410°

Crytek Details Ryse Graphics: Full Real Time Lighting, Advanced Level of Details, Praises Xbox One

Interesting new details for Ryse Son of Rome.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
ZodTheRipper3855d ago ShowReplies(4)
TrevorPhillips3855d ago

It's the next generation we're talking about, we expect 1080p, no excuses.

360ICE3855d ago

You're in for years of disappointment, buddy.

iamnsuperman3855d ago

Exactly. It is just the nature of the beast. A lot of developers think 720 is fine and up scale their games. Same with 30fps. We are going to have another generation of this but it does mean other aspects can be pushed like physics, texture and lighting effects

3855d ago
JimmyLmao3855d ago ShowReplies(2)
CrossingEden3855d ago

You're gonna be pretty disappointed over the next few years. Hope you aren't expecting 60fps for every game.

jeffgoldwin3855d ago

PC gaming is already at 2500x1600. Sad that next-gen consoles will struggle to reach 1080p for a few years (if even then).

At least we will finally be using dx11, pc cpu, and a lot of ram, so there's that.

Sweep143855d ago

PC Gaming is not at 2500x1600 on a 399$ machine...

jeffgoldwin3855d ago (Edited 3855d ago )

"PC Gaming is not at 2500x1600 on a 399$ machine..."

Ya I agree with that. If your on a budget, consoles are a very good value + depending and what your friends are playing on, can have a lot of social value too. However your still paying more for games & that $50-60 annual fee to play online.

I just didn't feel like making an all inclusive list of all the pros and cons.

deecee333855d ago (Edited 3855d ago )

"PC Gaming is not at 2500x1600 on a 399$ machine..."

I have both a PS3 and a gaming PC that runs BF3 at 1080p60 with almost everything maxed, and that's with the framerate capped at 60 to prevent tearing- without the cap it runs at ~100fps. It cost $600, which is about what most people will be spending at launch for their PS4/XB1 including games and accessories.

People need to stop implying that PC gaming is some unreachably expensive plateau for a decent experience. You can build a machine that will easily match and exceed next gen consoles in terms of smooth graphical performance for only a little more. And I'm no PC fanboy- I'm also getting a console like most of you are. Let's just be realistic here.

3855d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3855d ago
black0o3855d ago ShowReplies(3)
RytGear3855d ago ShowReplies(1)
Ohlmay3855d ago

My only guess for why Ryse is 900p is the Xbox One graphics drivers are out-dated and terrible and any PC gamer knows drivers can make a big difference, but this is just an assumption, could easily just be weak hardware. *Greatness Awaits*

BG115793855d ago

I kind of tired earring "The One Graphics are outdated". Didn't MS made a DirectX 11.1.2 exclusively to handle the console? So, is the Direct 11.1.2 already outdated or it is just that Microsoft is incompetent when making software?

Ohlmay3855d ago

Direct X 11.2 is looking great, but I've been hearing reports developers are having issues with the Xbox One drivers, my best guess is that's the issue.

BallsEye3854d ago

@Ohlmay

You have been reading too many false rumors on n4g. None of these driver issues are confirmed. 90% of articles here are submitted by sony fanboys and all the sourcer are the same - a friend of a friend who got connections to someone that has a friend who is a developer told me bla bla bla. If XO have driver issues and ps4 is so easy to develop and 50% more powerful why games keep on getting downgraded on ps4 and recent builds just look awful in comparison? Deep down, killzone, driveclub (don't make me post screens from newest builds of direct feed...)That 50% and super drivers must be really well hidden inside of that small box. All we can do is wait till november and see some real comparisons.

Show all comments (96)
110°

15 Best Ancient Rome Games of All Time

From underrated Xbox One launch titles to absolute emperors of the strategy genre, history heads will love these games based around Ancient Rome.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Leeroyw363d ago (Edited 363d ago )

There's fifteen ancient Rome games?

LG_Fox_Brazil363d ago

Shadow of Rome was so freaking good

Sashamaz363d ago

I'm still waiting for the sequel.

HyperMoused363d ago

Ryse was awesome, i have no idea why it wasnt recieved well and why we havnt seen another, Rome conquered so much, you could take the action anywhere, and it looked great when xbox one came out, now would be even better.

200°

Ryse: Son of Rome Deserves a Second Shot

Ryse: Son of Rome was an Xbox One launch title that has been left to collect dust, but Crytek should set aside Crysis and give Ryse another shot.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
AngainorG7X618d ago

It was a great game, it had issues but it can only go up from here.

crazyCoconuts618d ago

It was just ok. Looked really good for an Xbox game though

Snookies12618d ago

"for an Xbox game"

Way to subtly throw shade there. It looked amazing compared to any game at the time it was released.

