660°

Why I'm Choosing PS4 Over Xbox One

John Meadows from GoozerNation writes "For the past ten years Microsoft console's has been my gaming console of choice. But with this next generation of consoles upon on us Sony has swayed me to their side and the reason may surprise you because it surprised me."

Read Full Story >>
goozernation.com
golding893906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

I respect your opinion but not this gen. xbox one day one for me.

I rather my gaming console can do all the extra features Xbox one is offering. No offense guys.

pedrof933906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

Maybe you didn't notice but Ps4 pretty much offers all the same so called "features".

Oh nevermind you are talking about kinect.

But the author opinion its all about the price. I could argue and give 10 more reasons, like the extra ram, the sony first party studios, the extra flops, the instant game collection, the cross game chat available for everyone, the 15 minutes capture, the playstation design, the new controller or even the Led on the PS4 and not to mention Killzone. But I won't bother explaining that. PlayStation app, background downloading, selective download, the touch pad on the dualshock, Infamous SS, it can stand vertically and horizontally .

What about Planet Side 2 ? No one mentions it, what a great game, I have it on PC but the poor thing can't handle it. Can't wait to play it on PC.

@golding89

ps eye ? I don't care about it.

"has better online play" Sony says it has invest on the Psn support, I think it will run better now. I mean there is so many people downloading free games that the whole thing starts overheating.

"Sony needs to prove it has new games as last gen" - Because Microsoft has already proved it ? This is Sony.

"please dude..ps4 has better specs..that's it." Can't argue there I'm sorry you totaly shut me up.

Well that's it.

golding893906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

You are right. the day that the ps "eye" can do HALF of what kinect 2.0 can do..I'll take your statement as a valid statement. until then. no.

It's a fact dude.

Sony sacrifice your "eye" to compete with microsoft in prices. Look it up. I can't make this stuff up. lol

Edit: please dude..ps4 has better specs..that's it.

This is a new gen soon. Sony needs to prove it has new games as last gen. and don't even get me started on which has better online play.

No thanks.

Edit (2): "can stand vertically and horizontally" (like a pr0n star) lol nice one.

Anyways. i'm just giving my 2 cent on next gen. You like ps4..get it.. I like xbox one. I'll get that.

Later dude.

georgeenoob3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

IMO only logical reason to get a PS4 over X1 is if you're 100 dollars short with no job.

Cause despite Xbox being an all in one system and not just for games (which is good), X1 is currently dominating PS4 in exclusives. Funny, don't you think?

pedrof933906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

@George

Use your bubble wisely.

I know I only have two so don't bother explaining it to me.

"X1 is currently dominating PS4 in exclusives"- Oh you mean the launch games ? Does this sequence of words "Wait for Gamescon and there is still tones of games to be shown and there is still 3 months 'till console is released" mean anything to you ?

ShwankyShpanky3906d ago

Thing is, we know very little about what the new Eye can do.

Can the new Kinect take 3d photos? The new stereoscopic Eye can. Some (like me) may consider that a useless or niche feature... just like I consider reading my heart rate and emotions to be worthless. In fact, I assign them negative worth... many of the Kinect features are detriments in my opinion... not only do I not want to have them, I want to not have them.

"Sony sacrifice your "eye" to compete with microsoft in prices. Look it up. I can't make this stuff up. lol"

Why don't you "look it up" and give us a source? Maybe that's because it's just idiotic speculation. Just because you "can't make this stuff up," doesn't mean some other idiot blogger didn't.

So a PS4 is $400, and the Eye is $60... totaling $460... but they "sacrificed the eye" to compete with the price of a $500 unit? Being cheaper wasn't enough? They sacrificed it to be more cheaperer? Does not compute. Dude.

blackbeld3906d ago

"Why I'm Choosing PS4 Over Xbox One"

Because Sony Playstation never ever let me down in terms of great Games and exclusivity since my first Playstation.

davidj883906d ago

@golding89

Well you can say Sony sacrificed the PS Eye but considering i can buy the PS4 + PS Eye and it'll still be cheaper than the Xbox One bundled with the Kinect 2.0 tells me 2 things, either Sony dropped the Eye to make the price more appealing and maybe MS bundled the Kinect 2.0 so they could bump the price up and use Kinect to justify it.

Also if anyone needs to prove it has new games it's MS, Sony proved they have continual development of original IP's to keep gaming a fresh experience and built up a reputation for supporting it's gaming consoles 100%.

Thirdly ''don't even get me started on which has better online play''.....can i borrow your DeLorean and try both next gen consoles online play too?

Maybe the PS eye can't do half of what the Kinect 2.0 can but that would surely be understandable seeing as they built the system around the Kinect. PS eye always was just an addition, something that gave a different experience when accompanied with the PS Move.

Omegasyde3906d ago

Yea Planet Side 2 I am really looking towards as I also had an outdated Pc that played ok between minium and recommended PC requirements.

