250°

Ryse: Son of Rome has a petition to bring the game on PC

You can now sign a petition to get Ryse Son of Rome on PC, if you believe in these things.

Read Full Story >>
worldsfactory.net
trywizardo3912d ago

loooool ... you really don't thing that MS will drop its epic swords exclusive game for PC . i really don;t think so

BiggCMan3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

I was hearing at E3 that the game practically plays itself with all the QTE's that you cannot fail at all? I don't recall if that's 100% accurate, but if it is, I have zero interest in the game any more.

It looks good otherwise, nice graphics, nice gore etc.. And I don't mind QTE's at all, I do love Heavy Rain and God of War. But when you can't fail them, and the game practically moves on anyways, that ruins everything entirely.

I won't bother with this petition.

EDIT: Yea here it is, this just makes no sense to me.

http://www.kotaku.com.au/20...

JokesOnYou3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

BiggCMan, Where have you been theres been hands on which contrast Kotakus old impression of the game, they made the demo very easy to save time for the E3 presentation, which was more of an advertisement for the cinematics than the gameplay. Here is a vid about all the background work they were intending to showcase with the demo at E3.
http://www.comingsoon.net/n...

"San Diego Comic Con 2013: Xbox One Hands-On Impressions"

"This Roman war mongering simulator looks incredible. The combat isn't all about doling out repeated Quick Time Events, which is something I was relieved to learn about. As it turns out, the QTE's are definitely optional. There's no penalty for skipping them entirely, either. I had a blast just cutting up hapless soldiers and just moving on to the next one without ending their lives with a brutal QTE. Each button pertains to a different piece of equipment (the sword, shield block and shield bash/kick counter)."

"When facing off with multiple enemies, the complexity of the game's battles become a bit more prevalent. It pays off to know exactly when to block, slash and counter all the enemies that surround you. Paying attention to character animations plays a large part in knowing how to approach certain battle situations. The QTE's aren't the focus of this historical beat 'em up. Thank God for that (or the developers themselves)."

DonFreezer3912d ago Show
trywizardo3912d ago

@biggCMan mmmmmmmmmm IDK how to explain all the stuff in the game ill try a few though ...
1-these are finishers not QTE so you can skip them and kill enemies in old fashion boring way if you want to
2-there are more than 100 animation of finishers depends on how good you're in them and in what side of enemy you choose to finish and some will be unlocked when you're really good at them
3-the game is really brutal you can see legs sawed off
so yeah if you want to skip skip , but for me its one of the best next gen games
(look at the behind the scenes video in youtube to see what im talking about)

LordNikon3912d ago

@DonFreezer

Just so you know, crappy gameplay is far worser than crappy graphics. But Evolution did say, their graphics has been improving a lot lately. And Crytek did say their gameplay won't look as bad as it did at E3. So i believe both can turn out to be a lot better than what they looked like at E3.

opinska3912d ago

shut up, you won't get this one on PC lol >:)

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3912d ago
3912d ago
fermcr3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

If every X1 exclusive comes to PC, then what's the point of having a X1 ?

Microsoft wants people to buy a X1.

We don't see Sony or Nintendo bringing their main exclusives to PC.

starchild3912d ago

Because as lots of console gamers make clear time and time again they don't want to game on PC. There is some overlap, but they are largely different markets.

3-4-53912d ago

On PC, with mods, this game could actually become pretty awesome.

GrownUpGamer3912d ago

@ trywizardo
" loooool ... you really don't thing that MS will drop its epic swords exclusive game for PC . i really don;t think so "

Well is not a bad decision. In the minds of PS fanboys is a bad decision but in the mind of a gamer is great news for gamers. PC gamers and real gamers understand why.

starchild3912d ago

Among console focused gamers, it wouldn't really make a difference anyway. It wouldn't be playable on competing consoles.

3912d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3912d ago
Belking3912d ago

It all depends on how well the games does on xbox-one. If it does well then don't expect a PC version anytime soon.

FrigidDARKNESS3912d ago

Waste of time with petitions. Only on xbox one is where gamers can play this game.

DragonKnight3912d ago

Don't be so sure. This is Crytek's game and they are first and foremost PC devs. The only way this game stays on Xbox One is if MS owns some kind of rights to it.

FrigidDARKNESS3912d ago

Its published by Microsoft.

elhebbo163912d ago

it wouldn't be mind blowing if it comes to PC in later years... Mass Effect WAS a 360 you know.

