340°

Nintendo Promises To Push Gay Agenda On Children

Earlier this month, the Japanese company Nintendo declined to introduce same-sex marriage in “Tomodachi Life,” a life simulation handheld video game marketed to children over the age of eight. Following the #Miiquality push (Mii is a digital avatar used in the game), Nintendo said it “never intended to make any form of social commentary with the launch of” the game.

The company, however, later stated in future releases of the popular game they will “strive to design a gameplay experience from the ground up that is more inclusive, and better represents all players.”

Read Full Story >>
infowars.com
nope1113622d ago

LOL somebody is having too much fun with the photo mode.

3621d ago Replies(5)
thehobbyist3621d ago

Social justice is ruining video games.
Firstly, Tomadachi Life never had homosexuality in it to begin with. That was a lie that spread like wildfire because of SJW's.
Secondly, Sexuality is a Mature (Wink wink nudge nudge) topic and shouldn't be put into a game designed for kids and is rated 'E for Everyone'. If this was rated T or higher I'd think it's acceptable but this game is designed for an audience that thinks romance in general is gross. Come on, guys.

marloc_x3621d ago Show
sjaakiejj3621d ago

Acceptance is a topic that applies to everyone, not just adults. The ability to have a homosexual relationship is just as relevant to children as the ability to have a hetero sexual relationship. Either have both or neither, anything else and you're essentially telling children that not everyone is equal because their preferences don't match that which the materials they are exposed to reflect is "correct".

If "romance is gross" is the group of people this game was aimed at, then why have a relationship option in the first place?

ChickeyCantor3621d ago

@Sjaakiejj

I'm 100% with you, but you shouldn't bother here. Loads of ignorance that runs here.

kreate3621d ago (Edited 3621d ago )

@sjaak

I see plenty of movies and other games that only represent hetero sexual relationships.

what about those?

are they telling children something?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3621d ago
BullyMangler3621d ago

Dear nintendo,

please just cancel this game

thehobbyist3621d ago

Dear Nintendo,
Please just cancel a game that's probably already gone gold and is the game that allowed Sakamoto to stop butchering Metroid. Just because of a little controversy that you've already addressed and will make changes for in the future.

jc485733622d ago

why does it have to be an agenda?

Sly-Lupin3621d ago ShowReplies(4)
3621d ago Replies(2)
trywizardo3622d ago

i think the world don't need an 8 years old gay kids , when they grow up they will choose their sexual desires ...

kingdom183621d ago

Emmm... I don't know, its not like it has sexual scenes, I'm assuming, its just conditioning to children to the fact that its okay to be different, that its okay for a man to love another man and woman another woman. I don't think this is a big deal either way, not having it or having it in the game that is, as you said they'll develop their sexuality when they get older.

Loadedklip3621d ago Show
saviin3621d ago Show
Loadedklip3621d ago

Does the game have sexual straight scenes inappropriate for kids? No it doesn't ... so what gay stuff could possible be added that would be anymore inappropriate?

3621d ago
Berezau3621d ago

ps4rulez, you are a homophobe; just admit it and be done with semantics.

Meanwhile, good on Nintendo for at least acknowledging the issue; it wasn't necessary, but positive nonetheless.

Dehnus3621d ago Show
deafdani3621d ago

Homosexuality and heterosexuality aren't choices, buddy.

A gay man doesn't choose to like men. He just does.

A straight man doesn't choose to like women. He just does.

Same goes for women, obviously.

schlanz3621d ago

its a choice to act on it however.

pedos don't choose to be attracted to children, either. but they certainly choose whether or not to act upon it. the same could be said for people with all kinds of involuntary propensities for vices such as alcoholism, gambling, violence, ect. just because you can't help feeling a certain way does not give that feeling a free pass.

that's exactly why the "I was just born this way" argument has absolutely zero leverage in the conversation. pedos can make the exact same claim, but naturally we wouldn't excuse it in their case. if it doesn't work there, it doesn't work anywhere else.

aLucidMind3621d ago Show
Nevers0ft3621d ago

@schlanz
That's a silly comparison to make. Why should any of us care what two *consenting adults* get up to?

DarkHeroZX3621d ago

@schlanz

GG my friend. You just said what I've been saying for the longest.

ChickeyCantor3621d ago

"that's exactly why the "I was just born this way" argument has absolutely zero leverage in the conversation. pedos can make the exact same claim, but naturally we wouldn't excuse it in their case. if it doesn't work there, it doesn't work anywhere else."

A pedophile might be born that way but the subjects are CHILDREN. Who can not act on their own behalf or take responsibility when it comes to the act of sex.

The context here is consent. That's why it does make a difference when a homosexual says it. By only preferring one combination between the sexes ( between 2 consenting adults) you are annihilating the other. It does not reflect reality.

"its a choice to act on it however. "

So this means absolutely nothing. Because straight people choose to act on it as well, so what exactly is your point?

deno3621d ago (Edited 3621d ago )

Homosexuality is a mistake in nature. History will look on you and your ilk as perverted and confusing people with upside down values. How can a man sleep with another man, that is an atrocity.

schlanz3620d ago

@Neversoft

I'm not comparing the acts at all, nor am I saying it's right or wrong to be a homosexual.

I'm simply illustrating the fallacy of using the argument of "born this way" as a justification of behavioral proclivities. And having feelings and acting on them are two completely different things.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3620d ago
-Foxtrot3622d ago ShowReplies(3)
miyamoto3622d ago Show
Show all comments (135)
80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple1015d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref4d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde4d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander19724d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville4d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff21834d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos4d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
isarai5d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref4d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan4d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis0073d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander19725d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

4d ago Replies(3)
Einhander19724d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

4d ago
4d ago
Zeref4d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde4d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander19724d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander19724d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier4d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto4d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff21834d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto3d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
Hofstaderman4d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts4d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts3d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic3d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
90°

Nintendo's War Against Player-Made Content Will Hurt The Company In The End

Danish from eXputer: "Nintendo has historically gone against player-made content and emulation of its games. This has done much to harm the company's image."

XiNatsuDragnel11d ago

I agree nintendo hire some these folks to help in your games it'll help imo.

banger8810d ago

They need to stop announcing these mods and fan remakes until they're finished. Finish it, upload it, and then if Nintendo dmca's it tough shit. Once it's online, people can share it around, even if the original download gets taken down.

Jingsing10d ago

True, but most modders need constant admiration during the process to motivate them.

PRIMORDUS10d ago

Yup, once it's a torrent nothing can be done Nintendo is helpless at that point. But it would be wise if they just had a site on the dark web, it's also easy to use with Tor and no one will bother you.

mastershredder9d ago

This is all coming from the mouth of short-sighted fandom and grifting madness.
No.... it wont. There is a clear defined reason why they don't. This is nothing new. Make your own shi7 from your own original ideas especially if you are trying to capitalize of it it. Duh.

Yeah, hire people that have zero respect or understanding for an established process. Wow. Yep. Totally makes sense.

shinoff21839d ago

Those guys that made that sonic game got a gig from sega or something along those lines and that game was dope as hell. One of the best sonics as of late.