aceitman4040d ago

Yes . Nice. Cant wait to see it

HammadTheBeast4040d ago

I'm pretty sure one of the developers at Dice confirmed that it would be Frostbite 2.5 not 3 entirely.

irepbtown4040d ago

Assuming BF4 will be next gen, a new engine makes sense.

This is what I've been waiting for: 'Among the new additions is a much improved destruction feature where buildings can be completely destroyed (like in Bad Company 2, only at a much greater level and detail)'.

I love Battlefield 3, however no destruction (well, there is a bit) was very disappointing so to see they've listened to us and including it is very nice to know.

By the way, where did you get ' Dice confirmed that it would be Frostbite 2.5' from?
I've certainly not read/heard that before.

Peppino74040d ago

Reinventing TOTAL destruction!

BattleTorn4040d ago

@irepbtown

Wasn't Frostbite 2, the 'next-gen engine' that they already built?

I thought I read that was why it's struggled on current consoles... I could be wrong..

Gazondaily4040d ago

What a brand new engine? Take note Activision!

Frostbite 2 was an excellent engine and easily capable of being described as next gen. Now with weather effects, improved destructibility and lighting, we really in for a treat. I am definitely excited now.

Tr10wn4040d ago

"Assuming BF4 will be next gen, a new engine makes sense. "

BF3 is already "Next Gen" and i heard it was using Frostbite 2.5 too.

RioKing4040d ago

Soooo.....updated engines are now "brand new" engines?? Yeeeaaahhhhhhh -_-

ZigZagLagger4040d ago

Almost all engines are just gutted and revamped old engines.

papashango4040d ago

DICE screenshot leaks are PR bullshots.

They've been doing it since bf2 was announced.

dantesparda4040d ago

Exactly, "DICE screenshot leaks are PR bullshots", that's what i thought when i saw them, straight up bullshots! it needs to stop.

SolidStoner4040d ago

Next gen battlefield on my PS4 will be so epic... I just cant wait!! It seems I must rest from gaming this summer because next year will be crazy! :)

gedapeleda4040d ago (Edited 4040d ago )

@HammadTheOne
Because in reallity it's a pimped 2nd engine.

Linsolv4040d ago

@irepbtown - This is what you've been waiting for for, what, a year? TWO FUCKING YEARS it's been since the last title update was supposed to be the best new thing since sliced bread, took 3-5 years to make this great new engine, etc etc.

Now it's 'oh we're doing semi-yearly title updates and each one is just as big a jump as the huge jump we bragged about for months.'

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4040d ago
ShabbaRanks4040d ago

When devs brag about game engines it makes me laugh. 6 dudes made Natural Selection2 with a home made engine. Bethesda made Skyrim with a heavily modified 20+ year old engine, yes it was buggy as fuck on both PC and Console but they still made a pretty impressive world despite its flaws.

My point is Devs always talk about engines because they what it to sell. Look at Crytek always bragging about how awesome Cry3 is or Epic with Unreal.

I don’t give a dam what Engine they use as long as they make something good with it. I’m not saying I’m not hyped for BF4 lol, I’m fu**king hyped alright, but I want to see game footage NOW :P

DigitalSmoke4040d ago

Skyrim is a very bad excample, the game has physics less sophisticated then the bend twirly hair on my nutsack.

Its about putting everything together and have it effect eachother.

The pixel shaded texture on a brick should be effected by a bullet mark after it gets hit, then have physics realisitcaly move it calculating hit direction weight and friction.
The dynamic light should change on the brick and the shadow of a tree cast over it as well.

New engines take most of this into consideration.

vZeppelin4040d ago

Use Skyrim as a example, a poorly optimized game filled with glitches. But yea who needs a new engine, that costs money. Just change a very things and rename it.

Skate-AK4040d ago

I expected Frostbite 3.5 before 4. Idk if they can replicate the graphics gap between Frostbite 2 and 3 in less than a year.

secretcode4040d ago

Frostbite is not just a graphical engine. :\

DoomeDx4040d ago

Really? I thought it was.

What else is it? Its not a Physics engine aswell because Frostbite uses Havok as far as I was concered.

secretcode4040d ago

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Graphics are part of it, but so is animation, scaling, rendering, lighting, "destruction", and additional physics coding.

