410°

Crysis 3 Graphics Comparison - PS3 vs PC vs 360

IGN - We compare the platforms that Crysis 3 has been released on in this graphic comparison looking at the PS3, PC, and 360.

T9004071d ago

PC looks sharp while both console versions look blurry. Probably because the consoles are running in sub hd.

ziggurcat4071d ago

obviously the PC version is going to look better...

and how is 720p sub HD?

konnerbllb4071d ago

It's not native, it's upscaled.

Welshy4071d ago

At this point we still care? Seriously?

Anyone with half a brain knows by now that Ultra PC setting will look better than PS360, that's just common sense now.

Dylila4071d ago Show
brich2334071d ago

720p is Sub HD
1080p is FULL HD

JasonXS124071d ago

@Dylila To me it's not that the PS4 embarrassed PCs it's just that the games embarrass PC. It's up to developers to create the game and if developers are just porting some half ass game from console to PC of course it's going to be limited and look like crap compared to if it was PC exclusive with real effort placed into the game. We all know that a game built 100% for PC would have to be dumbed down just to run on a console. I'm sure Killzone would run amazingly on PC if ported right but if it was built for PC then it could be so much more.

PC hardware surpasses consoles. Even if the PS4 is next-gen technology, the hardware is still relatively mid range this gen. It's also because of pricing.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4071d ago (Edited 4071d ago )

Can't wait to see pc games without 7 year console holding it back and also ps4 is x86 so great for pc and ps4. Lets hope 720 will not hold everyone back.
Also Dylila is crazy.. BF3 looks better than kilzone..
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

and is 64 player on a huge map.

yeah and is a 2011 game.

ritsuka6664071d ago

Dylila@

You are typical Ps3 fanboy. Please stop give a bad name for Sony.

nveenio4070d ago

Hurry up and get here, PS4.

Braid4070d ago (Edited 4070d ago )

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney,

Good luck with that. I have the same graphics card that's used on the PS4 (7850) and 8 gigs of DDR3 RAM plus 2 GB GDDR5 VRAM on the GPU, not only my PC struggles to run Crysis 3 at max settings but also I have yet to see a game with an extreme visual fidelity like Killzone Shadow Fall on my system.

Crysis 3 is a gorgeous looking game but it's not a next-gen title. I'm sure Crytek can do wonders with PS4 but people claiming that Crysis 3 looks better than Shadow Fall are either in denial or have terrible visual senses. Crysis 3 is basically Crysis 2 on steroids while KZ Shadow Fall has a never seen before geometry detail, view distance and millions of polygons all over the place. Hell, even the bricks on the ground are perfectly modelled, it's not your tpyical tesselated/parallax mapped objects. You really can not compare ANY current-gen game with that, that's simply another league and a step forward to CGI-quality graphcis.

I know PC gamers have been messing around with DX11 visual effects for a long while now as I tend to have a good gaming rig right next to my consoles as well, but next-gen games are more than that. I know they look kind of similar to PC gamers as you're familiar with those effects already but the devil is in the details, not in the effects. People comparing Crysis 3 with next-gen games are actually comparing apples to oranges, I'm afraid.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4070d ago
karlowma4071d ago

It's the low res textures that make the console versions look like trash relative to the PC release.

black9114071d ago (Edited 4071d ago )

The 360 has held the PS3 back "ALOT" This Gen. Not anymore with PS4!!!!

mwjw6964071d ago

@black911 The PS3 held the PS3 back this Gen.

PS: Its A LOT not "ALOT"... Sony fanboys on this site.

akaakaaka4071d ago

I can't believe KZSF and every next gen game showed on the 20th has open my eyes! even BF3 running on Ultra high look ugly now!
I understand you PC gamer's now! but know you are been the one who can't see the true!
KZSF is miles ahead and don't hate the game or the PS4 be a gamer!

classic2004071d ago

I WANT TO SEE A KILLZONE SHADOW FALL VS CRYSIS 3 COMPARISON.

Perjoss4071d ago

Yeah lets compare a game that has had 1 sneak peek video released with a game that's finished and on shelves.

