980°

Final Fantasy XIV PS4 vs PC Highest Settings (1080p) Screenshot Comparison: Basically Identical

Here's a comparison between several screenshots of the upcoming PS4 version of Final Fantasy XIV, and the same elements in the PC Version of the game at the highest setting and 1080p resolution.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
EXVirtual3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

Whoa... almost identical to the highest PC settings, yet still 1080p native. I really can't believe it. Obviously the PC version has better textures and stuff, but damn.
Props to SE for there skills in graphical fidelity and of course Mark Cerny.
Can't wait to play this!

EDIT: Why the disagrees guys?

PeaSFor3771d ago

"GRUMBLE GRUMBLE GRUMBLE" made some PC only circlejerk when they see this kind of quality for a 400$ system

Ricegum3771d ago

PS4 version looks incredible. PC scrubs out in full force today.

JsonHenry3771d ago

Looks pretty close to the PC version. I wonder what the PS4 version of WoW would look like? :p

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

Both versions look meh. As always ps4 matches pc in games that don't push hardware. Try BF4, witcher 3 and other super high end games. Ps4 version of COD & diablo matches pc.

Really impressed?
http://cdn2.dualshockers.co...

I am sure ps4 could run pong at same settings as pc also for cheaper..

Greatness awaits.

mikeslemonade3771d ago

"..but look at me, I have a PC" haha

Anarki3771d ago

I really need to start playing this game again, I loved it. I got to max level did a few dungeons and got bored but I'd love to get back into it and doing some more serious hardcore content.

guitarded773770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

PC is a bit sharper, and may be, but there is still the loss on quality due to streaming. I expect the PS4 version to look great when it comes out... I'm playing it on PS3 right now, and can't wait to play it on PS4. Really the best Final Fantasy experience this generation. XIV brought back my love for the FF Universe that XIII crapped on.

LonChaneyTV3770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

Final Fantasy XIV even at high end settings equals to a last gen game. Black Desert Online is where it's at. better looking characters.

http://www.mmoculture.com/w...
http://games.mail.ru/pic/pc...
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

It's also going to be Free on PC.

slayorofgods3770d ago

Those images do not look "almost" identical to me. If it wasn't for that tittle and everyone saying they look so "identical" I'd say the PS4 looks good...

... PS4 is a fine system. Sorry folks, but the PC version of this game looks quite a bit better to me.

awi59513770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

No it just means they didnt try on pc and the ps4 is the lead platform. This game doesnt even look better than guild wars 2 texture wise. That game is really detailed and you can even see the stitching and skin textures of the animal in the leather armor.

Yeah this game doesnt touch gild wars 2 at all it looks dull and dated by comparison it looks closer to world of warcraft mist of pandaria graphics update than guild wars 2.

This games graphics are on par with lord of the rings online and DDO but there are MMO's on PC that look far better than this game.

Computersaysno3770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

They look pretty similar, PC definitely edge it for sharpness of image quality and some textures however it is likely the stream quality.

It's not this is some amazing thing though. It already runs in some form on PS3- it has roots that lie in previous generation console hardware.

It hardly looks amazing on PC and it runs really easily on pretty weak PC hardware. You can run it on a 6 years old Core 2 Duo machine with a Geforce 8800GT.

I would be impressed if this was some sort of high end PC game but it just isn't.

Of course we probably have everybody saying wow haaaaa look PC gamers PS4 matches PC on this game. Well it should!

The PC version is tailored to be able to run on a wide range of hardware because it is an MMORPG- thats the whole point. You need and want a large userbase and so you don't target higher end hardware.

Its just not a demanding or next gen game. If this didn't run about the same as the PC version it would be a HUGE disappointment. It runs on PS3 for goodness sake...

ThanatosDMC3770d ago

More like mid range. The PC version has crisper and more detailed textures. Unless it's the screenshot program that's making everything look faded on the PS4 version.

Btw, is this game worth buying? Hoping to get some non-MMO player's opinion.

kreate3770d ago

Even if u brag about how PC version is superior. most of us have a gaming PC. But rather play on a console.

