Gareth at Skewed and Reviewed has posted an opinion piece asking if it is time for the media to shut up and take a break from the constant barrage of coverage and speculation about the Playstation 4 and Xbox One. The article cites the need to wait for more information and more hands on time with the consoles rather than a wave of speculative pieces.
Lam is among the 120 characters available for recruitment in Eiyuden Chronicle: Hundred Heroes. While she is one of the many straightforward recruits, a known bug may prevent players from recruiting her if certain conditions are met. Despite developers’ assurances of fixing the bug, some early access players still encounter issues with recruiting Lam despite attempting the standard method.
Tomb Raider 1-3 Remastered players are ticked off by the game’s most recent patch, which censors in-game pin-up posters of Lara Croft.
This is why gaming is screwed. When people change things to fit someone’s agenda, it’s a slippery slope downhill.
tbh I dont see something like this as censorship. Does anyone else not find it strange for someone to stick pin ups of themsleves in a locker room?
Now of it was a pin up of some half naked firefighters it might make sense as Lara might like that, and if they removed that I would cry censorship. But removing pin ups of the main character, yeah I get it.
By the year 2030, this remaster collection will totally be changed and censored. Probably will remove Lara as a playable character. It's ridiculous. Glad that my family didn't buy this.
I still have Tomb Raider 2 PS1 as a memory.
It’s mentioned in the article, and it’s a point i 100% agree with, it’s the fact that they can censor a game after you buy it. That’s total bullshit.
Whilst it's an overreaction to say this has "ruined" the game, it's still problematic that this has happened post launch and for many, post-purchase.
I don't want someone to change a product for the worse after I've bought it. The same goes for implementing micro transactions after reviews.
I wonder why they did this? Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.
Gary Green said: In a time where an enhanced, 3D remake of Final Fantasy III already exists, it’s hard to argue that Final Fantasy III Pixel Remaster is the definitive version we were expecting. With Final Fantasy III already being the last in the series to be translated and make its way west, this is something of a slap in the face for the fans. Still, let’s not be disheartened. There may be many shortfalls in this edition of Final Fantasy III, however there’s no denying that this classic JRPG still holds some nostalgic value, even if it struggles to break away from its original hardware limitations.
It’s funny I’m seeing these articles about pixel remaster, and I just platinumed 1-4 within 8 days lol. I’ve been on FF5 for about a week now. Let’s just say 5 was the start of FF having content like crazy. I should have the plat within 2-3 days.
The game being an accurate represantation of the original was not a slap in the face to the fans. The 3D remasters looked like ass (visually) tbh.
I just want to see what they have for GamesCom, I will be very disappointed if Sony don't show big new games, we gave it the benefit of the doubt at E3 because they used the time to address the DRM issue, but now they have to "bring it".
I think MS will show the Kinect games this time around, and maybe Sony will show what that MM puppet game is all about.
Says an article about the PS4 and the XB1
I have wondered if Microsoft did not expect Sony to announce in Feb nor did they expect them to ship this year and as a result were not fully prepared with their response and presentations as that is what helped cause the issues. They have been on the defensive in many ways since Sony announced the PS 4 in Feb. They made mistakes at their annouce event and at E3 and Sony has been reaping the rewards.
If we weren't talking about these two next-gen consoles and comparing them even if it's in a competitive way, something would be wrong with one. You don't see people comparing the PS4 or Xbox One to the Wii U. It's good for marketing. It's the excitement the gaming giants want from their passionate gamers/consumers.
Only thing worse than an article pitting Sony and Microsoft against eachother?
an article about the fact other articles are pitting Sony and Microsoft against each- INCEPTION!