220°

Are Valve and AMD about to ruin PC gaming?

Cyril Kowaliski: When the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One were announced earlier this year, I saw it as a victory for the PC.

Soon, it seemed, bringing major blockbusters to the PC would be easier than ever. There would be three major gaming platforms—the PlayStation 4, the Xbox One, and the Windows PC—and each one would be only a slight twist on the same basic formula. Each one would feature an x86 processor, a DirectX 11 graphics chip, and its own, custom-tailored operating system. How could it get any simpler?

Read Full Story >>
techreport.com
Gozer3843d ago

I can see why the author is concerned. Its hard enough using a pc to game without Steambox and Mantle being in the picture. The guy is right, now that SteamOs and Mantle exist its going to fragment the pc market. Its going to stretch 3rd party devs thin trying to code for pc, mantle, consoles and SteamOs. We certainly might see a migration of pc gamers to consoles.

Pandamobile3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

"We certainly might see a migration of pc gamers to consoles."

Hell no. I know more people switching to PC gaming right now than vice versa. Everyone is playing League of Legends or DOTA2 or TF2 or Guildwars to an extent. I doubt people will abandon those things.

Pandamobile3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

(accidentally responded to my own comment, please ignore)

Harpers_Ferry3843d ago

Well, to be fair to Gozer's comment, the change would be a result of negative effects to the PC market through these various sources, so it would be a ways off if it were to occur. Sort of a worst case scenario.

If nothing else, these issues could potentially cause a rift in the PC gaming market, which is certainly nothing any of us wants.

MadLad3843d ago

I have seen a shift to PC gaming among my friends. We're all in our early to mid-twenties and it seems like it's just the shift people are making.
That's from personal experience, anyway.
That said, having a friend make the shift certainly would have an impact on others and make it more appealing to make such a shift as well.

Studio-YaMi3843d ago

I'm not switching,though I am building a Beasty Rig with the help of ATi_Elite.

But PS4 is still gonna be my main console for it's great exclusive IPs.

For my multiplatform games,nothing can beat a duel GTX 780 in SLI.

Gonna be enjoying my 5 years of eye-candy glory on my new rig.

THANKS ATi_Elite !

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3843d ago
Funantic13843d ago

This is the first time that I've ever thought about going to PC.

BattleAxe3843d ago

I have become a PC gamer over the past few years. I still have my PS3 and PSP, and I'll probably get a PS Vita at some point, but the PC is where it's at as far as I'm concerned.

Pandamobile3843d ago

Exactly. Everyone still has consoles, but most of my friends have slowly been moving towards PC as their main gaming platform.

BattleAxe3843d ago

It just makes so much sense to go down the PC road. You can't beat the price for games on PC, you'll always have backwards compatibility, graphics are more detailed and you can choose to use whatever input devices you prefer whether it be an Xbox 360 controller, PS4 controller, Logitech controller or any number of mouse and keyboard configurations.

And more to the point of the article, I love what Valve is doing for PC gaming. Microsoft has had a monopoly on PC gaming with their Windows platform, and so I fail to see how giving developers and gamers more choice is a bad thing...

SniperControl3843d ago

Much of my gaming is done on PC, exclusives to Sony and MS i play on console, simple as.

ATi_Elite3843d ago

Things will not get complicated but only SIMPLER.

Make games for consoles. XB1 is DX11 so that's an easy port to PC. Actually make the game PC first then port down and everyone wins.

then be able to make games for SteamOS and have them run really great.

Most PC Gamers have multiple OS so it's NO BIG DEAL. I got 4 on one PC and 2 on my other one.

I like the idea of Mantle and SteamOS. looks like PC Gamers will have options to game without Windows and DirectX.

and if the Performance gains are a really big jump then PC gamers will surely have no problem switching or having both.

I see this as PC Gaming getting away from Microsoft's Death grip and also HOPEFULLY as a sign that Ray Tracing is closer due to Low Level GPU Api's like Mantle.

Gonna need all the juice possible to run Ray Traced games.

WarThunder3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

Yea!

Mantle will help developers, develop their games directly on the graphic card and much more optimization than before.

Windows Directx is crap.
OpenGL gives you direct access to all new graphics features on all platforms, while DirectX only provides occasional snapshots of them on their newest versions of Windows. The tesselation technology that Microsoft is heavily promoting for DirectX 11 has been an OpenGL extension for three years. It has even been possible for years before that, using fast instancing and vertex-texture-fetch. I don't know what new technologies will be exposed in the next couple years, I know they will be available first in OpenGL.

We need competition and freedom to drive down prices and drive up quality. A Microsoft monopoly on gaming would be very bad for both gamers and game developers.

