710°

Why Won’t Sony Let Us See What the PS4 Looks Like?

The next generation of console gaming is upon us. Nintendo has already launched its Wii U, Microsoft’s Xbox One will be launching sometime later this year, and Sony has revealed several details about its PlayStation 4.

Read Full Story >>
slashgear.com
Sandmano3985d ago (Edited 3985d ago )

Its a great way to build hype thats why. Were all excited to see it at e3 and thats where MS went wrong. They showed the console and not the games people wont care about the games at e3, it will all be about how the PS4 looks.

Cam9773985d ago (Edited 3985d ago )

It's a strategy. Sony knew they were going to reveal first so they held onto the PS4's design so that they have something to show, and build up hype for at E3. You see, nobody cares about the XBONE at E3 because everything excluding games has been shown. On the other hand, the PS4 is yet to be shown which is great as people are still interested in it.

Yi-Long3985d ago

... they already knew the specs and wanted to announce what they were going to do, but I believe they are still just putting the finishing touches on the visual design of the actual console.

I guess Sony didn't want to prematurely show a design that might resemble a huge Betamax-player or something.

TBH, it's not all that important to me. The PS3 phat looked great, the 2nd PS3 looked a bit less impressive, and the last release just looks cheap and 'plastic', which is a shame.

I hope the PS4 will look stunning ofcourse, but it won;t be a dealbreaker.

When Sony start announcing the same kinda crap that MS announced, THAT would be a dealbreaker!

Muerte24943985d ago

That should be an "if" not "when", in your last sentence. People are assuming Sony's is going to follow Microsoft for some reason when it comes to used games and DRM. Nintendo jumped from #130 to #40 after Microsoft's reveal on Amazon. Unless PS4 is requires a connection every 24 hours or mandatory game installs, then i don't see how they can enforce it.

duli143985d ago

@ yi-long

Killzone:sf was running on an actual ps4 so I think they are finished with the design of the console.

BadboyCivic3985d ago (Edited 3985d ago )

Be assured, it will looking nothing like X1 . I just want to know if they really paid someone to design. Reminded me of the Gamecube, well at least the GC was purple

NatureOfLogic3985d ago

Xbox One design is so ugly that MS should've claimed it to be only an prototype, and had an alternative design ready to go.

BadboyCivic3985d ago

PS4 will not look like a square box

Kaizin5143985d ago

@ duli14

Just because it was running on an actual PS4 doesn't mean that the final design was finished. It very well was probably running on a development kit as I assume most demos are during these conventions.

In terms of the article, I do agree that it is just a strategy to generate hype for their conference. Can't really fault them for that considering E3 this year was gonna be all about next gen. I am looking forward to it and like many others, I was kind of disappointed with what Microsoft brought to the table. I was really hoping for a huge competitive difference this gen, but I am not really seeing it... yet.

Yi-Long3985d ago

... I said 'VISUAL DESIGN' of the console.

I didn't say the hardware (internally) wasn't finished yet, just that they were probably still considering their options about what it would look like.

@Muerta: You're right, I meant 'IF' they make similar announcements.

buynit3985d ago

@muetre

Mandatory install didnt bother any one with a ps3 everyone actually defended it, so why is it an issue now?

S2Killinit3985d ago

@buynit
because this time around it about controlling you. MS is pretty much taking money out of your pocket. You no longer will own what you pay for. You are merely buying permission to use the games you buy. This is what happens when consumers buy into shit like paying for online gaming when it is proven not to be necessary. People defended having to pay for Live, just to have to pay again for netflix and what not, and here is the results. Now MS pushes for even more from the consumer since they got away with it before. Sadly, I think if xbox one proves to be a success, everyone else in the industry will follow suite, including Sony.

PiTCHBLaCK3985d ago

@ buynit

The PS3 didn't require you to install the whole game from disc.

abzdine3985d ago

of course it could be about lettig the hype train going, but in my opinion there could be more things into it than just hype. maybe the box has some material things that could be copied by others? i dot know but i'm thinking exchange of parts and all...

