1000°

Sony announces official accessories for PS4, Prices Revealed

Sony has announced two new accessories for the PS4 which is the DualShock 4 charger and the PS4 vertical stand.

Read Full Story >>
gamechup.com
cl19833893d ago

Surprised the stand isn't included with the console.

killcycle3893d ago

Why? The Ps2, Ps2 Slim, Ps3 phat, slim, super slim all don't come with a stand.

You high?

cl19833893d ago

No being that part of there advertising is the system standing upright I'm surprised they didn't include that with the system.

Ron_Danger3893d ago

@cl1983

Does the XBox One come with a cable box?? I mean, they advertise all the TV stuff you'd think it would come with a cable box.

guitarded773893d ago

You can stand them vertically without the stand. The stand just offers better stability. I'm getting a charge cradle day one. I have all my controllers on charge cradles... it's a good way to keep them powered, and makes my rig look clean.

BattleTorn3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

Um, maybe because every "box content reveal" article shows it!

And even the goddam RETAIL BOX displays the PS4 in the stand!!

Go check out my comment below, I linked all the articles. It's been strongly advertised WITH stand!

Me-Time3893d ago

OH come on. Some of you people need to be reasonable and stop being so sarcastic. (this isn't directed at you, killcycle. your comment gave me a grin)

British_Knight3893d ago

Everyone complains when Microsoft doesn't include an accessory.

KiLLeRCLaM3893d ago

I am! Just because those old gen consoles didn't come with a stand doesn't mean that they shouldn't included it with PS4.. It would have been nice that this time around they included it ^^

Bolts3893d ago

Why don't you clowns just do what you'll end up doing anyways. Buy a stand from eBay for half of the price and it'll be just as good. Its a god damn stand we're talking about here. Thats the last thing you want to buy from Sony.

evilhasitsway3893d ago

because it's suppose to be the future of gaming and you don't want to try to sell to many accessories cause your compatetion might package it but we all know ms wont make a stand or anything but whatever I get what cl1983 means.

Tidybrutes3893d ago

Im sure the original ps2 came with a stand.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3893d ago
HammadTheBeast3893d ago

Same. But it's $30, so idk.

I wish it could just naturally stand up as well.

FamilyGuy3893d ago

It can, they all can. I've never bought a stand for my PS systems but they've all stood up just fine. Just don't bump into them lol

ShwankyShpanky3893d ago

Yup... $30 for a 25-cent piece of injection molded plastic.

I'll be seeing how well it stands on its own. Looks relatively stable. :P

Blaze9293893d ago

Xbox 360 controller used to be $49.99 compared to the Dualshock 3's $59.99. Now both are $59.99. But noooo one seems to have a problem now -_-

showtimefolks3893d ago

Blaze929

how you been man, long time i haven't seen your comment?

which system are you buying?

Blaze9293893d ago

got both pre ordered on amazon

kreate3893d ago

Actually msrp for ds3 is 54.99

MizTv3893d ago

I'd be too scared to stand up my brand new console like that

Eizhale3893d ago

I never used a stand on any console I like it sitting flat anyway lol but each to their own...:-)

kreate3893d ago

Same here. Flat seems to be the more natural position imo.

tarbis3893d ago

ditto. It's a little awkward to insert the disc vertically though. lol

greedybear883891d ago

Same. It looks better sitting flat.

Neo-Axl3893d ago

Truth be told, I thought of the same thing, although it's a bummer, I suppose I could easily just purchase one alongside my console.. if money allows that, I'll be snatching as many games as possible.

Bhuahahaha3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

opps double post sorry

AKR3893d ago

$25 for a stand seems a bit pricey...Even if it wasn't included prior, that still seems to be a bit much for a little piece of plastic. Oh well, the system seems pretty small, regardless, so skipping the vertical set-up shouldn't be too much of a space-taker.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3891d ago
No FanS Land3893d ago

Gonna hang it to a wall instead :)

MasterCornholio3893d ago

I'm serious because I don't have space for a horizontal console.

Motorola RAZR i

No FanS Land3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

http://www.ps3hax.net/wp-co...

how do you top this, really?

sAVAge_bEaST3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

That's one of the sickest setups I've seen.

AceBlazer133893d ago

@NoFans dude that is epic , took me a second to find the ps3

tarbis3893d ago

No FanS Land
That's beautiful. The wall speakers looks great too.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3893d ago
Blackdeath_6633893d ago

not really it can stand on its own without the stand. purely for aesthetics nothing more. i will probably put the ps4 vertically in a bookshelf no chance of it falling then

ziggurcat3893d ago

it's the stability that's important. without the stand, it'll probably fall over if you look at it the wrong way.