In general MS monopoly is bad for gaming. Im really glad Valve and AMD are switching to linux with OpenGL and CL.

The guy who made the article doesn't know what his talking about.

Thanks to AMD we can built a $400-500 inexpensive PCs for good performance.

RickHiggity3843d ago

It's still entirely up to the devs if they want to use any of these things. EAs Origin and Ubisofts Uplay should be evidence enough. Mantle is just a nice little tool for PC devs to use if they choose. If anything, people will just convert to an AMD card or vice versa. How in fuck would it make sense to switch to a console?

Spinal3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

Loool PC gamers will not be switching to console only gaming lool. Most PC gamers will also own a console anyway. I plan to get a PS4 but my PC is my main platform an the ps4 is for the sony exclusives.

It's true what Panda said I got a few friends that switched to PC gaming for football manager and have invested in steam sales now seeing loads of them with dishonored, bioshock infinite, dark souls. Battlefield 4 is grabbing many for the PC experience.

As for Steam machines they will go the route of Ouya. Mark those words.

BenRage33843d ago

Wow, you are really locking yourself into that position. I'm not disagreeing with you, but I do have a question for you.

What if the Steam machines are heavily promoted? Like as heavily promoted as the consoles (TV commercials, internet etc), in addition to them being sold at gamestop? If that were to happen I find it hard to believe it won't be more successful than Ouya only because it will have some things the Ouya does not like a huge library of amazing games.

I'm not making any predictions, but what are your thoughts on that hypothetical scenario?

Spinal3842d ago

@Ben

It would also depend on the price of said Steam Machines, if they matched console prices or are cheaper than they would do better than the Ouya but they most definitely will not compete with the consoles which have Brand recognition.

Who outside of the hardcore gamers know Valve? or even know what Steam is? Ask a non gamer about Nintendo, Playstation or xbox and they'll tell you exactly what it is.

Brand recognition is important, when you think games you think those 3 and thats whats going to hinder steam machine sales.

To be fair Steam Machine has the potential to do better than Ouya cause who wanted Android games on a TV? lol seriously. Steam has a great library but most PC gamers wont buy a steam machine cause they would already have a PC to run those games. And most console gamers will already have the PS4/Xbone/Wii U so the chances of Steam machines selling well are slim to none.

But yes Steam machines will do better than Ouya but thats not saying much.

SignifiedSix913843d ago

Lol, the PC market has been fragmented with hundreds of GPU's.
No difference here.

wheresmymonkey3843d ago

How? Steam OS is free. If you own a PC you can simply install it, i could see a lot of PC gamers moving to it or at least dual booting and i could see plenty of devs moving away from windows towards it because it lets them get a lot more out of then hardware.

IF anything its just going to continue to give PCs a huge edge over console gaming.

steve30x3843d ago

Until the day that console game developers allow keyboard and mouse control I will keep doing most of my gaming on my PC.I find using a game controller in games as precise as shooting blind

Alexious3843d ago

I agree about the first part, but that doesn't necessarily mean we'll see a migration to consoles.

allgamespc20123843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

i can see the concern, but i dont see PC gamers switching over to steambox when steam pc offers the same benefits.

i rather consoles take over than that bullshit people call part of gaming, aka, mobiles.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3842d ago
shivvy243843d ago

I honestly dont see the point on steam machines, just buy the same parts and build a pc ! I reckon valve should have made something like the vitaTV so just stream pc games to tv and have it bundled with that new controller

Deadpoolio3843d ago

VitaTV isn't streaming vita games to a TV....At all.....It's a vita system without a screen that connects to your television...It's that EXACTLY not a streaming device not a OUYA like device...It's exactly a Vita that uses your Tv as the screen.....

BattleAxe3843d ago (Edited 3843d ago )

True, and the only things that it will stream are Netflix and maybe GaiKai if Sony releases it on the Vita.

Agent-863843d ago

I thought the VitaTV plays Vita games directly and is also a streaming device for apps like Netflix and Hulu Plus. I also believe that it'll stream PS3 games and, in the near future, PS4 games as well.

Obamanationn3843d ago

Destroy to rebuild it ! down w/ DX/M$ up with Mantle/Linux

BG115793843d ago

The certain thing is that developpers will develop games to the plateforms that bring them most money.
Seing that most of multi plateform games actually are first released in console plateforms before PC is scary. But worse than that, is seing games being released into tablets/smartphones intead of consoles and PC is even more scarier.
I believe that valve and AMD's actions are correct. If PC gaming does not change or evolve from this stagnade position they, the futur of PC will not be bright.

_LarZen_3843d ago

I do not think it will ruin PC gaming. Especially since it's still a PC one are playing on.

