440°

Bungie confirms 'Destiny' day one update to include 'UI readability,' plus more

Bungie's Director of Production Jonty Barnes spoke about what they have planned for Destiny when the game launches and beyond.

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
crusf3525d ago

Hope my hard drive can take most of these updates. Patches are getting bigger and bigger everyday. Ghosts is a good example 2-3GB for stability updates -_-. Here is hoping bungie knows how to compress there patches.

plut0nash3525d ago

My bandwidth cries at the thought to be honest. Hey, everyone has fast, reliable internet, right?

Randostar3525d ago

COD is a bad example. Those guys can't make shit efficient.

KwietStorm_BLM3524d ago

Well I do. But my name is not everyone. It's Jamaal.

ScottyHoss3524d ago

I hope these huge updates at least have something worth it like local split screen :/ my 500GB is feeling it already, might have to upgrade to 2TB

lokirevamped3524d ago

I do, I would love to have faster though. I have Fios 150/65

memots3524d ago

Try that in a submarine.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3524d ago
n4rc3525d ago

Its replacing data for the most part.. A 2gb update may only add 500mb to the total size on your HDD..

Bandwidth is another issue.. I have a 2gb update for wolfenstein that only adds audio for other countries.. Or completely useless to me in other words lol

Patrick_pk443524d ago

Thank god my internet provider gives free downloads between 2am-8am.

ScottyHoss3524d ago

I got lucky, mine doesn't pay attention. I rarely go over the limit though

Iamnemesis48803524d ago

The thing I hate with patches is the time to download just want to jump into the game not have to have a patch to load as soon as possible.

One good feature that the xbox one has you can put a external hdd up 14tb I have running a 1tb hdd and that is enough.

Bungie should have this patch really compressed to to have the download done faster.

3-4-53524d ago

Destiny will end up taking about 150 GB when it's all said and done with future DLC and 2015 content.

500 GB just isn't enough especially when out the box you only get 349 GB or something.

* I've only played Forza 5, Titanfall, PvZ & I'm down to 289GB.

I'll manage because I played all last gen with a 20 GB Xbox 360, but it would be nice if I could just buy a disc and put it in and play without having to install.

Hopefully the DL isn't too long.....Going to be the longest wait ever for that DL.

lokirevamped3524d ago

How about buying an external hard drive......problem solved, I have an 3TB Hard Drive.

Suit_A3524d ago

I'm from Australia where my internet provider is a sedimentary rock holding a bent antenna running on rubbing your feet together then touching your head and trying to download a 3GB update can take me hours...Cheers Optus :(

purp13m0nk3y3524d ago (Edited 3524d ago )

Lols. Fellow Optus user here. So much for that NBN roll out. F'k you Tony Abbot you clown!

I got lucky and actually got my new fiber connection before they stopped the roll out. Sadly many of my PSN friends weren't so lucky :-(

BallsEye3524d ago

That's nothing. battlefield updates usually take all together 5 times more than the actual game.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3524d ago
nerdman673525d ago

I miss when they finished games before releasing them.

aLucidMind3524d ago (Edited 3524d ago )

That time never happened. N64, PS1, and PS2 games had plenty of horrible glitches that would be patched if they had been PS3/360 or newer games. The only games that didn't were extremely simple and had little depth.

It's like whining that Skyrim had glitches when Super Mario Land 2 on SNES had none worth mentioning when the tech involved in the making of the games alone are two totally different animals at this point. While some developers are getting a little too complacent by developing the mindset of "we can patch that later", that doesn't mean games before this day and age weren't also bereft with the same or similar issues.

ExPresident3524d ago

That being said, there was a time when patches weren't available. Ala Nintendo days, Super Nintendo etc. Developers and Publishers alike knew they had once chance to win the customer over and their game better be right. Were there still bugs and glitches... sure, but they weren't typically game breaking. That stuff had to be solved before it went to the customer or you'd have no chance of winning them back by a simple patch on release day.

i8urCAKE3524d ago

remember when games didn't have updates on first day?

UnHoly_One3524d ago

Remember when everything was fine out of the box and they NEVER had updates?

aLucidMind3524d ago

Nope, because that never time never happened. Games were simpler in design back then, and didn't have as many issues. This does not mean they were bereft of crippling glitches or idiotic issues on-par with modern games. They never had updates not because they were flawless, but because it wasn't possible to do without separately releasing a new copy of the game.

Meaning patches back then were not worth the time or money to make them, as they are now.

PsylentKiller3524d ago

I guess you don't remember Battletoads for the NES.

UnHoly_One3524d ago

I played Battletoads and have no recollection of it having any problems.

And I'm not saying that games never had any glitches, but they at least were playable out of the box, something that can't be said about some games today.