PFFT3912d ago

Yes yes it was BUT you can bet your ass MS were the ones to give the go ahead and let that game release on the other consoles. And not only that im pretty sure they got something for it.

JokesOnYou3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Well DragonKnight that's called a legal loophole via a buyout, micro obviously agreed to for some undisclosed compensation, so unless you have some inside info that Crytek is about to be bought out by EA, your Mass Effect comparison means nothing. Microsoft is the publisher, Ryse is exclusive to X1. Ryse looks like its going to be a kickass game so I'm not surprised PC and sony fans are so interested in its status.

DragonKnight3912d ago

@JokesOnYou: I'm not interested in Ryse's status at all. To me it looks very casual, relies too heavily on QTE's and is riddled with Crytek's "looks over gameplay" style. I simply pointed out that Crytek is a primarily PC developer and it's not out of the realm of possibility that Ryse can go to the PC. EA buying out Bioware doesn't create a legal loophole that allows for past works to break any already established agreements. The law will only allow for that as of the writing of the contract and any future projects unless otherwise stated in the contract and agreed upon by involved parties.

It's also easily possible for MS to only have publishing rights and no IP rights. That means that as soon as the time limit, if one was established, in the publishing contract is up then Crytek can put their game wherever they want.

Don't be surprised if it shows up on the PC in the future.

@trafalger since I know you're so interested in what I'm saying and will show up: I don't care about the PC, but that doesn't mean I can't talk about it, so your links trying to discredit me because I talk about the PC are meaningless. Discussions aren't black and white situations.

JokesOnYou3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

lol, You just said the same thing I said:

"The law will only allow for that as of the writing of the contract and any future projects unless otherwise stated in the contract and agreed upon by involved parties."= legal loophole

-Yeah of course it was some type of vague writing or even puposely written language which in this case obviously it opened the door to ME being published on another console by a different publisher due to the buyout of Bioware. I mean its a fact that micro once owned the publishing rights. Do you actually think Micro would let it be published on ps3 for good will or because EA came in the picture? In fact since the game only came over after a while after the buyout and no other micro published game has gone to ps3 ITS CLEAR that the buyout was the driving factor or do you believe all the 3rd party exclusives like Gears of War aren't on ps3 because Epic doesn't like sony fans money?

-Saying well because of one game this COULD happen for every other exclusive is like saying Naught Dog could do one of those deals internally with sony and go independent but its very, very unlikely.

btw heres the link I forgot to include for the San Diego Comic Com hands on impression comments I quoted above:
http://www.heavy.com/games/...

DragonKnight3912d ago

@Jokes: Actually I wrote that out poorly. What I meant was this. EA could have bought Bioware, but that doesn't mean that they would be legally entitled to ownership of IPs that Bioware gave the rights to to another company BEFORE the buyout. Microsoft's rights would supersede EA's for Mass Effect 1. Only if Microsoft agreed to give up the rights to Mass Effect 1 in the original or a subsequent contract could EA then do whatever they wanted.

So when you say that Microsoft probably got something out of it, then yes I completely agree. However we don't know if MS owns the IP rights to Ryse or just the publishing rights. If MS own the IP rights to Ryse, then it will only go on PC if MS authorizes it. If just the publishing rights, then I'd be expecting Ryse on PC eventually.

Your Naughty Dog example is flawed due to the fact that Sony own Naughty Dog and all IPs they create, so the "legal loophole" you were discussing is impossible unless created by Sony.

JokesOnYou3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

OK, I think we are saying the same thing, for the most part but hey either way if Micro is the publisher like every other game they've published besides ME= EA buyout then its pretty much exclusive. As for my Naughty Dog example, I'm correct because members inside of a company can always "opt out" and form a new studio if they are unhappy with the parent company, notice I never said take their IP's go with them although that's possible through negotiations, but they definitely can just go independent, again that would mean ND was extremely unhappy under sony which I know is NOT true, just saying its possible for anything to happen in business because its always just about leverage/money and as great as ND is sony does not have the ability or desire to keep them from moving on if that's what they wanted to do.

DragonKnight3912d ago

Well yeah ND staff members could leave and form their own studio, doesn't mean the Xbox One will get Uncharted 1 through 3 though. It's not the same as Bioware being bought by EA and then EA working on MS to bring ME1 over to PS3.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3912d ago
3912d ago Replies(3)
Seafort3912d ago

Can I sign a petition to NOT bring Ryse to PC?