It will open up the world of PC gaming to a allot more people. Personally I would buy a new cabinet and move my hardware over to a living-room friendly cabinet and play games with Steam OS and their new controller where I could.

And a mouse & keyboard on games I would prefer that.

I use my PC only for gaming. I have other devices to comment and read sites like this.

Show all comments (30)
100°

Make your next GPU upgrade AMD as these latest-gen Radeon cards receive a special promotion

AMD has long been the best value option if you're looking for a new GPU. Now even their latest Radeon RX 7000 series is getting cheaper.

Father__Merrin1d 3h ago

Best for the money is the Arc cards

just_looken1d 1h ago

In the past yes but last gen amd has gotten cheaper and there new cards are on the horizon making 6k even cheaper.

The arc cards are no longer made by intel but asus/asrock has some the next line battlemage is coming out prices tbd.

Do to the longer software development its always best to go amd over intel if its not to much more money even though intel is a strong gpu i own 2/4 card versions.

270°

AMD FSR 3.1 Announced at GDC 2024, FSR 3 Available and Upcoming in 40 Games

Last September, we unleashed AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3)1 on the gaming world, delivering massive FPS improvements in supported games.

Read Full Story >>
community.amd.com
Eonjay32d ago (Edited 31d ago )

So to put 2 and 2 together... FSR 3.1 is releasing later this year and the launch game to support it is Rachet and Clank: Rift Apart. In Sony's DevNet documentation it shows Rachet and Clank: Rift Apart as the example for PSSR. PS5 Pro also launches later this year... but there is something else coming too: AMD RDNA 4 Cards (The very same technology thats in the Pro). So, PSSR is either FSR 3.1 or its a direct collaboration with AMD for that builds on FSR 3.1. Somehow they are related. I think PSSR is FSR 3.1 with the bonus of AI... now lets see if RDNA 4 cards also include an AI block.

More details:
FSR 3.1 fixes Frame Generation
If you have a 30 series RTX card you can now use DLSS3 with FSR Frame Generation (No 40 Series required!)
Its Available on all Cards (we assume it will come to console)
Fixes Temporal stability

MrDead31d ago

I've been using a mod that allows dlss frame gen on my 3080 it works on all rtx series. It'll be good not to rely on mods for the future.

darksky30d ago

The mods avaiable are actually using FSR3 frame gen but with DLSS or FSR2 upscaling.

Babadook730d ago (Edited 30d ago )

I think that the leaks about the 5 Pro would debunk the notion that the two (FSR 3.1 and PSSR) are the same technology. PSSR is a Sony technology.

MrDead31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

I wonder how much they fixed the ghosting in dark areas as Nvidia are leaving them in the dust with image quality. Still good that they are improving in big leaps, I'll have to see when the RTX5000 series is released who I go with... at the moment the RTX5000's are sounding like monsters.

just_looken31d ago

Did you see the dell leaks were they are trying to cool cards using over 1k watts of power.

We are going to need 220 lines for next gen pcs lol

MrDead31d ago

That's crazy! Sounds like heating my house won't be a problem next winter.

porkChop30d ago

As much as I hate supporting Nvidia, AMD just doesn't even try to compete. Their whole business model is to beat Nvidia purely on price. But I'd rather pay for better performance and better features. AMD also doesn't even try to innovate. They just follow Nvidia's lead and make their own version of whatever Nvidia is doing. But they're always 1 or 2 generations behind when it comes to those software/driver innovations, so Nvidia is always miles ahead in quality and performance.

MrDead30d ago

I do a lot of work on photoshop so an Intel Nvidia set up has been the got to because of performance edge, more expensive but far more stable too. Intel also have the edge over AMD processors with better load distribution on the cores, less spikes and jitters. When you're working large format you don't want lag or spikes when you're editing or drawing.

I do think AMD has improved massively though and whist I don't think they threaten Nvidia on the tech side they do make very well priced cards and processors for the power. I'm probably going with a 5080 or 5090 but AMD will get a little side look from me, which is a first in a long time... but like you said they are a generation or two behind at the moment.

Goosejuice30d ago

While I can't argue for amd gpu, they aren't bad but they aren't great either. The cpu for amd have great. I would argue the 7800x3d as one of the best cpu for gaming right now. Idk about editing so I take ur word for that but gaming amd cpu is a great option these days.

porkChop29d ago

@Goosejuice

I have a 7800X3D. It certainly is great for gaming. Though for video editing, rendering, etc, I think Intel have the advantage from what I remember. I just mean from a GPU standpoint I can't support them.

70°

AMD storm Nvidia's Super launch party with temporary price cut to RX 7900 XT

Now that the RTX 4070 Super has launched, AMD have chopped the price of the RX 7900 XT to new lows.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com