140°

Respawn Wants Titanfall to Feel Familiar, but “It’s all new”; the World Is “so Much More Open”

During the launch broadcast of the Xbox One yesterday night, Respawn Entertainment co-founder Vince Zampella was asked a few questions about Titanfall, and he shared his vision for the game.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
AngelicIceDiamond3800d ago

Here's hoping it lives up the hype. 100k pre-orders and counting.

Tctczach3800d ago

Can't wait for this game. Should have an Xbox One by then.

Pascalini3800d ago

The game all Sony users want

thorstein3800d ago

Evidence please. I admit (and have admitted) that this is the best game coming to the XOne. I am not a Xbox fan, and I won't be buying one. I wanted this game on the PS4 and am glad to hear that future titles will come to the PS4.

However, I own a PC also and will be playing the hell out of it on there.

What is wrong with wanting good games, BTW? I like Fable and Halo and Dead Rising. What, I can't want them?

And what, you can't admit to wanting SONY exclusives like the Last of Us or Uncharted?

NihonjinChick3800d ago

I'm sure a lot of them will be enjoying it on a PC if they have one.

porkChop3800d ago

PC and 360 say hi. You don't need an Xbox One to play Titanfall.

supraking9513800d ago

meh, so its CoD in a Battlefield setting. Respawn saying "familiar" means CoD

spicelicka3800d ago

*facepalm*

what must they do to differentiate it from COD? They added freakin mechs, added parkour-like traversing, added vertical gameplay, hijacking, mech on mech fighting. Yes the shooting style reminds you of COD (and i hate cod) but it's totally something new.

Does it have to turn into super mario to look different from COD? Before you say shit like that, give a good example of what you want them to do to differentiate it.

Every other freakin FPS looks like COD then by your logic.

370°

That day when Activision fired Jason and Vince

“Jason and Vince just got fired!” A lead artist shouted, as he rode in on one of the many small kick-push scooters that would typically lay around the studio. He quickly scooted away to some other part of the office space to spread that shocking message.

Read Full Story >>
linkedin.com
DaniMacYo71d ago

Activision would say that to all their victims. Here’s money now get over it.

RhinoGamer8871d ago

A friend worked there in production and was miserable due to working with IW and with ATVI. When he complained to his VP about it, he was told...be glad you have a job and are making games.

mastershredder71d ago

Sounds about right, but is also sounds like something Infinity Ward would say. They made their own bed and cashed in hard to do it. F em.

franwex71d ago

That sucks, but that’s corporate America. I mean, they could’ve turned down the money and leave to Respawn too. At least they got something, my corporation would’ve probably expected everyone to go back to normal.

gold_drake71d ago (Edited 71d ago )

daaaym

"oh we're running ur life? pff get over it, like honestly"

scum

theindiearmy71d ago

I mean, if my company wants to give me a bonus and raise my salary by 50%, I'd get over whatever the hell they wanted me to. 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (16)
120°

Respawn Boss Confirms "Other" Star Wars Project in Development at EA

It seems there might be more Star Wars stuff on the way from Respawn's parent company EA according to Respawn boss Vince Zampella.

masterfox356d ago

we need this Star Wars UNcharted type of game:

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

This looks way more impressive than Survivor imo, and is from 2012 I think!!

IamTylerDurden1356d ago (Edited 356d ago )

1313 was going to be tough. Savage cancellation by Disney. Jedi FO/S was imo built off the carcus of 1313 but 1313 to me looked and sounded more compelling for its time. How about a Bioware Star Wars? Please?

-Foxtrot356d ago

I don’t think I could trust the Bioware of today with Star Wars

It already makes me nervous with Ubisoft doing an open world SW game

I honestly can’t even which multi platform developer could do SW justice outside of Respawn.

IamTylerDurden1356d ago (Edited 356d ago )

Ofc there's more, it's Disney, they will milk until it's powder. We know Quantic has a game, KOTOR should still be a thing. Jedi and other EA games, VR, etc. I'm all for more but we knew Disney would bleed it dry. I just hope for more SP and RPG as opposed to mp.

excaliburps355d ago

What if it’s a Star Wars MP game to replace Battlefront?