Azmatik3770d ago

Ok im gona start this off saying im a ps4 gamer but i have a good pc and love both they go hand in hand perfectly but i still do prefer my ps4 cause ease of access. Now these dont look identical at all you can cleatly tell PC is wayyy sharper but could be stream quality i play this game on pc and its amazing. @computersaysno: are u for real right now!!! And u get 5 agrees! U can NOT run this game on a 8800gt lmfao! And a 6 year old core 2 duo LMFAO wow man just wow this game is VERY demanding to run it on max it recommends like a i5- i7 for god sake. Just ur statements show me u have no idea what ur talking about u do realize even if u bought a 2 year old mobo a core 2 duo wouldnt even fit right. Plz know what ur talking about before posting so much miss information on the internet. U clearly have no idea what the word hardware even means.

Computersaysno3770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

Azmatik what are you talking about? You don't know.

Minimum requirements are very low end on PC. Core 2 Duo and 8800 in fact.......It isn't targeted for high end hardware. Its designed to run on slow old configurations as well as modern systems. That usually limits what you can do.

The fact it runs on PS3 says enough, its no more a true next gen game than any other of these ports.

Seems you don't know what you are talking about.

If you can run this game on high and 1080p on a midrange Radeon 7870 and get 60FPS then it should be easy for PS4 to get a similar performance.

Gamer19823770d ago

Need to click on those to see real quality PS4 shots are washed out and
http://cdn.dualshockers.com...
http://cdn.dualshockers.com...

No comparison look at the building in the back and the details e.g. you can easily make out the bricks on PC version. Thats because PS4 has overkilled the blur filter to make up for lack of graphics. Dont get me wrong it blows the PS3 version out the water but its supposed to the PS3 has 512mb RAM. It doesn't touch the PC version. Oh and this says nothing about PC it says more about the game. As you can max this out on PC on a £400 PC.

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 3770d ago
ATi_Elite3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

1. PS4 has a HD7850 in it (laptop version) so it should produce good graphics. No one is denying that a HD7850 is a great GPU!

2. This game is not a Graphical tour de force so I expect a WiiU to produce the same results.

3. Some colors are still washed out and you still have Low detail in many areas as the Devs are sacrificing color contrast and Detail in order to do something else on the PS4.

Capped at 250 watts the PS4 can only do so much but what it does is GREAT! For $400 it's AWESOME, It's Incredible, It cures cancer! there I said it you happy?

The PS4 is wonderful but I'm not gonna sit here and PRETEND or BE BLIND or BE A IGNORANT FANBOY and act like it has NO LIMITATIONS when DAY 1 The Frostbite 3 revealed those limitations.

5. I only wrote this after reading so many Negative comments made towards PC Gamers and NO PC Gamer even made a comment.

So obviously you fanboys are thinking about PC gamers when PC Gamers are NOT thinking about YOU!

EXVirtual3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

Ha, yeah PC gamers did comment. You also need to remember that this game runs at native 1080p on the PS4. However the screens have a blur because of livestream compression. So things won't look as good as they would when you see it on a 1080p TV.

What do you mean PC gamers aren't thinking about us? They're the ones disliking anyone who says anything positive about this. If you ask me, they can't stand seeing this kind of quality on a console. How was I being a fanboy exactly?
Yes, I know BF4 runs at 900p on the PS4. I never denied that, or even mentioned the game.
Even now, they're still calling people fanboys.
Get over yourselves.

AnteCash3771d ago

It looks like your caps key broken

2muchw1nn1ng3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

Yeah... no, I highly doubt the Wii U can render the same game with its limited hardware at 1080p, fanboyism aside.

And please. Enough with the annoying elitist attitude. It's downright childish.

3771d ago
FlyingFoxy3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

Well, considering the desktop 7850 is less powerful than my 4 year old 5870, i guess the PS4 is less powerful than that..

http://www.hwcompare.com/12...

Btw my 5870 is worth about £80 now, so yeah.. paid about £300 for it @ launch, cracking card to last all this time though.

Gohadouken3770d ago

"So obviously you fanboys are thinking about PC gamers when PC Gamers are NOT thinking about YOU! "

Oh the irony and hypocrisy . You care on a daily basis . No one usually ever summons you and yet guys like you would pop up in completely unrelated subjects , unlike this peculiar one , to " enlighten the masses" .

Dude4203770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

"Well, considering the desktop 7850 is less powerful than my 4 year old 5870, i guess the PS4 is less powerful than that.."

Umm, no, the card you're reffering to is the HD 6850. At stock, the HD 7850 is slightly faster than the 5870. Not only that, but its newer architecture makes it more power efficient and has better overclocking. There's a reason AMD hit it big with the HD 7xxx series.