@Georgenoob - How is it dominating? Oh I get, you don't count "console" exclusives. If you count games that will be on the PS4 and NOT on the xbox1 day one- PS4 wins with 1 extra (and that's not including indies)

Ryse, Killer Instinct, Forza, Dead Rising 3(4) vs
Killzone, Knack, Drive Club, War Frame, DC Universe online (6)

I am pretty sure Planet Side 2 will be ready at Launch or atleast within two months of PS4.

Reference:
http://www.ign.com/wikis/pl...
--Vs--
http://www.ign.com/wikis/xb...

3906d ago
malokevi3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

It isn't "speculation". Give me a break and think for yourself.

The eye was abandoned to beat Microsoft's price, as evidenced by the now defunct light bar built in to every controller.

Remember, "it will be able to determine who is first and second payer and change the screen accordingly"?

I love this selective memory that psfanboys seem to have.

I will be going XB1 day one as well, for all the refined features and multi-functionality that it has, not to mention the online emphasis, which is where I spend 95% of my gaming time.

Anyone who denies it will eat their words by days end. I will be enjoying a masterpiece in form and functionality.

My PlayStation4 will be plugged into my receiver, which will be plugged in to my XB1. Everything else is secondary, as always. Xbox Live simply can't be beat, thems facts fellaz.

dudeOplenty3906d ago

@malokevi
I don't think you know what the word "fact" actually means.

JackStraw3906d ago

but ps eye can do just about everything kinect can do. people just haven't spent as much time developing for ps eye as they have for kinect. the most important things about the cameras are the depth cameras.

can you name 5 things kinect can do that ps eye can't?

ShwankyShpanky3906d ago

Right... gotta "think for myself."

Because if I thought like everyone else, I'd think that 460<500.

Power to ya, malokevi. Keep on thinkin' as only you can.

Xbot logic. Does not compute.

LordNikon3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

@Malokevi

Could you post the source where SONY themselves confirmed that they dropped the PS Eye to compete with MS......? You can't. Because it was ONLY a rumor, there was NO confirmation by Sony of said rumour... so stop treating it so. The only things i've read (from Sony themselves) is:

1. They didn't want to alienate their consumers like they did with the PS3.

2. Consumer choice. That's what Sony's being preaching about from the introduction of their next-gen device, iirc.

And please drop the Xbox fanboy biased act. You're just making yourself look like an idiot.

BitbyDeath3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

Sorry but Kinect has always been less powerful than the move/eye combo. Lag was never an issue and games like Killzone 3 and Heavy Rain used it. Kinect 2 may be better but it is yet to prove itself.

Ryse was supposed to be a Kinect game but obviously that didn't work out as that is no longer the case.

boing13906d ago

Anyone with a brain will choose PS4. Besides, MS is cutting the markets where x1 will be available on launch. They are way behind the schedule with production. Expect announcement soon.

Cyanide853906d ago

I find reading X1 fanboy comments very funny they are really ignorant and MS slaves, just a few months ago pretty much EVERYONE was hating on MS, X1 fanboys was the worst because anyone that was already going PS4 didn't care that MS had all the DRM crap. And now they are defending the X1's useless "features" as they call it, I call it another way for MS to squeeze money from the consumers. And the tv crap only works in the US!

Now the ignorant MS monkeys that think that Sony cut the eye so that the PS4 would be cheaper, as said earlier its still cheaper WITH the eye than the X1 is. And how in the world would Sony know what the X1 price point would be?! Are you really that stupid people?! They wanted to have a good price point partially I think after the PS3 price disaster. And they see the eye as a addition now as a requirement like the MS NSA spy camera.

This is just my thought on the kinect requirement, they want you to use it so that when you do they can use the information they get from it to give you the type of advertisement that appeals to the person using the console.

And this type of advertisement is used already in some places in the world, they use all you info on say Facebook as an example they use that info to be able to send you the type of advertisement that appeals to you.

So be my guest and have a great time with you advertisement box.

Ju3906d ago

The author brings up a valid point: Vita. Some of us have a Vita already. "Remote Play" is a unique feature I am looking forward to. I hope Sony will be bringing a Vita bundle which wold allow a better saturation and better chance of actually getting more second screen features (not only remote play). Well, sure, this might lead to more WiiU ports, but why not. BF4 Battle Commander would run well on the Vita.

Death3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

It's ironic how Sony fans think buying a Vita for remote play is helpful. Same goes with Plus. For $50 (great deal by the way), you get free games. Brilliant if game sales are making you money. A Vita simply for remote play is a bad idea. Software generates profit, not hardware.

Sometimes this site gives me a headache...

Buy a PS4 because you like the games. If you are buying for the "hardware advantage" you aren't buying it for the right reason. Buy a Vita and some games to support the system and company. Plus is a nice thank you from Sony, but too many rely on it for content. Support your damn system with new game sales. Sony is not in a good place financially and just as they start to gain momentum some idiot decides a PS4 and Vita for $500 is good for Sony. Way to not only feel entitled, but take a chance at killing real sales with a made up sku.

