130°

Why no E3 press conference is a catastrophe for Nintendo

"By skipping the big E3 press event, Nintendo is effectively saying they are not in the same league as Microsoft and Sony." - Wii U Daily

Read Full Story >>
wiiudaily.com
MultiConsoleGamer4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

It's a big mistake for any company to diminish their presence at e3. It's the most important gaming event of the calendar year.

I'm also shocked 2k games is skipping the big show entirely, along with a few other smaller companies.

donman14007d ago

Nintendo decided to make this E3 all about showing games and allowing attentants to play them. So how exactly is this a problem?? The last time I check E3 is about Games, Games and Games. Sony/Microsoft need to do their traditional press conference because they have to showcase their new hardware. Nintendo did that last year.

BitbyDeath4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

"Nintendo decided to make this E3 all about showing games"
Behind closed doors

"and allowing attentants to play them"
Leaving millions in the dark.

"So how exactly is this a problem??"
You really need to ask?

HammadTheBeast4007d ago

Well, there's no live streams or hype for games being p
played in some showroom somewhere.

SilentNegotiator4007d ago

Booths will never get a tenth as much attention or coverage as a conference.

Saving a couple million will not be justified when they're losing 90% of the attention of the most important media event of the year and losing the confidence of investors by not having a conference.

Nintendo having a couple of bad conferences does not justify it either; that's not a call for them to stop, but to revise.

Only through the thickest of fanboy goggles could anyone think that Nintendo made a good move.

DeadlyFire4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony typically have a conference every year to discuss new games at E3. Nintendo not doing that is a big blow to their public reputation. Could mean they are lacking games, but then again they have Nintendo Direct they will likely use to showcase their games before E3. If neither are present I would expect Nintendo to be forfeiting this generation. They clearly see their mistake this time I believe. Even if the machine is 20-30 times more powerful than the Wii.

I still expect Nintendo to come out this gen in 2nd place. I could be wrong and Andriod consoles could hit Nintendo's market as well, but not certain on that. Its still way to early to spell doom for Nintendo just yet. I say 2015 we will have a clear picture.

famoussasjohn4006d ago

"The last time I check E3 is about Games, Games and Games."

Ya..and the Wii-U is struggling to even get those.

donman14006d ago

@ BitbyDeath

The points you are trying to make are nonsense.
Please try and explain:
"Leaving millions in the dark" when journalist and gaming websites will provide coverage of the games they are shown and have played.
"You really need to ask?" Yes, please let me know how their decision to focus on games is a problem.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4006d ago
LOGICWINS4007d ago

LOL, as if the majority of gamers watch/know what E3 is? Ask all the soccer moms, preteens, and casuals if they know/care about what E3 is.

SilentNegotiator4007d ago

But you don't get the word of mouth if gamers online don't get the news to spread. You need a majority of dedicated gamers attention for any of it to drip down to the casual audience.

And gamers WILL be overwhelmingly discussing the Ps4/720 conferences over anything Nintendo shows off at a booth or behind a closed door.

Nitrowolf24007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

The thing is Logic, with Sony and Nintendo they are showing us their games, releasing videos, ect ect.
Nintendo is doing stuff behind closed doors, meaning we'll have to wait longer to see any of that gameplay or may not even get to see it.

Now putting that aside, those who don't watch E3, what are they most likely to hear about a game that was shown to everyone, including the public, or a game that was shown to a very tiny base. Word of mouth is stronger, especially if they'll be able to look it up after being told it.

Yes there are a bunch of people who don't know what E3 is, but there's also a bunch of people in America who don't know the first president.

There's never a "majority" that knows something if you put it like that, but that doesn't mean E3 isn't one of the biggest, if not is, events out there.

LOGICWINS4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

Anyone who wants info on the Wii U can type in "Wii U" in Google and the first link that will pop up will be Nintendo's Direct Feed.

It's the SAME thing.

Media will have Nintendo's Direct Feed on their sites just like they have Sony/Microsoft's conferences.

We will get gameplay, previews, screens and trailers of Wii U games on Youtube just like we will have gameplay, screens, previews, and trailers of 720/PS4 games.

