600°

Jack Tretton comments on the graphical jump of the PS4 when compared to PS3

Sony’s Jack Tretton has made several comments in regards to the differences between the graphics of the PS3 and PS4.

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
Qrphe3799d ago (Edited 3799d ago )

>"obvious dramatic difference"

No jump will be as big as the 4th to 5th gen jump just merely due to 3D gaming. Regardless, unless this is your first console transition, you should be able to tell right off the bat obvious graphical jumps that will be made even more obvious in the next couple of years.

cleft53798d ago (Edited 3798d ago )

Obvious dramatic difference is more or less PR talk right now. With that said you can tell the difference in how much particle affects are being heavily used without it slowing down the console. Look at Resogun, that game is a technical masterpiece with all of the particle affects firing off constantly at 1080p60fps and no slowdown. Resogun is even impressive when compared to Super Stardust HD and that is no small thing. I am definitely looking forward to games within the next 6 months for PS4 and I am thrill to have my system right now despite it having some hdmi issues.

What is a clear and obvious difference is how much faster the PS4 is than the PS3. I wasn't one of those people that hated the speed on the PS3, but wow is it hard to switch back to PS3 after experiencing the speed of the PS4. Really loving the PS4.

PLASTICA-MAN3798d ago

Just see this to get a proof:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

To be honest I didn't know the jump was SO big, at least with a laucnh title.

Those pics just prove that, and in those pics it really look beyond next next-gen:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

Especially this one, NOTHING comapres to that on ANY PLATFORM:

http://i1.minus.com/iMfsaaS...

This just trumps nan-sayers about next-gen and PS4 not going to look any different. Well, at least,the PS4 got the jump into next-gen rightfully.

Totoro173798d ago

100% agree. Seeing how fast cell phones have evolved, I'm used to multi tasking and need speed. The PS3 did not keep up and it was frustrating pulling up the XMB and waiting for, what seemed like, forever for it to come up.

The PS4 is smooth, simple, clean, fast and powerful. I had to put away Ghosts for the PS3 because those graphics literally made my eyes hurt. I most definitely didn't have that problem with the PS4. Those razor sharp, hi-res graphics are nothing to scoff about and to think these are release titles that are kicking ass.

What surprised me the most is that I'm actually surprised by the quality of these next-gen consoles. I'm a PC gamer (not an elitist or a snob like some of these other jerks) and have been playing games with these caliber graphics for a few years now. But I paid a lot more than $399 for my powerful gaming notebook ($2000, to be exact) and for this little machine to crank out what my notebook does for a fraction of the cost is mighty, mighty impressive.

Xbox One, PS4...I'm excited for both systems. can only imagine how incredible games are going to look in a short time seeing how amazing they already look.

stragomccloud3798d ago

Not so much more obvious. Remember that the reason for the big graphical jumps on a console in the past was the fact that it took a long time for developers to fully familiarize themselves with how to get the most out of the hardware. However, this time around, Sony is going with x86, meaning that developers are already familiar with the architecture. This means that developers can get way more out of the system early in its life, but that also means that there aren't really any secrets to discover, so what we see is what we get.

porkChop3798d ago

That's not true at all. There are still lots of ways to optimize for better graphics, particles, lighting, framerate, etc. x86 makes the console easier to use and easier to develop for, but it doesn't negate optimization in any way.

I usually use the analogy of rocks in a glass versus particles of sand. That's a great way to think of optimization. Now to understand what x86 means for developers, it makes it much easier to get that first batch of rocks in the glass and have the game running smoothly. But developers still have to figure out ways to break those rocks down into sand.

stragomccloud3797d ago (Edited 3797d ago )

I don't mean that there won't be any ways to optimize. What I mean is that we will definitely not see an improvement in fidelity like we did with the evolution of Uncharted to Uncharted 2.

There are no longer any hidden nooks and crannies, since those nooks and crannies of power have been discovered long ago.

And to those who disagreed, you guys are obviously fanboys that don't understand that the reason PS3 games looked so good later in its life was because the Cell architecture was an absolutely convoluted piece of hardware that took developers years to get a hang of.

Qrphe3797d ago

Original Xbox was also x86 based and it saw obvious graphical jumps throughout its lifespan. Ease of development does not null optimization at all.