Jrxbarrett3905d ago (Edited 3905d ago )

Kinect > ps eye(always)
Xbox live > psn
Kill zone 30 fps
Dual shock 4 hmmmm.... An led light yay.
The ps4 can be vertical or horizontal. That's new right?
15 min capture.... I mean that's really a pcs job.
Every one also knows that both consoles are just about equal. Just like last gen. When it comes to specs
First party studios? They can't make a break through fps so their studios are irrelevant.

Oh yeah vita is garbage. Handhelds are not that huge of a product anymore. Remember the days when We thought ms would make one. There's no need. They see the future...... In tablets and cell phones. Think ahead Sony.

Next gen gaming is all online and mp modes. Xbox live is where it's at.

indysurfn3905d ago (Edited 3905d ago )

Why This 10 year xbox lover is choosing PS4 over Xbox1.

Microsoft tried to steal my gaming ownership.
Microsoft tried to limit how many times I could lend a game out to 10 per disc when every system since the begging of time was unlimited. And tried to insinuate it was going to have other people playing it, while I was playing it. Microsoft tried to charge me a fee for saleing my game, and forcing me to a list of stores. Microsoft was not going to give any of it to the publisher or developer that they where hiding behind.

Microsoft was selling me a machine that would stop working, after the generation was over.
Without telling me this up front!

Microsoft kept insinuating this stuff was not true (pay attention to the legally binding words).

Microsoft finally admitted it, then started denying it again. Then admitted it FULLY, and revoked the policy.

This is my problem with them after they reversed it. If your a person that tried to break in my place, and steal but got caught before you could take the goods. Why the heck would I ever give you my money? Or trust you? Your my enemy now! Hello I'm no fool! I don't owe you anything especially not a second chance! I didn't owe you Nintendo, or Sony a first chance so why are you going around acting like I OWE you a second chance? Blank you, the end.

blennerville3905d ago

you gota admitt waying your hands around in the air and shouting at your tv and ending up on the NSA watch list sounds better for TRUE GAMERS.

see what i did there :P

jcnba283905d ago

Funny thing is most of the stuff you mentioned about the ps4 was not impressive. PS4 design? Touchpad? Are you serious?

3905d ago
BaronVonRhett3905d ago

@Jrxbarrett

For one, everyone know the specs aren't equal, Xbox boys just down play the difference because who would ever admit their brand new toy is inferior.

Two, the Vita isn't garbage. Being able to pick up your full console game and take it around with you (with limitations on where you can go, for now.)is something I have heard many people ask to be able to do.

+ Show (23) more repliesLast reply 3905d ago
jcmeadows3906d ago

None taken for sure. I love the new features of the Xbox One. I just don't know if they are worth the extra $100, the Kinect is worth the money but I just don't think ill use it as much.

stuna13906d ago

From the sound of things, you'll have no choice! I have no problem with preference per ce, but when it comes at the cost of choice, it becomes a hard pill to swallow!

People are looking at this the wrong way, here's a couple of prime examples, when your shopping for a new car, you can pick the color, the model, the brand, and a number of extra amenities! The same goes for the style of clothes you wear, the food you eat, even the tv's and computers you buy give you choices even from the same manufacturers.

Nintendo gives gamers choice, Sony gives gamers choice, the question people should be asking is why can't Microsoft also give gamers choice? And for starters that choice should be to be able to purchase a $500 console without the need to have a camera attached to it.

Godmars2903906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

"the day that the ps "eye" can do HALF of what kinect 2.0 can do."

But what can/does Kinect 2.0 actually do? Past voice commands, and being about to watch/track you, they've only stepped back from any usefulness it has towards games. And you're only paying extra for it. Paying for access to things you'll have to pay more to actually access.

Edit:
"please dude..ps4 has better specs..that's it."

And when the 360 had the better specs over the PS3, a unified 1/2 GB of RAM versus two 1/4s anyway, many MS fans tried to lord that over the system.

kneon3906d ago

They didn't even need kinect for voice commands, even the PS2 had voice command.

All you need is a microphone, and that could have been added to the console for less than a dollar.

gamer20133905d ago

Dude, XB1 = more functionality, better games, more games and superior online>>> slightly better specs - period!

thexmanone3905d ago

@Godmars290
So MS finally released the specs for the Xbox1?
I did a search on the net, but I can`t find it anywhere. Do you have a link with that info.

3906d ago
Deadpoolio3906d ago

You mean all those EXACT same features that the PS4 has....Oh wait you can't hook up your cable box to it and pay an extra $10 a month to get those ads fueled by Doritos and Mt.Dew....Outside of that again they have THE EXACT same features...

Although PS4 doesn't want $92 bucks for a complete controller or $50 bucks for a headset adapter....

