MorePowerOfGreen3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

Options are good. http://www.ea.com/news/ea-a... It's a smart idea for EA and MSFT because EA has so many annual games and is the reason I don't buy sports games.

xHeavYx3549d ago

It's a smart idea yes, but I think that excluding Titanfall is a mistake

OpieWinston3549d ago

Considering Titanfall sells fine on it's own right now. I don't think it's a mistake.

It'll keep selling.

xHeavYx3549d ago

@Opie
Can you please tell me how you know Titanfall is selling well? I'm just asking because I tried to look for sale figures and couldn't find anything

Mr Pumblechook3549d ago

PlayStation 4 is the new generation market leader yet absurdly EA has partnered with Microsoft making this exclusive to Xbox One. This speaks volumes. It highlights the strength of the Peter Moore & Phil Spencer relationship and of the power of Microsoft dollars.

Corpser3549d ago

Titanfall is the best selling xb1 game, makes no sense to include it in "the vault", maybe next year

gaffyh3549d ago

Nice to see EA can see where gaming is going.

Magnes3549d ago

@Mr Pumblechook Peter Moore is a former MS employee. EA makes no secret they prefer MS console.

Eonjay3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

Business wise its very smart. A nice business move for multiple reasons.

+1 for business sense.

Edit.
@Mages
I'm the greatest Sony fan but you are wrong. Personal preference only gets you so far in business. Its about money. Yes EA may have shot itself in the foot with Titanfall, but rest assured, they got paid. Whats good for the consumer is not always whats good for the bottom line.

gaffyh3549d ago

@disagrees - I meant the fact that gaming will probably end up as a subscription service I.e. Netflix,

maniacmayhem3549d ago

Are there any links that say Titanfall isn't selling well?

xHeavYx3549d ago

@Maniac
No, but no one said anything about Titanfall not selling well. I just wanted to know where Opie got the info that Titanfall is selling good

sonarus3549d ago

titanfall sold well dunno if its still selling well but for next gen exclusive it did well sales wise.

honestly dis news makes me a bit jealous. i would have probably delved in if this was for ps4

mhunterjr3549d ago

@mrpumplechook

Do you think that partnerships should only go to market leaders? Its a good thing the world doesn't work that way...

nicksetzer13549d ago

I find it hilarious how people on this site will manage to downplay anything. This is an amazing program and it is exactly what I and many people have been hoping for. Honestly, at 30$ it is even more exciting than I had expected. Seeing EA doing it first is the only surprise. As long as the catalog continues to grow over time, I cannot wait.

BlackTar1873549d ago

So can we all agree that and put it to bed once and for all that EA is not a neutral company. They are so in bed with MS that it just further paints how much alike EA and MS really are in their lies.

It's Absurd to think how many times MS and EA have lied to everyone on multiple occasions. Yes i have a Sbox one and this still stings becasue it shows what great lengths EA will go to play favorites to one console.

Death3549d ago

EA is the company responsible for driving the Dreamcast out of business. They pledged full support to the Playstation and no support for Sega's console. It's ironic that Peter Moore was the head of Sega at the time.

As for EA showing bias, it's also possible the same offer was made to Sony and they turned it down. Without knowing, forming an educated opinion is difficult at best.

OC_MurphysLaw3549d ago

@xHeavYx I think Titanfall is not on the list as its not EA owned IP. Titalfall is merely a parntership that EA is the publisher of the game on.

XBLSkull3549d ago

Not a huge EA fan but renting 4 games for $5 a month is pretty sweet, spin that however you want. Plus another 5 titles on the way this fall.

juggulator3549d ago

EA truly just wants to sell more to more people.Not entirely a bad thing in their eyes. It seems like they may not include newer games though but it would be cool so play something like Dragon age Inquisition for $5 a month.

mixolydian_id3549d ago

Titanfall sold 3 mill (all consoles)

Halo 1-3 sold 10 mill each

Infamous sold 1.5 mill

creatchee3549d ago

@Death

"Without knowing, forming an educated opinion is difficult at best."

*Looks at comments*

I see what you did there :)

tbone5673549d ago

Oh yeah. Incredible value for EA games only on Xbox One? Wow.

dedicatedtogamers3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

Looks like that "unparalleled partnership" between Microsoft and EA continues...

Seems like a neat way to catch up on the EA backlog, but I don't see how this is superior to Gamefly or PS+

I sincerely hope, however, that this isn't the wave of the future. Imagine EA Access, Activision Access, CAPCOM access, etc. and then those companies start adding in exclusive content only available through their Access subscriptions. PS+ already does this with Betas and early releases of certain things.

Insomnia_843549d ago

Oh, look! It's the two worst companies in the U.S getting in bed together AGAIN!

http://www.polygon.com/2014...

http://www.lazygamer.net/ge...

More reasons to STAY AWAY FROM XBOX!

fr0sty3549d ago

...and microsoft continues their transition to "Games as a service". I get the feeling like they want to move on to that exclusively.

That isn't to say Sony isn't flirting with it too. Hell, PS+ and PSNow are both prime examples of games as a service.

Sitdown3549d ago

@ZodTheRipper
I completely agree, I'm glad the ps4 lacks this option, because?.... :-/ But seriously if you are knocking this, then I'm pretty sure you are just as vocal against Sony's approaching service that currently appears to have a higher price tag. Seriously though, unless you got stock in Sony.... Calm down.

SmielmaN3549d ago

EA partnering with MS makes me think of a rich a$$hole paying his prostitute.

4Sh0w3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

Ohh yeah! We are getting closer to that future digital platform with better deals. I don't buy a lot of EA games but for $30 a year and 10% on EA digital games I'm definitely going to be playing more of them. Damm I keep trying to put gaming on the back burner due to other commitments but its so hard when stuff like this happens, I mean its a great deal, I don't want to miss out but where in the hell will I find the time? -It's a nice problem to have I suppose.