USA0073798d ago

What about when we make the jump to virtual reality? lol

Jughead34163798d ago (Edited 3798d ago )

After playing through Killzone Shadow Fall's story mode, and compare that to PS3 launch games, I'd say the jump is pretty huge. Is it as dramatic a jump from PS2 to PS3? I'd say so. Just wait til 2015. I think that's when all the cross platform games will cease, and devs will really start to dig in to these machines for real.

FamilyGuy3798d ago

You know what will be cool once that stuff is released?
You'll be able to do things like copy a video to your system from a media server or usb device... in the back ground.

No sitting, waiting for it to transfer before you can do anything else. On top of that, in regards to usb devices the ports are usb 3.0 now so the speed is even more appreciated.

I hope we get all the PS3s media functionality. I want the PS4 to "only do everything" like the PS3s slogan.

Jughead34163798d ago

Yea I can't wait to see what they do with the Gaikai technology. Once you actually get the new console, you almost forget all the features they promised. I think they said we'll get the best of the PS3 games. So, I guess they won't waste their time with games like Duke Nukem. Hope I don't have to pay for them again.

solidboss073798d ago

I think we all want that. But the slogan should maybe be 'PS4, Only does the important things', or 'Only does the good stuff', in a friendly-competitive dig at the competition.

isa_scout3798d ago

I agree. I think people mistakenly compare the PS4 launch games to the later PS3 game like Uncharted and The Last Of Us. The PS3 didn't start of with graphics that good compared to the PS2.
Lair,Heavenly Sword, and Resistance all have horrible graphics compared to the games that are coming out now on the PS3, and I expect the same from the PS4.
If you compare launch games to launch games like Resistance vs Killzone:SF I think it's pretty obvious that there is a huge power difference between the PS3 and the PS4.

JsonHenry3798d ago

Even compared to TLoU the difference is huge. Imagine what they are going to be doing with the new hardware when they release the exclusive games?!

solidboss073798d ago

You are correct, except for Motorstorm which we got at launch here in the U.K. That game was better graphically than any other title at the time, even better than Gears on 360, different types of game I know, but Gears was a benchmark in those early days, and Motorstorm as a launch title impressed.

Welshy3798d ago (Edited 3798d ago )

Woah woah woah!

Don't you say bad against R:FOM, i sunk way too much of my time into that game.

Kids nowadays will never know the joy of holding R2 and asking "anyone got a bluetooth headset? hello? anyone?..." and getting a response!

"OMG! dude! join whisky, join squad whiskey!" and making your very first PSN buddies.

I agree, it looks pretty rough now, but such a great game back in the day =)

Edit: Resistance 3 brought back some of the atmosphere and tone of R:FOM and i enjoyed the hell out of it, but i think the series was kind of lost on people by the time it released =/

UnholyLight3798d ago

@solidboss07

The first time I laid eyes on Motorstorm and played a store demo way back in the day..WOW. I thought it was unreal.

Now I've just completed Killzone SF and I'm like :O Exceeded my expectations graphically by a long shot. Online videos do NOT do this justice at all people ESPECIALLY when you have a good TV to game on with your shiny new PS4 :)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3798d ago
LocutusEstBorg3798d ago

By 2015 we'll feel the graphics are ugly and low res just like how we feel about the PS3 now.

MajorGecko3798d ago

ok we get it the systems a beast now give us the media capability's we had last gen and then flap your gums more

Visiblemarc3798d ago

Another thing people forget is just how long last gen was. It was to a point where our machines could barely run the games. Just the fact that we can best those games and on top of it have 1080p and 60 fps...the shift is huge.

UnholyLight3798d ago

The wait was SOOOOOOO worth it.

Seriously.

Absolutely loving my PS4 aside from the Battlefield 4 problems I'm having :/

Bhai3798d ago

Here it is people, enough said!:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

Dear GOD!!!

mike32UK3798d ago

The blood splatter looks ridiculously good!

Bhai3798d ago

Right man, the ear, the head gear, the real 3D hand wear, the blood splatter... I never thought next-gen would bring THIS much jump over the previous fidelity :O

PLASTICA-MAN3798d ago

Don't forget the enevr seen ray-tracing lighting, also the textures all feel natural unlike in KZ3 where the collar feels like a bendable LCD screen XD.

Morpheuzpr3798d ago

And that's a comparison between one of the best looking games from the previous gen with a launch title from this gen. If we compare lunch vs lunch, it's a wrap.