For those who can't do math XBO controllers complete are $92 bucks....$60 (controller)+ $25(battery)+ 8%(sales tax)=$92 while Wii U and PS4 controller $64.79

princejb1343906d ago

Lol who actually cares about kinect. Ps eye can go drown itself also
I want to play games with a gaming controller not have to stand my lazy self up and do gestures
Kinect 1 sold millions however it had no games to back up all that technology. Kinect 2.0 is going the same route.

So far both launch titles for both consoles aren't very impressive to me

However Sony has proved to me they back their console with new ips and many more exclusive.
All we basically saw from MS this gen was a bunch of sequels of the same game over and over again. Gears, halo, forza, crackdown, gears, halo, halo fable, etc.
I will be expecting the same next gen from Ms while Sony keeps releasing new ips

gamer20133905d ago (Edited 3905d ago )

The amount of exclusives the PS3 has compared to the PS2 is really pathetic. I have to ask, is a measly few more first party games really something to boast about? After all, the 360 has a larger overall library of games than the PS3 because of it's year head start.

fattyuk3905d ago

^^^ look at the quality of first party games that have come under the brand of Sony playstation 3 though.

Ok maybe the "list" isn't as long as PS2 but quality just oozes out of Sony games!

3906d ago
ricochetmg3906d ago

Logically if you like games......and exclusives the only choice is the ps4.

Karpetburnz3906d ago

Very true.

Sony has 20 exclusives comming out in the first year with 12 brand new IP's. looks like Sony had beat Microsoft once again in the exclusives department.

tommygunzII3906d ago

The main thing is that Sony will have exclusive games beyond the first year.

Tatsuya 3906d ago

Why I choose the PS4?

SONY have never bailed out on me with games. More variety in the games department. Have the games that I'd actually be interested to play and to finish. I've been playing multiplayer for free the entire 7th Generation. I have been given so much more than what I paid for with SONY. I'm satisfied with my PS3, now I'm ready for my PS4.

Honestly, when it comes to winning me over. It's just two simple things:

Games and 1st party exclusive and SONY only gives the best :)

scofios3906d ago

@golding89

sorry to burst your bubble dude but your lovely kinect is just a eyetoy wannabe with a big ad campain to begin with. in case you didn't know there is no Milo it was just smoke and mirrors .

gamer20133905d ago (Edited 3905d ago )

Eyetoy wannabe? No, I don't think so. The new Kinect uses 1080p camera, processes 2 gigabits of data per second to read its environment, can see in the dark with it's IR sensor, able to track up to 6 skeletons at once. It can also detect a player's heart rate, facial expression, 25 individual joints (even thumbs) and the precise rotation of such joints, the weight put on each limb, and the speed of your movements, and track gestures performed with a standard controller.

Sorry to burst you're bubble. lol

StoneyYoshi3905d ago

@twisted

Cool story bro... Now when i see a kinect game actually working in real time (which we havent seen yet) well then my bubble has been burst.

thetruthx13906d ago

Here's some more reasons for the xbox one

More reliable online gaming, better interface, better controllers,direct x 11.2 exclusivity, Ryse, Titanfall, Halo 5, Forza, Dead Rising 3, Quantum Break, Killer Instinct, Gears of War 4, snapping, better looking games (looking at the actual games and not numbers)

jessupj3906d ago

I've been gaming online on my ps3 since the start and in all those years I might have been d/c'ed from a game maybe 5 times. The PSN is just as adequate.

A lot of sources have been saying how great the PS4 interface is.

Many sources have been saying the D4 is better than the X1 controller.

X1 doesn't have a better line up and it doesn't have better looking games. It's too subjective at this point.

What X1 does have is a company backing it that is known to drop the ball on exclusives as soon as they think they have enough core customers. The amount of exclusives released in the last few years on the 360 has been absolutely pathetic to the point where I would think xbox fans would be extremely embarrassed.

Sony is known for producing amazing games. It's a no brainer really.

hilyou3906d ago

I have a question for you? How do you know Xbox One has more reliable online gaming? You haven't used it. So how do you know?

If your reply is "Xbox Live never got hacked on 360", that's not a reply. I thought PS3 would have the best games due to PS2 having the best games but I was wrong.

Plus Titanfall is a timed exclusive. There is no Gears of War 4 (although I wish there was), and there isn't Halo 5 either, at E3 there was a teaser for a Halo game that's it. No "Halo 5".

hilyou3905d ago (Edited 3905d ago )

http://ca.ign.com/games/hal...

They haven't confirmed it's Halo 5.
You forgot Infamous Second Son.
And going by your logic for GOW 4, I assume there's going to be Uncharted 4, LittleBigPlanet 3, new God of War, maybe a Last of Us sequel, new Ratchet and Clank plus so many more games.

And if you know anything about networking, those aren't 300 000 "dedicated" servers. They're servers for cloud computing, Game DVR, streaming etc. Nearly all 3rd party games use their own severs. That's why you always hear EA shutting down their game's servers, not Microsoft.

http://www.engadget.com/201...