Edit>> Oh come on, I don't get the hate, I think something like this has always been in Microsoft original digital plans. I bet if this was a EA/Sony new partnership everyone hating would be screaming from the mountain tops how great sony is for securing such a partnership. It's the same damm thing everytime, micro/exclusive deal is always bad, but Sony having exclusive deals are always treated like they partnered with sony for love. It's business and maybe Microsoft pulled out the check book or EA thinks it fits better on X1 who cares the reason if its successful then no doubt ps4 will get something similar from EA or other 3rd party devs. Its a great deal if you want to still play a lot of games that you don't necessarily want to buy= $5 per month or better $30 a year. It's a win, win situation for X1 owners since if you don't like it you don't have to use the service.

system223549d ago

As of May titanfall had sold 925,000 copies specifically in the US specifically on Xbox one. That doesn't include any other markets like the UK and others where titanfall has remained in the top 10 til this day. It also doesn't take into account digital sales which are on the rise. I think it's safe to say its a good selling game.

BattleAxe3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

Subscriptions, DLC, F2P/P2W Micro-Transactions, Subscriptions, DLC, F2P/P2W Micro-Transactions, ..... welcome to the next gen, where the only things that have evolved (or devolved depending on your point of view) are the payment schemes.....yuk!

MeliMel3549d ago

No its not a mistake. Plus you guys know it will eventually be on the service.

Pogmathoin3549d ago

There is nothing bad about this deal. Zod, obviously not what you have been smoking. You are a negative machine. Heres a suggestion, play a game. You do have a console, right?

PeaSFor3549d ago

EArly Access, So they are just delaying games for a week so they can make people pay more..

EA can barely release a finished product on their normal release schedule and they want me to pay $5 to play it even earlier?LULZ!

k3rn3ll3549d ago

Well there's this is regards to titanfall http://www.vgchartz.com/wee...

Its not exact statement buts it's the closest we got. Id say thats pretty good for 4 months after the release along with having the smaller jnstall base. But it is vgchartz

ABizzel13549d ago

The service has potential, but I seriously doubt EA is willing to do much to make the service a must have for most people.

It seems like a "play the games EA released last year" for $30, since by next year their games generally stop selling all together.

The price is worth it, but the game selection is up in the air. Personally I'm not a fan of sports games so this isn't for me, but if they add more games like Mirror's Edge, Mass Effect, Burnout, Need for Speed, etc... then it could be a really good service.

I don't understand how they can have a $5/mo. and $30/yr service which makes me believe that they're probably going to increase the price of the annual service to $50/yr. if the service takes off and get popular. It'll still be a good deal though.

Great move for MS, but once again it's stupid of EA to align with a single platform.

Christopher3548d ago

If you're only going to include certain games and not all EA games, then what's the point?

This looks to me like a way to get people to pay for things they normally wouldn't buy.

It's smart business, just not for me.

4Sh0w3548d ago (Edited 3548d ago )

"If you're only going to include certain games and not all EA games, then what's the point?"

Uhmm the point is you get to play more games for less, my guess is EA has done some research and figured out this will be an added revenue vs the used game sales that they get 0 revenue from now. Again, in regards to the consumer they get to play more games, which yes they might have otherwise passed on but instead they pay a fraction of the price. It's sort of like me saying imo Madden isn't worth $60, $50, or $40 to me but hey I'll check it out for $20, $10 or cheaper. So for some it's not that they don't want to play certain games but the price is a barrier as its not worth full price to them, no different than buying from a brick n mortar when the game is cheap, only difference is here they are or will be conveniently in one place( EA games).

Sure their not going to include brand new titles as the free game in the Vault, its possible on a rare occasions but definitely not going to be the norm. That's like asking sony to give away their new releases on ps+ for a small subscription fee. No the idea behind this service from EA is to let you play more games that you passed on AND give benefits like early access to try new games AND let you buy new games 10% off AND even let your progress carry over to the new retail game should you choose to purchase it. So essentially besides the older games you can play select new games for 5 days without purchase.

It's not some "OMG" new feature but imo it's certainly nice to have. I see more of this incoming for both consoles.

Wizard_King3548d ago (Edited 3548d ago )

All this whole thing says to me is don't buy a console at all. They are just designed to bleed money out of you at every step. Consoles stopped being about the pure games ages ago. Sad really as PS1\2, N64 & earlier were the kings of pure games.

You could save all that wasted cash paying just to play online and on those over priced console games and peripherals and get yourself a kick ass gaming rig. Once you do that never look back.

If this is what a majority of you consider gaming is and is moving to then I want no part in it and prefer to be called a PC enthusiast, over a gamer. No gamers I now like the idea of this.

EA has never made a game worth a yearly sub to access to begin with, why anyone thinks this fee is a good thing is so far beyond me.

EA = Cancer
MS = AIDS

EA + MS = I shudder thinking of the baby

Christopher3547d ago

***Uhmm the point is you get to play more games for less, my guess is EA has done some research and figured out this will be an added revenue vs the used game sales that they get 0 revenue from now.***

And yet by excluding certain games you risk a greater chance that someone won't subscribe to the service.

Myself as an example. If EA is going to have primarily sport games as the option, then I don't care. I don't pay for those even if they cost just $5 nor do I play them. Same with multiplayer FPS.

But, if they threw in some of their single-player focused shooters, actions/adventure, and rpgs... I'd at least consider it.

You see, you add more because the more options there are, the more potential subscribers you will have.

+ Show (36) more repliesLast reply 3547d ago
AngelicIceDiamond3549d ago

I have to say this is very interesting.

Play trials of the new games that's great. Mass Effect 4, Mirrors Edge 2 Battlefront will also take advantage of this hopefully.

That's sounds fantastic.

Especially when they start to get the newer games on there ready to play. Now I'll wait until I get the absolute full details on this. Wait and see how EA will executes this.

testerg353549d ago

Zod,so you're a new moron that pays for online gaming? Is that what you're calling PS4 users? Trying to figure out what you're saying.

Brim3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

Oh look now you guys pay for a online service and $5 games that belong in the mobile marketplace....and yet people cheer for PSNOW and paying $14 for 24 Hours for a game that came out 10 years ago... go away ... I'm not saying this service is great because i need to hear more but why come into a post about Xbox if you do not like it?.. Disappear please.

AngelicIceDiamond3549d ago

@Zod Chill your fanboyism. Seriously get it under control because you sound hell a salty its comical.

That's why I said its a wait and see if they can pull this off.

But it sounds cool I guess expressing some sort of excitement angers you to death. Not my issue so fix yours.

"Morons. But hey, the same target group paid for online gaming and Skype for a whole decade so who's to blame?"

Your attacking Xbox not EA's service.

Who's the true moron here? And a mad and salty one at that?

Get lost I don't got time to put up with your fanboy kiddy tantrums.

christocolus3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

@angelice

I think this is good news. Its good to see MS partnering with more publishers but im wondering why all the usual suspects are here again attacking this article? Its just another xbx one article..so why are they here?..smh

As i was saying there's also a full year subscription which is a better deal than the monthly one. Millions of people buy EA games yearly..this gives xbx owners a chance to try a number of them out before buying. Nice. Go on to the xbx one subreddit forums if you want to get a clearer picture of how it will work. There are some really great discussions going on there& major N is on there now.

Death3549d ago

Zod,

You are getting indies and older games on Plus too. Why pretend EA's service is different than Sony's? You can't praise one and diss the other if you want anyone to take you seriously.

Bigpappy3549d ago

Because I buy my games digitally, I have no choice but to pay that $30 for the year and getting 10% of Digital downloads. Lets hope M$ drops the price of 1st party digital by 10% for Gold subscribers as well.

Dread3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

@Zod

So xbox live users are morons, but i guess the sony fans who now have to pay to play online are fine. Lets not call them morons because I bet u have some sort of argument to distinguish them, as I am sure ur not a hypocrite.

Edit: I take that back, u are a hypocrite.

DLConspiracy3549d ago

@Zod

You seem to be getting upset and your posts are starting to show it more and more lately. Calling people morons in the comments section is kind of uncalled for. I can almost guarantee your reaction would be completely different if this was for PS4.

mixolydian_id3549d ago

So.... If you normally buy one EA game per year at 30£...

You can get a subscription that gives you all their digital games for free?

You can see why xbox was pushing the drm "fiasco".

Nda killed that idea... But this could be amazing if it's exactly what seems to be

k3rn3ll3549d ago

Why wouldnt you be able to play fifa 15 next fall when 16 comes out? 14 is one of the games included. People want to bash EA for annualizing sports games but here they are offering them all for $30 a year but a year after release. The whole argument against EA sports titles annualized is people dont feel the new ones are worth paying $60 for. So EA answers with "ok if you feel that way pay $30 a year and play them all after a year." So why are the some haters before hating now? They just catered to you all. If someone really does feel that way then you should have no problem paying $30 for all those titles. Unless of course all of em were just hating to hate. But that would never happen right?

How did you get so many bubbles insulting people and making comments like this? I for one buy Tiger, FIFA, and Madden every year. And I love doing so cuz I feel I get my moneys worth. With 10% off im saving $18 a year on those titles alone. Not to mention games like Titanfall, Battlefield, Mass Effect, Stars Wars, Dragon Age and other no yearly games sprinkled in tgere and my subscription will pay for itself. Oh and 10% off DLC too? Ye a get out of here man cuz your comments hold no weight here. Can't beleive im saying this but GG EA! And GG MS as well! Haters gon' hate

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3549d ago
ramiuk13549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

starts at $4.99 so its gonna be more as they havent detailed packages.
but even if it is little more its a decent deal.
there is way to many things going off with MS and EA,im suspicious now asfter this reveal.

i dont see why EA would be willing to lose so much money,the sub is half the price of 1 game.

parkesy783549d ago

Because when it officially launches it will be all old games not new releases

mrpsychoticstalker3548d ago

I agree this is a huge win for Microsoft, this is the future of video games. I can't wait for this to come out. It's a day one for me. Fifa 15..... 5 days before it comes out. That sounds great!

Mystogan3549d ago

This is a huge win for Xbox.

AngelicIceDiamond3549d ago

If EA executes this properly then yes I can agree this will be a huge win for X1 owners no doubt.

Angerfist3549d ago

People can disagree all they want but EA is still the 3rd Party Publisher with the most popular franchises and IF they add Games in a regular manner to the Vault this will be a hit.

But if this is just a paid Demo section where can play the games for 2 Days and then have to buy them it stinks. If not count me in.

turdburgler10803549d ago

This is what happens when Sony gets so full of themselves they start taking swipes at EA during E3. What did you think was going to happen Sony? No one likes being made fun especially not a massive publishing company.

DigitalRaptor3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

@ turdburgler

Ah right, forgive me. EA isn't going to be publishing their games on the console that makes them more money (Sony), because of spite. They have such bitterness towards Sony that they made this deal to spite them... /s

That is why Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare is coming to PS4 next month, right? Seriously… this sounds like nothing more than a losing brand to attempt to gain ground and marketshare by making a deal with the company that is voted as the worst company in America, right next to them. It baffles me how EA could continue to be so stupid to accept an offer from the console that is less supported than PS4...

And that is why my theory is this…

Titanfall exclusivity is up (we all knew it was coming anyway)… but MS paid a lot of money for its development and marketing, so this is the deal they made so that Titanfall can come to PS4, and Xbowners get decent deals on old games in return. Will be interesting if my theory is correct.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3549d ago
BattleTorn3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

Hahahahaha "options are good"

That is definitely the best spin one can put on being provided new avenues to give a company more of your money.

Death3549d ago

Live, PSNow, PS+, and EA"s Vault are all avenues to spend money. Vault subscribers won't necessarily give more, this may be what they do instead of buying all new releases. B4 is $60, for half that you can subscribe to Vault for a year and still have access to it. The value for Plus is the same, if you aren't getting your subscription fee's worth of games to play you are most likely doing something wrong.

3549d ago
Athonline3548d ago (Edited 3548d ago )

@Death:

The EA's Vault is $30 (£20) per year. Half the price of the B4. Plus you get discounts on DLCs.

Imo the price is right, as long as they put some context.

I'll get it, £20 is simply one less fancy burger next time I 'm in London or I'll simply sell my FIFA 14 disc. I just hope E.A will support this properly and add titles

harrisk9543549d ago

The idea seems really good, but read the TOS and see the "fine print":

http://www.ea.com/eaaccess/...

"As part of the EA Access Services, members with an active subscription are offered (1) the ability to play a limited trial of certain EA Content 5 days prior to the date that EA Content is otherwise available on the Xbox Marketplace (“Play First”), (2) discounts on EA Content offered through the Xbox Marketplace (“Discounts”); and (3) access to a limited library of certain EA Content (“Vault Title(s)”) for unlimited online play (“Vault Access”) for the duration of their availability in the Vault. Limitations and exclusions may apply. For upcoming EA Content eligible for Play First and Discounts, and for current EA Content available in the Vault, and current details on other membership benefits, see http://www.ea.com/eaaccess. Certain EA Content may be excluded from Play First, the Vault, and/or Discounts; see http://www.ea.com/eaaccess for details on such exclusions as they become available."
_____________________

Basically, it for access to a "limited library of certain EA titles" (Understood that they will likely not give out new games)

"for unlimited ONLINE PLAY" (no single player included at this point)

for the "duration of their availability in the vault." (the title is only playable while available in the vault. Title gets removed from the vault, it is no longer playable)

Also, a "limited trial of certain EA titles 5 days before release on XBox Marketplace"... (So, full access or partial access?)

"Limitations and Exclusions apply" (Obviously not all games available and can be pulled at any time from the vault)

The 10% off thing sounds good on new games.

But, need to see what games are available and if it is going to be "online play" only as it states in the TOS, then I am not so sure how good a deal it is.

Gh05t3549d ago

"Understood that they will likely not give out new games"

They say Dragon Age inquisition... is that not new enough? I would say its mostly for EA owned games and not all EA published games will be available. Only time will tell.

"no single player included at this point"

Or the unlimited online refers to the fact you cant get EA Access without being connected online. i.e. you cant watch digital netflix movies without being online, but you get unlimited online movies that are offered.

"the title is only playable while available in the vault. Title gets removed from the vault, it is no longer playable"

Why waste server resources if no one is playing a game. Not to mention if they do have content where they are just the publishers than there would be some licensing agreements which would have an end date.

This TOS seems extremely standard with nothing that pops out at me that isn't in any TOS from any service like this.

lelo3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

I suspect EA are pretty pissed at Sony for not supporting the online DRM that was originally planed for the X1. Microsoft was already on board, but Sony screwed their plans by going the other way. I've seen quite a lot of support lately from EA to the X1... Titanfall, FIFA exclusive deals, time exclusive games, etc... and now this EA Access subscription service.

EA don't seem happy with Sony.

Ra30303549d ago

@lelo
Is anyone happy with EA. When was the last time EA did a single thing right? I'm putting my money on the screwing this up as well. On another note why would anyone support this I thought pretty much everyone hated EA or did the last I heard. Lol ....funny thing is with EA and this program the more successful this is the more it will cost and or the less you'll get...bank on that because it's the EA way.

LOL_WUT3549d ago

True and with this it also means they'll probably won't be any EA games for PS NOW ;)

JackBNimble3549d ago

Yes... what ever happened to the EVIL EMPIRE of EA?

Kidmyst3548d ago

This isn't a bad deal, might move some Xbone consoles and it'll be interesting how it does. But the last time I checked, EA has been the worst company or second worst for the last several years and doesn't treat gamers very well even for what they pay for, IE: Battlefield 3 bugs, Spore bugs, Sim City Bugs, and when gamers complain their accounts are suspended. EA was a big backer of the DRM and no rental policies too.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3548d ago
StrangerX3549d ago

WOOOHOOO! very good idea for those that want to just play temporarily the sports games that come every single year and wont cost them that much. I.E no middle men!

FanboyKilla3549d ago

i love it!!! hearing you fanboys cry and whine. its ok when sony and bungie partner up. but when ms and ea do it they're the devil. lmfao if you weren't a fanboy you wouldnt be missing out. if they're selling it, you can buy it you know? i loooove this idea. good work ms. they're looking like chickens with their heads cut off. they were no where near ready for whats bout to go down. xbox one now $399.

jkendrick3549d ago

@fanboykilla

Boy I guess that deal with Bungie is gonna stop you from playing Destiny. /s

Playstation owners, EA wanted the drM and since it blew up in Microsoft face, they are determined to take it out on us PS gamers. From this point on if I am interested in a EA game I will wait till its in the bargain bin.

cee7733549d ago

EA are pretty much further devaluing its games its good for gamers and all but why buy any EA game at this point if it could just as well be free someday I hope it works out for them but I can see A Ps+ or Games with gold effect happening on A much larger level with all EA games. By the time EA's fixed all the bugs in their games it will be free lol (looks @ battlefield 4).

