250°

Microsoft Working on AAA Free to Play Game Based on Established and Successful IP

Microsoft Game Studios recently posted a career opportunity ad that sheds some light on a project that definitely sounds interesting, describing an AAA Free to Play Game Based on an Established and Successful IP.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
Kingthrash3603810d ago (Edited 3810d ago )

awwww man like they did ki?
i mean ki is awsome but imo would be better as a full priced game...with f2p most games will be jago vs. jago.

Abriael3810d ago

It seems pretty much like that, yes.

ShinMaster3810d ago

"Based on Established and Successful IP"

They only have 1.
Halo F2P game confirmed.

MidnytRain3810d ago

And they said they were bringing more "exclusives" to PC. Hmm...

Red3810d ago

Free to play-lo........no? I'll see myself out.

Fireseed3810d ago

And if you want another character just pick one up...

Kingthrash3603810d ago

i would but many wont so online will be full of jago's is my point..just wish it was a full priced game it should have been. its a very iconic game.

malokevi3810d ago

Who cares? Lol. I'll be spending 20 bucks on day 1, and so will many others.

Can't for the life of me understand why this matters so much to some people.

Fireseed3810d ago

@Kingthrash360

So what if others don't? If you buy yourself the characters, you'll have others to choose from. Not like you had any influence over what others played against you before. Besides what's the difference between releasing the 8 done characters now, and waiting until more are done and releasing them then?

Revolt133810d ago

Isn't there only 8 characters anyway? Free to play is fine for me

mydyingparadiselost3810d ago

8 characters now, 8 more later.

mhunterjr3810d ago

I doubt it. If people like the game, they'll pay the 20 bucks and get the other characters.

OT: the game isn't free to play. There's a demo with just Jago Or you can buy characters. If you choose to buy characters separately, the moment you spend $20, the rest of the cast unlocks.

Also, the demo character changes every few weeks. To start its Jago, but a few weeks later it will be someone else...

ma1asiah3810d ago

@ Kingthrash360

I can't speak for anybody else, but I am getting the full package day one, so no I personally will not be rolling with Jargo.....though once Spinal is released well more than likely I'll stick with him majority of the time.

I don't think FTP is a bad thing it just depends on how they roll it out...Look at Project Spark or World of Tanks.

Kingthrash3603810d ago

yeah true most would pay the $20 for the game...i wonder tho...if it was 59.99 dollas would there be more characters...i say they should have went all out on ki had a 20 ch roster at launch. it woulda had more hype and excitement that way.

UnHoly_One3810d ago

I agree with you. I hate free 2 play.

Look at it this way, though. You'll get really good at fighting against Jago. lol

Mystogan3810d ago

KI is not F2P. They said so themselves. Its more like a really awesome demo.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3810d ago
nyobzoo3810d ago

yea, this was my guess also

darren_poolies3810d ago

I would actually buy an Xbox One for that. The original Crackdown was absolutely brilliant.

BlackTar1873810d ago

But #2 was one of the worst games made last gen.

I believe it was made by a different studio.

darren_poolies3809d ago

@BlackTar187

Hence why I said the original Crackdown :P

JasonKCK3810d ago

Crackdown seems likely, hope it comes to PC.

ATiElite3810d ago (Edited 3810d ago )

@ Sarobi

Wow you have the very Best guess!

Too bad Microsoft is NOT as smart as you LOL!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3809d ago
DCfan3810d ago

Would still need to pay for gold to play the game lol

ma1asiah3810d ago

That depends Project Spark for one does not require a Gold subscription.

The people behind World of Tanks are also still in discussions with MS in respect of their game not requiring GOLD, I am sure Bethesda with Elders Scrolls Online though not an FTP is also trying to get MS to drop Gold being a requirement as well.

So at this stage it is more or less a wait and see.

FAT MAN GO BOOM3810d ago

Wow this just means there are going to take a good series and turn it into a Sh*T Pay to Win cash cow...

ripping off gamers as much as possible by paying 3 or 4 times the for items that would be in a base 60 dollar game....

Thanks MS for wrecking another game... Killer instincts was not enough eh

Gazondaily3810d ago

Because Killer Instinct was wrecked right? /s

Fireseed3810d ago

Guessing you're one of those people who claims KI has been ruined yet hasn't played it yet... Cause no one I know of has put their hands on it has been able to whole heartedly say it's bad.

