730°

Overhype The Last of Us: Remastered PS4, Where is the Actual Gameplay running at 1080p/60 FPS

The Last of Us on Playstation 3 was a masterpiece, graphics/visuals, storyline, gameplay in every aspect it was perfect. Naughty Dog once again showed why they are the best in business and what exactly is raising the bar for them in gaming industry. Few months after the launch of The Last of Us on Playstation 3, Naughty Dog announced a remastered HD port for Playstation 4, "The Last of Us: Remastered". At the time of official announcement, Naughty Dog stated that the studio is targeting "60 FPS" for Playstation 4.

F4sterTh4nFTL3574d ago

They will still be making improvements on it till the last second and I am sure when they will feel completely satisfied they will show us something.

ZodTheRipper3574d ago

Yep, judging by tweets from Naughty Dog they are all working very hard on it. This is not traditional game development - they are porting a finished game over to completely new hardware, it's probably looking better/running more stable every day so they don't want to show the unfinished thing. We will get some footage soon enough, don't worry.

christian hour3573d ago (Edited 3573d ago )

How did this person ever survive in the days when you saw very little, if nothing at all, of a game before you actually picked it up bar a few pictures and a write up in a magazine?

Growing up in the late 80's/early 90's, I found out about games through word of mouth and would know very little about them going in. I miss those times :(

It surprises me that there are still people out there that don't have faith in Naughty Dog despite their 20+ year track record of quality and never over promising and under delivering. The game will run as smooth as they say it will, and they'll show us it when they're ready to, they don't need to go in to a PR frenzy months long hype train like an EA/UBI/ACTI title, not for a polished and refined port anyway.

Todays gamers are an entitled bunch :P

nix3573d ago

this website should be renamed "gamepurr.com"

Army_of_Darkness3573d ago

How dare he question naughty dog!!!

Eonjay3573d ago

"Where is the Actual Gameplay running at 1080p/60 FPS"

Wait what? You think that it doesn't exist? Man, you guys make ND's job too easy...

Crazyglues3573d ago (Edited 3573d ago )

@ Army_of_Darkness

Yes in Naughty*Dog we trust.. but it is weird that they have not shown it yet....

I'm sure we will get some footage soon, but My guess would be the team that makes that call (to show it or not) is trying to make sure they show it in the best light -(meaning give you some screens that show it off the best)- this is a big project and the team probably worked really hard on it..

So you don't want to mess it up by just rushing to show screens... your going to take your time and present it in it's best light.

I'm sure it will look fine, nothing too amazing it's just a re-make, but I'm sure it will look as good as tomb-raider...

.____........___...
.____||......||.......|___||
||.........___||............ ||

morganfell3572d ago (Edited 3572d ago )

Are Gamepur really this imperceptive?

Where are the majority of game videos posted? Even by Sony on their own official blog?

Youtube. 30 FPS and low bitrate.

Do you think it will compare well and show off its best side with a bunch of youtube videos? How many people really understand the negative impact this would have on the Remastered version.

It is fairly apparent Gamepur doesn't understand this fact. Though they mention the need for direct feed in their article, a hugely valid reason, they minimalize this truth and ignoring their own remark go on to whine beneath their hit inducing title 95% of the time. Gamepur, you seriously have zero credit as a reporting entity.

Sony has a duty to its developers, its investors and even its fans to protect its products. No matter where they release a direct feed video it will wind up on youtube where 99/100 people that see the video will view it.

Naughty Dog has access to 60fps Youtube but it is still low bitratye. And when 1000 people reupload the video it will be cut to 30fps which really does then make the video a lie.

Could you just be a little bit more even keeled and common sense in the next attempt Gamepur? These ill-conceived articles are really getting old.

Darkstares3572d ago

Not knocking Naughty Dog but it seems to be the common theme now to just show trailers or clips without actual gameplay. It's what we saw of a lot at E3. Even Uncharted showed a clip that was rendered on the hardware but not actual gameplay. It wasn't just Sony's show but also Microsoft's E3 as well. I want to see people playing the game on the hardware.