If you own an xbox one why buy EA games at this point besides the sports titles This could bite EA in the ass .

50/50

1Victor3549d ago

Ok this worries me "Play First – Membership in EA Access lets you experience trials of new EA games up to five days before the release date.* It starts with Madden NFL 15, NHL 15, FIFA 15, NBA LIVE 15, and Dragon Age: Inquisition, but more are on the way.👉👉 If you decide to buy the game, your progress will carry over so you can pick up right where you left off.👈👈
To me it looks like you're paying for demos and not the full games correct me if I'm wrong or explain it clearer than the press release please

Couldntfindasn3549d ago

It sounds to me like a full game trial(not a demo)playable up to the date of release. Trials and Demos are two different services. Trial is usually a full game on a limited time frame like a week or a certain number of hours. A Demo is a limited version of the game, usually playable over and over again. EA has done stuff like this in the past with their other services i believe.

Blaze9293549d ago

Niiiice - at $30 a year this is a STEAL. Regardless of how you view it otherwise.

Good move Microsoft, things like this make Xbox One a very nice console to own :)

Sayai jin3549d ago

I am in the Xbox Early Preview Update Beta Team. I received a message from MS with my code to download the EA Access App. It was a pretty simple process. Memberships run from $4.99 monthly or $29.99 yearly. I chose the yearly, because my sons play a lot of EA games. They already downloaded Madden and FIFAA for free. So the subscription already paid off for us got a $100 to $120 worth of games already. Seems like a advantageous deal so far.

Lennoxb633549d ago

I see all these programs like GWG, PS plus, and now EA Access, as ways to get people to constantly buy the game's DLC. Instead of paying the initial $60 then buying a season pass or DLC separate. So I think $5/month or $30/year is a steal.

smt_Nocturne3548d ago

Anyone remember this ?
http://n4g.com/news/1543320...

did they said you will play a full games for 5$ per month ?
or it is just a bigger demons ?

mmcglasson3548d ago (Edited 3548d ago )

This is a great feature for a lot of people. However, I sure do hope this, Netflix, and many other services do not start the business of streaming media (games, music, movies, etc) only. I'm a huge fan of owning my content. I don't want to have to pay monthly subscriptions to continue paying for things I could have bought.

I prefer physical but digital hasn't been so bad. Digital has a lot of conveniences. What I worry about digital is what happens the publisher of that digital media decides to pull it from their servers and you can no longer download it/play it. That is one reason why I will always prefer to own physical media over digital. However, if I am guaranteed to have the ability to download games I've bought digitally for life... then that's great. I've bought many games off of PSN but these are games I'm willing to lose if they are ever no longer available. Games I still continue to buy physically are games I wouldn't ever want the chance of not being able to play again.

I have also received a lot of games from PSN for free. However, I understand they are not mine and I won't be able to play them if I am no longer a subscriber. Which is pretty much what EA has brought out. I have nothing against this because this would allow me to play the EA games I didn't by the year they came out... For a low price. However, games new versions of Madden, FIFA, Battlefield, etc likely won't be available to rent the year they that they release. You will be able to try them out for a few hours but you will still have to buy the game at the store for full price or digitally with a 10% discount. Then in "x" months the games should be available for rent through this service.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not bashing this service. I think it will be great for gamers that aren't big into collecting their games. All my negativity is due to ownership vs service based subscriptions. I don't want the way of digital media to be subscription based like Pandora, Netflix, Amazon Prime, etc. Don't get me wrong, I am a subscriber of Netflix and I use it all the time. It allows me to watch movies I normally wouldn't watch. PSN has allowed me to play games that I normally wouldn't have bought for the past 2-3 years (I subscribed to PSN the day it was released). Now XBL has added Games for Gold and now EA is stepping into this business practice. One thing I hate about PSN/XBL is that they force me to subscribe (used to just be XBL) to pay a game online that I already purchased. This service is great for Sony and MS from a business standpoint but it is a little disappointing for consumers that already payed $60 for a brand new game. It also brings benefits to the consumers as well and that is based off the profits they receive from this service. They can use these profits to bring better servers, better stability, new features, etc. The reason why I'm not against the PS+ is because it wasn't a requirement to play online before and it provided games with discounts, tons of free games, etc. It still provides me with tons of free games and discounts but now no matter what... I have to be a subscriber to play online.

So in conclusion this new service is great for anyone that hasn't purchased any EA game this year... this will be an amazing deal for them (you can't beat it to be honest). $30 a year is nothing to pay for hours of entertainment. To be honest, even if it was $50 a year, it would still be a great deal. MS and EA have a nice partnership and this will be great for a lot of Xbox 1 owners.

XiSasukeUchiha3548d ago

@MPOG

Sigh, man the two "worst" game companies are collide confirmation of DRM?

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 3547d ago
DeforMAKulizer3549d ago

Nice, so a PS+ like thing on Xbox One for EA Games.

Wonder if Sony will work to get it to there console.

Nitrowolf23549d ago

I dont think ea would miss the chance if it hits on X1.

BlackTar1873549d ago

EA and MS are sharing beds together. The lie they say about being neutral is just that a lie.

mixolydian_id3549d ago

Exclusivity deal?

Sony wanting to push PSnow?

Ideal world, bring it over!...but it's controversial to their own plans to lift subscription money from their customers pockets.

christian hour3549d ago

I think Sony would be more interested in getting EA games on to their streaming game service PSNow, but that would NEVER happen. I dont buy much EA games but for people like my bro who get the yearly sports titles this is great news, and he was still on the fence as to whether he should get a PS4 or XB1 so this will definitely help him decide, I'll go tell him the good news!

Godmars2903549d ago

That's likely what this is: a move against PSNow. If other companies followsuit, create their own services whether they be multi or XB1 exclusive, its only going to hurt Sony if they catch on.

