Comments (6)
wallis  +   656d ago
To be fair it just sounds like he's not a gamer. He makes one potentially hazardous comment (some games have no story whatsoever like hack and slash) but he makes it so clear he knows nothing that it shouldn't be taken seriously. He doesn't impinge on them as being rubbish either, like The Critic That Shall Not Be Named and a lot of people I know.
Alos88  +   656d ago
It's weird, he sounds like he's trying to be polite about a medium he really doesn't understand or care for.
mac_sparrow  +   655d ago
"A story can only be contained in a book."

Not true, and having read some of his work I can honestly say that I found it to be quite disjointed and mediocre at best. If it weren't for the fact that the games had created interest in the character for me I don't think I would have finished the book.

Obviously not all will agree, Mr Sapkowski included, but I feel that the Geralt in the games is superior to that I have seen in print.

I think Mr Sapkowski could do worse than to look at the Legacy of Kain series from a story standpoint.
#3 (Edited 655d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TheTwelve  +   655d ago
Dude is a conceited prick, period. Nobody heard about his books until the games came out and this pisses him off. --- 12
dafegamer  +   655d ago
ehhm this is a bit disrespectful cause after all, it was him who created the witcher. At least give this Man some credit for his amazing work
#4.1 (Edited 655d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
TheTwelve  +   652d ago
He should be grateful for what the games have done for his books.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember