340°

140 PS4 Games in Development, 100 in First year, 40 Have ‘Exclusive Experiences’

Sony has announced that not only are there 30 games coming from Sony Worldwide Studios, but over 140 games are in development for PS4 over all. - PSLS

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
NeverEnding19893970d ago (Edited 3970d ago )

Same. And now it's one less game to pay for online.

Pyrrhus3970d ago

Your moaning about playing online is tedious. We know your preferred console is an all-round pitiful pile of crap. Go to sleep.

Gratisfaction3970d ago

Is there a way to report you and remove you from the site?

Actually, how about you go do it yourself...

PraxxtorCruel3970d ago

40 Exclusive Experiences my ass. They never turn out good.

malol3970d ago

i like how MS came out and was like
"we have like 18 games !!1111111!1!!!!1111"

trenso13970d ago

your trolling horrendous, you defended paying for live all the time so, you cant even talk about paid services unless your going to bad mouth M$ as well

Ausbo3970d ago

You know what? im just glad sony fanboys won't ever talk about paying for live again. Sony is right to do this though. Its not cheap to run these online services.

badz1493970d ago

I'm tired of replying to the clueless but how is paying for PS+ will make you have 1 less game to buy?

pay for PS+ and get Drive Club for FREE! so...ONE less what again? and you will continue to receive FREE PS4, PS3 and Vita games every month for the whole period you're subscribing so...what exactly is this "one less game" that you are talking about dude?

I get it that you have to sacrifice 1 game in order to pay for XBL but PS gamers aren't used to THAT concept like...EVER! PS+ members pay $50 a year and get like $500 worth of contents back...not just online play for games we already paid for and XGC!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3970d ago
TrendyGamers3970d ago

I'll need a third and maybe a fourth.

princejb1343970d ago

Sony won next gen without even starting

THE-COMMANDER3970d ago (Edited 3970d ago )

Man this is awesome!
Sony is doing the right thing in everyhing!!
I want a Playstation 4 Now!!

The world is in play!

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

first1NFANTRY3970d ago

that was epic lol. M$ just got trolled hard.

what a pitiful greedy company. They have finally been exposed.

Sony wins next gen by default.

pompombrum3970d ago (Edited 3970d ago )

"I need a second job" - Said the Xbox One owner. We PS4 owners will be able to trade in our games wherever and however we please to help us fund the new stuff :D

kayoss3970d ago (Edited 3970d ago )

Hahaha you guys are fools. Getting a second job bwahaha... I'm selling one of my kidney. That's why god gave us all backups organs ( except for brain, heart, and penis these I will charge more). If you get second jobs when will you have time to play ps4?

showtimefolks3970d ago (Edited 3970d ago )

no DRM
let's you play used games
No need for net connection
$100 cheaper, and in Europe and UK even more cheaper than xbox one

Knak,,KZ,Drive Club day one launch

Have to pay for psn0plus to play online but atleast you get drive club for free, new game costs $60 you get drive club for basically $49.99 and keep psn-plus

with a fee you know psn will become even great service

i know some will complain about paying and i am not happy either but they took a stand for us gamers against publishers on drm and used games so we can give them the benefit of the doubt on psn-plus

Also this is the reason some 3rd party publishers went to MS with exclusive games i guess since sony said no to DRM

great conference overall 10/10 from me

Edward75

why is no one talking seriously, its all over n4g.com and every other site

Edward753970d ago

Great show by Sony, and MS. Sony didn't show many exclusives at E3, but the price point and no online verification needed are great. One thing that many aren't talking about is that PS+ may be needed for online play. Why is no one talking about that?

THE-COMMANDER3970d ago

@Edward75

ill tell you why mate:

because most of us already subscribed for PS+,
also, PS+ provide great contents varies from exclusive contents,avatars,themes to amazing instant game collection. So, you will get your money back with all the great stuff of the PS+.

BABYLEG3970d ago ShowReplies(8)
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3970d ago
Majin-vegeta3970d ago

Damn and i just got a raise at my job hell yea.

CaptainPunch3970d ago

Haha good stuff, need to put aside some money now.

Voozi3970d ago

Thank you for shopping with us. We'd like to let you know that Amazon has received your order, and is preparing it for shipment. Your estimated delivery date is below. If you would like to view the status of your order or make any changes to it, please visit Your Orders on Amazon.com

PraxxtorCruel3970d ago

Did you ask the card holder's permission first?

WalterWJR3970d ago

I was not planning on it but after that showing I have pre ordered through Amazon.

Usally I would look for a bundle but I have a feeling this thing will sell out fast.

Show all comments (52)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot13h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack12h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke198h ago(Edited 8h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke193h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot1h ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf5h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor7h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave5h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor3h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot1h ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke193h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai6h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris5h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (22)