And regarding the PS4, we're talking about an APU here, not a discrete card. I'd say that performance is impressive for the type of chip the PS4 uses.

fr0sty3770d ago

Having an APU can actually give performance advantages, as both CPU and GPU reside on the same chip and (in the consoles) have custom buses that connect the two together that you won't find on PC. PS4's GPU also can queue up more asynchronous compute commands at once than pretty much any PC GPU on the market today (though that will change soon), and doesn't have bloated middleware and operating system overhead to deal with. If you need to know just how much performance is lost to that, just look at AMD's mantle tech demos. They go into detail about what mantle enables that typical directX PC's can't. And yes, Mantle is PC tech and it will bridge the gap I mention above, but so far it is only available in one game and doesn't work on Nvidia GPUs.

PS4 isn't as powerful as the most powerful PC by a long shot, but you won't see games that go well beyond what PS4 can do (that only the most powerful PC on the market today can run) for many years. About a year to 1.5 years before we're talking about PS5, you'll start to see PC games that the consoles just couldn't handle start to trickle out. It isn't because the PC's can't handle it power-wise, but that the install base of PCs that can handle it is WAY too small to justify a developer spending millions of dollars making a game that maxes that system out completely (and by maxed out, I'm not talking about running an unoptimized game that was made to run on PS4/XBO at a higher resolution/framerate, I mean running graphics and CPU functions that simply are not possible on current console hardware. Kinda like how PS3 and 360 weren't capable of DX11 features like hardware based tessellation, but we didn't start seeing games really take advantage of those features until around the time BF3 came out.

PudgeySan3770d ago

Just an FYI The silcon on board is way closer to a HD 7870 then a 7850.

NeoTribe3770d ago

Lol your always so mad and on the defense about consoles. Your such a sad individual. Get over it and accept that consoles are in and pc gaming is a niche hobby.

tee_bag2423770d ago

Well said ATI.

I thought it was pretty much a 7970m laptop GPU inside - TDP's are probably about spot on.

Yeah this game isn't exactly pushing any system.

deSSy27243770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

Native 1080p means shit, its sjut resolution (pixels on screen). Graphics settings/details are much much more important. PC can do 1080p and maxed out or 2K-4K + resolution and maxed out. But PS4 cant do that because the hardware has its own limits. So, you need to make a choice..... very good graphics or very good frames per second. You cant have both (unless you pay 1000-2000$ for your system aka PC).

And all that depends on the game.

Gamer19823770d ago

Its 2013 it SHOULD be running at 1080p. As for the rest its just gravy.. It is looking good for what you get I guess. But the games are a joke in price compared to PC..

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3770d ago
NeXXXuS3771d ago

My god... seriously, PC guys... Just play the game and stop bragging about your damn graphics. It's amazing no matter what it's played on. :\
This is probably one of the reasons I hate PC gamers. Always so full of themselves when it comes to their $800 gaming rig. I'd much rather replay PS1 games than game on a next gen console simply because of story and originality.

3771d ago
MatrixxGT3770d ago

It wont go away. Just ignore them that's what I do. I could afford to buy the best of the best PC but I don't because I really don't care to have yet another piece of furniture to set all of that up on or have something else connected to my tv which wont look as great as a monitor anyway. With a console Its plug in and play, set it and forget it, ect. Oh and I don't have to blabber around the internet justifying the money and time spent into my PC. I don't even own a computer, don't need one.

awi59513769d ago (Edited 3769d ago )

@xJumpManx

LOL well its better than a ps4 for damn sure. i just built my sister a 7850 dual card gaming pc that runs BF4 mulitplayer on ultra at 60 fps. It didnt cost more than about 703 dollars to make.

It has a overclocked 8320 8core cpu @ 4.3Gigs, dual 7850 2gb cards, Msi 990fx motherboard, 16 gigs of ram, and a corsair 850 powersource. And it maxes all games she throws at it. I installed my copy of metro last light on it and on ultra settings it runs at 50 fps @ 1080P its a nice little budget build. Oh yeah bioshock infinite on it ran at 200 fps on ultra @ 1080P lol

aquamala3771d ago

You can look at it either way

1) SE is so talented! Making PS4 version look the same as pc version

2) SE is so lazy! They are not taking advantage of more powerful PCs and develop the game for the lowest denominator