Death3549d ago

If I were EA or Ubi and seen a chance to stream my games while eliminating retailers and platform royalties I would jump at it. PSNow if it works can kill the bulk of Playstations third party support if it takes off. EA has talked about entering the console market for decades. Streaming may be the solution they have been looking for.

rainslacker3549d ago

Sony would have to pay EA to have games on their streaming service. No publisher is likely to give out a big part of their library for free. Netflix has to pay publishers for their free streaming content. If Sony and EA come to a deal where it benefits them both, then you will see EA games on PSNow. Revenue is revenue regardless of how it's obtained, and I wouldn't put it past EA to put this service on PS4 if it's successful on X1.

nunley333549d ago

This isn't a move against PSNow i believe, it serves a different purpose than this would. I see this much more as a strike at gamestop, PSNow also.

nunley333549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

@rainslacker EA could very well put some games on PSNow later if this MS deal doesn't prevent it. If any titles goes into the service it's wouldn't be free, there would be a rental fee. There are some free titles in it now but most aren't and it would be up to them. EA has offered several games to PlayStation Plus in the past, EA was paid for those also just like the NOW games would be. This isn't like NETFLIX and there's only a per game charge right now, one may come later and the beta has been doing well.

mmcglasson3548d ago

This EA thing isn't a streaming service. It's a subscription based rental system. You download the game, you play the game, you pay the monthly costs. So basically it's a copy of PS+ but for only EA games.

Netflix and PSNow are streaming services. This EA service is like Netflix and PSNOw in the fact that you are renting the game instead of owning the game.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3548d ago
jackanderson19853549d ago

not really like a PS+ thing, you download the titles so no streaming, it's sub based not a per title base...

DeforMAKulizer3549d ago

I didnt say PS Now.

Everyone is comparing it to Netflix or PS Now, when in fact it is PS+.

Getting free games every now and then, and discounts on upcoming games.

Godmars2903549d ago

"I didnt say PS Now."

Its still going to be measured against PSnow. Likely going to effect XBL, as that subscription service tries to measure/catch up to PS+.

Death3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

Live and Plus have been an apples and oranges comparison since Plus was released. In the past we subscribed to Plus for the "free" games. Live has been a matchmaking service since the 90's. With the PS4 Sony decided to make Plus a requirement to play online. Microsoft recently started giving out free games to existing subscribers. Both services are evolving into similar match making/rental services over time. Let's not pretend only one is "catching up".

Godmars2903549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

@Death:
No, PSN and XBL have been at odds. One gave you unrestricted access to apps, the other required an additional paid subscription for things like Netflix. that was a constant argument.

When PS+ showed up, the Xbox camp tried to compare it to XBL Gold, made it into a joke, but it kept improving as a discount and leasing service while XBL not only stayed the same but increased it's rate. Eventually it had to start offering games as well.

Now what EA is doing is putting up and redrawing fences. Will likely effect any plans Sony had for including their titles in either PS+ or PSNow.

Also, in regards to your 2.2.2 comment, how is this going to cut down on EA's console licensing? They're still going to be offering their titles on the PS3/PS4, and are probably giving MS a cut of subscription fees.

Darkstares3549d ago

Games on Gold differed in the fact Xbox owners kept those games regardless of continuing the service. I might be mistaken but I think that has changed on the XB1 to be more like PS+.

This is very interesting because now that the XB1 will be offering pre-purchasing like the PS4 does XBox owners will be able to play day one and get a 10% discount for digital purchases. That pays for itself on the monthly option.

Where things get tricky is access to older titles. EA is notorious for pulling server support after the game gets old. So I doubt we will see a huge catalog of games in a few years.

Either way it's an interesting idea but whatever happened to EA's own Origin service? What will be even more interesting is if EA games perform better still on the PS4.

jackanderson19853549d ago

ah yeah my bad misread it completely ignore my comment so

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3548d ago
truefan13549d ago

Wow for that price I'm in. If they give me Madden 15 the deal will already be paid for. Add in Dragon Age and Fifa 15 and it's just theft.

tgunzz3549d ago

I didn't see this coming... This could be interesting...

ZodTheRipper3549d ago ShowReplies(3)
styferion3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

you seriously think EA will give you brand new games for free in this subscription? this is EA we're talking about you know..

The best we'll get are small discounts or trials for new games. I'm pretty sure the one they'll give for free are old games.

jkendrick3549d ago Show
4Sh0w3548d ago

Who said EA is great? Offering a good deal and being great are 2 different things. All I see is some X1 owners appreciating a new service/partnership that they think will benefit them in some kind of way.

lol, by you logic all ps owners think Activision is great because as the publisher of Destiny they are in affect partnered with Sony for exclusive content. Sure this deal with EA/micro is of a higher magnitude but I remember when there were plenty of calls for not supporting Bobby Kotick/Activision yet here in 2014 a Activision/Bungie/Sony deal is praised, as it should be, see gamers soap box rant alot but in the end they just buy what's good for them.

AndrewLB3547d ago

jkendrick- And it's been proven over and over that Sony had the EXACT SAME DRM planned for the PS4. They pulled the plug when they saw Microsoft go public with their plans and got thrashed by the press and gamers for it. Remember that Day 1 patch on your PS4?? Part of that update removed the DRM.

I would suggest that you stop repeating the DRM lie because it only makes your other more valid arguments look like BS as well.

iistuii3549d ago

You'll get Fifa 15 Madden 15 etc for a five day trial. Then you gotta buy them. But you will get all the back catalogue games in the fee. So in effect yeah you will get Madden 15, but towards the end of next year just before Madden 16...