And I totally want to use other applications while gaming. I really won't get distracted. :)

Spoons3906d ago

Hey man, I agree. I don't just want a straight upgrade in power, this is next gen. Not next half gen. I want innovation!

thetruthx13906d ago

I've also heard sources say the xbox one interface is better and we have seen some of it looks great can't say the same for Sony. I also hear that the xbox controller is perfection while the D4 may be an improvement it still looks like the wimpy joystick they slapped a touch screen on .

You can't honestly say Ps4 has the better games now. Knack, Driveclub, Killzone going up against Ryse, Dead Rising 3, Forza, and Killer Instinct xbox one's definitely winning that battle

For the guy that said Halo 5 is just a teaser and not a real game??? I hope you're kidding and know that Halo 5 has already been confirmed at 1080p 60 fps. Gears of War is a top selling xbox series so if you think they won't make another you're lying to yourself

Xbox one will have 300K of dedicated servers and yes credit card info has never been compromised.

Titanfall hasn't been *confirmed* to being created on the Ps4 so until then it is a xbox one exclusive but maybe you Sony fans will get Titanfall 2 lol

Microsoft stop making exclusives for the 360 because they were prepping games for the xbox one and now they have more games in development than ever

Syntax-Error3906d ago

That's how I feel Spoons. I feel the PS4 is giving me everything PS3 has with prettier pictures. The X1 is nothing like the 360, so to me it's more of a new console than an upgraded one. Everyone has their reasons for their purchase.

QuickdrawMcgraw3906d ago

Maybe I'm wrong,But I have been lead to believe that a lot of the new features the Xbox1 is offering.Are the same as a lot of the features the PS3 already has.So though it might sound as if the new Xbox is offering a lot of new features.In reality they are just catchup to the PS3.And some of these new features on the 1 are just expected on PS4.Not saying it's fact,but does seem reasonable.

TemplarDante3906d ago

Golding89, I was you 161 disagree.
Xbone sucks because the original ideology sucks and those snakes, MS will enforce it next next gen if their not put into the dust now.
PS4 for me. Its like, going back home for me. :)
Im so glad to be a part of the playstation nation once again.:)

3906d ago
OmegaSlayer3906d ago

The point is very very simple.
PS3 owners will move to PS4.
Not every XBOX360 owner will move to XBOX1.
Not every multiple console owner will buy the XBOX1 or will buy the PS4 first.

That's the simplest and most realistic way to see things.

USMC_POLICE3906d ago

I agree not having to use my TV remote will be so amazing and Microsoft has a great history of first gen hardware reliability also......not I bet he's got call of duty preordered too. Its not hard to use a TV remote that's the main difference

Vercious3906d ago

um... shouldn't have said that, but yep... ps4 is the one for me.

hiredhelp3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

You know what Certain N4G xboxbers are soo two faced. When we learnt the Xbox one had few draw backs like DRM little support indi games kinnect only getting worse when comes to watching You.. Many were wild very angury even xboxbers were sayin they buying PS4.
But since the upset by fans MS reversed there choices now its like 360 vs PS3 again..Why? To me as a gamer witch we all are Games matter here we spending alot money for new system to me both consoles are close to specs both powerd by AMD i think PS3 has edge in way of graphics way there system works.
But here's reason why i beleave Sony will always dominate thats GAMES GAMES GAMES after 12 months MS will be doing what they do now exclusives dry up start depending on third part games.

hiredhelp3905d ago

Sorry for some bad spelling my ipad has auto correct messes with my words my bad. Im 33 btw @pxljunk

Pxljunk3906d ago

How old r u!? LMFAO 😂😆😂

Syntax-Error3906d ago

So people disagreed with him because he's choosing Xbox over Playstation? Funny how people tell you how to spend your damn money and what preference you should have.

3906d ago
saywat2473906d ago

but listen to this, it has multitasking, twitch, skype, television, and what not...you have OTHER F*CKING DEVICES FOR THAT SHIT!!! YOU HAVE SMARTPHONES AND SET TOP BOXES FOR THAT!!! WHY THE F*CK DO THEY NEED TO ADD ALL THOSE POINTLESS STUFF THAT WE COULD ALREADY DO ON OTHER DEVICES!! WE WANT GAMING CONSOLES BECAUSE OF THE GAMES!!! NOT F*CKING TELEVISION AND THE OTHER POINTLESS CRAP! PLAYSTATION 4 FOCUSES PRIMARILY ON GAMING WHICH GAMING CONSOLES ARE SUPPOSED TO FREAKING BE ABOUT!!

LogicStomper3905d ago

Which is more convinient, having a cellphone with only a call function or, a smart-phone that can double up as a mini-computer?

thexmanone3905d ago

@saywat247

spoken like a true PS fanboy. Enjoy all your free rentals on psn.