3771d ago
Corpser3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

Exactly! pC gamers like parity with ps4 as much as ps4 gamers like parity with Xbox one

OsirisBlack3771d ago

If you think this game looks bad then you obviously have a crap GPU or just a crap CPU in general. I play this game on the highest possible settings generally at 2 or 4k the PS4 will NOT look as good as this game does on PC. I do own a PS4 and while I am amazed at how good it looks I cannot understand why PC gamers are ranting about how the game looks bad or is optimized poorly..... stop complaining and do what you always talk about and up the resolution to beyond what the PS4 is capable of..... Play this game at 2k and 90fps and then say it is not beautiful.

http://i.imgur.com/O8kzbgs....

http://i.imgur.com/hao4RfD....

Like I said Beautiful..

kryteris3771d ago

the difference is day and night. PC wins.

bumnut3770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

PC wins because you have to buy a new console to play it!

And the PS4 shots look blurry to me.

kryteris3770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

bummnut, agree. These screen shots on ps4 probably are not a good representation, but there still is much missing on the ps4. I have the PS4, and I really do not understand why a 7870 gpu cannot offer the same unless they are trying to run it at a silly 60fps again. 20-40fps is just fine.

thekhurg3771d ago

You got disagrees from the PC fanboys.

lex-10203770d ago

It looks good don't get me wrong but the differences are very noticeable, particularly when it comes to draw distances and object edges.

FanOfRootBeer3770d ago

Because you dared encroach upon the territory of Lord PC, you dirty casual.

/s

NarooN3770d ago

The disagrees are just butthurt PC elitists (not normal PC gamers.)

Ignore the agree/disagree nonsense on N4G and you'll have a better time.

adorie3770d ago

@EXVirtual
No. I focused on the visual comparison,although I usually do read the articles.
TBH, this is more of an idea how they look against one another, than a real comparison. At least to me.

adorie3770d ago

I'm going to be honest, the game looks muddy in some shots for PS4. Color is sometimes different, I'm speaking about the ground. Slight aliasing, but not too much. The hotbars look a little blurry too.

My opinion is that SE rushed this game. I've seen bigger environments showcased for different games that looked a heck of a lot more impressive.

SE better use the money they're getting from PS3 and PS4 owners to improve the look of this game, cause, again, I think this game is a rushed port.

EXVirtual3770d ago

Did you read the article? It's because of livestream compression.

Embolado3770d ago

Disagrees where from Hitagi Senjougahara, for the lack of air time in Monogatari Season 2.

grimmweisse3770d ago

The disagrees are from angry PC fanboys needing to justify their anger because they somehow feel insecure about a console game looking as good a pc game.

Old McGroin3770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

"The disagrees are from angry PC fanboys needing to justify their anger because they somehow feel insecure about a console game looking as good a pc game."

The PC screenshots look a good bit sharper. I think you'll find it is the PS4 fanboys who are now feeling insecure as it can't match up to a game that wouldn't really push a PC gaming rig in any way.

EDIT: And no, I don't have a gaming PC or a next gen console yet. Going by the launch titles and these pics of FF I think I made the right decision in waiting a year or so to jump in to the next gen. I will be getting a PS4 but I'm quite disappointed so far by what has been shown for it. How many years of development has it had and it can't even match up to this?

d3nworth13770d ago

Dude ATI elite and decrypt are to 2 biggest PC fanboys on this site. You can't say anything positive about a console without them getting butt hurt. So don't waste your time trying to talk sense to them.

HardcoreDaBoss3770d ago

because the pc version looks way better?? look at the water.. look at the trees.. and look at the bridge.. more like greatness waits.

Cueil3770d ago

because you limit the resolution of the pc version

worldwidegaming3770d ago

Ok why are the pictures of different characters in different gear? apples to apples or they have something to hide.

AndrewLB3770d ago

They look very close. But this isn't due to the bizarre leap in logic claiming PS4 is just as powerful as a gaming PC. What really happened is SquareEnix decided to be lazy and not include an "ultra" mode, along with high resolution textures instead of the 1024x1024 ones most PS4 games use.

To sum it up... once again consoles and their lackluster performance have caused forward looking game development to be held back

Old McGroin3770d ago

Wow, the PC screenshots look a lot sharper.

tigertron3770d ago

"Why the disagrees guys?"

because the PC master race didn't like what you said. :P

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 3769d ago
TopDudeMan3771d ago

I could nitpick about the shading and the detail, but I'm not gonna. It still looks good on both platforms. Shame about the gameplay, though...