Crazyglues3572d ago (Edited 3572d ago )

@ the Disagrees...

Now I'm really laughing, it seems lately, especially on this site there is a quick to go Flame On' the second someone says anything..

I said I'm sure they will show it, it's not like you can hide it the game will have to come out.. LoL (and you people flame me)

Come on' what's with all the flaming, morganfell made a good point, and I was just about to agree when I saw him saying use "common sense" - What? So a website is not allowed to make a mistake or over look something, there suppose to be perfect... Come on' people, You do realize this is a gaming site, right?

I just think people are too quick to go Flame On' --> I bet half of the disagrees I got didn't even read my full comment..

But whatever - Flame On!

.____........___...
.____||......||.......|___||
||.........___||............ ||

Sevir3572d ago

Its funny people call it overhyped. They did a similar tactic with the games multiplayer suit which didn't get any actual footage until the game was reviewed and on store shelves when it released last year. And they were bragging about how epic it was for months on end. And every news outlets had no play time with it until they received final review/retail copies.

I have a feeling this is similarly how they're doing everything with this. We haven't seen anything other than the cinematic trailers remastered, and they'll likely keep it till the game releases this month.

morganfell3572d ago

@Crazyglues,

Websites are allowed to make a mistake but an entire misdirected article? This wasn't just one line or sentence where something was incorrect. No, it was 95% of the article. The worst part is they have the solid reason IN THE ARTICLE ITSELF. But they ignore that. They make 1, 2, 3, 4 wrong assumptions.

And we have to take them on the whole. Recently they have issued a slew of ill-formed deductions. So you see, this is not the matter of a single mistake or even two. That is certainly forgiveable. Instead what we have here is a pattern and it is a disservice to the game community.

alexkoepp3572d ago

I don't know about overhyped, people are excited but nothing near the Master Chief Collection on the X1.

It is strange though there was the announcement trailer, a little e3 footage and nothing else. Games due out in 3 weeks so it's odd but you are just showing off an already released game with sharper graphics and a higher frame rate. We don't really need to see anything to know the effects of your standard remaster.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3572d ago
C-H-E-F3573d ago (Edited 3573d ago )

This article is like saying... GTAV was overhyped and info faked because they didn't release any footage of the game actually running... LIKE UGH.... there's a reputation system to uphold in this line of work. Naughty Dog is a prestige studio with grade A developers. At this point if you don't take their word for it then I suggest you retire from gaming. Based on how great the original was... there's no need to question the quality of the port. I don't see anyone questioning Rockstar for the GTAV PS4 port. And that one has more variables of consistency to uphold because of the multiplatform architecture of the dev. process. smh... STOP JUST STOP!!

Kavorklestein3573d ago

There isn't 400 articles per second about GTA V remastered, so it's a lot easier to give it slack, and also we saw the Amazing trailer Rockstar put out that showed things all around the city of Los Santos, with MAJOR improvements. Not slightly less aliasing, and a barely relevant 60 fps scene with hardly any characters and almost ZERO movement like TLOU:R's "trailer" had. It's not that anyone DOUBTS Naughty Dog, it's just we want to see some substantial gameplay or diversity.

GTA V DOES have a tougher job to remaster than TLOU ever will. Are we even comparing the difficulty of porting from 2 consoles to 2 new consoles to 1 to 1?

AngelicIceDiamond3573d ago

Hopefully it comes soon. I wanna see ND create magic again.

UltraNova3572d ago

Personally I want to see ND make a borderlands-fallout hybrid fps rpg...

Dreams..

Sayai jin3573d ago (Edited 3573d ago )

I hope those buying this game, enjoy it...game on!

On topic, overhyped? I am pretty sure ND will deliver!

