DailyGame: Will Sony’s removing the camera to get the PS4 price reduced have long-term consequences for next-gen games? What does it mean for multiplatform titles?
Ritual of Bonds Vol.2 follows on from Vol.1 to add a smattering of new content to SWORD ART ONLINE Last Recollection
Moiz from eXputer: "The constantly challenging nature of Balatro makes it an unforgettable experience and a delight for Poker enthusiasts."
In a recent Game Rant interview, Mob Entertainment's CEO and Co-Founder Zach Belanger talks Poppy Playtime Chapter 4 and the company's future plans.
We've already said no in other stories about this. I have never once owned a Eye or motion controller set up. It's just not for me. Yet, I own many games that have the ability to use those types of controllers. But since I don't "need" them and can use the DS3. I'm not missing out on anything. I'm glad the camera is not forced on us.
Depends if motion/camera games ever mature past party and child game phase.
Edit:
Wouldn't mind seeing a few more lightgun games.
Some lightgun games.
*Any* lightgun games...
I own the Eye, Move, Nav controller, and Sharpshooter. I would have preferred if Sony included the camera in the KZ bundle instead of a second controller.
I understand why they did it though. Most people don't care about Move. I'm sure Shadow Fall supports Move, but its a bit suspect that they didnt mention it. The only rational explanation is that Sony wanted to downplay the importance of the camera since they didnt want consumers to feel like they were being shortchanged by the lack of a camera in the bundle.
Probably very little if Sony had software or camera hardware that were worthy of mass adoption they would include it. But yes the mass adoption angle to game development will be held back when it comes to what little Sony's offerings could bring to the table.
No, because controlling games with a camera doesn't work, EyeToy showed it and Kinect stamped the confirmation on it.