Abriael3771d ago

What's a shame about the gameplay? FFXIV has fantastic gameplay.

TopDudeMan3771d ago

It wasn't for me. I don't know, after playing guild wars 2 (the only other mmo I've played), I guess I expected certain things from the battle system and it just didn't impress me.

Abriael3771d ago

Eh, it's just a matter of genre, GW2 is a twitchy MMO, this one isn't.

Quality-wise though FFXIV literally shreds GW2 under basically every aspect.

DeadManIV3771d ago

You sure abriel? I played the beta and every quest I tried was boring as hell - I was continually asked to do extremely menial things for xp.

Sevir3771d ago

You can see some loss of texture quality in the PS4 version but man does it look impressive!

Abriael3771d ago

That's just due to livestream compression, as explained in the article. We'll have to wait for direct feed screenshots (luckily SE releases its press screenshots in lossless PNG, so it'll work well) to be 100% positive, but the textures look absolutely identical to me considering the lossy stream. Same for normal mapping.

Einhert3771d ago

Texturing, shadows, water, foliage all looks better on PC.

The edges also look crisper due to better AA.

It also probably runs at a higher frame rate and can run at higher resolutions.

Not exactly a good comparison as these devs are not pushing the PC, the real comparison will be the Witcher 3.

Abriael3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

Better AA? Lol. PC has the crappiest possible FXAA and you can't gauge the AA in the PS4 version at all because of the livestream compression that blurs the image slightly.

So I wonder where did you see the AA lol. If anything the PS4 version can only improve on that, because literally you can't have worse than FXAA unless you don't put AA at all.

The rest is only due to livestream compression.

Mind you, FFXIV is the MMORPG that pushes PCs the most, it has fantastic graphics for the genre. The Witcher 3 has better definition per models, but displays a TON less models on screen, so it doesn't necessarily have a higher total polycount.

The only thing you nailed is that it'll run at 30 fps.

sorane3771d ago

I expect smarter comments from people with 8 bubbles. You do realize we can push all types of AA through our videocard controls right? Unlike consoles we have all sorts of freedoms to fool with our settings.

"Mind you, FFXIV is the MMORPG that pushes PCs the most" That's just plain false. Much better lookings MMORPGs out there. Not sure why you even listed Witcher 3 since it's not even close to a MMORPG.....

T9003771d ago

@Abriael

PCs are open system's unlike consoles they have this thing called freedom and options lol.

Check out utilities like Nvinspector for reference.

Abriael3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

@Sorane: I listed The Witcher 3 because I was responding to someone that mentioned it. Saying that it's not comparable. Did you even read my comment?

The fact that you can force other kinds of antialiasing via video card is irrelevant. The comparison is beteen the default PC version, that has only FXAA available as an option, and the PS4 version.

Otherwise we could include things like sweetFX in the mix, but it's not what a comprison between two versions of the same game is about. You compare what the developer offers.

As for other MMORPGs that look better, please give me some examples. I'm always up for a laugh at midnight.

@T900: completely unrelated. We're comparing the two versions of the game, not the platforms and their inherent capabilities unrelated to the game.

sorane3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

"The fact that you can force other kinds of antialiasing via video card is irrelevant." That might be irrelevant to you since you can't do any of those things, but I can and do so it's not irrelevant to me by any means.

"Otherwise we could include things like sweetFX in the mix, but it's not what a comprison between two versions of the same game is about. You compare what the developer offers." Next you're gonna say we are only allowed to compare them at the same res/detail/fps and on the same specs. Sorry your platform doesn't have options, but mine does and I'll use them all if I want to compare the two.

"As for other MMORPGs that look better, please give me some examples. I'm always up for a laugh at midnight." Uhh off the top of my head quick Planetside 2, Guild Wars 2, Blade and Soul all easily look better than Final Fantasy. I'd name more, but I'm too busy having a good laugh at your post.

Abriael3771d ago

@Sorane: "That might be irrelevant to you since you can't do any of those things, but I can and do so it's not irrelevant to me by any means."

I'm a PC gamer, smartie. Where do you think I took the PC version of the screenies?

It's irrelevant in a comparison between the two versions of the game.

"Next you're gonna say we are only allowed to compare them at the same res/detail/fps and on the same specs. Sorry your platform doesn't have options, but mine does and I'll use them all if I want."