Unless you plan on physically being at E3, you will get EQUAL online coverage from the Big Three.

"Nintendo is doing stuff behind closed doors, meaning we'll have to wait longer to see any of that gameplay or may not even get to see it."

Explain to me how GTAV is the most anticipated game of the year, yet all the gameplay thats been shown of it is behind closed doors?

You don't need some big ass song and dance conference to get exposure.

G20WLY4007d ago

E3 is important in terms of feeding the press, which in turn feeds public awareness.

You're right; it's really only us lot that will actually watch the whole thing.

But it's less about E3 as an event, more about generating a buzz via the (especially non-gaming) press and therefore creating that wider awareness among the demographics you mentioned.

Well, that's just how I see it, anyway.

LOGICWINS4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

^^Its not the conference that the press cares about. Its the information WITHIN that conference that people want. Lets assume Sony/Microsoft did their conferences, yet we subtract the audience(no fanboy cheerleaders and no press).

Afterwards, Sony/Microsoft make recordings of their conferences and post the videos on Youtube on the morning of June 10th, naming them "Sony Direct Feed" and "Microsoft Direct Feed" respectively.

Can you please explain to me what difference it would make if Sony/Microsoft took this approach as opposed to a live conference?

In both cases we will have gameplay footage, the opinions of the media, price drop announcements etc. So what exactly is the problem?

Too many of you live in the console war bubble. You put way too much stock into E3. E3 didn't sell the Wii. Oprah, smart marketing, and word of mouth did.

Nitrowolf24007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

first I notice with my first post I said Sony and Nintendo, I meant Sony and Microsoft XD (not directed at you Logic, just in general)

"Explain to me how GTAV is the most anticipated game of the year, yet all the gameplay thats been shown of it is behind closed doors?"

Because the majority knows how GTA plays already, however that doesn't mean they haven't been shouting at Rockstar these pasts months demanding screens/footage (on their site there were countless posts about this).

If Nintendo announced a game called " Jabba The Hutt: Huts Escape" (don't ask me why I just imaged that), but showed it behind closed doors the only thing we would be able to know about this game is that it's a starwars game and the little bit of info of the gameplay. The vast majority of people here in this world thinks like this.

"I'll believe it when I see it"

How often do we get to see the gameplay footage of games behind closed doors? Either never or it's months, and i mean months away. if Nintendo did release gameplay footage say the next dya or week, then yea it';s not at all harmful, but the focus of gamers will be on Microsoft and Sony. More people will be able to write about previews, shwo off the gameplay, ect ect.

Of course we care about the info at the conference more than the conference itself, but being there to present it makes a bigger impact than telling people this stuff behind doors and waiting for it to reach the public.

If Sony or Microsoft missed E3 it would still be a big deal, sure the majority of gamers don't use the net to check this stuff up, but that's a pretty big chunk that does.

I like to think that the general way that gamers feel towards a game/announcement on the internet reflects how it'll do in reality. You act as if the internet for gamers is a small thing when it comes to these things, but it's not. Yes not everyone watches E3, but either way the amount of attention that a video is gonna get compared to a written announcement with no screens or antyhing to really back it up is much larger.

@SilentNegotiator

Actually it is XD, different type, but still is.

@Logic:
"Will your tv turn itself on when E3 starts?"

Yes, timer + DVR functions :P . I know I am a disgusting human.

SilentNegotiator4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

"Anyone who wants info on the Wii U can type in "Wii U" in Google and the first link that will pop up will be Nintendo's Direct Feed.
It's the SAME thing"

*FACEPALM x10*

No. E3 is marketing. Someone googling is not marketing.

LOGICWINS4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

"*FACEPALM x10*

No. E3 is marketing. Someone googling is not marketing."

FACEPALM x20

How does one GET to E3 content if they don't look for it? Is Kaz Hirai or Major Nelson going to bitchslap everyone on the planet and tell them to watch E3?

Will your computer turn itself on when E3 starts? Will your tv turn itself on when E3 starts?

@Nitro- LMAO!

jetlian4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

logic its this simple you don't announce major games on the e3 floor!! Doesn't matter if nintendo is at e3.