Never played it myself though, wasn't really interested in it personally. Plus it came at a time when I didn't own an Xbox console. But it was at least different than the usual copy/paste games we get. So I hope it gets another chance sometime soon.

Crows90618d ago

It was a crytek game though

1nsomniac618d ago (Edited 618d ago )

It was a stunning game on all basis. One of the standout games for Xbox as a whole. I ended up buying on pc as well… and yes nothing looked better than it in PC at the time either. Nothing just ok about it, definitely needs a sequel.

fr0sty618d ago

@snookies12, don't pretend like the Xbox One didn't struggle with being gimpled by its tiny pool of ESRAM as a frame buffer. It was significantly weaker than the PS4.

crazyCoconuts618d ago

Metacritic 60, user score 6.4. I'm not alone in putting it into the "ok" category...

VenomCarnage89617d ago

@snookies
Haven't played it but at least you know enough to defend Xbox over it. The game did look good, for an Xbox game. That's not some "subtle shade," it's full on reality.
I remember it being nearly the only graphically decent game on the Xbone for like the first two years after launch, and graphics were that games strength

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 617d ago
CrimsonWing69618d ago

I really enjoyed it. Bought it at launch even.

ManMarmalade618d ago (Edited 618d ago )

The qte's were disappointing though. God of war was doing it back in the ps2 days. As gorgeous as the game was, the gameplay needed to be updated.

annoyedgamer618d ago

I really liked the original Ryse but Crytek doesn't have the funds. The mismanaged their properties and let EA raid them with Crysis for the duration of their relationship. Right now they are working on Crysis 4, I doubt they can spare resources to work on a Ryse sequel.

gamer7804618d ago

It would have to be funded by MS, I really liked Ryse sure it got repetitive but the setting visuals and story were good

moriarty1889618d ago

MS should have funded a sequel to Ryse and Sunset OD. Two good franchises they definitely needed last gen.

annoyedgamer618d ago

MS is too busy trying to become the next EA, Ryse wont be on their list of titles to finance unless it gets a hipster makeover with lootboxes.

darthv72618d ago (Edited 618d ago )

I recently bought it for the steamdeck and have to say... 60fps is a game changer. I really wished MS had gotten a one x patch or series boost mode option but sadly, nope. Other games that definitely deserve a second chance (esp on steamdeck/pc) are quantum break and sunset overdrive. Both deserved 60fps support on one x / series but you have to go to PC for that.

Rumor has it Crytek had plans for a Ryse 2 but due to the low turnout for XB (at the time) it was shelved. They really should give this another shot. i dont care if its multiplat on PS and XB and PC and Switch... just so long as part 2 gets made.

babadivad618d ago

The game is automatically boosted on Series X

darthv72618d ago

sorry... but it's not. It still runs at the same fps the XBO did.

lelo2play618d ago

Game was good enough, not great.
Graphically it was top notch. Still holds well till this day.

Crows90618d ago

It only needed more enemy variety and few more movesets or weapons to use. That would have made the experience tons better.

MadLad618d ago

It was a good game.
Only time I saw quick time events actually make me feel engaged.

Show all comments (39)
50°

Here are the new Xbox Game Pass Quests for August 2022

Xbox Game Pass Quests recently reset for the month of August. So if you try to collect as many Microsoft Rewards points as possible, there's a new set available now.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
anast624d ago (Edited 624d ago )

This is not what I would call value for money spent. They give you quests in liveservice games to get you "re-engaged" with the monetization schemes or to get you hooked or so you at least spend some extra on skins and loot boxes. Then they dole out paltry points after you have already paid extra for whichever liveservice within a liveservice that you are already paying for. My worry is people can't actually be that stupid to fall for this, can they?

littletad623d ago

Absolutely nothing in this comment makes sense. At all.

anast623d ago (Edited 623d ago )

How does it not make sense? O thy god of reason, shine some evidence upon us. Ryse of Rome, ESO,and AC: Origins are all live service games, between them you can get 275 points. Liveservice games are made to keep people spending. Therefore, Gamepass is a live service and the points are for playing live service games.

It is not my problem that this does not make sense to you, it is absolutely your problem. I mean it is all your problem.

Julion0715623d ago (Edited 623d ago )

Hate Xbox but comments in every Xbox article 😂 without making sense smh

anast623d ago

Bring the evidence and then your emoji might make sense.