WC: The ten entries in this article are all headlined by short sentences which encourage you to look at a game slightly differently. Some may inspire you to see the absurdity of some titles; some may help you see underlying problems. Hopefully at the very least you can see one of these games in a different light, giving you a perspective that may be different to your own.
With hundreds of games, some of which are considered to be classics that hold up to this day, you’ve got the pick of the litter when it comes to choosing a potential remake
^This. THIS!
Stop remaking PS4 games!
Remake PS1 and PS2 games à la FF7R, RE1, Mafia, Half Life style ....
Make Legend of Dragoon, Legacy of Kain etc Remakes happen
and Valkyrie Profile Lenneth. They did Star Ocean 1 & 2 R already, VPL should get the same treatment.
I'd be down for FF8, and Xenogears. But I would also be down for Chrono Trigger and Chrono Cross. And I wish Namco would get off their ass and remake or remaster the Xenosaga trilogy.
1. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins
2. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins
3. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins
4. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins
5. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins
6. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins
7. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins
8. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins
9. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins
10. Tenchu: Stealth Assassins
There are many worlds out there brimming with wondrous creatures ready to help you on your adventure beyond Pokemon.
Temtem is actually really good as a single player experience or as a co-op game. Played the shit out of it when it released
These groundbreaking video games changed gaming forever and drew in scores of fans in the process.
Whatculture makes some terrible articles strung out across a bazillion pages.
"Haytham Kenway’s Section Ruined Connor As A Character"
Haytham was pretty badass in my opinion and an awesome character
<SPOILER>
The fact they made him a templar and an enemy while making us play boring old, bland Connor was depressing and ruined the game for me
It didn't make sense either that Haytham, Charles Lee and the other British people at the start of the game were templars.
I mean look at it this way, in the present we find out Templars have taken over and have control over the world because of them all being in high power with massive corporations and Governments...right? So why is it that the intro to the game Ubisoft made up Templar enemies like Haytham when they could of used young founding fathers of America who have devised a plan to use a war to top the ranks and take the country for the Templars where they will be able to grow their base of operations against the Assassins. Seems perfect story wise.
Least then with this idea we could see Haytma as an Assassin come over from Britain to stop there plan.
In the end since the colonists win the war it would show us how the templars managed to turn the tide of their war with the Assassins and how in the present they control everything. I mean we even see a picture of George Washington use the Apple to win the war in past games.
They buggered up the story in my opinion...and for what? Seems like it was so they didn't p*** off Americans for making them look evil even though it makes more sense for the games story.
11. Oblivion: monsters level up with you
what up with all the hate FFVIII been getting lately