DragonKnight3893d ago

You all know that making it stand is actually not good for it right? I don't know why Sony includes these stands when they themselves have said that it's much better for the system to be horizontal for the air flow. Just because heat tends to rise, doesn't mean that a vertical console is good. Horizontally there is a lot more circulation, vertically all the air has to travel through the system out one vent.

ShwankyShpanky3893d ago

Where did they say that? How does its orientation affect the air flow?

Hicken3893d ago

Don't think I understand what you're getting at. Having the system stand vertically doesn't block off any vents, unless the PS4 has broken trend and has vents on the side(which I haven't seen in any images).

Neither PS2 and none of the PS3 models have this, and I really can't imagine that would be any different for the PS4.

DragonKnight3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

@ShwankyShpanky: It's never been said about the PS4, and I was mistaken. Sony didn't say it themselves, I saw it on playstation forums. I personally don't have my system vertical, but I'm going to use this video to explain why it's worse than standing it horizontally. I only use this video for visual aid purposes, not for it's content.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

With the Phat PS3, there were more vents and they were located underneath the front and opposite side relative to the stand's placement. On the slim, there are significantly less vents, one row on both sides underneath the overhanging "lip" of the lid, and one row in the front.

Placed horizontally, air flow is much more efficient as the fans are able to push the air out and away. Placed vertically less air is pushed out the other two vents in favour of pushing the majority of the air out the top.

Now that isn't to say that no air is coming out of the other vents, because it is, but the majority of it is being pushed out one vent as opposed to an even airflow through 3 vents.

However, what could make my statement incorrect is that I've heard that, in playstation consoles at least, the fan actually pulls in cool air and forces it out the back of the console which would render the method of placement completely up to you.

I apologize if I'm mistaken, I was remembering second hand information rather than a direct source. My experience comes from when I was attempting to extend the life of my own launch 60GB PS3 and looking for ways to maintain a lower temperature and I read that standing it vertically is actually a detriment to cooling off the system.

Oner3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

Here is the information that supports DragonKnight's comment about how horizontal placement runs cooler vs vertical placement using an IR Camera for temperature pics on the PS3 (funny enough it's from Afterdawn a site I am a Moderator at) ~ http://forums.afterdawn.com...

DragonKnight3893d ago

Thanks Oner. +Bubbles for Helpful.

ziggurcat3893d ago

actually, it standing vertically is a little better for the air flow.

with the PS3, all of the heat sinks, and whatnot are on the bottom, so standing it upright keeps it running a little cooler because there's more than 1/8" (about the height of the feet of the unit) of space for the heat to dissipate. if the PS4 is anything like the PS3, it'll run cooler standing upright as well.

Hicken3893d ago

From what I can gather, the second and third pictures show the right side of the console- the side that'd be facing UP if it were placed vertically- as having a 2 degree increase in temperature when vertical, from 53.77 to 55.69.

For the rear of the system, images four and seven show vertical and horizontal, respectively. The maximum temperatures here show a slight decrease from 55.42 to 55.26 degrees.

There isn't an image that shows the temperature of the "top" when sitting horizontally, though image 5 shows the vertical temp at 29.97. I would imagine, though, that having the system stand vertically would pull heat away from the heat-producing components more easily. It would warm the overall system more, but keep the aforementioned areas cool.

It should also be noted that there are NO vents on the side on which the PS3 rests when standing vertically, therefore no vents are blocked. I can confirm this with my 80GB phat and 120GB SS. The same is also true for my phat PS2; I don't have them on hand, and don't feel like looking up the images, but I'm certain this is also true for the Slim models of both systems.

From all this, I can see NO obstruction of airflow that would result in increased heating, but I DO see more dissipated heat from being vertical than horizontal.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3893d ago
Deanc3893d ago

Pahahahaha, And theirs your $499.. Typical sony just took shit out the ps4 box and made it on its own to make them look like the cheaper console, Xbox will always be inferior.

No FanS Land3893d ago

the stand was never expected to be included. it was never included with the PS2 / PS2 silm. Ps3 slim and super slim.

why make it appear negative all of a sudden?

Ritsujun3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

That mindless blindb0t doesn't even know the meaning of "inferior".
Yup, Xbosh is indeed inferior. And, the billyb0ts love getting Xbone180'd over and over again.

HolyDuck3893d ago

The stand is actually shown on the PS4 box, so it's implied it's included, that's how I see it anyway.

Minato-Namikaze3893d ago

Or you could just not buy it.......

Patrick3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

Wait.... are you bashing Sony or MS? Cause at first you were bashing Sony saying they just took stuff out to make it cheaper than MS... which isnt true. It comes with what it always comes with, except that you actually get a headset.
Then U call xbox inferior.... which per the dictionary means "Lower in rank, status, or quality." ...lol
If the word your looking for is "superior" then you would be wrong there as well.