Soc53798d ago

Hey for lunch I had a wrap!

isa_scout3798d ago

Holy crap thanks for that!!! I've been trying to tallk a friend into buying a PS4, but he said there isn't enough of a graphical jump to upgrade...Gotta show him that comparison for sure. If he doesn't see a sudden and distinct difference between those two images then there is just no hope for the guy.

Show all comments (57)
70°

Former PlayStation boss Jack Tretton talks about backing indies like Blue Isle

From GameIndustry.biz: "When Citadel: Forged With Fire launches this fall, the release of the online sandbox RPG will be a milestone not just for the developer, Toronto-based Blue Isle Studios, but also for Jack Tretton, former CEO of Sony Computer Entertainment America.

Since leaving Sony five years ago, Tretton has turned his eye toward investment in the games industry. He is a strategic partner at Ocean IQ Ventures, as well as a managing partner in Interactive Gaming Ventures, two outfits with a remit to invest in gaming intellectual properties rather than game studios. While IGV has yet to announce the projects it's backing, Ocean IQ invested in three Blue Isle properties back in 2016. Two of those games -- Valley, and Slender: The Arrival -- received Switch ports earlier this year. The last of them is Citadel: Forged With Fire, which debuted in Steam Early Access two years ago this week and is slated for a full release on Steam as well as PlayStation 4 and Xbox One October 11."

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
720°

Ex SCEA Boss: Sony Is Well Positioned for Next-Gen but Will Face Exponentially Greater Competition

Former SCEA boss Jack Tretton said Sony is well position for next-gen as the current market leader but will face much greater competition this time around.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
uptownsoul1795d ago (Edited 1795d ago )

Ex PlayStation America Boss Jack Tretton: "Their [Sony's] business model obviously worked well for them the last time around, and it doesn’t look like they’re going to deviate from that."

(source: https://venturebeat.com/201... - sentence 3 from question 12)

Tech51795d ago (Edited 1795d ago )

the future - pc is going to have a party.
cloud gaming from both sony, MS and youtube/google. Epic game store, Steam. and then 3rd party emulation.

bouzebbal1794d ago

There was zero competition this gen.. Let's hope next gen delivers on this

FalconofLucis981794d ago

I love Jack Tretton, miss the guy. He was a great CEO for Sony. Particularly remember his Sony E3 2013 conference.

indysurfn1793d ago

Did you hear that Stadia? Read between the lines your just a wrinkle! Here let Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft iron you out.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1793d ago
NarutoFox1795d ago (Edited 1795d ago )

They have no competition for first party exclusive games but I can't speak on all the other features yet like cloud gaming. Games make a system shine something Microsoft hasn't learn yet

KwietStorm_BLM1795d ago

Next generation hasn't started yet, so you can't speak on games either. Everyone starts at 0.

milohighclub1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

Kwiet I think he's basing that on the last 2 generations. Halo, gears, forza repeat. For 2!? Yes 2!? Generations. That's what now 13/14 years? That's how long its taken them to realise they actually need games on a games console.
There may be more exclusives next gen but don't expect much more than GAAS.

bluefox7551794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

@Kwiet Historically speaking, he's right, they have never had any real competition. I don't see why that would change now, it might, but doesn't seem likely. Especially with regard to single player AAA titles, which other companies see as less lucrative, and don't even really pursue.

DJStotty1794d ago

@milo

still banging the halo gears forza drum? They have done much more than those 3 ip's but you probably will not attempt to recognise them.

Your comment screams pure fanboyism

We have not had halo for 4 YES 4!!!! years YES YEARS!!!! or gears in 3 YES 3!!!! years yes YEARS!!!

So your rinse and repeat comment is based on the non factual Sony drivel you get drip fed from unconfirmed sources

Kribwalker1794d ago

Nintendo has Sony beat on Highly Rated exclusives the last 2 gens. Funny how everyone always forgets that

Nintentional1794d ago

Nintendo exclusives have always been better than Sony exclusives.

NarutoFox1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

@Kribwalker
Nintendo is not competing with Sony and Microsoft

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1794d ago
codelyoko1795d ago

That's why they partnered with Microsoft to improve PlayStation Now

-Foxtrot1795d ago

Funny seemed like a two way thing, they partnered with each other

Not one sided

ShadowWolf7121795d ago

These dudes like to forget MS is also buying Sony hardware to help improve their Azure servers for gaming and media streaming.

timlot1795d ago

Microsoft is buying Sony camera sensors for ar/vr. They use Nvidia for their server chips.