3905d ago
rmedtx3905d ago

I respect our opinion but besides Kinect, I don't see any advantages on getting an Xbox One. Even that... Kinect It's a great piece of hardware but not many games are taking advantage of it.

Pope_Kaz_Hirai_II3905d ago

golding89 + 18h ago
I respect your opinion but not this gen. xbox one day one for me.

I rather my gaming console can do all the extra features Xbox one is offering. No offense guys.
#1

wow....

PSVita3905d ago

This is why I'm getting a ps4.

http://youtu.be/Rlm-AFVzDcc

Infamous is one of the best games I've ever played along with RDR, MGS4 and Demon Souls.i can't even imagine what they're going to do with the sequels in a few years. :)

bigfish3905d ago

I think we're all choosing PS4 over Xbox One.

That_Ninja_Gray_Fox3905d ago

So you rather not enjoy the best gaming experience? All those extra "features" they are touting aren't actually innovative or the future of gaming. If you want to keep supporting the same company recycling the same franchises for 10 years and have pop up adds for food then be my guest.

Godlovesgamers3905d ago

"I rather my gaming console can do all the extra features Xbox one is offering. No offense guys."

"Extra Features" like spying on and data mining you?

No thanks, I'll pass. If I have to choose between my right to privacy and playing a video game, I'm going to choose not to erode my rights to privacy and personal freedom.

I don't know, maybe grow a backbone?

BTW, I have a suspicion that right when you fire up the XBone for the first time, it'll unlock the following achievements:

"Servitude"
"Subjugation"
"We're Watching You"

Just kidding about that last part. But seriously, you have to be spineless to sell out your right to privacy just to play a &*^%$#@'n video game!!

If Sony pulled this with the PS4, I'd shun them faster than a Catholic Priest does allegations of child rape.

3-4-53905d ago

I'm hoping that by 2014 ( March/April), they release a PS4 + Vita bundle or just lower the price on Vita.

The PS4 makes owning the Vita that much cooler, and thus owning they compliment eachother

3-4-53905d ago

Nothing wrong with wanting an XB1. Just understand what you are getting your self into and the potential outcomes that it brings.

I've owned the last two xbox's but I'm probably going with Playstation for the first time ever in my life.

Kind of an intuition thing about future games.

I've been getting more into RPG's lately and I just don't see many quality ones making their way to the US on the XB1.

Especially JRPG's, as XB1 is and won't be popular in Japan, there may not be reason for them to makes rpg's on XB1.

XB1 does have TitanFall & Forza, Spark & Sunset Overdrive, which all look unique and really good, but it may not be enough to appeal to me.

Sad because Xbox 360 controller is my favorite, but I dunno, something about their sneakiness just doesn't sit well with me.

Retroman3905d ago (Edited 3905d ago )

Just keep these nonesense article flowing nothing better than start up daily chaos,rumors,shenanigans. AMAZING what these editors will pull out of the sky for hits.

unbelievable theories either to make one console look bad undesirable or good exciting to own. FREEDOM of choice is what both company guilty of manipulation of the mind.
The console to choose is "SIMPLE" whoever you are LOYAL to that fits your personal gaming needs is the winner.

clrlite3905d ago

golding: Most people on here know that you are either paid to troll or are incredibly biased, so I doubt they are offended.

The majority of people prefer Playstation and I doubt your comments are doing much to sway their opinions.

No offense of course.

+ Show (35) more repliesLast reply 3905d ago
Majin-vegeta3906d ago

1.Better hardware
2.Cheaper price
3.Better 1st party support.
4.Better value for paying to play online
5.not everything is locked behind a paywall.
6.Can still play"CERTAIN" games online without PS+.

Well my reasons anyway.

HammadTheBeast3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

Backwards Compatibility confirmed for next year.

@JBSleek

Where did that come from? You just made it up lol.

@Lwhit6

Sony confirmed at it's reveal that they'd incorporate BC through Gaikai.

JBSleek3906d ago

You will have to pay for that so it isn't BC if you have to pay.

Lwhit63906d ago

Really? Could you cite your source?

kneon3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

Gaikai isn't really backwards compatibility. It will give you access to some games under yet to be disclosed terms and costs.

Karpetburnz3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

Very good reasons.

My reasons:

1: more powerful
2: cheaper
3: PS+ is superior to XBL
4: better value
5: better exclusives
5: 20 exclusives in the first year compared to only 15.
6: Naughty God
7: free to play games are actually free to play.
8: apps like YouTube, Facebook and Netflix will not be locked behinds the pay wall
9: does not require an Internet connection for the initial setup.
10: main focus is a GAMES console, NOT a cable box.
11: improved controller, now with touch pad and share button.
12: 15 minutes of recording gameplay vs only 5 minutes.
13: most likely to have superior multiplatform games.
14: PSVita remote play.
15: Gaikai, will be able to stream PS3 games.
16: PSeye is OPTIONAL, unlike Kinect.
17: smaller console and better looking,
18: controller does not need AA batteries.
19: camera doesn't spy on you and your family.
20: can download multiplayer and single player seperately.