I don't want another QTE type games. It was bad enough when they thought it was a good idea to add QTE to Tomb Raider and a few other games but I can't bare the thought of playing a game that has exclusively QTEs.

Belking3912d ago

"but I can't bare the thought of playing a game that has exclusively QTEs."

Then you better stay away from GOW and heavy rain....lol

Skips3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

"exclusively QTEs."

"Then you better stay away from GOW"

You mean those QTE that only show up in boss fights??? LMFAO!!! XD

You're seriously reaching bud... Wouldn't even touch GOW if every SINGLE KILL ended with a QTE like Ryse...

Agree about Heavy Rain but in HR, it can actually change the story line...

Ryse's QTE's are just COMPLETELY unnecessary...

DigitalRaptor3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

Man, I wish I could understand how such fail is possible.

The guy is a PC gamer.

Anything that is an attack on Xbox or its games has to be somehow PlayStation related in your eyes. GOW and Heavy Rain are PlayStation games so what do they have to do with this guy or his comment? Fail.

JokesOnYou3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

DigitalRaptor, it isn't because its an attack on xbox, I disagree with him only because what he said doesn't make sense, for the following reasons.

#1 He mentioned "Tomb Raider and a few other games" and went on to say he "I can't bare the thought of playing a game that has exclusively QTEs.", which doesn't make sense because Tomb Raider is not exclusively QTE's, however I'm not sure what other pc games he's referring to are "exclusively QTE's"? Belking is correct about Heavy Rain, which is ALL QTE gameplay and its been highly regarded on this site. Ryse is nothing like HR.

#2 Clearly he doesn't know much about Ryse since its NOT "exclusively QTE's".

#3 PC has hundreds of games released each year, why as a PC gamer would he hope a game he doesn't care about come to the platform for those that do?

-It seems both you and Skips conveniently recognize when GOW QTE's occur but overlook that Ryse QTE's aren't really traditional QTE's at all, and more importantly you don't have to use them.

Spurg3912d ago

But the thing is they already said ages ago that those weren't QTE. The combat is similar to the arkham series and is the same button prompt appears when batman has to do a finishing move.

Its not a cinematic event where you have to press a few buttons to win the battles. Notice he had to slash a few times to prompt the a button for a finishing move. And to get a better more rewarding finishing moves you have to chain combos and parry. The combat isn't simple as people seem to think it is.

ohbaby3912d ago

Exactly, but people have Sonective memory jk hehe, on a serious note. The developers have stated the game is NOT QTE heavy, it was only that way for the E3 demo.

starchild3912d ago

I'm a PC gamer, but I disagree with you.

First of all, Tomb Raider was an amazing game. The few QTE in the game didn't take away from the experience at all.

Second of all, I don't even plan to buy an XB1, but it's disingenuous to say that Ryse is all QTEs when we can clearly see that it is not. Previews have also said as much.

Third, it doesn't hurt you to have a game simply be available on the PC. Even if you don't like the game, there may be PC gamers that do. The more games available on a platform the better. If you don't like a game, don't buy it. Simple as that.

Show all comments (82)
110°

15 Best Ancient Rome Games of All Time

From underrated Xbox One launch titles to absolute emperors of the strategy genre, history heads will love these games based around Ancient Rome.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Leeroyw363d ago (Edited 363d ago )

There's fifteen ancient Rome games?

LG_Fox_Brazil363d ago

Shadow of Rome was so freaking good

Sashamaz363d ago

I'm still waiting for the sequel.

HyperMoused362d ago

Ryse was awesome, i have no idea why it wasnt recieved well and why we havnt seen another, Rome conquered so much, you could take the action anywhere, and it looked great when xbox one came out, now would be even better.

200°

Ryse: Son of Rome Deserves a Second Shot

Ryse: Son of Rome was an Xbox One launch title that has been left to collect dust, but Crytek should set aside Crysis and give Ryse another shot.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
AngainorG7X618d ago

It was a great game, it had issues but it can only go up from here.

crazyCoconuts618d ago

It was just ok. Looked really good for an Xbox game though

Snookies12618d ago

"for an Xbox game"

Way to subtly throw shade there. It looked amazing compared to any game at the time it was released.