Obscure_Observer1795d ago

-Foxtrot

"Funny seemed like a two way thing, they partnered with each other"

If Sony plans to use Azure servers to power up PS Now, i think it´s safe to say that this partnership may be a two way thing. But it´s deffinelly critical to Sony.

rainslacker1795d ago

They're using Azure to maybe host PSNow. PSNow runs fun on their current servers though. Maybe it'll get some improvements, but the announcement said they were looking to just adapt PSNow to run on Azure. Nothing about how Azure would make it better. It's not known if this will be Sony moving all their services to PSNow, and it certainly doesn't mean they're moving PSN over to Azure like some have been positing.

Obscure_Observer1794d ago

@rainslacker

Of course Azure will make PS Now better. I´m sure Sony is definelly looking to the same technology behind XCloud, otherwise the partnership with Microsoft wouldn´t make any sense. I mean, why would you run to your main competitor looking for their technology instead Amazon or Google?

You said that yourself, remember? You said Sony were fine with Gaikai and in case they need extra servers they always could resort to Amazon or Google.

You would NEVER guess that Sony would become Microsoft´s partner on this.

I don´t know nothing and didn´t say nothing about PSN running on Azure servers. But i can´t say that i would be surprised if that´s turn out to be the case. I been warning people for some time now, Sony is under new management. Things are supposed to change, some things already changed and will continue to change. Sony´s new CEO has a financial background. Kaz Hirai has a Marketing background. Very different approachs and goals.

Under Kaz Hirai, Sony was more focused on strengened the Playstation brand making it the number one, which he succed. I think under Kenichiro Yoshida, Sony´s main focus will be making more money out the Playstation brand.

Wheter it´s gonna be good or bad for Playstation fans, remains to be seen.

ThinkThink1794d ago

I read MS is using Sony's camera sensors for their a.i initiative. Not gaming related though.

UltraNova1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

Obscure

"Of course Azure will make PS Now better"

How is that, are you from the future? Is Xcloud up and running and objectively better than PS Now at your future timeline?
Smh..

The only REAL Cloud gaming example we currently have from MS(Azure) is Crackdown 3...well yeah. How good will full on game streaming be is another question entirely.

Until Xcloud comes out and outperforms PS Now(or at least, realistically shown) decisively (in performance, cause library-wise it won't) we can talk. And any PS Now to Azure migration wont happen until then. So please stop it, just stop it with the hyperbole.

1794d ago
343_Guilty_Spark1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

And yet all everyone is talking about is "Cloud"

Semiconductors and optic sensors might be okay for Kinect and AR/VR but that's niche stuff. None of Sony stuff will he used for console gaming.

Cloud is where everything is going. Microsoft's Azure Cloud is probably more valuable than all of Sony.

This wasn't a partnership where Microsoft needs Sony. They have much bigger things than video games. But Sony does need Microsoft.

Kribwalker1794d ago

It’s pretty certain that Sony is using Azure for gaming. It was announced by the MS CEO

“Bringing the power of Azure and Azure AI to Sony to deliver new gaming and entertainment experiences for customers”

https://twitter.com/satyana...

And really, do you believe Image Sensors being used for AI makes this a 2 way partnership? lol. Billions upon billions going in to the Azure Cloud, image sensors is not a equal trade lol

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1794d ago
OB1Biker1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

That's not the reason. It's meant to be a long term partnership profiting both companies and.not just gaming related.
Regarding the cloud, I think they are trying to built future gaming solutions together for the next decade.

milohighclub1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

I reckon the partnership will bring "The power of the cloud" to ps games.
Expect there to be an xbox gold subscription required though. XD
They probably will help Improve the streaming of psnow, I mean they need to do something to claw back some $ their R&D department is burning through. Must be gutting, spending all that money on the cloud for it to be tainted by crackdown 3s development and that massive downgrade it received. I mean if they're offering their only ace to the competition, right as we're going into a generation where there's gonna be a massive push on cloud gaming (meaning they would have an advantage over Sony in that area), the brand simply can't be doing well.

I wonder if this partnership will lead to a collaborated studio... could pump out some good stuff. With Sonys talent at recruiting talent and Microsoft's marketing skills they would be nearly unstoppable and I think something like this is needed to counter Google and Amazon's gaming ventures.