Foxhound9223906d ago

You forgot that it doesn't look like a 20 year old vcr, it can stand vertically our horizontally. Most likely will be more reliable and also Sony has a clear head this generation and isn't changing their policies every other day.

Salooh3905d ago (Edited 3905d ago )

Killed it . But still don't like these articles. Enough already , the people who approve this kind of articles need to be kicked. Just release news and let these opinions in a forum or something..

Why can't we choose what we want to see and for the hardwares we want to see , for example i just want to see news + media + reviews in ps4/vita/X1/pc/ps4. That's it . That would be great and will save a lot of time and search :/

kakashi813906d ago

I don't get why people can't have their opinion on the consoles??? I'm getting a PS4 before I get the Xboxone this time around. I had both consoles last gen and I'm getting both consoles this gen. :-)

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3905d ago
BLKxSEPTEMBER3906d ago

Why I chose BOTH consoles day 1... Cause I'm a gamer!

Transporter473906d ago

Or have over a grand to spend. I'm not that wealthy.

BLKxSEPTEMBER3906d ago

Yeah that sucks but I'm sure sooner or later u can get both if you save up. I'd buy which ever console I like best then pickup the other later

Omegasyde3906d ago

Not only that, you have to consider paying to play online X years you own the system.

That's an additional $100 now. Do just for first year (400) + (500)+ (50) + ~(50) = 1000 + games on both.

To me its about the exclusives and the way Microsoft decided to pay for DLC instead of games, makes me worry.

gusgusjr3906d ago

Agreed, actually excited for xbox one a little more. Both look great though. Might keep both and my Wii U to exclusives and get a PC for multiplats. One thing is for sure, I will only purchase 1 game at a time. ok maybe 2.

Deadpoolio3906d ago

Cause some of us are smart enough to remember the 55% failure rate of the 360(I personally went through 4) and want to know for sure that the DRM isn't coming back although they kinda confirmed that it was in saying that digital purchases will be under the same policies they named at E3

TheRealHeisenberg3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

PS2 lawsuit much?

Edit: Oh wait, I get it.

kneon3906d ago

DRM won't come back unless it's optional. They wouldn't be able to get away with retroactively imposing DRM.

Hicken3906d ago

Weak excuse.

If you're a gamer, you'd be concerned about what Microsoft attempted with the XB1 before their 180.

You don't just buy a console because it's a console, because buying that console might send the wrong message to the manufacturer. You don't just buy a game because it's good, because that might make the dev and publisher think it's okay to do something bad(on-disc DLC, for example).

Whenever I hear "I'm getting both because I'm a gamer," I believe the exact opposite about that person, because it shows they're not actually thinking about the industry, which is one thing any REAL gamer should do.

Gazondaily3906d ago

"You don't just buy a game because it's good"

Lol what? No I DO buy a game because it's good. I'm in this for the games, not to abide by some person's blinkered agenda.

All this so-called caring about the industry....I have severe doubts about how genuine these concerns are.

Each to their own. I buy games that are good full stop. If a developer has a made a title that I feel is worthy of making me spend money, then that's all I'm concerned with. I'm more concerned with enjoying the medium by playing enjoyable games. THAT is what a true gamer is.

TheRealHeisenberg3906d ago

You stopped taking your medication again didn't you? Seriously, you and many like you are on so deep into the anti-MS agenda that you don't buy games because they are good? Shows me that you are really thinking about the industry.

BLKxSEPTEMBER3906d ago

Whats the key word in your lil rant? "attempted" so since those policies are gone now why should i miss out on games i want? my primary console was the 360 and the x1 will be my primary. and your right i dont give a rats ass about the gaming industry i care about more important things like my family or my job. and what other reason do i need to buy a game besides it being good? thats one of the dumbest things i ever read. i will buy both systems and enjoy both system. i dont give a shit what any of you sony dick riders say or think. enjoy your one next gen console with your limited selection of games while i enjoy it all...

Rachel_Alucard3906d ago

@Septic

You are a corporate sheep and you don't look at the big picture of your actions.

Hicken3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

I don't buy from a dev who's a jerk, like Phil Fish. Sorry, but when you act the way he did, you don't get my money.

I don't buy from publishers like Capcom, even if their games are good(which is why I didn't pick up Asura's Wrath, despite enjoying the hell out of it). Not gonna show support for you nickel and diming people, doing things like selling DLC that's already on the disc I bought.

I don't buy from console makers like Microsoft, even if they'll have some exclusives I'd like to play. I mean, the "vision" they had for gaming is one in which they- console makers and publishers- control how we use what we buy. We'd own nothing, and there's no way I'm supporting that.

Whether you have doubts or not means nothing to me. I've been gaming for as far back as I can remember, and it's one of my favorite things to do. I'm not making my decisions for you to agree or disagree with, but I AM doing them so ALL gamers can have the best possible industry.

