270°

Project CARS Xbox One targets 1080p, 60 fps - Slightly Mad has "top secret" ideas for cloud

OXM "Not content with threatening Forza 5's visual lead on Xbox One, Slightly Mad has confessed to a few "top secret" ideas for how Project CARS might make use of the Xbox Live cloud. Drivatars beware."

XiSasukeUchiha3749d ago (Edited 3749d ago )

They target it hopefully its happens and sercet idea for cloud please just stop until u MS can give us proof of these claims i'm not buying this!

Disagree: Be logical here they haven't show us really much of cloud and 'true' power yet so i have the right to say it! be fanboy of logic geez sue me!

Fireseed3749d ago

They haven't shown us much of their ability to utilize cloud computing... HOWEVER they have found a way to visually destroy every other racing game around. So I don't think they're banging rocks together over there.

cyguration3749d ago

Keep in mind that SMS is destroying every other game visually on PC. We don't know how the game will look on consoles yet.

Naga3749d ago (Edited 3749d ago )

I have two main concerns with Project Cars on any console:

1) Will it measure up to the droolworthy graphical prowess they've displayed in the PC screenshots?

2) Will there be enough of a hardcore audience to sustain a game like this?

On the second concern, if the game is not accessible to the masses, it will matter very little how great of a hardcore simulation it is. The game itself would run the risk of being too exclusive to sustain a healthy profit for the developers, and the long-term viability of the project would come into question. To be clear, I'm not suggesting they compromise on their vision... it's just that there are natural consequences with going there.

As a car racing fanatic, I'm hoping for success on both fronts and on both consoles.

AndroidVageta3749d ago

"Visually destroy" isn't accurate I would say. Even older games like NFS: Shift 2 or GRiD 1/2 don't look THAT much worse (if at all considering it at least has 3D crowds).

So yeah...not trying to be anti-X1 or anything (don't even own a console) but Forza 5 genuinely doesn't look THAT good. If it were not for the 1080p and 60fps it wouldn't even be that big a jump from Forza 4.

UltimateMaster3749d ago

Didn't I read an article that said the Wii U version will also be 1080p?

http://wiiudaily.com/projec...
http://nintendoeverything.c...

Guess I did.

http://gamingbolt.com/proje...

kopicha3749d ago

Wait till something has been shown and proven. Other than that to me this is just another PR talk trying to hype things up. So far it is pretty damn clear that the Cloud thing that MS is bragging about is clearly just marketing bullcrap. As usual since that what they always does. Mark Cerny did commented Cloud wont make prettier graphics or anything about visual. However it does help other things that works well in Cloud. If whatever MS is bragging about their Cloud is so true, they would not be keeping quiet about it considering how they get so offensive when the internet blow up about how much more PS4 is technically more powerful than XO. Even Phil Spencer himself now said local compute is very critical now and a long way to go when being asked about Cloud. That already completely contradict the way how MS initially brag about their Cloud can do.

All in all those dont matter to me. What I really want to see is how this game able to stack up with those already establish franchises like GT n Forza. That's all I am interested now. All other talks are just more PR shit imo

P0werVR3748d ago (Edited 3748d ago )

^

Wow, all the comments above...LOL!

Hope this isn't a new trend. Where an independent studio claims the benefits of cloud computing and they get bashed for it. You guys are low. Very sad.

I believe it's too early to down the technology so early. Give the generation a year before we start making judgments. So far, I'm loving this innovation. Games will be more changeable and organic. AIs will improve and newer gameplay features will make gaming great.

Can't wait to see what Fable Legends and Sunset overdrive will reveal. Or even Halo and Black Tusk's game.

GameNameFame3747d ago

XBL will benefit from dedicated server, but desperate fanboy think it is some magic secret sauce. It isnt any company with dedicated server can do it.

Some facts to get past their delusion.

-MS themselves stated in their business plan that Azure is focusing Outlook, Skydrive, server liscensing and etc. Not XBL.

So to say MS spent 250 million just for XBL is pure just delusional. Servers made mainly for XBL stuff.

-What MS is doing with server has been done everywhere else. LOL. Literally for a decade. Look MMOs, all the AI, world events are done and calculated on server.

Now MS calls it cloud, fans who wanted to desperately clutch on to something now thinks it is magic sauce.

LOL. Using Outlook server on games. You think that is your secret sauce. LOL. Using servers has been done for decades. It does not offer any advantage over using dedicated servers.

Forza graphics have nothing to do with cloud. LOL. It runs exactly the same when you play offline. And Forza 5 was not really acclaimed for graphics.

Look at all the games doing with so called Cloud. LOL. nothing. Now Titanfall is confirmed 6v6 with cloud and reported to be 720P with cloud.