THC CELL1794d ago

My god some of you are way too far up Ms arse

It's always been the case
Like Samsung all other phones including apple warriors phones use Sony cams as they are the best cams ever

Most of your games use Ms havok licences or so on

It's deffo a 2 way thing
Are u thick heads too stupid to see sony been using cloud gaming for years now

They own onlive and Gaikai cloud gaming service

Sony dose not need ms they could of gone amazon and or Google

Between em both behind closed doors they are best buds

Ms did not save anyone and sony dose not need saving you read way too deep into bs

UltraNova1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

Amen...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1794d ago
Chris_Wray1795d ago

Naturally, though this seems to be part of the cycle. Not only are Sony going to face increased competition from MS, but Nintendo are in a very strong position. Plus the growth of PC gaming and cloud gaming.

Obscure_Observer1795d ago (Edited 1795d ago )

@Chris_Wray

"Plus the growth of PC gaming and cloud gaming."

Growth of PC gaming? Last time i checked, PC gaming is shrinking. :/

https://h3g7w2e9.stackpathc...

warriorcase1795d ago

That's a graph on revenue share by 25 top companies. If in the top 25 there are Sony and Nintendo first party developers then of course PC will rank low.

You need to look at the larger picture when referencing:
https://www.wepc.com/news/v...

Every market is growing year over year alongside each other with a growing number of people owning Gaming PC's and a console for exclusives.

starchild1795d ago

That's not true. PC gaming as a whole has continued to grow year after year.

Gravesinger_1794d ago

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

BrettAwesome1794d ago

@warriorcase

Wow, that's old. Some of it is based on 2014 numbers. Wanna find some new ones? Some that take into account the fact that ps4 sold 100 million units? I think a whole lot of people decided to go with a console instead of upgrading

warriorcase1794d ago

@BrettAwesome

It refrences plenty from 2014 to 2017. It literally says 2018 on many of the references. I own a gaming pc, ps4 pro and xbox one x and have no favourite.

Fanboys who get upset over some stats and have loyalty to a corporation because it's all you could afford so defend it is just sad. The growth of the industry as a whole is best for everyone.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1794d ago
BrettAwesome1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

@warriocase
Nope. I question your numbers. I have no problem with PC. Plenty of room for both PC and consoles. What? You wanna measure dicks with apple fans too? You know you'll never beat them when it comes to fanboyism, although I have to say you certainly do give them a run for their money. The only one defending anything is you. And you deserve it. You paid good money for bragging rights. Enjoy it! But quit fucking about with obsolete numbers. Some might be correct, others may not. Get back with some real shit, or shut up while the grown folks are talking

warriorcase1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

>"Nope. I question your numbers."

They're not my numbers and question away. It's just a reference which like any could have misinformation

>"Plenty of room for both PC and consoles. What? You wanna measure dicks with apple fans too? You know you'll never beat them when it comes to fanboyism"

That's exactly what I was getting at. There is plenty of room and the industry is growing year after year all around which is great. I think something was lost in translation here because you agree with me and I you.

>"The only one defending anything is you."

Was pointing out that all markets have been growing. Not really a defense

>"And you deserve it. You paid good money for bragging rights. Enjoy it!"

Thanks?

>"But quit fucking about with obsolete numbers."

You do realize that most groups don't do large global market statistics every single year right?
Here's different sources for you if you like.

https://www.statista.com/to...
https://gamegavel.com/gamin...

>"Get back with some real shit"

Not even sure what you're talking about.

You seem a bit upset from your reply. When I referred to fanboys I wasn't even talking about you but other comments on n4g that base their bias around whatever they own. You need to relax with the hostile tough attitude online dude. It's just people talking about video games.

PhoenixUp1795d ago

It’s amazing enough to see PS4 doing on par with PS2 in the same timeframe when PS4 has had far more competition than PS2 did.

PS5 will most likely break the 100 million mark as well

DarXyde1795d ago (Edited 1795d ago )

Sales would need to completely fall off to not reach 100M.

Personally, I am very curious to know how Japan would respond to a "super slim" PS4. I think it would do quite well and push sales for a while in the region.

Of all the consoles I've seen, PS2 slim impressed me the most in terms of form factor and I think that helped it sell so well.

Benjaminkno1795d ago

Ps2 had the gimmick of being a DVD player.
It was cheaper than getting the real thing for awhile. So I think that ps4 sales are actually more impressive.

