410°

6 Screenshots That Will Sell You on Next-Gen Gaming

Ready or not, the next-generation of gaming is coming and it's actually not that far away. The sheer power that next-gen gaming consoles boast is nothing short of stunning.

Sony has made their bid with the PlayStation 4 and shown but a taste of what they have up their sleeves. Microsoft is set to do the same later this month with the next generation Xbox.

The proof, they say, is in the pudding. The task remains for Sony and Microsoft to show us what these systems are capable of.

If what we've seen so far is any measure, the community is in for some truly amazing experiences this year.

Read Full Story >>
fpsgeneral.com
FLGhawkeye4001d ago

As good as these graphics look, PCs have been capable of this for years.

Naate4001d ago

I know what you mean, but it's fun to see consoles getting powerful.

Autodidactdystopia4001d ago (Edited 4001d ago )

I thought this was what the ps3/360 looked like.

not shadowfall but the rest just look like current games...

I dont get it..

I hope we get smart with shaders soon cause im getting sick of the same models, blinn phong you know the stuff that makes engines look different. this all looks like stuff we already have. we need something groundbreaking.

I remember when fear came out on pc the textures were superhighrez but when the next gen 360/ps3 were released the industry took like 5 steps back in terms of texture quality in favor of advanced lighting and more advanced shaders.

i remember being blown away by the new lighting models etc but when i looked close there was no supporting detail... diffuse texture resolution was tiny masked by normal maps and procedural bump maps etc.

i hope this gen we finally get the super high rez textures along with the good lighting/shading models.

cant wait.

MaxXAttaxX4000d ago (Edited 4000d ago )

Not if it isn't being put to good use by most developers.
The tech may have been there, but it's what they do with it that counts. Art direction and design matter just as much, if not more, than just raw power.

Gameplay, story and art direction are the things that make games memorable and make you wanna go back and play them later. Not resolution or frame rate.
But PC fans see it differently, so I guess we may never agree.

IcyEyes4000d ago (Edited 4000d ago )

PC is ... "everything" ...

ZzzZZZzz

(yes, the "PC is the best" post/reply/crusade is really boring)

Ps no Sir ... there isn't any game on any platform NOW that can be compared to Killzone Shadowfall ... So enjoy the vision.

Pss I love the graphics of Crysis 3, but KZ:SF is superior.I know that ;)

Psss Awesome collection of screenshot

BullyMangler4001d ago

so the power was already there. its the art design that matters, not p.c. power.

4001d ago Replies(1)
BitbyDeath4001d ago (Edited 4001d ago )

Prove it hawkeye. Let's see some non-modded PC games which look as good as Killzone Shadow Fall. Deliver the pics.

SilentNegotiator4001d ago (Edited 4001d ago )

Come on. You can't really think that there aren't any PC games that look better than the upcoming Killzone, can you?

BitbyDeath4001d ago

Yep, I do. Feel free to prove me wrong though

Venemox4001d ago

Crysis 3 maxed out looks better than Killzone Shadowfall.

thechosenone4001d ago (Edited 4001d ago )

@SilentNegotiator

Dude just prove him wrong by posting up some links and that'll be the end of the discussion. What's the problem? Oh and make sure it's exclusive non-modded PC games please.

(If you ever want to quickly shut down a snobbish PC troll just ask them to provided you with some proof of these super awesome PC games with teh magnificent graphics and you'll quickly learn that they never follow through because these games simply don't exist)

FFRyan4000d ago

Whats that? I can't see you past the visuals of Star Citizen.

SilentNegotiator4000d ago

If nothing else, you have to admit that this is highly comparable.
http://img.gawkerassets.com...
http://cdn.overclock.net/1/...
http://www.abload.de/img/cr...

And don't call me a "PC snob troll"
I'm always there defending consoles when PC trolls are saying stupid things about consoles.

But the idea that PC doesn't have ANY games that look better than the next Killzone is ridiculous. Furthermore, you can't just IGNORE mods. Mods are available to ALL PC gamers with the system to run them.

BitbyDeath4000d ago

Grass is a bit of a jagfest in Crysis 3 and also there is not much going on in those shots, just scenery so it hardly pushing tech, even PS3 and 360 can play Crysis 3 so it is nothing special.

http://i50.tinypic.com/2h6r...