TheSaint3573d ago

Agreed, if anyone can do it it's ND.

showtimefolks3573d ago

so let's see. B**** and Moan about not seeing gameplay, Its ND afterall. Don't they deserve our trust? seriously guys

why are gamers so quick to jump on every little thing, don't you think we will see gameplay before the game releases?

Kojima
ND
Valve
R*
Bungie
Rocksteady
etc,

i will always give some of these developers the benefit of the doubt till they mess up. Until than STHU. Its not like the game is out and we don't have any gameplay videos, developers are trying to rip us off or something

wait and we get exactly that plus more,

Fishy Fingers3573d ago

'Gamers' aren't, two bit websites looking for some easy traffic are.

snookiegamer3573d ago (Edited 3573d ago )

Overhype who?? Who's overhyped TLOU-R? Naughty Dog only confirmed 1080/60fps, and they delivered, so where is the overhype?

Forget these two-bit wannabe-a-writer articles...they only serve to discredit. What kind of idiot questions the integrity and honesty of a studio like Naughty Dog?

ND always deliver, yet these whinning negative gamer barons continue to...ah whatever, I'm sick of negativity for just about every/any game this gen. Please just go F ya'selves you sad bunch of sacks.

SilentNegotiator3572d ago (Edited 3572d ago )

I'm pretty sure we can give Naughty Dog, of all studios, the benefit of the doubt.

Unless they're outright lying - highly unlikely - it's just a remaster and there's not really much to worry about.

assdan3572d ago

When HD says something, I trust it. They're one of the only compaines I can say that about.

FayZ_3572d ago

how hard is it to turn up some fps & res settings like a pc game?

FanboyKilla3572d ago

lol yeah we want to see it. are you serious? it looks amazing, its next gen, looks like it was made for ps4. all these words no action. cmon everyone here knows why they havent shown the game. the internet is going to put it through the ringer. compare it to this and that.

im with nd here. why show it when we told them its amazing and they ran with it? preordered anyone? and these guys on here want to attack peope that want to see it. also defending a game that devs wont let them see but will let you preorder. wow you sony fans never cease to amaze me how far and low you will go for sony. smh i bet you aren't this loyal to family and friends when they screw you over. lol most of you guys make other sony supporters look bad. and gamers in general.

jebabcock3572d ago

Coherent sentences go a long way in helping people understand what you are trying to say...

reko3572d ago

@typicalxboxleechfanboy

LMAO LMAO gtfo!

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3572d ago
fluffydelusions3574d ago

We knew nothing about the MP in the game till the last week of release. In ND I trust.

l-Mc-I3573d ago

Exactly. I wasn't expecting much of the multiplayer for the Last of Us since they hadn't shown anything, but I was treated to one of the best competitive multiplayer experiences of last gen.

BigBosss3574d ago

I have heard they will be working hard on it until the week before release date. I cannot wait to get my hands on it, just 2 weeks after my 25th birthday :)

Nitrowolf23574d ago

It actually looks like the games about to go Gold (tweets), probably within the next few weeks

neoandrew3573d ago

This is actually impossible, you need to send the game to manufacture the disks at least one month before release date, you need also to distribute the game disks all over the world, and trust me, even in 21 century this is not so quick task.

Also your must wait for the certification.

I don't know how fast sony is, but in the past several game developers were claiming that you need about 3 months for a ps3, xbox360 game to get certified, so you would need actually done it 3 month before release.

If there ware any other fixes or updates that was needed you would need to update the game after release, and your update would also need to be certified.

SlavisH23574d ago

i got fooled into the 1080p@60fps b.s. with tomb raider and wasn't impressed imo. There just isnt a noticable enough jump from last gen. Im going to wait for a real sequal or their next project.

Cryptcuzz3573d ago

That's your opinion and I respect that, but Tomb Raider on the PS4 looked impressive to me for a last gen game. As for TLoU on the PS4, considering what Bungie was able to do for GTAV, I have no doubts Naughty Dog will blow everyone away AGAIN.

