120°

WWE Legend Kane Talks WrestleMania 29, Team Hell No And 2K Sports Video Game Challenge

Like many WWE superstars and divas, Kane is a big gamer. He also happens to be a big guy (7 feet tall and 323 pounds). That makes things interesting when he plays games online and takes on unsuspecting gamers who have no idea who they’re going up against. Born Glenn Thomas Jacobs, Kane is the current WWE Tag Team Champion with Daniel Bryan as Team Hell No.

With Team Hell No ready to take on Dolph Ziggler and Big E Langston at WrestleMania 29 at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey on April 7, the big man took some time to talk about the biggest wrestling spectacle in the world and offer some thoughts on the new 2K Sports WWE video game in this exclusive interview.

jagiii4041d ago

I've always been a fan of Kane and his many incarnations.

uncharted564041d ago

I remember the days when his gimmick actually mattered and he was not a joke

AngelicIceDiamond4041d ago

Apparently Randy Orton is turning at WM.

NegativeCreep4274041d ago (Edited 4041d ago )

Attitude Era. Which is arguably the greatest era, not only in WWF/WWE(yeah whatever) history. But in any era withing any major wrestling organization.

I just hope he never really sells himself short by acting to be John Cena's bodyguard; for as any real WWF/Amateur WWE fan would respond with...John Cena SUCKS!!!

GreenRanger4041d ago

Kane used to be awesome, but now he's only used as a joke for kids.
Vince McMahon is an idiot.

uncharted564041d ago

Its not that he's an idiot but he has lost his edge no pun intended lol. They just don't have a plan and any long term booking plus they just cater to Cena and push him as the top guy. They just don't do anymore sensible booking and have derivated so far away from what they used to be in making superstars.

190°

Tattoo artist successfully sues 2K for replicating their designs on a WWE 2K wrestler

From VGC: "A tattoo artist has successfully sued 2K Sports and its parent company Take-Two Interactive for including her designs in WWE 2K video games.

Catherine Alexander filed the lawsuit in 2018, claiming that her tattoo designs had been used without her permission in WWE 2K16, WWE 2K17 and WWE 2K18.

The tattoos in question are original tribal-style designs Alexander applied to WWE superstar Randy Orton’s upper back and arms in real life."

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Software_Lover566d ago

......... Some of these lawsuits I just don't get.

CobraKai566d ago

I don’t either. On can argue that she owes Orton for being the canvas to show her artwork. I personally feel that since money was exchanged between her and Orton, that the issue should be if Orton wants his tattoos showcased or not.

roadkillers566d ago

Very confusing… so Pepsi has no issues with Punk having a tattoo with Pepsi symbol with him being in all of these promotions.

Can you get sued for using WD-40 in a movie? At what point do you own something. Too confusing.

LostinthePANIC566d ago

I can understand the artist's point of view and the ruling was more than fair:

"The jury determined that Alexander was entitled to $3,750 in damages. It also determined that since none of the game’s profits came as a direct result of her tattoos being included, she wasn’t entitled to any further compensation."

Rainbowcookie566d ago (Edited 566d ago )

That is nothing to be honest. It does make it harder for authentic Orton to be included in wrestling games in the future. She will probably try to to push for more. I wonder how the amount was worked out.

Bobertt566d ago (Edited 566d ago )

She won't get more because they ruled even though they included the tattoo in the game they didn't profit off it because no one bought the game just because of her tattoo. The $3750 is for using it without having the rights to it.

P_Bomb566d ago

Ridiculous. Especially if she spent more on legal fees.

andy85566d ago

Any decent tattoo artist wouldn't replicate a design anyway so why does it matter? It's his body 😂 this is a poor ruling because now it opens the can of worms of every famous person in games having to be edited or some tattooist will sue.

MrBaskerville566d ago (Edited 566d ago )

But could also result in companies having to pay artists for using their work, which is a good thing. It's unusual, but why should a tattoo have less worth than a painting, song or a logo?

Adrian_v01566d ago

Getting a tattoo is usually expensive. I'd argue the person paying for the tattoo to be made on his body is owner of all rights for said tattoo.

RauLeCreuset566d ago

"It's unusual, but why should a tattoo have less worth than a painting, song or a logo?"

It's not about having more or less worth. Rights don't exist in isolation and are balanced against other rights in a society. This is why death threats can get you locked up despite being a form of speech.

