700°

Destiny PS4 vs PS3 Beta Screenshot Comparison Shows How a Cross-Gen Game Should Be Made

When a game is announced as cross-generation between PS4, Xbox One, PS3 and Xbox 360, it’s easy to understand why many that moved to the current generation of consoles feel a measure of their excitement ebb away. Cross-generation games tend to penalize the current generation platforms rather heavily in order to accommodate the restriction of the old ones.

Luckily the PS4 version of Destiny doesn't suffer from that problem too much.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
gamer11383560d ago

Looks like old gen players are gonna have a good time. But remember Bungie said they wanted 10 years out of this game...will we start to see Next Gen Only dlc?

Abriael3560d ago

I'm pretty sure it's 10 years for the franchise, not the single game :D

gamer11383560d ago

See, I'm sure they were talking about this being the base game then going with expansions. Kind of like warcraft. I guess we'll see.

JackOfAllBlades3560d ago

Either way this game looks great

badz1493559d ago

There is no where in Hell Activision would only release 1 game for 10 years. The least we can expect is a biannual releases from Bungie.

guitarded773559d ago

Yeah, I'm not happy about Activision being involved at all, but the Alpha was awesome, and I'm downloading the beta now and expect it to be even better.

WARNING: There is a Facebook page called "Destiny Beta Codes" sending e-mails to their FB page, and have a download .exe file with it. DO NOT download. It is a Trojan.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3559d ago
Mikelarry3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

@ gamer
thats what i thought as well but no there was an interview on this site about them saying (praraphrasing here)"they would only make destiny two once they have proven themselves with this one". ill find it and update my comment

Edit: article below

http://www.trustedreviews.c...

MasterCornholio3560d ago

That was helpful. I thought it would be like Guild Wars but I guess I'm wrong.

Thanks for the link.

Gh05t3560d ago

I thought the cat was out of the bag because of some court document that it is planned to have a game then one year later an expansion and then a year later another game and so on and so fourth through 3-4 cycles. I will have to look for the document but Im pretty sure that was the plan.

if so I would expect the next stand alone game to be next gen only.

wsoutlaw873559d ago

Yes thats what i remember too. There would be 4 destiny games with one every two years, with a large expansion in between each release. There will also be multiple dlcs. So i would imagine when destiny 2 comes out in 2016, it will be next gen only. Im sure with all the ps3/360 sales they are going to have the dlc and next years expansion are pretty much a guarentee on last gen.

Magicite3560d ago

call of duty have been milked longer than that.

3559d ago
ITPython3559d ago (Edited 3559d ago )

I started the beta tonight on PS4, and I gotta say, the visuals are pretty sh**y. Barely looks better than a late last-gen first-party PS3 game. Hell, aside from extra AA, it looks worse than quite a few.

I am incredibly disappointed, I would love to play the game and just have fun... but I can't get over how insanely crappy it looks. Hell, I can even tolerate Watch Dogs visuals for crying out loud!

This game is unbelievably sub-par in the visual department. I even get frequent framerate slowdowns, despite the game appearing as if it is only slightly better than last-gen PS3 visuals. This shouldn't be happening on the PS4.

XB1 parity was confirmed by Bungie, so that explains the beyond garbage visuals and sh*t performance on the PS4. ( http://www.digitaltrends.co...

F**king MS and their parity BS. We are going to be punished all generation long on multiplat games because MS chose sh*t hardware for the XB1. Unbelievable.

gamer11383559d ago (Edited 3559d ago )

No pal, the reason for your perceived lack of stunning graphics comes down to the fact that Destiny is a CROSS GEN game. Watchdogs got smacked with the same thing. They have to have an engine that "scales" from 360/ps3 to x1/ps4. Watchdogs, Titanfall, Wolfenstein, Sniper Elite pretty much everything that is on old gen and next gen has had this issue. Stop spouting the parity shit. Did the xb1 stop COD from being 1080p on PS4? Did it stop the higher res on other multiplay games? No. You're unbelievable.

OT. I think the game looks good for an always online game.

ITPython3558d ago

@gamer1138 - Sure, use cross-gen as an excuse now, but when this kind of garbage keeps up even when the games are only on PS4/XB1 what excuse will you use then? There is no doubt that MS is behind this. They will do everything in their power to bring the PS4 versions of games down to the XB1's level, as that takes away one of the biggest advantages the PS4 has, superior hardware.