JeffGUNZ3524d ago

I don't really see the big deal. I remember when games had bugs well, that's it', you were stuck with them. You're telling me that John Montana football for Genesis meant to allow people on the kickoff to just run along the sideline and it be impossible for the CPU to tackle you? Also, what about all the NHL games on Genesis, where you skate across the left to right side of the crease and it's a goal 100% of the time. So many games had so many glitches, but we just adapted to it.

We live in a day and age with the internet and the ability to patch these games. If Bungie found something or tweaked something after going gold, wouldn't you like to have it patched immediately upon playing, or would you rather wait a few weeks or months?

As long as the game isn't broken and is a solid product, updates are great to keep it fresh and fair.

n4rc3524d ago

Haha.. I remember that NHL glitch.. Top right corner worked almost every time as well

Iamnemesis48803524d ago

At least give people a week to start the game then drop the patch is that so hard to ask for.

--Onilink--3524d ago

well... thats a nice way to waste part of the benefits of preloading a game... hopefully its not too big and the network doesnt completely collapse

LAWSON723524d ago

For you maybe 2GB for anyone with cable is nothing

--Onilink--3524d ago (Edited 3524d ago )

if the network is down because everyone is trying to download the update at the same time, you will be doing a whole lot of nothing with your game and your speedy internet.... thats one of the major benefits of preloading, all the downloads are spread out across several days and not everyone at the same time, seriously.. its common sense

UnHoly_One3524d ago

I'd just like to point out that nowhere in that article do they actually say there will be a day one patch.

This was his exact words when talking about changes they were making based on Beta Feedback.

"We've got some things like UI readability we've got for day one that's just better."

So the changes are going to be there on day one, but he didn't specify it was going to be via a patch. Maybe they've already changed it and it's going to be there on day one because it's on the disc that way.

JeffGUNZ3524d ago

I wouldn't be surprised if their was one. If their is, it shows Bungie is still testing the game and trying to make it the best it could be. I guess we will find out in two weeks.

I really wish they would tell me the download/install size of this game. I just upgraded to a 2TB HD, but I want to know how long it will take to download this gem.

UnHoly_One3524d ago

Yeah I'm not saying there won't be a patch on day one, just pointing out the title of this article is completely bogus and misleading.

Show all comments (38)
240°

Destiny Made Over $160 Million In Microtransaction Revenue In Less Than 2 Years

Destiny has made over $160 million in MTX revenue, and these numbers only account the data from late 2017 to early 2019.

Sgt_Slaughter325d ago

That's extremely low for microtransactions, especially for a game that's essentially designed around it

LucasRuinedChildhood325d ago (Edited 325d ago )

This was back when the game wasn't free to play.

The figures are from November 2017 to February 2019 (1 year and 4 months).

Based on that projection, the MTX revenue for Destiny 2 likely would have been closer to ~$240m for 2 years.

Not sure if premium expansions are included in that figure either although ... I'd hope that they are though and that most of the revenue was for actual content like Forsaken.

People spend way too much money on cosmetics.

Rude-ro325d ago (Edited 325d ago )

Seasons($10 and just got bumped to $12) and dungeon keys($10 each, two a year) are through the eververse(micro transaction) store.
So for those two years, in order to play a season, you would pay through micro transactions.

Sonic1881325d ago (Edited 325d ago )

Bungie Marathon will be worse since it's designed around it as well

Kurt Russell325d ago

It makes me sad to agree... but at the same time I am looking forward to giving it a go. Destiny 2 is so far in, I find it difficult to figure out what I am meant to do first.

buffig325d ago

I think FIFA alone makes over $1bn a year from mtx

anast325d ago

FIFA promotes a worldwide sport. It should make more money than destiny.

CantThinkOfAUsername325d ago (Edited 325d ago )

Let's compare something similar. Apex Legends and its ridiculous $18/$40 skins make EA a billion each year.

z2g325d ago

For as much as ppl complain how much they hate microtransactions, they sure don’t act like it. No wonder they aren’t going anywhere.

spicelicka325d ago

By "people" you're referring to millions and millions of people. Obviously the ones complaining aren't necessarily the same as the ones spending all that money.

325d ago Replies(1)
325d ago
Father__Merrin325d ago

There's millions that purchase MTX and there's nothing we can do about it

Show all comments (17)
70°

Stop Trying To Make Destiny

In Episode 1 of Spot On, a new weekly news show, Gamespot talks about the dangers of chasing a trend.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
100°

Destiny 1 Becomes Playable on PC via Emulation

Playing Destiny 1 on PC has been something fans have been requesting for years. It looks like Destiny 1 is now playable on PC via the RPCS3 emulator.

Read Full Story >>
gamejunkie.net
spoonard477d ago

I've been thinking about playing through D1 again before it goes away...

CobraKai476d ago

That’s the sad reality of a game like this. I bought it, invested lots of money, and it can go away at anytime. I still think this was more fun than 2.

jeromeface475d ago

prob because 2 is a grindfest slog

spoonard473d ago

That's the bummer of 'games as a service'.