The decision here gives undue consideration to the artist's copyright, with the implication being that it should trump Orton's right to his own likeness*. The very act of tattooing someone inherently relinquishes control over how that particular copy of the art is displayed. Rather than recognize this, the decision goes against precedent to suggest receiving a tattoo effectively transfers the rights to one's image to the tattoo artist or copyright owner of the tattoo.

*I'm assuming Orton gave permission for his likeness to be used in the games. The article didn't state otherwise.

monkey602566d ago

Oh no! This leads us down a very bad path

Show all comments (20)
150°

15 Best Wrestling Games of All Time

The best wrestling games range from all-time classics on the N64 all the way up to some surprising new hitters you should check out.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
darthv72824d ago

I was always partial to the arcade wrestling games like Saturday night slam masters, wwf superstars, wrestlefest, wrestlemania, wrestle war and then a NES classic... pro wrestling. By the time the N64 era of wrestling games happened, I wasnt into wrestling much anymore (tv & games).

jjb1981823d ago

It was all about the Starman Somersault or the Tiger Claw!

Fist4achin823d ago

Starman was awesome. I also remember a tan dude with bright yellow hair. Good times!

gurp824d ago

Smackdown 1+2 on PSX
A lot of hours went into those two games

jbrock11824d ago (Edited 824d ago )

Virtual Pro Wrestling 1 & 2 > Most games on that list.

Also, WCW/NWO Revenge should be #2 minimum.

Petebloodyonion824d ago

King of coliseum
most of the all japan pro wrestling
Toukon Retsuden 3

Terry_B824d ago

WWE 2k13 thanks to the WWE Attitude Mode. Followed by WWE Attitude and ECW Hardcore Evolution.

also: ECW! ECW! ECW!

Show all comments (13)
160°

EA Sports Thinks 2K’s New NFL Game Is ’A Good Thing For The Industry’

EA Sports doesn’t seem too concerned about 2K getting the rights to an NFL game of their own.

As everyone anticipates the release of Madden 22, we’re also waiting for news on another football game that is on the way. 2K Games, the developers of the dormant but never forgotten NFL 2K franchise, have their own NFL game on the way. Announced back in 2020, 2K has been working on an arcade-style football game with the NFL license. When it releases it will be the first game to use the NFL license not developed by EA since ESPN NFL 2K5.

ApocalypseShadow1029d ago (Edited 1029d ago )

You know what would be even better? Do I really have to say it? Don't even get me started.

Of course EA aren't concerned publicly. Give up the license so that others can make a game and see if that lack of concern still applies. They say more football games are good for the industry. But they are the very reason there's a lack of them.

I haven't bought a simulation football game since NFL 2K5 which I still have on the OG Xbox. That should give clues on what I think of EA, the NFL and the license. And, I'll never buy a game just because it's the only one on the market undeserving of purchase. Playing an arcade game I'm hoping will be good will never make me go out and buy Madden. And that's being nice about it.

Knightofelemia1029d ago (Edited 1029d ago )

I'd like to see Sega start making sports games again. I hate EA to the core and I refuse to support them unless it's a title I care about which is really rare.

badboyz091028d ago

EA spent 1.5Billon$$$ to keep the NFL License Sim to them for anther 5years. This is just EA saying There new game is to arcadey to compete with us.

yeahokwhatever1028d ago

blitz was always more fun than madden, so here's hoping sega can pull off making a fun game

badboyz091028d ago

Take-two owns 2K now it's not sega anymore.

yeahokwhatever1025d ago

im a 10000 years old and forgot about that, despite working with people from sega currently.

brewin1028d ago

Didnt EA also buy up the NFL Blitz rights at one point? They used to have the EA Big label, which made fun, arcadey alternatives to their sim sports games. I miss NBA Street and NFL Blitz style games honestly. I always thought they should have made an NHL Street, but instead we got FIFA Street, which pretty much ended that style of releases from EA.

I hope the 2k NFL game is great, but I also hope they bring back some of the 2k Sports line. The NHL series could use some competition as EA has let that get pretty stagnant. Madden has been crap for years as far as Im concerned. At least they are on Gamepass so I cant complain too much as I never pay for them. I definitely miss the NFL 2k series, those were always a blast to play! They were a fine line between sim and arcade-style fun.

brewin1028d ago

Yes Im aware. I wish 2k would get back in the game though as there is just no competition and EA has gotten lazy the last few years with NHL in particular.

BlaqMagiq11028d ago

They are scared of 2K running them out of the simulation industry and they know it. Even with 2K at its worst they are still 100x better at sports simulation. 2K nowadays is garbage too but I'd rather take my chance with them at a sports game than EA.