LOL

GameNameFame3747d ago

Also, first time I've heard a game with

-Card board crowd
-No dynamic weather
-Static lighting
-Static environment.
-Static seasons.

Get called "visually destroy" anything. LOL. DF wrote and article about its unimpresive graphics. LOL

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3747d ago
3749d ago Replies(3)
Rainstorm813749d ago

Agree.....why is it all the cloud uses are always secret?

Let's talk about it...gamers are dying to know

It does make it seem like all PR.....using Cloud only as a talking point....can we see some implementation that actually show how "revolutionary" it is supposed to be for games

MRMagoo1233749d ago (Edited 3749d ago )

The secret is it wont do anything special , the same as it hasnt done anything special for pcs in 10 years, the cloud i mean.

Ausbo3749d ago

We are disagreeing because we know you dont have an xbox one for the cloud capabilities to matter to you

Prime1573749d ago

And that he only tries to be the first post in almost every article.

GiantEnemyCrab3749d ago

Have you not seen the Drivatars in Forza that use the cloud?

Rainstorm813749d ago

I don't have an X1 just yet..... can u tell me how the Drivatars are different from Ghosts we've seen in games for over a decade?

GarrusVakarian3749d ago (Edited 3749d ago )

@ Rainstorm81

Drivatars and ghosts are 2 completely different things. Ghosts are just overlays of your exact lap onto the track whereas Drivatars are data collected from real people who have played game, transferred onto an AI driver. They act like real players, because they are composed of real player data. The devs explain it much better here : http://www.digitalspy.co.uk...

The first time i read about the Drivatar system, i was really impressed. I haven't played Forza 5 yet, but i can't wait to see how it actually works in-game.

On topic: Great news about 1080p, 60fps. I hope they can hit the target.

GarrusVakarian3749d ago (Edited 3749d ago )

Double post, my bad.

AndroidVageta3749d ago

The thing that was used in the other Forza games without needing "Cloud Power™"?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3749d ago
Muffins12233749d ago

Honestly if Microsoft can stream enhancing graphical features(like %20 of the gmae) and we see sony streaming %100 of a game then sony can easily do it too

Mister_Dawg3748d ago

Yet if Sony had said this, you'd be riding them like a greased up piggy in the deep south.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3747d ago
_FantasmA_3749d ago Show
curtis923749d ago

Imagine what they can do with the PS4 version then!

Show all comments (61)
170°

Why did EA Kill Project CARS?

This video explains why we think Electronic Arts didn't see a future in the sim racing title Project CARS and promptly cancelled the fourth instalment.

Jin_Sakai525d ago

After the last installment I’d say most hardcore fans left. It’s just not that good anymore so I can’t really blame EA this time.

masterfox525d ago

because it was always a project and it never got finished :D

ChubbyBlade523d ago

Every game is a project. Your joke doesn’t make sense

InUrFoxHole522d ago

It makes perfect sense. It's obviously a play on the title. Jesus christ you must be a blast at parties.

ApocalypseShadow524d ago (Edited 524d ago )

Ask Bullfrog or Black Box or Tiburon or Studio 33 or Criterion or any of the previously acquired developers who made racing games as competition, or as developers of EA games, then eventually dissolved into oblivion or reassigned. Just ask them. They'll tell you why.

ApocalypseShadow523d ago

Oh. I forgot. Even Code Masters were absorbed into Criterion. Another racing developer EA took over.

Every racing developer either absorbed by EA or eventually destroyed by them. They either kill competition or have them in the end make Need 4 Speed for them.

MadLad523d ago

EA only cancels projects for one reason.
They didn't see enough money in it.

Kombatologist523d ago (Edited 523d ago )

Not when it's because it didn't meet some crazy margin. It's like if something doesn't make EA a billion dollars on day one (I'm exaggerating that figure of course), they swiftly put it out to pasture.

SurgicalMenace523d ago (Edited 523d ago )

Much like if you're spending money on what's a bad investment for your desired goals, you'd do away with it, if you're wise. We should try to get away from thinking we know more about business than individuals that have been doing it for decades. Perhaps you could benefit from going into business instead of wasting all of your talents in comment sections. It's clear that you're the missing piece that EA's been looking for.

MadLad522d ago

I've made a good amount of money betting on underdog investments over the years.

EA sets unrealistic expectations of their more niche developers, yet continue to fund absolute blunders like DICE and the Battlefield series year after year.

dumahim523d ago

EA butted in and messed with the formula and act shocked when it doesn't work out.