Cryptcuzz3573d ago

You're right I meant Bungie ;)
That's what I get for commenting with a few drinks in me.

Volkama3573d ago

Guess it takes a little while to sober up...

neoandrew3573d ago

Cryptcuzz

If you meant Bungie then in this case you are thinking about Destiny, correct?

Cryptcuzz3572d ago

I was watching a Destiny video from PlayStation Access on YouTube that day :)

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3572d ago
anwe3572d ago

I've learned my lesson on pre-ordering anything sight unseen and based on hype alone, I don’t care who the dev is. Unfortunately just saying as much gets everyone’s panties in a bunch. After seeing some reviews & or actual gameplay I will decide whether to purchase it for the second time. Personally a straight port @ 60fps doesn’t interest me, but a higher res version with cleaner textures will sell me on it.

DanielGearSolid3574d ago (Edited 3574d ago )

Uncharted 3 downgrade? WTF?

Two screenshots from different scenes prove downgrade?

Not to mention both of the scenes are PRE RENDERED

Ok, u wanna see TLOU:R but don't come with bs to prove your point

christian hour3573d ago (Edited 3573d ago )

It's amazing, even though that has been cleared up a bunch of times since that fake comparison popped up (referring to the Mr X one with chloe on the bus btw), how the flow of misinformation is still going strong.

Show all comments (101)
160°

The Last of Us Part 1 – Why The Ending is Still so Impactful

The Last of Us never dreams of insulting its audience’s intelligence. And the best example of this is, of course, is its ending.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
shinoff2183488d ago

Shit the beginning was to. I'm not sure how I would feel if I didn't have kids but having them it broke my heart to see.

ClayRules2012488d ago

Yes. The beginning and ending…how they break you, make you think , question things etc. so impactful.

And yeah, I have a son (he’ll be going to college here next year) and just feeling Joel’s pain, heartbreak, loss…it hits you differently when you have a kid (s) of your own.

PhillyDillyDee488d ago

I didnt have kids when i played it and the beginning had me sobbing. That story left an impact on me

Orchard488d ago

The story was a rollercoaster from start to finish. Probably my 1st or 2nd most favorite game on PS3 (the other being MGS4).

Aloymetal488d ago

I agree with you. MGS4 was truly special, I wasn't the biggest fan of the long cutscenes but I understand is part of Kojima. Great game nonetheless.

Snookies12488d ago

Best Metal Gear game, coming from a HUGE fan of the series. I bought a PS3 JUST for MGS4. And got the collector's edition too. Worth every bit of money.

Yes, the cutscenes can be very lengthy. But a lot of it was quite necessary to really tie things together. Previous games had some longer cutscenes as well. It's just that they were trying to wrap everything up with MGS4. So, it's understandable that they'd have to throw some info dumps into the game here and there.

Orchard488d ago

The cutscenes are long indeed, every Kojima game sets a new record there :P

But the game was awesome, the second they showed that first E3 demo, it was clear it was going to be something special.

I still remember being mind blown by the Octocamo. It was also the first third person shooter game where I felt like the controls and aiming etc all went smooth / fluid and weren't janky. Hard to explain in words, but it felt 'natural' to aim, move etc in it.

gangsta_red488d ago

I thought the game went on a little too long and it started to wear thin. It should have stopped at Winter. That would have been a great way to end that game with the sequel continuing from there (if necessary).

-Foxtrot488d ago

I loved it however the ambiguous ending was kind of ruined in the sequel

The first game had this conflicting grey area of Joel's actions, a decision to let you think it over and discuss it with people, however the sequel created a narrative that "OMG JOEL 100% DOOMED HUMANITY...HOW SELFISH" and making out Ellie wanted to die in the hospital even though 1) She didn't know she was going to die and 2) She was ready to see Joel once she got out of surgery so he could teach her how to play Guitar.

For me he did the right thing, I mean they pretty much attacked him when he was trying to save Ellie, they lied to him and said they were going to kill her without thinking any other decision out or asking Ellie herself and they pretty much were going to throw him out onto the street without any of his weapons/gear where he could have probably died. There was no guarantee a cure could be made with these guys, it was all "chance".

Crows90488d ago

Exactly. He made the first good decision and this time around the girl he took care of didn't die while escaping...which alluded to the beginning of the game. He was prepared this time.

-Foxtrot488d ago

Like I just don't know why the Fireflies (and now Jerry in Part II) didn't think about any other tests, it was literally "Yeah this bitch has gotta die". You're telling me they couldn't wait for more blood tests, think of new ways to approach it? The worlds been gone for decades, it's not going to collapse even more by waiting, the damage is done.

If they woke Ellie up and asked her but Joel also told her what they did and were going to do to him I don't think she'd really want to sacrifice her life for these guys compared how she suddenly reacts in the sequel.

Even the hospital setting in the original game was run down, dirty and literally the best they could do, that alone didn't inspire confidence they had the tools to distribute a cure let along make one. I know the sequel and remake kind of retcon it where it looked cleaner, brighter and newer but again I'm going off the original, the first time I played it. The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind, I don't think they would have been fair handing out the cure if they did get it made

TricksterArrow488d ago (Edited 488d ago )

It's a work of fiction, and more than once Bruce and Neil stated that the cure was a given, it was a sure thing and they regret not making it more clearly. If the cure wasn't a thing, the ending wouldn't ne nearly as impactful as is.

Crows90488d ago

@trickster
Except tlou2 states that it isnt a given. The ending is still impactful.

Inverno488d ago

Think the reason why she was going to die was because the guy was a vet, not a doctor

-Foxtrot488d ago

Yet suddenly was the only person who could create a cure

"We deffo need to kill her"

"Wait...WHY"

"Trust me....I'm a vet"

TricksterArrow487d ago (Edited 487d ago )

Jerry was a doctor. A lead doctor. His bio makes it clear that he attended Northern Utah Medical University. He just happened to like animals. I wonder if people really pay attention to the games they play anymore (if they played, it’s a toss with TLOU2’s critics)…

Imalwaysright487d ago

TricksterArrow

You should play the PS3 version. Once you do, you'll realize that the ending was retconned because Jerry wasn't the surgeon that was going to kill Ellie.

TricksterArrow487d ago

I played all versions. He was not a vet in any of them.

Imalwaysright487d ago

He was not in the original version of the game but the "Jerry" that Joel killed in the original clearly wasn't someone that acted professionaly or inspired confidence because he was willing to work in a dirty operating room and was wearing boots.

TricksterArrow487d ago (Edited 487d ago )

Jerry was a minor unnamed role that got expanded on the sequel and also got recast, not unlike any TV series and games before this one (such as Resident Evil, in which Claire, Leon, Carlos and Chris all look considerably different from one iteration to the other). Also, still not a vet. And also unsure what argument you are trying to make by “dirty room” and “wearing boots”. He is still a doctor that has the ability to develop a cure, it doesn’t matter what he is wearing or what tools are at his disposal, the story is what it is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 487d ago
ChubbyBlade488d ago

That’s why I didn’t like part 2. It removed all the nuance

Inverno488d ago

I think when you realize he's a vet, Joel's decision feels a bit more justified for those who played both games. Just playing, since you're in Joel's shoes, you don't really question it. Then playing the second there's a justification that doesn't take away from Joel's decision but for the player should reinforce your understanding of it.

You said it in the second comment. "The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind." That's why they just went along with killing her cause they didn't want to figure out some other way.

shinoff2183487d ago

Foxtrot

I think they just tried to show you how Joel's decision affected more then just Joel and ellie . Just showing different angles and a bigger picture. I think Joel did the right thing.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 487d ago
dmonee488d ago

The story had me emotionally engaged. Gaming for 40 years it was the first time a game story messed with my emotions in the way movies do. As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok. It was the storyline that kept me going in TLOU 1 and TLOU 2.

ClayRules2012488d ago

“As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok.“

What exactly did the game do that qualifies it for just being ok? And same question for the gameplay?

dmonee487d ago

That’s a tough question because I could ramble on and on as to why. I’m speaking for myself because I usually pass on survival horror type games. So instead of getting into a debate as to why I found the gameplay to be ok. I originally commented on how the narrative had me emotionally sucked in. Especially the opening segment. So much that I purchased a game I would never have purchased if not for the story. It’s more kudos to the developer for getting people like me out of my comfort zone to play a game I wouldn’t usually play.

ClayRules2012488d ago

I know some people were upset with Joel lying to Ellie (friends of mine) that they felt it should’ve given the player an option to have Joel either

A. Lie to Ellie or B. Tell Ellie the truth. Type of situation, which just makes no sense. The game nor its story doesn’t given the player any control to have/make any choices that change the direction or outcome of ANY of these characters in this unforgiving and dark world.

I don’t blame Joel for doing what he did.

1. Ellie became the “Something” that he needed to keep fighting for, beyond just living day to day, simply being survivors.

2. Marlene gave orders to that no -name guard to kill Joel if he tried anything…you just done pissed him off all the more with those words. I wonder, if Joel had been killed and Marlene ever came across Tommy again (Joel’s brother) would she have the guts to tell him “Listen Tommy, we need to talk! About Joel…I couldn’t waste this gift. Tommy “What the hell you talking about, Marlene??” Marlene “I had Joel killed, if he” Tommy “YOU SON OF A BITCH!” Got carried away there lol. You get the idea tho. To my point, it wasn’t guaranteed that Ellie was the cure, and after all Joel did, went through, not even allowing Joel to see Ellie, just talk with her, that’s messed up.

3. Of course looking at the actions Joel took in the hospital and how that has major consequences in Part 2 for him, Ellie etc. it’s not like there wouldn’t have been a big threat later on at some point. This world is wicked, dark, unforgiving and everyone’s growing up, has their own WANTS. NEEDS. DESIRES. Solely for themselves, loved ones, or group. All while trying to survive.

Joel I think knew when he said “I Swear” that he’d done something much worse than when he actually saved Ellie from that operating room and possibly causing death to humanity (as if it would be appreciated anyways.

Yes, he lied to the one person who gave him purpose to live, purpose to have hope, purpose to be that father again (which he of course wasn’t looking for, but it just naturally happened upon him) like he was to his daughter Sarah all those years ago. And to him, maybe in that moment, lying would be worth the little bit of time, the years they’d have together creating memories, seeing Ellie grow up before his eyes etc. rather than lie to her and see a reaction in words and deeds in which she might’ve ran off losing all hope and trust in him etc. I mean, she did lose trust in him all those years later etc. but as we saw, she was willing to work with him, try to repair what Joel broke, and he knew it wouldn’t be easy, as did she. But with time she understood I think why he did what he did.

It’s just sad in the end, his lie, the time they lost with his betrayal, and than horrific death, caused Ellie to go seek revenge in a way in which Ellie changed, she kept chipping off more of herself along the journey, scary and sad thing to see, and exhausting. But powerful storytelling throughout it all.

Show all comments (36)
40°

Top 10 PlayStation Plus Premium Horror Games

We love to scare ourselves silly within the horror genre of video games. Thankfully, there are many to find on PlayStation Plus Premium, such as the intense Resident Evil VII: Biohazard and cult favorite Little Nightmares.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
40°

PlayStation Store July Sale Is Live With More Than 500 Games Discounted

PlayStation Store is offering a new sale this week with more than 500 games discounted including some DLCs. See the complete list here.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com