Anonagrog4040d ago (Edited 4040d ago )

@DoomeDx,

Havok still has to be integrated into the engine, along with the interface to it that will allow other systems to provide input and use the output from it. Then there's also the animation system, audio engine, artificial intelligence + pathfinding, gameplay layer, resource management + core systems, wider use of gpgpu tasking, a host of other possible middleware solutions (Scaleform, Enlighten, Bink, etc.) to maintain and interface with, not to mentioned the other half of what makes a 'good' games engine - the internal development tools, which act as the interface to the engine that artists and designers use to achieve their vision rapidly and with ease. There's also the engine design itself from a programming standpoint, typically with a looking towards improving productivity and maintainability into the future for all folks on the team.

An engine's rendering system certainly attracts more attention than any other part of an engine, but in reality it's still just one piece amongst many... albeit a big piece at that. The complexity goes way beyond the mediocre explanations I've put forward, but should at least highlight that a 'game engine' is far from being just about graphics.

peowpeow4040d ago

DoomeDx and Skate, that is some real narrow minded thinking

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4040d ago
4040d ago
HawtPaws4040d ago

Now with darks even darker and whites even whiter! IN THE RAIN!

What happened to "Frostbite 2.5"?

SeanScythe4040d ago

it's not an update to the engine it's rebuilt from the ground up so it's completely new.

bangshi4040d ago

Negative. 100% NOT built completely from the ground up.

That would take years to do.

SeanScythe4040d ago

@bangshi did you even ready the post?

Many suspected that Battlefield 4 would be powered by an updated Frostbite 2 engine — the same that powers BF3. Now it appears that Battlefield 4 is getting a brand new engine, Frostbite 3, filled with tons of new features built from the ground up.

Huh I guess you are wrong and I think I'd believe this before you.

dantesparda4040d ago

@Sean

He's still right, its not a a brand new engine rebuilt from the ground up

Show all comments (106)
150°

Battlefield 1, Hardline, BF4 Servers Are Being Taken Offline by Cheaters; EA Silent on Issue

Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.

-Foxtrot751d ago

Course they are silent, they are hoping people flock to 2042

gamesftw250750d ago

Maybe it was a inside job then haha.

jeromeface750d ago

wouldnt be the first time, titanfall 1+2 anyone?

PapaBop750d ago

Not even if they paid me.. EA always do this with old games with less money potential, if this was Ultimate Team, they'd address and sort it faster than stories could spread. Why invest time in their products when they will just dump it in the following years? Then again EA never could see the forest for the trees.

Inverno750d ago

I imagine after those games were given out for free a couple months back through Amazon, anything that makes people go to 2042 is a plus for them

XiNatsuDragnel751d ago

They want people to go on 2042. My theory

excaliburps750d ago

Nah. I think they can't do anything about it or they want to sink money into fixing it.

Pudge102888750d ago (Edited 750d ago )

EA owns all BF servers so yes, they can do something about it but they refuse to because they dont want ppl playing their old games instead of the new one. Its EA we’re talking about here

pr33k33750d ago

if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.

Pudge102888750d ago

Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.

FPS_D3TH750d ago

Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect

Show all comments (15)
60°

5 Great Shooter Games on Xbox Game Pass

The shooter genre is one of the most beloved videogame genres in the gaming community, and rightfully so. From DOOM Eternal to Battlefield 4, passing through The Outer Worlds, the Xbox Game Pass has a lot to offer when it comes to amazing shooter experiences. Come check out some great shooter games available on Xbox Game Pass!

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
MadLad765d ago

There's a bunch of great shooters on gamepass; both legacy and new.

A recommendation I have is a work in progress preview title called Anacrusis. It's a lot of fun, and has a cool aesthetic.

90°

5 Games That Started Out As A Buggy Mess

KeenGamer: "Sometimes a game starts out as a buggy mess and we all just stop and think, “that definitely could have spent a bit more time in the oven”. This is the case for these 5 games which infamously marked their place in recent game memory."

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
KingofBandits857d ago

"Games That Started Out As A Buggy Mess - A Bethesda and CD ProjektRed tale"