Ju3985d ago

I'd rather think, they must have had a couple of design prototypes ready since a while now. I agree with the strategy, Sony could actually beat MS to it - and still keeping the joker. Now they can simply counter the box after MS's reveal.

I think that was well played. Would MS have waited till E3 that would have been a different story - because I think Sony will show final HW at E3. They had MS run into a trap right there.

A case can be built in quantities fairly quickly as long as the board fits into the specs. I think that's what they did. Now they can adapt to that big back boring box. And still keep it interesting.

Gaming1013985d ago

What are we 5 years old? There's a time and a place for everything, and when it's ready it's ready. If the system packaging isn't fully finalized you aren't going to see it, grow up already!

AndrewLB3984d ago

Anyone who thinks the PS4 design is finished just because they've shown a game being played has no idea what they're talking about. Sony was showing off PS3 games prior to launch which was running on a dev system, and at E3 2005 where Microsoft had the official Xbox 360 preview which included being able to get hands on gameplay... but what Microsoft didn't tell anyone was behind the fancy gaming stations was a secret. Each Xbox 360 was actually TWO PowerMac G5 systems. I took this photo myself. http://i1248.photobucket.co...

minimur123984d ago

they will let us see what it looks like. you have to wait mr article writer. Stupid child

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3984d ago
sinncross3985d ago

They are keeping it for E3 and atm its helping to build hype for their conference.

its a win-win for everyone. what the PS4 looks like is one of my most anticipated announce for the whole of E3 this year.

just...cant wait!

Sandmano3985d ago

Well it cant be worse then the xbox one IMO. The boxy design just doesnt look attractive.

kneon3985d ago

I have no problem with the basic box shape of the Xbox One but this particular design is not all that attractive.

But for me, how a console looks is by far the least important aspect of a console.

moparful993984d ago

@kneon I can respect your opinion but if I'm going to be paying hundreds of dollars and have it take a prominent position in my av stack then I want it to have a pleasing design. It's not a deal breaker by any means but I deem it in the top 3 important features.

Omar913985d ago (Edited 3985d ago )

@Sandmano

I'm sorry but I completely disagree. Since when was it wrong to reveal your console at a press conference? Every generation before this, all consoles were shown when they were revealed. Sony did a great job at building the hype for their system, but miscrosoft did nothing wrong in terms of showing their console off at a conference specifically for that reason.

"They showed the console and not the games people wont care about the games at e3, it will all be about how the PS4 looks."

I guess you can look at this numerous ways, however I do not think that Microsoft did anything wrong not revealing any games at their console reveal. That's the point of E3 to showcase all the games XBO will have. So while sony will dedicate half hour or so on the reveal of the console, Microsoft will have the full 90 mins or so to talk about games if they decide to do this the right way.

I didn't personally like what Microsoft showed, I think sony is doing a great job in hyping and giving gamers what they want with the PS4, however I think your statement is a little on sided imo.

vitullo313985d ago

Lol id place a large bet that microsoft is not going to talk about games for 90 minutes...

Omar913985d ago

Thats quite possible lol. If they do though I'm sure there will be a lot of time dedicated to kinect games and not full fledge AAA games.

I just don't like that everyone is shitting on them for not showing games when clearly E3 is in 2 weeks. I'm sure they thought this through before announcing the XBO

MysticStrummer3985d ago

I agree that neither MS nor Sony has made a mistake with how they've handled revealing the actual look of their systems. I'd say XBox One looks like an early VCR, which is a questionable design choice, but that's entirely subjective.

I'm sure MS will focus on games, but they need to spend at least some of their time clarifying the info we already have. Their PR has been very confusing. Harrison and Nelson have been quoted, then those quotes have been both contradicted and confirmed by various sources. MS needs to explain what the real deal is.