Seriously read that article, they literally said they were not pushing the consoles (ie PS4's) limits due to some "creative" excuse. How would pushing the game to the limit on the PS4 harm their creative vision, please explain that to me.

Also remember when AC:BF released on PS4 with 900p resolution, then got patched to 1080p? And COD Ghosts was 720p with a patch to 1080p? The reason for that was without a doubt MS trying to cover up the resolution-gate, and they paid off the right person(s) to keep that disparity quite until the games released. Just imagine the game reviews if they had this giant difference in resolution when reviewing the games before they released.

I didn't play COD Ghosts, but I did play AC:BF, and it looked terrible before the 1080p patch. But with it running at 1080p, it is actually one of the best looking next-gen games so far, and it was cross-gen. So explain that.

This games lackluster visuals are either a result of lazy devs, or MS paying large chunks of cash under the table to have the PS4 version held back to XB1 levels. And I don't see Bungie as a lazy dev.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3558d ago
Mikelarry3560d ago (Edited 3560d ago )

Definitely they put some effort in the ps3 version congrats to them. if i didn't own a ps4 those screen assures me that that last gen was not an after-thought when developing this game.

Gazondaily3560d ago

The last gen stuff is really impressive. Kudos to Bungie for achieving that kind of fidelity on last gen tech. The next-gen stuff is nice but not really mind blowing but it is cross-gen.

ginsunuva3559d ago

That's what last-gen games looked like anyway.

We're giving current-gen too much credit.

marlinfan103560d ago

C4HG-79N4-D68M

if anyone still needs one

Clown_Syndr0me3560d ago

Wow last gens looks great. There isn't that much difference to be honest, atleast not for a casual gamer.
The leap of graphics this gen hasn't been that big just yet, if I wasn't obsessed with having the latest everything I wouldn't bother upgrading yet..

Show all comments (58)
240°

Destiny Made Over $160 Million In Microtransaction Revenue In Less Than 2 Years

Destiny has made over $160 million in MTX revenue, and these numbers only account the data from late 2017 to early 2019.

Sgt_Slaughter322d ago

That's extremely low for microtransactions, especially for a game that's essentially designed around it

LucasRuinedChildhood322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

This was back when the game wasn't free to play.

The figures are from November 2017 to February 2019 (1 year and 4 months).

Based on that projection, the MTX revenue for Destiny 2 likely would have been closer to ~$240m for 2 years.

Not sure if premium expansions are included in that figure either although ... I'd hope that they are though and that most of the revenue was for actual content like Forsaken.

People spend way too much money on cosmetics.

Rude-ro322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

Seasons($10 and just got bumped to $12) and dungeon keys($10 each, two a year) are through the eververse(micro transaction) store.
So for those two years, in order to play a season, you would pay through micro transactions.

Sonic1881322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

Bungie Marathon will be worse since it's designed around it as well

Kurt Russell322d ago

It makes me sad to agree... but at the same time I am looking forward to giving it a go. Destiny 2 is so far in, I find it difficult to figure out what I am meant to do first.

buffig322d ago

I think FIFA alone makes over $1bn a year from mtx

anast322d ago

FIFA promotes a worldwide sport. It should make more money than destiny.

CantThinkOfAUsername322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

Let's compare something similar. Apex Legends and its ridiculous $18/$40 skins make EA a billion each year.

z2g322d ago

For as much as ppl complain how much they hate microtransactions, they sure don’t act like it. No wonder they aren’t going anywhere.

spicelicka322d ago

By "people" you're referring to millions and millions of people. Obviously the ones complaining aren't necessarily the same as the ones spending all that money.

322d ago Replies(1)
322d ago
Father__Merrin322d ago

There's millions that purchase MTX and there's nothing we can do about it

Show all comments (17)
70°

Stop Trying To Make Destiny

In Episode 1 of Spot On, a new weekly news show, Gamespot talks about the dangers of chasing a trend.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
100°

Destiny 1 Becomes Playable on PC via Emulation

Playing Destiny 1 on PC has been something fans have been requesting for years. It looks like Destiny 1 is now playable on PC via the RPCS3 emulator.

Read Full Story >>
gamejunkie.net
spoonard474d ago

I've been thinking about playing through D1 again before it goes away...

CobraKai473d ago

That’s the sad reality of a game like this. I bought it, invested lots of money, and it can go away at anytime. I still think this was more fun than 2.

jeromeface472d ago

prob because 2 is a grindfest slog

spoonard470d ago

That's the bummer of 'games as a service'.