3549d ago
jkendrick3548d ago

@4show

Do you think its a great deal or its just because its exclusive? i think it has more to do with it being on xbox and not playstation than it being good. This is going to turn in to something gamers will regret, we are talking about EA here.

BattleTorn3549d ago

You really think EA is gonna give Dragon Age away NEW????

No wonder your comments are so often in left field.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3547d ago
3549d ago Replies(3)
Dudebro903549d ago

This could be the start of the future of gaming. Subscriptions could rule everything.

Volkama3549d ago (Edited 3549d ago )

It's finally happening! And with publisher-specific packages, as per the prophecy (aka my guess work)

Edit: Oh. Doesn't include new releases. Well... it's a start. Bump up the price and include the new stuff please.

Chevalier3549d ago

Why would EA include their new hot products? When they can sell you the game for $60, you think letting you play them for cheap benefits them?! That's an unreasonable profit model that will lower profits.

SuperBlur3549d ago

this is really nothing new , they had ea sports season ticket and retired the service , now they're back with this in hope of bringing more people by allowing them to play old games

KwietStorm_BLM3549d ago

Yea I know. And everyone is getting all happy, with EA nonetheless. We're living in the apocalypse and don't even care.

Magnes3549d ago

I wonder why EA and Microsoft don't merge already and get it over with.

oSHINSAo3549d ago

Just not suscribe in the same month, because in a year, you could regret XD

Show all comments (373)
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple1013d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref2d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde2d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander19722d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville2d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff21832d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos1d 23h ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 23h ago
isarai3d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref2d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan2d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis0071d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander19722d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

2d ago Replies(3)
Einhander19722d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

2d ago
2d ago
Zeref2d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde2d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander19722d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander19722d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier2d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto2d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff21832d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto1d 22h ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 22h ago
Hofstaderman2d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts2d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts1d 10h ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 18h ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
370°

Could Xbox Soon Become The Next Dreamcast?

Microsoft's future in the video game space is murky right now, so let's break it all down.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
ApocalypseShadow15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

Not anytime soon. But they're on that path.

One thing not mentioned in the article is Microsoft's money bags. If Sega had Microsoft's money, they would have still been around as a hardware manufacturer. Xbox as a platform only survives because of the money bags. They can continue making consoles for the core and port to PC.

The multiplatform strategy is only the result of arrogance and misguided leadership that blew up in their face. They thought gamers would jump on Xbox in droves if they knew that many of their favorite games would be only on Xbox. But that's not happening at all. Sales didn't increase. They decreased. Why? Because the dumb asses thought giving away these expensively made games in a cheap service would also turn the tide.

Gamers on other platforms are willing to buy quality. They don't need to be handed nearly free games in a service that aren't even finished and sometimes average in their development. Gamers buy Nintendo games. They buy Sony games. Microsoft groomed their base to not buy games. Even the quality ones. It has always been their plan to go digital. But most gamers still like single player gaming. Still like physical releases.

Microsoft's problem has always been that they don't produce high quality games at the same output as Nintendo and Sony. Actually, they should be producing quite a lot more because they're worth over 2 TRILLION. How they don't have more is ridiculous and no excuse. Buying publishers to take away from competition only backfired. Because it still takes millions of dollars to continue to make those games from the publishers they snatched. Their only choice was to crawl back to their competitors to help sustain those developers because Nintendo and Sony platforms were the ones buying games.

Am I sorry for Microsoft? Hell no! They deserved last place for putting in the least effort. They deserved the fallout for buying up the industry and didn't make a single blip on the radar against their competitors where they now need those same gamers they took away games from to support them. Part of it may have been to cash in on their competition. But the result is the slow death of their platform. They may go 3rd party. They may keep making hardware. I don't give a shit about them to worry about it. I only give a shit about the destructive nature of their industry moves that only negatively affect gamers. They could sell and drop out of the industry and I wouldn't blink. Probably laugh. But not blink. They deserve whatever comes to them. At least Sega put in the effort when it came to games. They just had poor leadership. Microsoft has poor leadership and barely makes memorable games. That's a killer combination. And not in a good way.

Cacabunga14d ago

That would be an insult to Dreamcast.. it had a crazy line up of legendary critically acclaimed games.

Crows9014d ago

I was thinking the same. Dreamcast had incredible games in such a short amount of time. It was truly exceptional.

darthv7214d ago

...and yet all those great games were not enough to sway people from the looming release of the PS2 at the time. Sony just has that kind of brand loyalty.

Cacabunga14d ago

Darth

I do not agree.. Sony had even better games thanks to an unprecedented 3rd party support..
DC had amazing lineup but 90% were arcade games..

88314d ago

@darth:
And Sony showed off "The Emotion Engine" and their real time demos that made everyone think they would miss out on REAL next gen 128bit magic if they jumped in before PS2s polygon pushing monster (and early lack of anti-aliasing with a healthy heap of shimmer + DVD playback) stepped up. PS2 was a fantastic system though with amazing games.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 14d ago
blacktiger14d ago

That's not true. Just because Microsoft has the money doesn't mean Microsoft can allow xbox to bleed entire Microsoft money. It doesn't work like they. Also SEC will be watching and investor won't allow it. Lot of reasons why Microsoft can not continue even if they wanted to. SEC regulations is expensive.

fr0sty14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Exactly this... Microsoft is a publicly traded company, mostly owned by their shareholders (Approximately 59.24% of the company's stock is owned by Institutional Investors, 7.73% is owned by Insiders and 33.03% is owned by Public Companies and Individual Investors.). Their shareholders call the shots on the business decisions, and their shareholders want one thing and one thing only, for their stock price to go up. Losses do not make stock prices go up... so if the division continually posts losses on hardware, but shows profits on software and services (which has been the case with Xbox its entire lifespan, for over 20 years now), the shareholders are going to grow impatient and demand they stop making hardware and focus on the only thing that has ever made them money, software and services.