All major news outlets will be attending and unless they go looking for an announcement they wont see it.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4007d ago
Mounce4007d ago

b-b-b-but the Nintendo fans say Nintendo doesn't need no stinkin' e3 cause Nintendo are just so awesome and strong!. . . .

*tries to hold back laughter*

OwlEyes4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

They don't need E3.

In this day and age, Nintendo could unveil a new game to three people in the middle of a desert. News and pictures of the event would still be on the internet within an hour.

Or to put in another way, if E3 was "so" important, why did both Sony and Microsoft choose to show off their new consoles beforehand?

Mounce4007d ago

Saying Nintendo doesn't need E3 is both arrogance and ignorance.... Hope you know that OwlEyes.

You talk like you visualize Nintendo being 'Above everyone else'....really, really pathetic I have to say.

StraightPath4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

here in N4G they believe everyone in the world tunes into E3.. wrong the people that actually watch E3 are a very small minority. Ask any average person what is E3....

" E3 What? " they will reply. Gamers watch E3 casual gamers don't know what that is even.

MEsoJD4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

Agreed. It's the one event where the world takes notice of games. Even non gaming media outlets cover E3 to some degree. This is the time Nintendo really needs to impress.

DA_SHREDDER4007d ago

Nintendo own their market, they don't need to compete with sony or microsoft directly, they will continue to just make first party titles till the end of time.

MultiConsoleGamer4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

That's actually very true.

But E3 is still very important. It has a riple effect on people who don't even know about the show. It also drives consumer sales through the holiday season.

Moonman4007d ago

It's not a "catastrophe". That is just extreme wording. Nintendo will bounce back like always.

miyamoto4007d ago

after two e3 disasters they are not repeating it for the 3rd time. something tells me there is nothing substantial to show anyways as their bodies aint ready to show the promised zelda hd.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4006d ago
Donnieboi4007d ago

I really think Nintendo should have prepared for an E3 conference. This is one of the biggest E3's of the next generation. Wii U needs to use this opportunity to flex it's muscle if it want's to stand against PS4 and 720, imo.

PopRocks3594007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

I'm pretty indifferent on the matter since I have no real opinion on how it will go either way. On the one hand, it would be tough for Nintendo to get a lot of attention while competing with two brand new consoles. On the other, it's the biggest game event of the year.

Oh well. At least they don't run the risk of another embarrassing presentation. I of course am talking about the "interference issues" with Skyward Sword during E3 2010.

Donnieboi4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

Agreed. I'm also leaning a little more neutral too, but my only pet-peeve is that it's the fact that it's during PS4 and 720's big conferences. If I was Iwata, I would show the new rumored Retro Studio game, The new Mario, SMT x Fire Emblem, monster Hunter 4, Zelda WW remake, and the new Zelda cannon game, all during a big event made just for Nintendo.

THAT list right there is VERY impressive, so I see how they can still have a strong presence. I just wish they didn't officially cancel the presentation itself, because it looks bad. At least we can look forward to those games :).

from the beach4007d ago

I think it's a bit unfair to highlight that Skyward Sword demo (especially since that conference was boss) when MS have had their problems on stage showing Kinect and Sony last year with Wonderbook.

Root4007d ago

Exactly

It has a ton of games to show and the Wii U needs to exposure. They shouldn't go into hiding because of the PS4 and the Nextbox

They have Bayonetta 2, Mario Kart U, Super Smash Bros U, Yoshi Yarn, Zelda U, Retro Studios new game, new IPs to show....I could go on

Why do a smaller show with less exposure when they have so much to show off.

Seriously it makes then look like they are running scared.

CouldHaveYelledUiiW4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

Again while I could give lots reasons why Nintendo taking this gamble, could be a good thing-

I don't for any reason believe that this could ever be a "Catastrophe" .

If an EXTREME condition befalls Nintendo it won't be because they had or did not have an E3 Press Conference.

I look at the Last picture in the article, that has Reggie standing in front of a screen that states "Playing = Believing"

Last I read about Nintendo's smaller E3 Press Events, was that they were going to let a select few Press Members play their games.
I think they are doing this because they believe in their Gameplay, because they believe that "Playing = Believing".