Edit: ha ha... Im not sure whether to hit agree or disagree.. I disagree with the first part but agree with the last line of your statement which is "Xbox will always be inferior."

Rainstorm813893d ago

I think his silly-azz meant SUperior.....yep RAtard

Rainstorm813893d ago

How do you bash Sony then go on to say... "Xbox will always be inferior."

Must be some kind of RA-tard....lls

Deividas3893d ago

What are you talking about? These are optional and you dont need them. And lets see...ps4 controller is rechargable while you have to buy your lovely recharge kit on top of that $499. This is simply another way to recharge. And also...at least you have the option to stand up the ps4, good luck doing that with your XOne

SchwoererBear3893d ago

I keep telling ppl that the PS4 charges contollers while the system is off. That eliminates the need for a charging station! I really don't see the point in getting one for next gen

GiantEnemyCrab3893d ago

So PS4 buys a charging station so you aren't sitting there with the silly little 4ft cords. While XB1 owners buy the Play N Charge kit and can swap out the batteries on the fly whenever.

I don't see a problem here.

Deividas3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

@GiantEnemeyCrab

So...instead of just buying a longer cord for like $5 your saying its better to buy batteries for $10 (Constantly) and a $25 Play N Charge kit....Not seeing your logic there...

And your telling me that opening your controller, finding the batteres, putting the batteries in and then turning the controller on is "on the fly" while just plugging in a cord thats already attached to your PS4 into the Controller...takes longer?

GiantEnemyCrab3893d ago

The Play and Charge kit comes with rechargeable batteries. Have you used one with a 360 controller? It takes all but 1 sec and it easily snaps in and out.

I will give you the $5 cable though but I'd rather not be wired when I'm gaming.

Deividas3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

Why would you be wired when your gaming?...the controller charges when the console is off, therefore everyone will be charging it overnight for their gaming activities during the day...or vise versa..And unless someone is going to literately be playing for 7 Hours straight, that wont be a problem for anyone.

And yes i do have a charge kit for my 360 controller right now, and when it runs out of juice I have to connect it to my 360 to charge while im playing. Making it a wired connection while gaming.

rainslacker3893d ago

You could use it using a USB wall socket as well if you got the proper cord. Or use a PC. Doesn't even have to be plugged into the system.

Charge station is nice for aesthetics, and was handy since the PS3 didn't charge while the system was off.

The stand...overpriced, but that's an aesthetic thing as well. I'd imagine a majority of PS4 buyers wouldn't bother with it. It's there for those that care.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3893d ago
KonsoruMasuta3893d ago

Yes, I agree that the Xbox will always be inferior.

wenaldy3893d ago

Damn right Xbox will aalways be INFERIOR!!! Retard!!!

pyramidshead3893d ago

No stand? Pre-order cancelled wah wah wah

KrimsonKody3893d ago

Damn, son!
You are severely suffering from "180's all over your body"!

Drekken3893d ago

Ugh... what are you even talking about?

MrBeatdown3893d ago

Not sure if worst trolling ever, or best trolling ever.

KwietStorm_BLM3893d ago

Yes, "removing" a little piece of plastic and an optional (read: unnecessary) charger would have added a justified $100 extra to the console. Makes perfect sense.

The_Sneauxman3893d ago

hahaha that is the funniest FAIL use of a word I've seen in a good while. INFERIOR lol, yep you're right it is inferior!

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3893d ago
jagstatboy3893d ago

Is the stand really necessary? I keep my PS3 on it's side w/out a stand and it stays upright just fine.

No FanS Land3893d ago

I think the PS4 will have a harder time standing vertical than the PS3 Phat, or even slim.

rainslacker3893d ago

PS3 Phat and Slim didn't need it due to the design. It just adds stability.

PS4 is pretty slim in comparison, may not stand up well due to there being no real base for putting it on it's side.

Convas3893d ago (Edited 3893d ago )

So wait ... I can't stand the PS4 up on it's side like my 360 and PS3 are without buying the stand?

It should be able to stand on it's own perfectly fine right?
Right? RIGHT?!

Patrick3893d ago

Just by looking at it I would say it should stand on its own... but as thin as it is, it wont be as stable as it would with the stand.But that's just opinion till I get mine... and even then it will still be my opinion. Sorry I cant be more help.

Show all comments (108)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies14d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken14d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga14d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken14d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6414d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long14d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197214d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic14d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 14d ago
DivineHand12514d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91314d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer14d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91313d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit13d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
Christopher14d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6913d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit13d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher14d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken14d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197214d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic14d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2314d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218314d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder14d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts14d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades20d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken20d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades20d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii20d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit22d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

22d ago
Profchaos22d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9522d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia22d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)