When Microsoft bought Blizzard and Activision for almost 100 billion, I knew that was the nail in the coffin for Xbox as a console... as the shareholders were going to expect a quick return on that investment, and when it didn't materialize, they were going to be out for blood... out to force Xbox to sell those games on as many consoles as possible, "and while you're at it, sell those first party exclusives that aren't selling well on other consoles as well... hell, just stop making consoles and sell games."

If there is another Xbox console generation, it will definitely be the last, but I doubt there even will be one at this point. I think the Xbox division planning on it just in case, but I don't think the project has been greenlit from Microsoft itself. The rumors that they have not yet even secured the chips needed from the chip fabrication facilities ties into this.

shinoff218314d ago

While I usually agree with you . Alot of what was said can just also be asked before any of that.

How long will the shareholders wait? It doesn't appear long at all

Babadook713d ago

I think I get your point. Like just because MS has money does not mean they are content to throw it away on a dying ecosystem. Xbox has to be profitable or “what’s the point?”

ifinitygamer14d ago

Money bags, yes, but are we ignoring that Xbox actually makes a profit on games and GamePass? Hardware is often a loss leader, and they're probably making profit 4 years into the life cycle, but games and services revenue have been very profitable while other parts of Microsoft's business is struggling. Say what you will about the quality of those games, of course, but this is kind of a reverse Dreamcast situation, where the console was dragging down the company and put it at risk of shuttering entirely. Killing that console saved the business and allowed it to continue to make games on multiple platforms. In this case, the service is very profitable, as are the games, and they're also double-dipping into Multiplatform to extend this further, while their hardware is just sort of what they believe to be the best for gamers and their own titles (whether that is the case or not...)

fr0sty14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

The issue is, they aren't selling enough hardware to make their exclusives profitable, and now that they've bought half the gaming publisher/dev industry, they have no choice but to go third party to make a profit... and that is making their shareholders take a real close look at their hardware division under the microscope... why keep making the hardware if the software is all that is making them money, and they continually, generation after generation come in dead last with hardware sales?

Look at a game like Spiderman 2... if it had been an Xbox exclusive, with the amount it cost to develop, it would have been a huge failure... simply not enough consoles out there to sell it on. They would have been lucky to break even.

ifinitygamer14d ago

@fr0sty agreed completely, which is why they're hedging by releasing other games to multiplatform, plus they have PC to make up for the difference in a lot of ways, which is why their games are not complete money pits. It brings up the question of whether or not those exclusives would drive sales of consoles, though. Let's say Spiderman 2 was an Xbox exclusive, it would certainly have pushed console sales, though who's to say how much is anyone's guess.

fr0sty14d ago

That's why you can't rely on just one exclusive, Sony has always delivered on a wide range of solid exclusives, even this generation (even if they haven't been strong on the first party exclusives, they've made up for it with third party). They don't rely on just one "system seller", they have a portfolio of them.

14d ago
JBlaze22614d ago

ApocalypseShadow To be honest Sony has more of a chance to go 3rd party because like you said Microsoft has money, Sony does not. Sony does not have games, Only games they have come from 3rd party. Sony has been losing money for years and you. Saying Microsoft has been putting the least effort just proves you have no idea what's been going on. All Sony has done is repeat and recycle, never innovating or doing something new. All Sony has is brand loyalty nothing else and it shows.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
LG_Fox_Brazil15d ago

Not sure about that. It's been two decades and I still think about Power Stone, Shenmue, Crazy Taxi, Jet Set Radio, Seaman and others, but I'm not sure I'll remember Xbox Series X/S games in a few years from now... Maybe I'll remember about the franchises that the Xbox brand spawned, but I don't believe that the Xbox Series lives up to the late Dreamcast or even to the Xbox name itself. I do have great memories about the 360 with Blue Dragon, Gears 2 and Lost Odyssey though

isarai15d ago

Nah, sega actually makes good games

Becuzisaid14d ago

No, Dreamcast was ahead of it's time and most still have very fond memories of it that had one. It also had some good games on it even in it's short lifespan. Xbox has none of these qualities.

Profchaos14d ago

I remember it coming out at the time in a really bad place they hit the market before the PS2 but it was during this transitional time when Sony was promoting the power of the PS2 and so many of the Dreamcast games were awesome but often third parties simply ported the PS1 version increased resolution and performance but rarely fully utilise the capabilities of the console.

I think in the end bad marketing done it in and like the GameCube so many people are fond of it now but at the time it was looked at in the lense of the day and it didn't stack up.

Personally I miss Sega in hardware they took risks that many companies won't

Becuzisaid14d ago

I never owned it, and got the PS2 right when it launched. But there were certain games it had that I was always jealous of that I didn't have access to - Sonic adventure, crazy taxi, power Stone, code Veronica, shenmue, skies of Arcadia. I always thought it was a really cool machine though. I've never heard a bad thing about it though from those that had it.

FinalFantasyFanatic14d ago

I only ever saw one Dreamcast, and that was one my friend owned, pity I never got to play it, I wonder what games he had for it?

It would be nice if some of those games got ported to modern systems.

Profchaos14d ago

Oh man sonic adventure on the Dreamcast made me so jealous as a huge sonic fan on the mega drive who also moved to PlayStation 2 I never got the chance to play it back in the day either. The Dreamcast in Australia where I am was always relegated to the smallest corner of EB Games it was kind of a strong first indicator that things were not going well at the time.

Show all comments (72)
80°

Microsoft Rewards app on Xbox and weekly streaks to be killed off soon

Microsoft has announced the Microsoft Rewards app on Xbox will be discontinued in April and has confirmed that weekly streaks will also be coming to an end.

Read Full Story >>
trueachievements.com