And the reason i am neglecting mods is because PC is obviously more powerful but my point is that devs are not coding to the full extent of PC and PC's are not pulling off PS4 graphics now, they will but they are not now.

MaxXAttaxX4000d ago

Thanks for the link. I keep forgetting how awesome that game looks so far.
http://oi50.tinypic.com/2h6...

Also, the tech may have been there, but it's what they do with it that counts.

ichimaru4000d ago

are you ill friend? im 100% a console gamer but your off your rocker if you think PC doesn't have games that look better than shadow fall. not to corner.you, but do you think SF is thw best game shown thus far? if you do let.me know and I'll link a few games that show pc's true.prowess.

4000d ago
thechosenone4000d ago (Edited 4000d ago )

@gameonbro

"why are console gamers such a-holes."

Oh I see we're a**holes when we ask you for proof to back your sh*t up but only after you started talking sh*t in the first place.

When is the last time you saw a PS3 user go into an PC related topic and start talking sh*t about how PS3 has been doing that for years and blah blah blah.

We've finally managed to quiet down the xbox crowd on who has the better hardware and games and now it's your turn. lol

And as you can see the PC crowd has had sufficient time to post loads of screens and video to show off the superiority of their platform but have failed to do so for some strange reason... heh.

@FFRyan

Star Citizen looks really nice but do you have any others examples? Exactly...

SilentNegotiator4000d ago

If you had said "An overwhelming number of developers don't make games that are meant to be run by anything much more powerful than the consoles", I would agree.

But PC definitely HAS games that look better than the next Killzone.

And even though Crysis 3 can play on PS3/360, it's definitely not anywhere near as good as Crysis 3 on PC, highest settings.

thezeldadoth4000d ago

why does it have to be non-modded? mods are free and easy to download to upgrade your game. a modded game that looks better than the original shipped game is a problem how? yes many modded pc games look better than killzone shadow fall and have for years.

ZombieNinjaPanda4000d ago

@Thechoseone

"When was the last time you saw a ps3 user go into..."

What are you daft mate? All the damn time.

BitbyDeath4000d ago

@thezeldadoth, because it isn't about who is more powerful. PC obviously is and always will be. If Devs really took advantage of PC hardware as people here seem to believe then graphical mods would not be needed in the first place.

PC games are held back by PC machines. You can't go building for a Titan when the average gaming PC is 5-10 years old.

Killzone SF has better graphics and is able to put a lot more on screen because it doesn't rely on any of the previous Playstation consoles to run.

PC can do the same game but every major game PC has gotten is a PS3/360 title with some added framerates and textures. That is no where the same as a brand new game that is not reliant on old hardware.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 4000d ago
SpideySpeakz4001d ago

Yes. However, they were never affordable for the average gamer, or the average person. PC gaming never appealed to the general public. The PS4 and Nextbox will give you more bang for your buck.

ZombieNinjaPanda4000d ago

I paid 600 dollars for my Ps3. That was not affordable for the average gamer or person, that did not give me more bang for my buck.

SpideySpeakz4000d ago

I got mine when it was only 399. Plus, $600 isn't nothing compared to a gaming PC. For you to run anything in medium to high is around $800, that excludes the mouse, keyboard, operating system, and monitor. All total around $1000. Now you can find deals on websites, like CyberpowerPCs, or Neweggs, and get it for MAYBE $150 cheaper.

ZombieNinjaPanda4000d ago

@Masseffect

I would tell you why you're wrong, but I don't bother dealing with people who lie and generally tell false information to try to get their point across.

SpideySpeakz4000d ago

lol. It isn't a lie. Go to any PC gaming site. Compare their price relative to their specs. If you want a GOOD gaming PC that runs everything on high, you're going to have to pay $800 or more. That's a fact.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4000d ago
thechosenone4001d ago

@FLGhawkeye

Really? Can you show me these PC exclusives from 5 years back that had this kind of IQ. I'd really like to see them and hopefully play them...?