Show all comments (16)
90°

Original Project CARS creator trying to re-hire EA team

Ian Bell, the founder of Slightly Mad Studios, is aiming to hire former Project CARS employees to work on his upcoming GTR Revival project.

Sgt_Slaughter526d ago

If it's just going to be another sim-cade that doesn't do either one correctly then no thanks.

Project CARS 2 was a step in the right direction but the physics still aren't where they should have been, so what did they do for PC3? Go completely arcade. That killed the franchise.

220°

EA dropping Project CARS

From GI.biz: "EA is dropping Project CARS, GamesIndustry.biz can reveal.

The Slightly Mad Studios-developed series was launched in 2015, with EA confirming today that it has made the decision to "stop further development and investment" in the franchise.

The announcement was made internally and it's unclear at this stage to which extent staff could be affected. EA said that employees working on Project CARS will be moved into "suitable" roles "wherever [they] can.""

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Terry_B528d ago

Typical for EA. They buy studios that created nice games..and are sooner or later destroying them and move the people to work on the old same 5+ EA series.

italiangamer528d ago

They will put the developers on the 1000th Need for Speed for the rest of their entire careers, just like Criterion.

SurgicalMenace528d ago

To be fair, it's not EAs fault it falls directly on the consumer. Everytime these companies choose to drop a series they're met with backlash though the gamers didn't support said series enough to justify its continuation. Attempting to paint every company as evil all because they're in it to succeed is ridiculous. They have to make money just like each of us typing in this section. If a job wasn't supporting you well you'd quit and find a new one, this is the same mentality concerning series.

TheColbertinator528d ago

@SurgicalMenace

No it is their fault. They don't listen to fans and burn the franchise to the ground by introducing elements that nobody wanted instead of increasing support for said respected franchises.

I order a steak, they make a steak. 1st sale
I order a steak again, they vomit on my steak and charge me more for it. No sale.

EA in a nutshell.

Tapani527d ago

@TheColbinator Well how do you think they make the billions then?

Their fans ARE buying their games. You are just not their focus group, and I can guarantee their customer insights team is more thorough and detailed in their reaearch than any N4G commentors’ opinion on the matter. Otherwise EA would not exist as a company, and they’d be bankrupt.

deleted528d ago

The one that still hurts the most though was Criterion w the Burnout series. Acquired Criterion's tech for their own existing IP, then shut em down. It's basically parasitic. I sure do miss Burnout's crash mode!

Hofstaderman528d ago

Sounds eerily similar to another large unnamed corporation hey. I believe some EA bigwigs shifted to that company back in the day, would explain the similarities.

rlow1527d ago

Must be talking about Sony

peppeaccardo528d ago

and instead they come out with that piece of shit of Need for Speed which looks like an Anna & Barbera cartoon. C'mon .... PC2 was my go to game for VR racing and the first one i played for tens of hours. i was so lookiing forward to PC4 after that failure of PC3 ... what a shame EA, they are bombing all the good games and stick to the garbage ones. EA when you think you have reached maximum of disappointment they top it off with style .... screw them!

SurgicalMenace528d ago

Need for Speed continues to sell so why would they get rid of what's producing what they need to maintain stability?

EazyC528d ago

What they did to this series was idiotic. The premise was great -- a sim/simcade game that GENUINELY got developed in line with its community. There is a huge gap in the market for this...I mean, PD hasn't listened to fans at all over the last year with regard to simple Gran Turismo 7 tweaks. Sim racing fans are screaming for a title where they actually give a shit about their users.

Project Cars 2 was genuinely on to something, it just needed some refinement. But instead they followed up by selling off to EA with a braindead GRID clone with Project Cars 3. Again...idiotic.

SurgicalMenace528d ago

Well since you're the authority on properly managing a million dollar company, why don't you just call them to let them know of your divine wisdom?

Hardcore sim racers are the ones who are competing acrossed the globe, no company in their right mind would focus on a forever moving casual market. They have to focus on those dedicated to supporting their efforts. Notice how you're speaking from a perspective of self opposed to the collective. Perhaps they sold out because they, like us, needed the money knowing that they could reinvest it into something new. PC was a decent racer but very few people mainlined it over GT or Forza.

EazyC528d ago

I'm not a divine authority but I notice a pattern where these huge corporations turn completely tone deaf of what the "average fan" wants.

vallencer528d ago

Hate to break it to you but project cars 3 was published by Bandai in 2020. EA didn't buy codemasters, which owned slightly mad studios, until 2021. Either way the sales were super poor for the game and it's not surprising EA would just drop the game. BUT it still sucks because it's one less sim racing game on the market. Especially because the first 2 were really good.

Tzuno528d ago

and focuses more on cartoon network games

Show all comments (19)