Plus if they follow a similar suit to League of Legends what's to hate?

FAT MAN GO BOOM3810d ago

When you get only One Character and shave to pay 5 bucks for each other character and for different looks and outfits and different weapons...

YES KI is Broken before it is even released. why because for 60 bucks everyone would have been on an even keel.

Instead o f getting to unlock and work at getting better at the game to gain access to all these unlocks..

the majority of the will be behind a pay wall... that will add up way way way more then 60 bucks....

Only ass hats think this is a good model for what was an excellent game.

Now if Halo goes down this path.. WOW... Well the young kiddies like free to play...

Only reason they are taking an established series to make a game is because most gamers hate F2P or pay to win. And new IP in F2P has very little chance of success sure one or two may be a hit but for the most part f2p games are not worth anything and fail as games...

Fireseed3810d ago

Your logic is severely flawed my friend. What significant advantage is gained from waiting till they developed enough characters for a 60$ package as compared to releasing the 8 characters now for 20$? Hint, their is none.

Not only that but this game is most assuredly not "pay to win" If I'm good with Glacius, and I buy Glacius and ONLY Glacius I will still destroy you even if you bought the entire cast. The costume and "weapon" (cosmetic only) unlocks cost in game money that can only be earned by playing the game and winning fights.

Sure over the time the game may in total cost over 60$ but if we keep getting more content for that money, then who could honestly complain? 20$ for 8 characters in S1, 20$ for 8 characters in S2, etc, etc. Sure it'll add up... but I'd rather my money go towards giving me more of something I love than trying to find a new game with that money.

Show all comments (55)
170°

Marvel: Ultimate Alliance Has Appeared On The Xbox Store

Activision and Raven Software's 2006 action role-playing game, Marvel: Ultimate Alliance, has found its way to the Xbox Store.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
LG_Fox_Brazil6h ago

Used to love this one, but X-Men Legends 1 and 2 will always be my favorites, especially Rise of Apocalypse. Would pay some good money to play it today with online multiplayer, back then I had no way to get a modem

ZeekQuattro6h ago

I remember buying them dirt cheap on the PS4 and then a few days later I read they were delisted. I was wondering why the bundle was price so low and got my answer when that happened.

Knightofelemia4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Sad to say this is one game franchise next to the Xmen that needs a sequel. I use to play the hell out of Xmen Legends and Marvel Ultimate Alliance. Was great when my cousin had the OG Xbox play with four other people and then playing online. Great games glad to see it reappear even though I own the discs love the mechanics of this game.

Terry_B3h ago

It got a sequel..but for dumbass #reasons as a switch exclusive.

shinoff21833h ago

It looked so horrible to. They should've kept it similar to the first two.

Asplundh3h ago

Because Nintendo funded it, they did the same for Bayonetta.

Knightofelemia3h ago

I totally forgot about the Switch sequel.

jukins3h ago

Misleading. This page is whats available for people who owned the game prior to delisting.

Abnor_Mal3h ago

The first game was the best imo.

150°

Hades 2 Is Already Fixing The First Game's Biggest Problems

Ben Sledge from TheGamer Writes "I’m already impressed with Supergiant’s commitment to improving body diversity in the Hades 2 technical test."

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Nacho_Z7h ago

There's a reason they're called 'gods' and not 'regular people'. It's nice they've diversified even more but gods looking godly wasn't exactly a glaring issue with the first game.

Juancho517h ago

Hey! Gods suffer from obesity and diabetes too!

Blastoise7h ago

This is the dumbest article I've read in a long time.

Michiel19896h ago

No one had an issue with that besides a very select group of people that try to push their own agenda.

Crows905h ago

Exactly. Not even sure they're necessarily committing to body diversity either.

The designs look fine not stupid.

Inverno5h ago

The writer of the this article clearly doesn't know what a real god looks like and has never seen them /s

Tody_ZA4h ago

Thanks for bringing up a bunch of garbage thoughts that never crossed my mind when playing the first game because I was too busy playing the game to worry about the portrayal of the physical bodies of gods.

Foolish me, when I read the title I thought we were talking about game mechanics.

Piss off, honestly, with this asinine bottom of the barrel try-hard-to-be-relevant trash.

Show all comments (9)
80°

Fallout 76 needs Ghoulification to make Appalachia more interesting

Players are taking to Reddit to let Bethesda know they want ghoulification added to Fallout 76 in a future update.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com