Bravo

RyuCloudStrife4071d ago

I still cannot justify spending so much money on a "rig" for the improvement I see on PC....

TruthbeTold4071d ago

Funny thing is, that's what a lot of people will say about the difference between Wii U and PS4.

Beyond a certain point graphics-wise, the dollars spent just don't justify the on screen difference.

xPhearR3dx4071d ago (Edited 4071d ago )

This video is a horrible representation of what the PC version actually looks like. Here's some screens of the game maxed out running at 1080p (Click the gear to show full resolution). Even these screens don't do the game justice as it looks even better depending on what type of TV/Monitor you're using. That, and seeing it run in real-time.

http://imgur.com/a/krDej

Oh, and this pic. Yeah, doesn't look ANYTHING close to this on consoles.

http://i.imgur.com/apYms8Y....

Statix4071d ago (Edited 4071d ago )

@xPhearR3dx:

Shows how amazing Beyond: Two Souls's faces look on PS3, considering it's running on 7-year old hardware.

http://i.neoseeker.com/scre...

What's even more amazing is that the PS4 will shame this level of facial detail! It's going to be crazy to see what Quantic Dream and other developers achieve in the coming years.

LKHGFDSA4070d ago

TruthbeTold, how can that be so when we haven't seen the price of the PS4. You fuckwit.
Wii U is $430 RRP. I highly doubt the PS4 will be much more than that. (Especially considering Sony said they want the price reasonable.)

Triggytrolls4070d ago

Games look a lot better.
Games are cheaper.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4070d ago
LackTrue4K4071d ago

see, this is what i always talk about with Crysis.
its all about the looks of the game.....
back and forth, back and forth about what looks better.
yes we all know it looks great (on pc, cuz on ps3...that thing is a joke)!!!

but lack of gameplay really missing...this game is given to much attention then it should.

CryofSilence4071d ago

It probably doesn't help that this video is sub HD and internet compressed. ;P

scott1824071d ago

It's starnge, I was expecting the PC version to look way better. It looks better but not to the level I was thinking it would.

Autodidactdystopia4071d ago

please internets catch up to the fact that youtube and other streaming sites compress about 80 percent of the original quality out of videos that you upload. :(

It does look better you just cant see that it looks better due to compression.

Statix4071d ago

I think the console versions are looking pretty good considering they're 7-year old hardware. Aside from some extra blurriness, they look rather similar.

Tyre4070d ago

Crysis 3 is by far the best looking game on the Xbox 360, period. PC will always look better. These comparisons are useless...U need to compare Crysis 3 console version to other console games. Anyways Crytek did a marvellous job on all platforms. Why do people need to bash this game? Everbody should have played this game without prejudice....u will be convinced of it's excellence. Crytek is way beyond most console games...remember EVERYTHING IS REALTIME all the time no pre-baked shadows/lightning/all scenes and backgrounds are realtime objects no paintings as BG. Wake the f up...This game is unprecedented on consoles!!!

Psn8004070d ago

They have done a great job on the consoles too .

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4070d ago
greenpowerz4071d ago

You're joking right? Only on N4G. I could see that the PS3 version seemed lowest res even on the 360 web browser and that's saying a lot.

N0S3LFESTEEM4071d ago

PS3 and 360 both look like mud... 360 less so.

greenpowerz4071d ago (Edited 4071d ago )

Never said anything different ;)

I just hope you didn't disagree when we agree.

I think crytek will have a say in the specs of the 720 just as epic did with the 360. Crytek and MSFT have been working together in the background for a couple of years now.

scott1824071d ago

I couldn't see any difference between the ps3 and 360. PC looked a bit sharper to me. I think they hyped the graphics of crysis 3 up so much I was expecting more on the PC version. Crysis 1 looks better to me.

ALLWRONG4071d ago

Would you like to borrow my glasses?

brettyd4071d ago

360 definitely looks the best, obvious....

MuhammadJA4070d ago

People doesn't get sarcasm.

RedDeadLB4071d ago

In all honesty neither version looks that distinctly better than the other except the higher resolution the PC provides. Everything else is just not significant enough of a difference. I'd take the version that plays best.