That means not supporting companies that wallet rape. It means making sure we OWN the games we buy, that console makers don't get to render our libraries inert at their whim. It means not buying a game that's the same as the past five, with slightly different coats of paint.

Disagree? That's your choice. But if you think a TRUE gamer just gives up his cash to a company he doesn't think will do the medium right, then your definition needs reworking.

Edit:

@TRH: There are more important things than whether or not something's enjoyable. Hell, with that logic, Microsoft could sacrifice newborn babies stolen from their mothers, and it wouldn't matter because they made good games, right? They can smear poo on your sister's upper lip and push your grandpa down the stairs, but that's all good, cuz they make good games. GTFOH.

@BLK: Your entire comment is pure ignorance. But as long as attitudes like yours are in the minority, I'm fine. Yeah, my job and my family are more important than gaming, but what type of self-centered ass must you be to make a comment like that?

Oh, well. Maintain your ignorance. I'll keep doing what I do. It's funny though: if anybody shows they're not gonna just forget that Microsoft tried to shaft them, and you're a Sony fanboy. Even former MS fanboys.

Go figure.

cyberninja3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

This is probably the best comment i've ever read. Wish that more people thought the same way...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3906d ago
jessupj3906d ago (Edited 3906d ago )

People like you a septic serverly, serverly piss me off.

You don't care about the games industry? Well maybe you should play gold instead of enable companies like MS.

You're disgusting attitude is akin to someone knownly buying a pair of shoes from Nike that have been made by poor little exploited children in sweat shops. Why should I care where my shoes come from? They're a good pair of shoes so I'm going to get them.

If more people were like Hicken, a real gamer, and less like you and Septic maybe we wouldn't have so much overpriced DLC. Maybe we wouldn't have a COD every single single. And most likely MS would have never tried to royally F gamers by trying to implement DRM.

You think you're a real gamer? You and Septic are the furthest thing from it.

LogicStomper3905d ago

Rubbish argument.

"You're disgusting attitude is akin to someone knownly buying a pair of shoes from Nike that have been made by poor little exploited children in sweat shops."

I'm sorry, does Microsoft have exploited kids working for them? I don't think so. Analogies are used for the IDEA. Here is an extract on the limitations of analogies:

"an analogy is a double-edged sword in that uncritical use of it may lead to misconceptions. This is because there is no such thing as a perfect analogy, that is, it is almost always impossible to have a perfect one-to-one fit between the analog and the target. Some pupils may only remember the analog and not the target, while others may focus on irrelevant aspects of the analog to form incorrect ideas about the target "

The last sentence of the quote sums up your mistake. You have pushed the aspect of the analogy. You exaggerate the situation, comparing a company that wants money to a company that allows child exploitation. These situations are very different and cannot be compared. It is correct with respect to the idea that you may not like the company, but to use extrema to push your point? No.

"If more people were like Hicken, a real gamer, and less like you and Septic maybe we wouldn't have so much overpriced DLC."

Real gamer? Please do explain to me how to differentiate between a 'real gamer' and a gamer. And what's this about getting over-priced DLC? Sorry but if the demand is high, a natural reaction would be to increase prices to maxmise profit. Also I don't even understand what is and isn't over-priced.

"Maybe we wouldn't have a COD every single single."

So it's Microsoft's fault that there is a CoD every year? I don't think so.

"And most likely MS would have never tried to royally F gamers by trying to implement DRM. "

Microsoft had a plan. They presented the plan. People did not like the plan. Microsoft changed their plan. This is much like an architect. You present your plan to the audience to see the reaction.

Also, you just said that Microsoft TRIED " to royally F gamers by trying to implement DRM. ". So you're saying that a company that wants money, is trying to screw them over? You must be messed in the head to think this.

In order to sell a product, it must appeal to the audience. Now Microsoft wants money, so they make a console to try appeal to the gamers. What you're saying is that Microsoft wants the money, but are trying to make the console as unappealing as possible. So your argument is invalid.

"You think you're a real gamer? You and Septic are the furthest thing from it."

This is one of the problems with N4G, many of you use terms you don't even understand. Before you use terms such as 'real gamer', prove to me you understand the meaning of it. Show me how a true gamer differs from a gamer. Prove to me that the last part of your argument that you are clinging on to is correct, otherwise consider your entire argument refuted.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3905d ago
Transporter473906d ago

For me the
1.Exclusives, not just the launch ones that they have showed, the series they own
2.Price
3.Hardware
That's all. Of course i can keep going but those are my 3 main ones.

3906d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (220)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies11d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken11d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga11d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken11d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6411d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long11d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197211d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
DivineHand12511d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91311d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer11d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91310d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit10d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
Christopher11d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6910d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit10d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher11d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken11d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197211d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2311d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218311d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder11d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades17d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken17d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades17d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii17d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit19d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

19d ago
Profchaos19d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9519d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia19d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)