210°

All PS4 games available to download, Sony to add tiered subscriptions

All PlayStation 4 games will be available to download, Sony has revealed.

Read Full Story >>
digitalspy.com
KewDeGra4069d ago (Edited 4069d ago )

Hopefully all the nice normal features will be free still. and the cool not so super needy features are the ones that they charge for.. i'll gladly pay for the top tier if this come to light.

GribbleGrunger4069d ago

Gaikai brings so much to the table that it would be easy for Sony to incentify people to subscribe to its benefits. What we have now for free will pale into insignificance when the PS4 finally hits store shelves, so, yes, there is no reason whatsoever for NOT offering what we already get for free.

PSVita4069d ago

I think the share feature will be part of the paid service.

Rainstorm814069d ago (Edited 4069d ago )

@vita

I hope not especially with there being a share button on the controller and (correct me if im wrong) a chip built in for video streaming it has got to be a basic feature.

PSVita4069d ago (Edited 4069d ago )

@rainstorm81
As a gamer I hope it's free of course but they need to make their money back and as long as there's still free online and Netflix I don't mind paying for the extra stuff. If they can do something like Netflix/gamefly and I pay a monthly fee for access to all previous ps1-3 games they'd win hands down.

turgore4069d ago

Gaikai is nice but not everyone has unlimited usage for their internet.

stragomccloud4069d ago

@rainstorm
The extra chip isn't powerful enough for encoding, the extra chip is for background tasks like updating/downloading/uploading .

nukeitall4069d ago

Have any of you actually used Gaikai or OnLive?

I don't see how anyone can claim cloud streamed gaming brings so much to the table with it's artifact full on screen and laggy experience.

Even on top notch fiber optic connection, there is significant lag. Cloud might be something working in the far future, but right now it is sub-par and I personally won't waste my time with it.

Too many good games to be looking at encoding artifacts on screen with unresponsive controls.

4069d ago
joeorc4068d ago (Edited 4068d ago )

"@rainstorm
The extra chip isn't powerful enough for encoding, the extra chip is for background tasks like updating/downloading/uploading "

are you freaking kidding me?

"The extra chip isn't powerful enough for encoding"

really?

So the key to all of this will be the integration of an ARM processor into an AMD APU, specifically ARM’s Cortex-A5 CPU. The Cortex-A5 is ARM’s simplest ARMv7 application processor, and while it’s primarily designed for entry-level and other lower-performance devices, as it turns out it fits AMD’s needs quite nicely since it won’t be used as a primary application processor.

http://www.anandtech.com/sh...

and see for your self

The Cortex-A5 processor provides full instruction and feature compatibility with the higher performance Cortex-A8, Cortex-A9, and Cortex-A15 processors - all the way down to the operating system level. The Cortex-A5 processor also maintains backwards application compatibility with Classic ARM processors including the ARM926EJ-S, ARM1176JZ-S, and ARM7TDMI®.

http://www.arm.com/products...

I would say perfect for Background downloading and for any feature that Sony would need this "Application" processor for a games console Hell the CortexA5!

Alone:

It is intended to replace the ARM9 and ARM11 cores for use in low-end devices.

you know the 3DS is an Arm 11 powered device, right?

the 3DS has a Dual core Arm 11 and you already see what it can do. and this PS4 APU Has a Cortex-A5 already in it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

and exactly why is this important?

"Even if AMD just intends to use ARM for TrustZone today, this opens the door to comprehensive native ARM code execution in the future if AMD wanted to go that way; but at the same time this could end up being as far as AMD ever goes"

you know what else uses and Arm Cortex based Processor? the Freaking PSVita!!

LOL

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4068d ago
jujubee884069d ago

It's free on VITA, therefore.....

MasterCornholio4069d ago (Edited 4069d ago )

Well these online features are free on Vita and therefore will be free on PSN for all devices.

1. Online Multiplayer
2. Cross Game/platform chat

Plus all the other features that are free on the PS3.

However i dont expect all of Gaikais features to be free except the ability to stream demos and similar items.

But hey if Sony can provide the share function for free that would be fantastic.

EDIT: Wait a second.

""With one subscription you have access to thousands of games - that's our dream," he added."

Thats probably the premium subscription which will probably function like Netflix.

Rainstorm814069d ago

Exactly I think it refers more to the extra features involving gaikai and different gaming models...... simple multiplayer and chat should remain free

I think Sony is aiming for the stars with the PS4, if they can establish a Netflix subscription model for gaming and a service of this kind is only available on PS4, it will be a game changer.

Imagine tons of PS1 2 3 and 4 games available under one subscription service freely playable..... It's the console counter move for Steam.............if they can implement it

GribbleGrunger4069d ago

We may see a few Gakai features for free on top of what we already get. Traffic is important to Sony so being able to increase that traffic gives them the opportunity to promote the more advanced features of Gaikai. Let them through the door for free and then offer them little perks is probably going to be their strategy.

dc14069d ago

Online gaming to remain free.

amiga-man4069d ago

Who disagreed lol what makes you think online gaming won't be free?

boldscot4069d ago

Someone who just renewed his X-box Live subscription!

4069d ago
Outside_ofthe_Box4069d ago

This is old. These are quotes from a week ago shortly after the conference and in terms adding tiered subscriptions they was speaking in a hypothetical context.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4068d ago
Dragos754069d ago

I knew they would end up charging for this. They would be crazy not too. Sony wants that money too.

AzaziL4069d ago

hmm, pay to play online or pay to get a bunch of games monthly, which one sounds more greedy...

Dragos754069d ago

They both do but one is more business savvy. Sony won't charge for online because they never have,and that would come back to urt them. It's not because they don't want to. They have to find ways of making money from these services.

nevin14069d ago

I said many times over the years that at some point Sony would have model.

Sure it seems it online will still be free but I won't be surprised if it isn't.

Rainstorm814069d ago

"With one subscription you have access to thousands of games - that's our dream," he added

That's my dream as well....Sony seems to be trying to create a gaming version of Netflix

lovegames7184069d ago

As i have said before and a few others as well prior to Ps4 reveal when Gakai was acquired we all knew it was aiming to bring a Netflix game type service to Ps4. The only ppl thinking otherwise were the pseudo analyst on here that always have a negative opinion about something and know it all. Common sense doesn't always prevail on this site. You have a streaming game service of course they will offer streaming games under a service irregardless of whether or not everyone has fast bandwidth to accommodate it.

On that note i have Verizon fios 120 dl speeds and i cant wait to get my hands on the top tier service for the Ps4.

280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies15d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken15d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga15d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken15d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6415d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long14d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197214d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic14d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 14d ago
DivineHand12515d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91315d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer15d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91314d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit14d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 14d ago
Christopher15d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6914d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit14d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher15d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken15d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197214d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic14d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2315d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218315d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder15d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts15d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades21d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken21d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades21d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii21d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit22d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

22d ago
Profchaos22d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9522d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia22d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)