WickedLester1795d ago

DVD playback wasnt a "gimmick." It was a damn nice built in feature that added a ton of value to the console. Now, motion controls? That was a gimmick!

bluefox7551794d ago

@Wicked Gimmick is the wrong word, I think he was saying the sales numbers are less impressive than PS4's because millions bought a PS2 for non-gaming purposes.

Benjaminkno1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

@WickedLester, @bluefox755
You guys should look up the word gimmick

A gimmick is a feature that has nothing to do with the product’s primary function.

Like a flashlight on a phone or a radio on a watch.
A console is used to play video games.
A web browser, Blu-ray, DVD player, CD player, all of these things are gimmicks on a console.

Perhaps maybe you feel stupid because fanboys love to call Wii a gimmick as it sounds condescending and cheap.
It’s not negative, but fanboys have made it bad word now. 🙄

PhoenixUp1795d ago

@ Dar

I doubt a smaller PS4 on its own would dramatically increase PS4 sales. Not even DQXI had a long lasting effect on PS4 sales in Japan.

Speaking of Japan, it goes to show how more globally successful PS4 is than to PS2 for it to keep up pace despite Japan being a smaller market for stationary consoles. Row markets are making up the difference of that shrinking Japan market.

@ Ben

You really call label features as mere gimmicks?

PS4’s success is indeed far more impressive than PS2’s. PS4 is still in the $300 standard price range going into its sixth year, not as prevelant in the Japanese as PS1 & PS2, not as many AAA third party exclusives as PS2, has far greater competition & no new media format yet its sheer inherent appeal is enough to keep it on the path as one of the fastest selling home consoles to reach 100 million.

IamTylerDurden11795d ago (Edited 1795d ago )

That's every gen, but i agree that technology and popularity have both increased and the gaming landscape is evolving faster than ever. However, Sony has sustained enormous gaming success for a number years and the popularity of the PlayStation brand is at an all-time high. Not only that, but gaming is a larger part of Sony's business model than ever before, by a mile. MS for example makes the vast majority of its profits outside of gaming, but PlayStation is the engine that drives Sony. When Sony restructured back in 2013 they decided that gaming was the lifeblood of the company, they realized that gaming saved the company, and they went all in.

Sony may have more gaming competition than ever, but they are also more committed to gaming than ever. This entire generation has also seen PlayStation dominate the market and build an enormous infrastructure of customers, technology, and successful new IPs. Sony is the only console provider to seriously enter the VR space and for all the talk about being behind in streaming, people forget that Sony was well ahead of its competitors and really ahead of its time with the inception of PSNow. Also, Sony has amassed a ridiculous war chest of successful AAA IP this gen. They already boasted an impressive selection of franchises even prior to 2013, but this generation has added hit after hit franchise to deepen their arsenal further. Bloodborne, Until Dawn, Horizon, Spiderman, and Days Gone are already hit new IPs and new franchises like Ghost of Tsushima, Dreams, and Death Stranding are still to come. Not to mention fantastic reboots of games like R&C and God of War. Great new VR franchises like Astro Bot and Firewall, 3rd party games like Predator.

Sony has more established franchises than ever and they are dominating the console and VR space. PS+ has 40 million subscribers, there are hundreds of millions of active PSN accounts and everything we hear about the PS5's infrastructure and technology is great. It seems to me that Sony is in a better position than ever with PlayStation and i expect the unprecedented success to continue from now through next gen proper.

rainslacker1795d ago

I think Sony is going to be fine, because despite competition, they actually are a leader in the industry, and have a lot of influence in the way things go for the future.

Obscure_Observer1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

@rainslacker

Course Sony will be fine. All that Tretton said is that Microsoft, Nintendo and the new players (Google, Apple, Netflix, etc...) will give Sony a run for its money come next generation.

milohighclub1794d ago

I think one of sonys best traits and what actually sets them apart from their competition is the fact that they listen to their customers and developers they learn from not only their mistakes but the mistakes of their competitors. They understand that their customers want excellent games and lots of them.
You think 90 million users are going to abandon their libraries, trophies etc for a console that has had how many hit games this gen? None? Maybe 1? Barely any are rated higher than days gone and if they are they're the same rehashed games they've had since the OG xbox/x360. Not gonna happen, even if a 3rd jumped ship which is unlikely, they would still have 60 million.

Show all comments (97)
60°

Jack Tretton interview — Why investing in indie game startups is hot again

Jack Tretton used to run Sony's PlayStation business in North America. Now he is investing in small game studios and helping them scale.

Read Full Story >>
venturebeat.com