I really don't get all of this "street brawl language" that is creeping into defining Billion Dollar companies.
I assure you none of these Billion Dollar Companies are scared of each other they are only afraid of losing OUR money.

(Some of them are even friends off "court").

BitbyDeath4007d ago

"I don't for any reason believe that this could ever be a "Catastrophe" ."

It's not, just disappointing.
Santa is on his way but this year you get less presents.

CouldHaveYelledUiiW4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

"Funny"
But I disagree.

Edit:
Maybe I shouldn't have disagreed.
It is disappointing only because I like Press Conferences.

But the truth is I don't know the outcome.

I gave you a Bubble-Up Vote however- so my bad. I owe you some agrees- sorry.

BitbyDeath4007d ago

No worries, i'll agree your disagreed agree

OwlEyes4007d ago

You'll still get the exact same presents, but without the boring bits - game devs trying to be funny and failing, endless pie charts.....

99% of people never go to E3 and will watch it on a video stream. This year, the only difference is you'll be watching a Nintendo Direct on the video stream instead.

LOL_WUT4007d ago

Nintendo is making a big Mistake. ;)

ATi_Elite4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

No need for Nintendo to waste money on a Presser when they have nothing new to show

SOny/MS got New Hardware and NO MATTER what anybody else does the BIAS media will focus on SONY/MS new hardware. Kinda rightfully so as it is new hardware.

So it's best for Nintendo to just make sure they got a line-up of kick butt games for gamers to play.

They need Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Yoshi, Pokemon, and Donkey Kong ASAP!

Perfect example:

"Nintendo just showed the WIIU teleporting Mario into your living room and using your furniture to create a game world"

"That's cool i guess but back to the PS4's 8GB GDDR5 Ram set-up we just can't talk about that enough and how wonderful it is"

lilbroRx4007d ago (Edited 4007d ago )

Well said, Nintendo is playing it smart.

The only people who are complaining about Nintendo not holding a press conference are people who don't like Nintendo, and that should speak for itself.

Why would gamers who normally belittle Nintendo products, want them to become software only, and biggest of all, constantly express how they have no interest in what Nintendo releases make such a fuss about them not holding an E3 press conference if it was good for Nintendo?

OwlEyes4007d ago

Exactly.

Also, I find it odd that gamers are moaning about Nintendo abandoning the gimmicks, focusing on the gamer, and ignoring the causal audience.

Surely, that's what people have wanted for years?

Show all comments (59)
80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10111d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref10d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde10d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197210d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville10d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218310d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos10d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
isarai11d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref10d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan10d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis0079d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197211d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

11d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197211d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

11d ago
11d ago
Zeref10d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde10d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197210d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197210d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier10d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto10d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218310d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto10d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
Hofstaderman10d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts10d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts9d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic10d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
90°

Nintendo's War Against Player-Made Content Will Hurt The Company In The End

Danish from eXputer: "Nintendo has historically gone against player-made content and emulation of its games. This has done much to harm the company's image."

XiNatsuDragnel17d ago

I agree nintendo hire some these folks to help in your games it'll help imo.

banger8817d ago

They need to stop announcing these mods and fan remakes until they're finished. Finish it, upload it, and then if Nintendo dmca's it tough shit. Once it's online, people can share it around, even if the original download gets taken down.

Jingsing16d ago

True, but most modders need constant admiration during the process to motivate them.

PRIMORDUS16d ago

Yup, once it's a torrent nothing can be done Nintendo is helpless at that point. But it would be wise if they just had a site on the dark web, it's also easy to use with Tor and no one will bother you.

mastershredder16d ago

This is all coming from the mouth of short-sighted fandom and grifting madness.
No.... it wont. There is a clear defined reason why they don't. This is nothing new. Make your own shi7 from your own original ideas especially if you are trying to capitalize of it it. Duh.

Yeah, hire people that have zero respect or understanding for an established process. Wow. Yep. Totally makes sense.

shinoff218316d ago

Those guys that made that sonic game got a gig from sega or something along those lines and that game was dope as hell. One of the best sonics as of late.