Never played it myself though, wasn't really interested in it personally. Plus it came at a time when I didn't own an Xbox console. But it was at least different than the usual copy/paste games we get. So I hope it gets another chance sometime soon.

Crows90618d ago

It was a crytek game though

1nsomniac618d ago (Edited 618d ago )

It was a stunning game on all basis. One of the standout games for Xbox as a whole. I ended up buying on pc as well… and yes nothing looked better than it in PC at the time either. Nothing just ok about it, definitely needs a sequel.

fr0sty618d ago

@snookies12, don't pretend like the Xbox One didn't struggle with being gimpled by its tiny pool of ESRAM as a frame buffer. It was significantly weaker than the PS4.

crazyCoconuts618d ago

Metacritic 60, user score 6.4. I'm not alone in putting it into the "ok" category...

VenomCarnage89617d ago

@snookies
Haven't played it but at least you know enough to defend Xbox over it. The game did look good, for an Xbox game. That's not some "subtle shade," it's full on reality.
I remember it being nearly the only graphically decent game on the Xbone for like the first two years after launch, and graphics were that games strength

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 617d ago
CrimsonWing69618d ago

I really enjoyed it. Bought it at launch even.

ManMarmalade618d ago (Edited 618d ago )

The qte's were disappointing though. God of war was doing it back in the ps2 days. As gorgeous as the game was, the gameplay needed to be updated.

annoyedgamer618d ago

I really liked the original Ryse but Crytek doesn't have the funds. The mismanaged their properties and let EA raid them with Crysis for the duration of their relationship. Right now they are working on Crysis 4, I doubt they can spare resources to work on a Ryse sequel.

gamer7804618d ago

It would have to be funded by MS, I really liked Ryse sure it got repetitive but the setting visuals and story were good

moriarty1889618d ago

MS should have funded a sequel to Ryse and Sunset OD. Two good franchises they definitely needed last gen.

annoyedgamer617d ago

MS is too busy trying to become the next EA, Ryse wont be on their list of titles to finance unless it gets a hipster makeover with lootboxes.

darthv72618d ago (Edited 618d ago )

I recently bought it for the steamdeck and have to say... 60fps is a game changer. I really wished MS had gotten a one x patch or series boost mode option but sadly, nope. Other games that definitely deserve a second chance (esp on steamdeck/pc) are quantum break and sunset overdrive. Both deserved 60fps support on one x / series but you have to go to PC for that.

Rumor has it Crytek had plans for a Ryse 2 but due to the low turnout for XB (at the time) it was shelved. They really should give this another shot. i dont care if its multiplat on PS and XB and PC and Switch... just so long as part 2 gets made.

babadivad618d ago

The game is automatically boosted on Series X

darthv72618d ago

sorry... but it's not. It still runs at the same fps the XBO did.

lelo2play618d ago

Game was good enough, not great.
Graphically it was top notch. Still holds well till this day.

Crows90618d ago

It only needed more enemy variety and few more movesets or weapons to use. That would have made the experience tons better.

MadLad618d ago

It was a good game.
Only time I saw quick time events actually make me feel engaged.

Show all comments (39)
50°

Here are the new Xbox Game Pass Quests for August 2022

Xbox Game Pass Quests recently reset for the month of August. So if you try to collect as many Microsoft Rewards points as possible, there's a new set available now.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
anast624d ago (Edited 624d ago )

This is not what I would call value for money spent. They give you quests in liveservice games to get you "re-engaged" with the monetization schemes or to get you hooked or so you at least spend some extra on skins and loot boxes. Then they dole out paltry points after you have already paid extra for whichever liveservice within a liveservice that you are already paying for. My worry is people can't actually be that stupid to fall for this, can they?

littletad623d ago

Absolutely nothing in this comment makes sense. At all.

anast623d ago (Edited 623d ago )

How does it not make sense? O thy god of reason, shine some evidence upon us. Ryse of Rome, ESO,and AC: Origins are all live service games, between them you can get 275 points. Liveservice games are made to keep people spending. Therefore, Gamepass is a live service and the points are for playing live service games.

It is not my problem that this does not make sense to you, it is absolutely your problem. I mean it is all your problem.

Julion0715623d ago (Edited 623d ago )

Hate Xbox but comments in every Xbox article 😂 without making sense smh

anast623d ago

Bring the evidence and then your emoji might make sense.