NastyDaddeh4001d ago

newenglandgamer.com/wp-content /uploads/2012/12/crysis-maximum .jpg

NastyDaddeh4001d ago

img689.imageshack.us/img689/84 07/crysis2010121801134930.png

NastyDaddeh4001d ago

4.bp.blogspot.com/-dXk4qoIdIdc /T5xEZETQlwI/AAAAAAAAArk/AZG2Iy lhqJ4/s1600/crysis+1+vs+alien+c ongelado+%2528rafieldgames.blog spot.com.br%25292941x1965.jpg

BitbyDeath4001d ago (Edited 4001d ago )

None of your images work NastyDaddeh.
Also why do they all say Crysis in the file name? Surely if PC was able to beat PS4 for years their would be more than one game?

@Venemox post pics where you think looks better than KZ Shadow Fall.

Dee_914000d ago

im really curious too.
I would like to see something other than crysis battlefield and witcher.Some pc dudes make it seem as if a majority of pc games just crap on consoles.

thechosenone4000d ago (Edited 4000d ago )

Nice try nastydaddeh but that's Cry1 and it's been heavily modded and I should know because I have those same mods installed on my rig right now and I'm not going to mention how poorly optimized Cry1 runs on current hardware. Anything besides crysis?

I've played Cry1 SP many times and not once was I ever in awe of its graphics or set pieces like I was with KZ3.

KZ3 in-game screens.
http://imgur.com/a/QW2xx#0

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4000d ago
Shotcalm-4000d ago

i think next gen is more about stuffing as much stuff into the games while maintaining good graphics :)

kupomogli4000d ago (Edited 4000d ago )

Even though right now a powerful PC can blow the PS4 and Next Box out of the water in terms of graphics, they won't. Consoles are holding PC games back and it's not going to change when consoles are more popular and make the developers more money.

So Sony saying it's not next gen until they say so. They're kind of right.

Muffins12234000d ago

Yes pc's are easily capable of running this but do we see any games that look like this?No...why? Because "next-gen" is officially started when a next generation console is launched and game developers wait for that to start actually making games that look like this.

tigertron4000d ago

Capable yes, but seeing as how many games are multiplat, you won't see PC's true potential unless you have games made specifically for it i.e. Crysis.

IcyEyes4000d ago (Edited 4000d ago )

Nice looking screenshot

Heavenly King4000d ago

it depends. Because most games are created on consoles and ported to PC. Those games dont look like that.

Mini05103998d ago

clearly just trying to start flame wars. gtfo

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3998d ago
crazypenguin084001d ago

Really excited to see what Xbox is going to reveal on the 21st, hope COD isn't a let down

Naate4001d ago

Hopefully they'll have a strong showing, I want to see that new engine.

Dj7FairyTail4001d ago

excited for graphics.
I PLAY GAMES for GAMEPLAY not Visual aspect.
Games are not power points.

Skips4001d ago (Edited 4001d ago )

Agreed. Seems like the people disagreeing think visuals matter more in a game than gameplay or story. LMFAO! XD

Anyways...
Story = Gameplay for me.

If one is lacking, all would be forgiven if the other exceeds my expectations.

Take Deadly Premonition for example, HORRIBLE gameplay but awesome and intriguing story. lol Or Demon's Souls, HORRIBLE story but awesome and unique gameplay. :D

Then A.I., physics, art style, immersion, music etc. etc... As long as all if not most of the above are great, then I could barely give two flying f**** about how realistic things look in my game. XD

As for story. Not many PC exclusives have great stories that I haven't already played years ago...

stuntman_mike4000d ago

it's the game as a whole that matters not just one aspect like graphics or story. when you put crysis 3 up to other games it pales in comparison. it may have high resolution graphics with lots of detail but the rest of the game falls apart completely.

even with all these next gen games coming up, i still think The Last of Us is gonna be something special.

2pacalypsenow4000d ago (Edited 4000d ago )

Thats like saying I have sex for the sex I don't care if its with a 300 pound russian woman with a missing leg . And if everyone had your thinking we would still be playing with NES graphics

gk074001d ago

wow somehow i think ive seen this lol

Show all comments (67)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

60°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

180°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot11h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

Duke195h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke191h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

mandf2h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor4h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave3h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor1h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

Duke191h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai3h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris2h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (18)