Majin-vegeta356d ago

Jedi power battles game again?

RaidenBlack355d ago

The Star Wars Respawn FPS, right?

senorfartcushion355d ago (Edited 355d ago )

Mobile games and GOAS games?

Xdefiant but with Star Wars probably

Show all comments (9)
190°

Respawn Boss Vince Zampella Admits Battlefield 2042 "Strayed Too Far From What Battlefield Is"

Respawn Entertainment -- and head of the entire Battlefield franchise -- Vince Zampella -- thinks Battlefield 2042 strayed too far from the franchise.

_SilverHawk_579d ago

All they needed to do was make a better bf4 game with a different story and better online multiplayer

porkChop579d ago

Agreed. Though BF4 was similarly broken at launch, along with every BF game since then. I think DICE needs to either take more time or reign in the scope of what they do. If they consistently can't release a working game it's because they're building games they know they don't have enough time to finish.

RaidenBlack579d ago

Or make Bad Company 3.
They've already assigned Ridgeline Games developing the next BF campaign.
Let DiCE and Ripple Effect handle the multiplayer side of things.
And release it not before 2025 and focus on current-gen platforms from ground up.

LordoftheCritics579d ago

But if they make BC3 what will happen to Battlepass 6?

Concertoine578d ago

The problem is current gen is growing too slowly because of supply that could get worse.

excaliburps579d ago

Yes. For multiplayer, all we wanted was better graphics, more maps, more destruction, more class items, etc.
DICE kept pushing for what they wanted and not what gamers wanted.

awiseman578d ago

Dice, is just another word for EA.

KyRo579d ago

If I remember reading correctly Vince made Devs go back and play older BF titles after the mess of BF2042 to understand what it was what made BF special.

I also remember reading that a lot of Devs that made the classic BF games were put on BF Portal duties which for me is baffling.

Vince has a good track record of changing things for the better so whilst BF2042 was a average game, I'm optimistic for the next installment.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 578d ago
Sciurus_vulgaris579d ago

Ever since Battlefield 1 the Battlefield franchise has gotten less-and-less immersive. The combination of historical inaccuracy [when set in an historical setting] and imbalanced classes is what drove me away from the series. I however, didn’t start playing battlefield until battlefield 4, so I can’t speak for long-term fans of series.

Pyrofire95579d ago

Unless they went really wild with it's inaccuracy, I doubt many people care about some inaccuracies as long as it captures an idea of WW1 and it's fun.

awiseman578d ago

It's basically grounded fortnight. That's not excusable.

Pyrofire95579d ago

Was Levelution not well liked?
I only started playing BF games last year and really like the BF4 stuff. I don't know why they haven't done that again. (aside from the massive amount of work that must take to make a level with evolution.)

Yi-Long578d ago

It kinda depended on the map and how the ‘levelution’ affected it. If you’re an assault type that ran/drove to every flag, I don’t think it made a whole lot of difference on how it affected your match, but if you’re playing as a sniper or are mostly in a boat, and ‘suddenly’ there’s a huge storm, you’d lose your long-range targets and ‘boating’ was more difficult.

I think for most players, some of the stuff was cool the first few times, and after that it was a ‘shrugs’ moment. Siege of Shanghai was probably the best map, in that the tower is pretty much the heart of that map, and flattening the tower made that flag far more vulnerable to take-overs.

Yi-Long578d ago

As we’ve been saying for years; All Battlefield needs to do/be, is be a Battlefield game. That’s it. That’s all.

It doesn’t need to copy all kinds of features from other games. It doesn’t need legends, or heroes, or battle royale, or whatever. Just 10-12 cool gorgeous fun maps, 32 vs 32 players, 5/6 flag conquest. That’s it. 4 classes, good balance between solo-play & squad-play. Good balance between vehicles & infantry gameplay.

A good Battlefield match is short but sweet (20-30 minutes), and ensures that YOU -can- make a difference, regardless of your individual play-style. That’s what made it special. If you’re on a ridiculously huge map with insane amounts of other players, you’re not really going to feel you’re making a significant contribution. Not to mention when half the folks on the map are bots, of course.

Show all comments (27)