoles in general - PS3 allows the use of third party hard drives but games are like 25GB each. 360 only allows for insanely expensive proprietary drives, though games take up less space.

In either case, you'll be off much cheaper if you just buy games from retailers.

As for your statement about Ps3 fans flip flopping - that's not something exclusive to them. 360 and Nintendo fans do the exact same thing ;). Remember the whole "Ps3 has no games" arguments?
stone_cold  +   717d ago
simply because Microsoft sucks
dennett316  +   717d ago
Of course they do....go back to sleep little one, those big bad other consoles won't hurt you any more. Oh! I see you've wet your bed again, naughty boy.
Now go ask Mummy and Daddy to buy you a 360 so you can get some perspective and stop being a silly little fanboy.
I think they are giving xbox users what they want or ask for. Making multi player free would be a bad move sice this is not what they ask for.

Hey MS is successful so I can't tell them to do anything different. Not many new AAA IP's since gears 1. They won't allow cross play with portal 2 with steamworks. They make gamers pay for some free pc content like on l4d http://www.planetxbox360.co... & minecraft.

Who else can come to e3 and show off dash boards for 10 mins? & skip all the other gaming events? they get a very special love from xbox gamers.

This is the future.
http://latimesblogs.latimes...

But xbox gamer are a weird bunch or they have to many average joe casual gamers. imo.
#3.2 (Edited 717d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
dennett316  +   717d ago
If you call releasing games at £59.99 for download "getting it right", then I suppose you could say Sony do.

I wouldn't though, I think that's a colossal rip off by the various publishers. Sony let them set the prices, I think they need to change that policy and make it fall at least in line with physical copies....if not cheaper. Only then will downloading really take off.

As it is, they take advantage of the lazy or those unwilling to shop around for good deals. Fair enough, it can be played on another console via content sharing, but it's still a lot of money for a single game.
sjaakiejj  +   717d ago
"As it is, they take advantage of the lazy or those unwilling to shop around for good deals. "

Then stop being lazy and search for good deals. I do it with anything I buy. To be fair, those people really aren't Sony's, Microsoft's or Nintendo's problem. In fact, those people earn them extra money - why would they change it?
dennett316  +   717d ago
It's kind of like taking advantage of a slow kid, it just doesn't seem right. Then again, if people are willing to pay such amounts, I can hardly blame publishers for not changing it. It just seems to me they'd get more sales if the content was much more reasonably priced.
sjaakiejj  +   717d ago
I agree that they may earn more, but it's a tricky market at the moment due to limited bandwidth. The question is, how many people are willing to buy digital copies of games, and how many are able to?

Given that the market is significantly smaller than that of retail copies, the higher prices may be out of necessity, in an attempt to regain the money they lost in making it digitally available.

All that is speculation of course, there might be entirely different reasons for it
HmongAmerican  +   717d ago
I know. How can they rip us off when there is no physical disk loyalty fees, but we still pay 60 for a digital copy. Just wait for a price drop seen right to me. It would be cool if PS+ members get a discount with new releases.
Cam977  +   717d ago
Because they suck and are driven by money. If you disagree with that ten you're blinded by fanboyism.
RivetCityGhoul  +   717d ago
every company is driven by money dude. your the blinded one.
NeverEnding1989  +   717d ago
Well not SONY, they're blinded by trying to get money again
iamgoatman  +   717d ago
The irony.
ALLWRONG  +   717d ago
I guess Sony does everything out of the kindness of their corporate hearts.

Right?
Cam977  +   716d ago
• Do Sony have ads on the XMB?
- No.
• Do Sony charge you for PSN?
- No.
• Do Sony change their focus from gaming to a more profitable media-based service?
- No.

No.
edonus  +   717d ago
Its because MS is still very strong with retail and dont want to alienate them. MS was the first ones to set up a robust digital download strategy. Its not like MS cant do what Sony and Nintendo are doing they are just choosing not to. I think they are exploring some different business models and already have their plan set for digital distribution.
SOULJER   717d ago | Bad language | show
green  +   717d ago
Until digital versions significantly undercut the retail versions, then i ain't interested. Saw Gears of War 3 on Amazon for £15 but its £39,99 on XBL. I think it is a no brainer which one i will go for.
GraveLord  +   717d ago
You get what you pay for.(I guess in this case, you don't)
MultiConsoleGamer  +   717d ago
Sony is also leading the way with their amazing and somewhat revolutionary PSN+ service.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember