120°

What the Announcement of Lucario Means for Super Smash Bros. 4

Nintendo has confirmed that the steel-fighting Pokemon Lucario will make a return for the upcoming Smash Bros. game, stunning almost everyone in the Smash Bros community. It’s not that Lucario isn’t appreciated by fans, it’s more that he was expected to be on the “cut list” by many fans.

Read Full Story >>
couchsquad.com
3-4-53729d ago

* Just a thought.

They could make a Smash Brothers like game for the entire cast of characters from Fire Emblem Awakening + a few from the other FE games.

* back on topic - I think we may get lucky and now have a chance to see a few more characters who would have otherwise been cut.

-Foxtrot3729d ago (Edited 3729d ago )

What a waste of a character, I'd rather of seen Mewtwo with his X and Y forms or a newer Pokmeon.

OR if it has Mewtwo in it aswell this character replaced with a different Nintendo in general

"There’s another big reason that both Mewtwo and Lucario could share the spot light. Both were prominently featured in the most recent Pokemon title. For those who’ve played the game, or do not care about spoilers, Lucario is among the first Pokemon to display Mega-Evolution in context of the story."

Yeah but Mewtwo has an X AND Y form...making him a better choice

SpiralTear3729d ago

That still doesn't mean that Lucario and Mewtwo can't both be in the game. Their Mega Evolutions would be great Final Smashes (especially against Lucario's original one).

-Foxtrot3729d ago (Edited 3729d ago )

Did you read my comment

"OR if it has Mewtwo in it aswell this character replaced with a different Nintendo in general"

Why would I want them both in the game, they'll probably end up being clones.

I'd rather take just one of them, that being Mewtwo because he was two forms and replace Lucario with another Nintendo character in general.

youndamie3729d ago

Wasn't both Lucario and Mew-Two in the last smash?

LennyLovespuds3729d ago

Often clone characters have a place in the game regardless of their move set. Ganondorf is heavy Falcon, but I wouldn't argue that Ganondorf has a right to be in the game, whether or not he is a clone of Falcon or not.

SpiralTear3729d ago

I did read your comment, man, and Mewtwo and Lucario's movesets were very different. Heck, their basic fighting styles were different. Just because they have a charging special attack doesn't make them "clones." I think people assigned Lucario the "clone" tag in Brawl just because Mewtwo got removed.

I don't see a problem with Lucario sticking around at all. If his Final Smash was Mega Evolution, then that especially would be a representation of Pokemon X/Y. Anyone can put a character in a game, but it takes skill to actually make the character's inclusion important.

And trust me, if I had to have only one, I'd pick Mewtwo. I just don't see why both can't be included if the roster allows it. Sure, I don't want Lucario in if another character, one that I like a lot more, was out, but the roster in Smash 4 is said to be much bigger than Brawl. So who knows? Lucario and Mewtwo might both make a showing.

king_george3729d ago

Sweet i loved him in brawl he was awesome!

user95970823729d ago

Man I can't wait for the fan made mod that'll fix all this game's inevitable balancing problems!

SpiralTear3729d ago

"Inevitable"? Please elaborate on that.

noxeven3729d ago

here's a link to the brawl + wiki it explains a lot that would just result in a crazy long post. http://supersmashbros.wikia...

there are other mods as well

user95970823729d ago

Let me start by stating that I am NOT into mlg gameplay (I actually despise what mlg does to video gaming) so my viewpoint is not that of someone who complains about action frames and what not.
I loved Smash 64 and I loved Melee and for a brief time I really enjoyed brawl. At least until i went to college and learned through playing with friends that were wannabe mlg bros, how broken brawl was. Basically, if you wanted to win, it all came down to which of the four top tier characters you picked. It was like type matching a pokemon battle.
Also, the game was slower, clunkier, and over just not as fun as previous installments.
Then Project M came along and fixed everything wrong with the game. Real balancing, adding in the good characters that got cut just made it so much better.
I highly recommend downloading it (does not require hacked wii). It's like a brand new game.
I'm just getting the feeling from what they're teasing us with the Smash four is gonna suffer similar problems. I really hope it doesn't but at least I know that if it does, some dedicated fans will come along and make into the game it should be.

SpiralTear3729d ago

@noxeven

I'm completely aware of how people have modded Brawl to play more like Melee and changing characters to be more accommodating to tournament play; I wasn't asking about that.

I'm curious about why @Shinymasonite said it's "inevitable" and why we should automatically assume that there will be mass balancing problems. Nintendo has made three Super Smash Bros. games. That's in no way enough of a reputation for us to instantly consider this. For all we know, the gameplay could be miles away from Brawl. Note that Sora isn't working on this one. Namco is and Sakurai is simply overseeing it.

SpiralTear3729d ago

If you're a fan of how Project M approached Smash Bros., that's fine, but this quote you used really bothered me:

"some dedicated fans will come along and make into the game it should be."

In my understanding, you're meaning that Melee was what Super Smash Bros. should be. That's not true. Sakurai's intention when designing the series in the first place was to make the game simple and less technical. It was designed to be the "anti-Street Fighter" because Sakurai was tired with overly complicated engines and obsession over tournament play. He hated that crowd. He didn't expect Melee to be embraced by the MLG audience. In fact, he didn't want it to be. That's why Brawl was so different from Melee; Sakurai didn't want Melee's complexity anymore.

Also, the Project M developers hate it when people say that they're trying to "fix Smash Bros." or make it "what it should be." They believe that that phrasing is disrespectful to Nintendo, the company who got them hooked on the series to begin with. They find Project M to simply be a competition-focused approach to Brawl, not "the way Smash Bros. should be."

OtakuDJK1NG-Rory3729d ago

It means he playable nothing more or less

80°

Behind The Dangerous Stunts Of Nintendo’s Iconic Mario Commercials

Two married costume designers share stories from a decade of traveling the globe with Nintendo.

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
253d ago
110°

Bowser Is Canonically 34 Years Old

In a YouTube video showing Nintendo Switch owners how to create a Nintendo Account, Nintendo of America revealed that Bowser is canonically 34 years old.

jznrpg315d ago

I saw Bowser when I was a kid and now I’m older than him , sigh.

Brazz314d ago

Wow, i'm as old as Bowser!!

Stanjara314d ago (Edited 314d ago )

He looks 55 to me.

Show all comments (7)
100°

Nintendo Is A Bad Company, But We Can't Help Loving Them Anyway

TG: “Most of us also grew up with Nintendo, likely forming a nostalgic connection with games that have long been crowned as our personal favourites. The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker was an experience that shaped my view on open world fantasy, and Super Mario 64 changed my life like it did for millions of others. These titles have earned their place in history, and remain loved to this day for so many worthwhile reasons. We replay them and beg for remasters all while delving into their worlds time and time again because they mean that much to us. It’s a shame then that the company behind them often kicks its own sweet darlings to the curb.”

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Magog323d ago

I never got the love for Nintendo games personally. The annoying vocalizations and ugly character designs do nothing for me.

Kosic322d ago

Don't forget the constant hand holding with tutorials. Learn this new ability by pressing Y, now prove that you can press Y 8 times before you can move on....

Tapani322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

Another very weird article.

Nintendo is a great company by almost all possible normal measures. The biggest one being: their own staff is happy, and they seem to be very happy, well compensated and retain rate is solid. They are also financially very stable, profitable, and cash rich, so shareholders love them.

Overall it is an extremely creative group of people, and their mission statement is fantastic as well "to put smiles on the faces of everyone we touch. We do so by creating new surprises for people across the world to enjoy together." The social impact is also massive, not to speak culturally. Additionally, they have a really strong core business, high customer retention rate and loyalty. Nintendo's reputation is extremely good, I think in the US alone they are 9th most reputable company, their customer service is better than the average company. Plus, the press gives them a pass, because they are Nintendo. But there's a reason why they do that, it's not "because they are Nintendo", there are more layers to the argument.

Then, then there's the random negative gamers online...and their "reputation" which is inside their heads. And their western ideas of how a Japanese company should behave or what they should do. But they have no right to ask a company to do anything for them, because they can vote with their wallets.

There's a small vocal community online who dislikes Nintendo for what they are, but then again, there's always a small vocal community that dislikes something.

Nintendo also disagrees with the Western world about IP, but most people call Westerners "hidoi!" when they emulate Tears of the Kingdom and do not experience it the way Nintendo wanted them (even if it is not the best visual way), because it is a matter of principle to them (Japanese are very much against anything close to plagiarism, and there are laws that are tight about creative works copying etc.)

The Western Braveheart "freedoom!" shouters need to understand that it is not an American company, nor they need to behave like one. They can have their own fights based on their principles (against emulation). And they very well may lose the battle with that and change, or find a new audience.

In the end, it is so very simple. Don't buy the products if you don't like a company, but there's no need to paint a picture that is unrealistic about Nintendo either.

MadLad322d ago

I hate virtually everything about their business practices, actually. Suing everybody for virtually anything, shooting down fan projects, games they never let devalue, their online infrastructure and how they handle BC.

They're lucky they make great games, because that's the only thing I feel they do right.

gold_drake322d ago

my issue with them, is the complete refusal to have decent tech for us.

and their odd censorship and lawsuits for modders.