My platform has plenty options, as my platform is a PC. When you compare two versions of the game, you compare the two versions of the game using what the GAME provides you, not external options.
It's really simple.

"Planetside 2, Guild Wars 2, Blade and Soul all easily look better than Final Fantasy. I'd name more, but I'm too busy having a good laugh at your post."

Aside from the fact that Planetside 2 isn't a MMORPG, all the titles you listed are trounced mercilessly by FFXIV visuals-wise, especially guild wars 2 that is made with a slightly improved version of an engine that was already old when Guild Wars 1 was released.

Try again, and you might want to actually google some pics of those games, because it doesn't seem to have ever played them :D

sorane3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

"It's irrelevant in a comparison between the two versions of the game." Maybe in your shallow world but not mine.

"When you compare two versions of the game, you compare the two versions of the game using what the GAME provides you, not external options.
It's really simple." Maybe you have to work within those constraints, but I don't I have plenty of options. It's really simple.

"Aside from the fact that Planetside 2 isn't a MMORPG, all the titles you listed are trounced mercilessly by FFXIV visuals-wise, especially guild wars 2 that is made with a slightly improved version of an engine that was already old when Guild Wars 1 was released.

Try again, and you might want to actually google some pics of those games, because it doesn't seem to have ever played them :D" Now you're just being troll #34567677 on this site since I have played all of those games so I know for a fact what I said is true. You just seem like a fanboy who can't accept the truth. Saying "trounced mercilessly" just proves you have no clue about the graphics in those games. Saying GW2 uses a "slightly improved old engine" is like saying Half Life 2 and Call of Duty does also since they use some Quake code.

Abriael3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

@Sorane:

Exhibit A Guild Wars 2:
https://d3b4yo2b5lbfy.cloud...
(lol at those trees)

Exhibit B Final Fantasy XIV:
http://www.dualshockers.com...

B trounces A under every possible point of view: art direction, texture quality and resolution, polycount, effects, normal mapping and everthing else, both on characters/monsters and environments.

Guild Wars 2 tries very hard to hide its graphical mediocrity behind an enormous wall of bloom, but only newbies get tricked by that.

"Maybe you have to work within those constraints, but I don't I have plenty of options. It's really simple."

you have to work with those constraints if you want to compare two versions of the same game, not the two platforms regardless of the game.

This isn't a comparison between PC and PS4 in general.

sorane3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

@abriael

Exhibit A Final Fantasy XIV:
http://i.imgur.com/88IJhvR....
http://www.darkcarnival.co....
(lol look how horrible that game looks)

Exhibit B Guild Wars 2:
http://www.guildwars2guru.c...

Lesson learned: I can cherry pick screenshots also.

Rest of your post is just rubbish.

Carheadbutt3771d ago

I'm pretty sure Abraiel's screenshot is from ANet. Also I'm pretty sure your FFXIV shots were taken on min settings because mine looks better than that.

Einhert3770d ago

You seem extremely butthurt, the blurred edges of objects are clearly visable even with the "compression" of the live stream.

The differences are noticeable to anyone who has gamed on PC.

Also lol at your screenshot of Guild Wars 2, nice job having it on medium settings and using a screen from an old version of the game.

http://i.imgur.com/tLjqs.jp...

Argue about AA methods all you like, fact is the objects in the PC look crisper, the colours in the PS4 version look flat.

But keep up the "I'm a PC gamer 2 guise" facade, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and you contradicted yourself completely.

hiredhelp3770d ago

FXAA
MSAA
MLAA
TXAA
SMAA
Just to name most common used today.
Heres the problem here when compareing not that i feel it needs to be firstly please state your video card used show proof the settings anyone can say max or ultra settings.
Secondly APU On PS4 Is limited AA it cant be helped also please Note unlike steam box ps4 does not hold a full fledge PCI Card ..
Yes PC has options many without injectors but really do we need scrap going into next gen we all bennifit.
More memory bigger games better graphics and DX11

adorie3770d ago (Edited 3770d ago )

"
The fact that you can force other kinds of antialiasing via video card is irrelevant. The comparison is beteen the default PC version, that has only FXAA available as an option, and the PS4 version. "

I usually agree with your opinions, but sometimes, like today, I do not.