I doubt Sony will spend a half hour on the look of the console. They'll have to spend some time on Vita, which will take away PS4 time, and I'm sure as usual they'll talk at least a little about sales numbers. That's understandable after what PS3 has done, but I'd rather get more PS4 info and see more games than see sales numbers.

S2Killinit3985d ago

its not that xbox did anything wrong in regard to showing their systems physical form, its that Sony's strategy makes sense. For example, I'm excited about seeing it for the first time, and Sony has already had its conference and the benefits that will come with announcing your system early. So no, xbox hasn't done a bad thing by showing it.

moparful993984d ago

@Omar91 The issue with revealing early like they have is that there was little to no hype surrounding the announcement and the design was very underwhelming. Of course that's just my opinion but as someone who has been gaming since the NES I feel that my opinion holds merit. As far as their E3 press conference being fully devoted to games I'm going to call false. Knowing Microsoft it's fair to say that they will focus primarily on the multimedia functions like Kinect, APPS, TV functionality etc... I hope they prove me wrong but I'm not holding my breath.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3984d ago
EasilyTheBest3985d ago

Just wait patiently for E3 to see what it looks like, just like all the Sony fans are just waiting patiently to see all the Xbox One games at E3.

bigfish3985d ago

if your thinking is correct, then MS screwed up lol

stage883985d ago

It's a fantastic strategy by Sony to build hype.

And guess what IT'S WORKING!

joab7773985d ago (Edited 3985d ago )

Reallly its b/c its 10 feet tall and weighs 75 pounds. I thought we were over this. We will see it at E3. Sony played this perfectly.

lilbrat233985d ago

June 10th all will be revealed :-)

Sitdown3985d ago

When Sony did not show the console at the reveal fans said who cares what it looks like, now we are excited to see it at E3? Anyhow, I am just ready to know the price and preorder.

PiTCHBLaCK3985d ago

@ Sitdown

It's because people are answering the Article, the Article says "Why wont Sony let us see the PS4?" It's because It's a Strategy move, MS played their hand, Sony Isn't done yet.

ABizzel13985d ago

I don't care what the box looks like, that's so superficial especially considering after you look at it for the first day then show it off to your friends it's going to be the least important thing to you.

It's what's in the inside that matter most to me as with every relationship :D

moparful993984d ago

I disagree something that costs hundreds of dollars and will take up the primary position in your A/V stack then the look of it is important..

Downtown boogey3985d ago

Honestly I don't give a shit how it looks. I buy things based on what they do, not what they look like (unless I happen to wear them)

colonel1793985d ago

Specs are more important than the looks of the console. If they had showed a beautiful console, but had specs like the Wii U it would have sucked. I liked that they secured gamers with the specs and features, because then, the looks don't matter that much.

Mounce3985d ago

It's kinda obvious that Sony shouldn't just bloody show EVERYTHING about the PS4 at the February announcement. Have to keep some secrets to hype people for June. If they announced PS4, showed it, told everything there was to know at Feb and it launches Oct/Nov then the wait inbetween? The hype would bloody die. It's sorta common sense.

So I'm not sure why this article and anyone else whining about not seeing a Plastic Shell has to whine so much. The console itself maybe will have features itself on it like the controller has a share button. Maybe the PS4 for a first time as a casing will have something unique about it too and not simply be a Console/Tower shell.

NumOnePS3FanBoy3985d ago

Your comment is somewhat true. But they are going to be showing a lot of games at their E3 conference.

Hercules1893985d ago

microsoft, atleast showed their console at a console reveal, it was never supposed to be about showing off the games when e3 is a couple weeks to go. I like the strategy microsoft took because now that they took care of what it looks like and the features, e3 will be all about the games while we already know about the ps4 games, so theres less of a surprise from sony.

xtremeimport3985d ago

They said they hadn't settled on a design model.

so...

