150°

Nintendo’s Secret War Against YouTubers Will Cost Gamers Considerably

FleshEatingZipper writes: Sometimes, there’s nothing more enjoyable than a Let’s Play video. They’re not always called Let’s Play, they’re Quick Looks, they’re our very own FEZ PLAYs, they’re whatever you like. If broadcast sports or Mystery Science Theater 3000 have taught us anything, it’s that almost any form of entertainment is enhanced by color commentary. A few years ago, a bill was introduced into US Senate that would to impose penalties on those who streamed copywritten material, which was construed as a government attempt to ban Let’s Play videos. While the bill’s creators have said that wasn’t the aim, it appears that Nintendo would have no issue with a variant of it as they’ve now sent out Content ID notices to Let’s Play producers like Zack Scott who rely on YouTube ad revenue to, well, live.

Read Full Story >>
flesheatingzipper.com
joxef3990d ago

This irks me so much, especially as a long time Nintendo fan boy. Definitely not buying anything from them for a while.

Phil323990d ago

Yeah. They should have threatened to take down channels like Microsoft.

If THIS is what pisses you off about Nintendo, your priorities are severely screwed up.

joxef3990d ago

I still like Nintendo overall, never said I didn't. I'm just saying, it's not a cool move either way. Sure, not as extreme as Microsoft or what Sega did with the Shining Force thing, doesn't mean I shouldn't dislike this action, though.

If you aren't at least a little upset about this, then your priorities are severely screwed up, as well, I guess.

DivineAssault 3990d ago

I stopped supporting them as soon as the wii u came around.. They have been making some very foolish decisions & arent doing anything thats appealing to me as a gamer so im done with them until i see change.. I have been a nintendo supporter since NES (even bought virtual boy) & have been there through thick & thin but enough is enough.. Its like they think ripping ppl off is funny or something..

RTheRebel3989d ago

You expect people to believe your response?LOL
cmon Divine you a Drone lol

ZodTheRipper3989d ago

I'd not call it ripping off, they still release high quality games once in a while ...it's more like they lost their focus long ago and that's why I'm not supporting them since I've sold my Wii. News like that certainly don't make it better.

gamer423990d ago

Wait people make money off Let's Play? That's ... I don't know how to feel about that...

TFXR3990d ago

They're incredibly popular. Quick Looks make up a lot of Giant Bomb's traffic, too.

MoveTheGlow3989d ago (Edited 3989d ago )

Yes, but GB gets actual permission. They have to, they're part of a much bigger company now. Some companies negotiate that they demo the game, or guide through it, which often turns into a Quick Look EX.

But yes, definitely they get traffic! Plenty from me, too!

scottd3989d ago

so if they were doing the videos and making no profit this would not be an issue??

dennett3163989d ago

Exactly...you can do LP's all you like but if you're monetizing them, Nintendo have put a stop to that unless you have some sort of deal in place.

It's odd. All the ones complaining about this are the ones who are making money using the assets of others without permission. People are saying that LP's are not about the game, but the commentary, and I find that massively absurd. Without the game - and all the assets and mechanics which belong to other people - there's nothing to comment over.

Machinima even had the gall to ask Notch for money because the videos made using his game amounted to free advertising for it, and they deserved a cut despite already making money off the ads they put in the videos. The greed and sheer balls it takes to ask that of the game creator is staggering.
A lot of LP'ers do it for the love of the game, or even to mock a terrible game in a funny way. Nintendo isn't stopping anyone from making the vids, they're just stopping people profiteering off their work.

If the LP'ers are so bothered, why don't they stop monetizing the vids, but charge for their commentary (which they DO own) in the style of Rifftrax...that way they make money on what they actually can call their own created content. If it's all about the commentary, then there should be no problem with that set up?

RuleofOne343 3989d ago

One thing for those folks to do is find a way around this crap or stop making vids & they can't do what their trying to do.

sloth33953989d ago

Nintendo doesn't have a problem with people making the videos as long as they don't try to profit from it. You can make videos all you want as long as their is no gain for yourself.