This is a comparison. PC Versus the PS4.
The screens for the PS4 look like crap. Plain and simple. It's probably compression as I can't write PS4's graphical muscle off that easily.

Now, AA is relevant because when you truly want to compare both (PS4, PC) you will need to play to both's strengths. Now, from the looks of these screens, the strengths of the PS4 aren't being utilized very well, there's compression and or both.

Now, as for the Witcher 3? Nvidia's Fur tech alone will probably bring VGA's to their knees.
The textures and new tech behind this game are leaps and bounds beyond FFXIV.

Lastly, you seem to enjoy the game, so don't take this like it's some e-peen measuring on my part.
I just don't agree with some of your comment. :)

I forgot one last thing, Don't forget that The Witcher 3 is going to be bigger than Skyrim. Also, did you see those textures? that foliage?

O.O

awi59513768d ago

@ adorie

Lets see the ps4 do edge detect xAA and see if it doesnt catch fire and explode then you can talk.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3768d ago
awi59513768d ago

The witcher 3 wont be a good comparison either. Because even though the witcher games look good, the witcher 2 was a direct x9 game. And it was so badly optimized even beefy pc's couldnt run the game at 60 fps with Ubersampling on. I could run it on ultra with ubersampling on only because i had 3 graphics cards to hit it over the head with untill it behaved.

JohnApocalypse3771d ago (Edited 3771d ago )

Looks dam good for an MMO. DC Universe online also looks very nice on the PS4

Beastforlifenoob3770d ago

Ps4 looks great
Pc looks great

But what the Ps4 has done is really great for only 399

Show all comments (162)
50°

Square Enix Releases Final Fantasy XIV: Dawntrail Benchmark Software

Final Fantasy XIV fans can now properly benchmark their PCs and check out some of what's coming to their game this summer.

Read Full Story >>
hardcoregamer.com
60°
9.0

Final Fantasy XIV Online: A Realm Reborn Review | TheXboxHub

Richard writes: Final Fantasy XIV Online on Xbox is built for newcomers.

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
210°

Xbox Profanity Filter Is Ruining the FFXIV Chat

The Xbox profanity filter is currently ruining the readability of the FFXIV chat on Xbox Series X/S due to censored words.

Read Full Story >>
siliconera.com
Snookies1215d ago

Lol, damn... At this point, they were better off keeping FF XIV away from Xbox. It has been nothing but obstacle, after obstacle.

gold_drake15d ago

wanted to say the exact same thjng.

VenomUK15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

What happens if you say things that used to get you banned on Twitter e.g. 'a man can't be a woman'?

RedDevils14d ago

*insert gift*
"Boys have a penis. Girls have a vagina."

14d ago
DivineHand12515d ago

I'm not convinced this is the profanity filter. It doesn't make sense to censor words like class, harvest and dance. It seems to be a bug.

15d ago
TheGamingHounds14d ago

Well, FF14 itself has some pretty awful chat censoring so Xbox being in the same boat isn't too farfetched

Eidolon14d ago

it censored the S T D in "harvest dance" and I bet the A S S in class. I know this because of Runescape

Aphrodia15d ago

Yeah these new fangled filters are going a bit too far. I have a game that filters "wtf". It's a censor for a self-censoring phrase. But I think overall it's how it should be. If you don't want certain language being used in your game by your player base, then it's up to you to filter/ censor the language you don't want. I can respect that. What I can't respect is when you say things that are not really offensive then you get ostracized for it.

shinoff218315d ago

What happened to just reporting people

NOMATICENIGMA15d ago

This is completely false, I tested this on my son's child account and mine, this is not Microsoft censoring they will censor swears but not the combination of letters I can prove this with a screenshot where I use all mentioned words in the article but do not know how to upload a picture.

NOMATICENIGMA14d ago

You can all continue your bashing, I was wrong someone explained to me this is a new policy, that's why it only happens for me in this brand new release. I'll try latter on ps to confirm but their response seemed informed wich leaves me rather worried for future censorship on my xbox.

CrimsonWing6915d ago

Geezus, Xbox, you get gifted gold and still f*ck things up.

NOMATICENIGMA15d ago

It's not xbox, go ahead start a chat with the youngest person on your friends list then say raid mass class sass said .... they do not censor any of these I even got away with R.Aids. sqaure on the other hand does.

CrimsonWing6915d ago

Does this affect PC and PS4/PS5 users, too? Or is it only happening on Xbox?

Show all comments (31)