AngryEnglish3985d ago (Edited 3985d ago )

Sandmano did you really just say nobody will care for the games at E3 and be more interested in PS4's form factor..... Come on man, I can't wait to get a PS4 but to say people won't Care for X1's games is crazy, it's E3.... The biggest games convention there is, it's been that way since 1995, this isn't the 1st piece of new hardware to be ever shown there.

@Mounce you could use that very same argument for the X1 reveal, they openly said before the reveal that the 1st look wouldn't be about games, but people must have thought they was lying, MS wanted to leave the games to E3 so not to spew everything they had, do I think MS did the right thing at their reveal.....No.... But it's the same thing, holding back so they can attempt to wow people with the games

PSVita3985d ago

In one interview they didn't have the final design complete when the did the PS Meeting.

mp12893985d ago (Edited 3985d ago )

Also im assuming its aesthetically worth it, unlike the xbox one

MASTER_RAIDEN3985d ago

exactly. the fact that sony showed games before console keeps people EXCITED to finally see the build.
the fact that microsoft showed the console before games leaves people WORRIED about the lack of software they had to show. the difference in strategy leaves gamers on opposite ends.

3985d ago
otherZinc3984d ago

What if its because SONY didn't test the PS4 with the components inside that they announced. What if the specs shown at the PS4 Reveal were thrown in due to what M$ was going to announce.

Maybe that's why Polyphony Digital or other devs were shocked at the specs of 8gigs & gddr5. Now SONY must find a box and cooling system that won't burn the house down.

TheSurg3984d ago

Wait, am I hearing you right? First you guys complain MS never show enough games on e3 and sony wins coz its all about GAMES. Now when MS announce e3 will be all about games for them, you guys say no one cares about the games but how ps4 will look like...
Unbelievable..you guys are really unbelievable. Anything posivite about MS you will turn into negative. Anything negative about Sony you will turn into positive. Hypocracy at it's best.

MYSTERIO3603984d ago

I think the title of this article should read ''Why Won’t Sony Let Us See What the PS4 Looks Like...just yet" and that's only to have more anticipation for E3.

+ Show (22) more repliesLast reply 3984d ago
icecoldfire3985d ago

Our faces will melt like wax, that's why.

icecoldfire3985d ago

Doesn't anyone here get the obvious Raiders of the Lost Ark reference?

KillrateOmega3985d ago

I did! :)

I would have replied in recognition earlier, but I just got to this article.

duli143985d ago

Better look away when they reveal it then lol

MysticStrummer3985d ago (Edited 3985d ago )

"It's beautiful!!!"

*face melts*

"Arrgghh!!!"

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3985d ago
tiffac0083985d ago

I would rather not have my face melt though, I want to live to play the console. lol!

PSVita3985d ago

You know I can see why the Xbox One is getting hated for the design but what IF the ps4s the same or worse. I doubt it but come on people it's not going to be dipped in Gold that's been melted by dragons breath and blessed with unicorn tears.

icecoldfire3982d ago

With the blood of 10,000 virgins as well, how can you forget that?

Bathyj3985d ago

They were too busy showing games.

militant073985d ago ShowReplies(2)
ginsunuva3985d ago

Because the actual physical console doesn't matter much at all.

How often do we look at our consoles anyway?
Mine are hidden in the electronics cabinet under the TV and wired from the back.

It's to make sure no emphasis is placed on the plastic but on the software, which is very smart.

GreenRanger3985d ago

Sony just sent me an email saying that they cancelled the PS4 because they forgot to put the adjustable PS logo on it.
I'm serious! Kaz emailed me himself!

GenericNameHere3985d ago

I guess Sony also cancelled the PS3 Slim, huh? /herp-a-derp-a-derp /jk

Off topic
Why does the Dragon Ranger have those atrocious white markings?? Gross! Use an original still image from Zyuranger/MMPR, not that dream sequence from Dino Thunder!

Show all comments (143)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot12h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke196h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke192h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot6m ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf4h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor5h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave4h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor2h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot2m ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke192h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai4h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris3h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (21)