Show all comments (70)
140°

EA’s best multiplayer games have now shut down for good

Battlefield Bad Company 2, Dead Space 2, Crysis 3, and a handful other EA games have finally had their online services shut down.

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
OtterX130d ago

I had no idea that Bad Company 2 was still running, and only now that I know, I want to jump on! 😥

SonyStyled130d ago

I was able to find games in the Vietnam dlc on ps3 the last week. There were articles on here about the server closure when it was announced in April

DaReapa130d ago

BF1943 is the only online MP game that I was genuinely interested in. Been playing since launch 14 years ago. Hate that I couldn't put in as much time to play as I'd hoped for during the final week.

Inverno129d ago

I got really into 43 when I bought Bf3, and preferred it. Everything that I disliked or found annoying about Bf3, wasn't an issue in 43. Too bad they never bothered releasing it on PS4 or PC.

1nsomniac129d ago (Edited 129d ago )

Dead Space 2...... I wasn't even aware that had multiplayer. Nevermind that it was apparently one of their best multiplayers!

anast129d ago

Once people stop buying micros, these companies close the doors.

Xenial129d ago

Dead Space 2 multiplayer had been hanging on for years - I'd boot my PS3 up to see some familiar names in lobbies. This will definitely be missed!

100°

EA has finally removed SecuROM from Crysis 3

Electronic Arts has released a new update for the PC version of Crysis 3 that removes its SecuROM protection system.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
370°

The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn & more running in 8K/30fps on NVIDIA GeForce RTX3090

Bang4BuckPC Gamer tested Crysis 3, The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn and Final Fantasy XV, with all of them running with 30fps in 8K.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
RazzerRedux1277d ago

Yep. Wait a couple of years and get this level of performance on a RTX 4070 or 4080 at a much lower price.

Killer73nova1277d ago

And wait a couple more years for rtx 5070 or 5080 at a much much lower price

Yung-T1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

That headline is a tad misleading.
The rig stated in that YouTube video is extremely high-end (ryzen 3950x oc, 32gb etc) and utilizing special water-cooling solutions, loops with pumps etc.

This rig easily costs 5k+ and a normal pc with a RTX 3090 wouldn't get close to these framerates or sustainable temperatures.

Aggesan1277d ago

Who has a "normal" pc with a RTX 3090?

Yung-T1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

There's still a difference between a high-end GPU+CPU and a custom-made water cooling system including a Waterloop&pumps etc though, it allows for much higher performance due to the better temperature management that would fry the GPU&CPU with normal builds.

lonewolf101277d ago

That's why people need to read the articles, most headlines are just to get you to click.

Rainbowcookie1277d ago

You would think yes, but honestly does it happen often 🤣 enough

I_am_Batman1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

Most of the threads of the 3950x were barely utilized and none of the games that were tested allocated more than ~12.5GB of system memory. Gaming at 8k is pretty much as GPU bound as you can get so you won't need a water cooled high-end CPU or 32GB of memory.

Psychotica1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

How does the cost of the PC make the headline misleading?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1277d ago
Father__Merrin1277d ago

Mega powerful video card but the games you can play on that card are all available elsewhere. I want to see compelling pc only goty material titles ASAP

Psychotica1277d ago

And where else can you run them in 8K or even in 4K with the same level of performance?

averagejoe261277d ago

Who cares? Nobody has 8k screens and the majority don't even have 4k screens.

This push for pointless high resolution is ruining progress. Give us better framerates, lighting, physics, etc. Stop wasting power on needles 8k.

lonewolf101277d ago

@averagejoe26

There are people with 8k monitors though.

Bender65021277d ago

And still we can't escape 30fps.

JCOLE131951277d ago

I mean given the fact the games are running at 8K it doesn’t surprise me...

MrDead1277d ago

DLSS 2.0 no doubt has a big part in this too, The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn and Death Stranding run like a dream on my 3080, 4k ultra set to 60fps no drops or stutters and the system runs very quiet. Playing Borderlands 3 on badass settings, Red Dead or Division 2 on 4k ultra all run great (Red Dead has a few drops below 60fps) but my PC is working a lot harder on games that don't utilise DLSS, my room warms up nicely when playing those games.

Show all comments (19)