PopRocks3593989d ago

It's not even that. From what I understand this won't even affect all Nintendo related uploads. Just videos featuring certain games at a certain length.

For example, it probably won't hurt game videos of Super Metroid. But it would probably affect a Let's Play of Zelda Wii U when it comes out.

We don't know the specifics yet so I wish people would stop freaking out with their knee-jerk reactions. As Phil32 said, they could be removing videos and leaving strikes on people's accounts like Microsoft and Sega.

dennett3163989d ago

It's telling that they use MST3K as an example considering how Rifftrax operates now. They've monetized their content by offering up the commentary on its own for a small fee, which then must be synced up to the appropriate video file.

Notice how they don't actually use the movie footage to make their money? Well that's what these LP'ers who monetize their videos are complaining about....they want to be able to use assets that are not owned by them in order to make a quick buck.

Nintendo are not waging war on LP's, or on fans of their games, they're clipping the wings of the greedy few who think they're somehow entitled to use anything they want to make money...regardless of who actually owns the assets being used.

Show all comments (20)
130°

70 percent of devs unsure of live-service games sustainability

With so many games fighting for players' attention and interest losing out over time, time sink games are at risk of eventually losing steam.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
thorstein1d 3h ago

It was worrisome to begin with.

It's a niche genre with only a handful of hits that can stand the test of time.

Cacabunga6h ago

I like the sound of that!! I will for sure never support these gaas games.
Sony must be shocked at gamer's reaction, making them cancel a few of these and hopefully go back to the good heavy hitters they had us used to..
now bring on that PSPro reveal and show us some SP 1st party awesomeness.

CrimsonWing691d 2h ago

What’s to be unsure of!? Look at the ratio of success to failure!

DarXyde9h ago

It's pretty ridiculous.

Imagine having a breadth of data at your disposal to see the statistically low success rate of these games, only to be laser focused on the exceptional case studies.

shinoff21831d 1h ago

Yes. Stop all the live service bs.

jznrpg1d 1h ago

Only a few will catch on. You need a perfect storm to be successful in GaaS and a bit of luck on top of that. But a potential cash cow will keep them trying and some will go out of business because of it.

MIDGETonSTILTS171d ago

Helldivers 2 manages just fine…

Keep production costs low… don’t just make custscenes until the mechanics and enemies are perfected first.

Make so much content that you can drip extra content for years, and the game already feels complete without them.

Most importantly: make weapons, enemies, levels, and mechanics that will stand the test of 1000 hours. This might require more devs embracing procedurally generated leveled, which I think separates Helldivers 2 from Destiny’s repetitiveness.

Show all comments (15)
60°

The Battle Pass Is The Worst Thing To Happen To Modern Gaming

Nameer from eXputer: "Some exceptions aside, I don't think the battle pass is a net positive for gaming with how they're implemented in most live service titles."

got_dam1d 5h ago

Battle passes AND meta gaming both.

DivineHand1251d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

I like the way Helldivers 2 does battle passes. It allows you to make purchases on each level of the battle pass and gives you the option of choosing which item to unlock first. The more purchases you make using medals the further you progress. There is no timer and you can earn medals towards purchasing stuff via personal orders and Major orders.

I haven't played much live service games that have battle passes but I remember some games that have battle passes where you progress through it linearly using an exp system. What makes it really bad is that the battle pass will have like 50 or more levels with the cooler stuff being closer to the end. They also have an in-game shop that sells exp boosters so you can reach the end of the pass before it refreshes. Everyone ilse will have to grind their way through.

lucian2291d 2h ago

battle pass in fortnite is perfect; buy one and it buys the rest for every other season as it gives you more money than the first cost. so 8.50 and season ends with you getting 13.00, it pays for the next and you have some pocket change to save up for cash shop. All of which is optional

80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."