220°
7.5

Crysis 3 Review Gamespot

Crysis 3 is a sandbox shooter set in 2047 where players take on the role of Prophet who is on a revenge mission after uncovering the truth behiind Cell Corporation's motives for building the quarantined Nanodomes.

Read Full Story >>
uk.gamespot.com
realiks4077d ago

Will get when the price drops. Didn't like very much Crysis 2. Maybe it's meant to be played on high end PC though.

Jobesy4077d ago

I feel the same, never even finished Crysis 2, got too boring. Also it has nothing to do with playing on a high end pc. It will look better, but a crap game is still a crap game.

Army_of_Darkness4077d ago (Edited 4077d ago )

How dare you say such things! your gonna upset the pc fanboys! crysis is their babY! they will love and defend it no matter what! LOL!

Grap4077d ago

I am PC gamer and Crysis is not my baby. i just run it to see and benchmark my rig. "it's very boring game"

Army_of_Darkness4077d ago

Don't worry bro, pc fanboy don't apply too you since your a pc Gamer.

ShinMaster4077d ago

""i just run it to see and benchmark my rig""

Such a stereotype reaffirmation lololol

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4077d ago
Trenta274077d ago

I love the series yet I didn't even like Crysis 2. This one, however, is wonderful. It's fantastic.

x5exotic4077d ago

I'll buy this game when the price drops to the point where they pay me to buy it.

Campy da Camper4077d ago

I picked it up from red box today. Its meh at best. I don't k ow what it is but it was boring. Played a couple hours before turning it off. Funny thing is I think 2 looked better. Aside from good lighting its blurry and really low res. The entire first level on the ship looked bad. Every yellow railing was a jaggy mess.

I know this prob looks sweet on PC but my ps3 copy was blah. We are seriously in need of a new console. I'm pumped for tom.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4077d ago
DigitalSmoke4077d ago

Yup Yup, watch the real reviews clown the ppl who say this game is great, blinded by GFX.

WarThunder4077d ago (Edited 4077d ago )

Sorry I don't use "reviews" other's people opinion to show me what game should i play, i use my own opinion... and From what i have seen gameplay video on Youtube, i think Crysis 3 is a great game. Graphics look fantastic, Gameplay is solid, it feels better than most shooter "COD, Battlefield, Halo etc)

If you like useing reviews more than ur own opinion then you are not a gamer ur just a troll and a loser...

Anon19744077d ago (Edited 4077d ago )

So what? I'm supposed to go out and play every game that comes out and make up my own mind? Sit through video of someone else playing the game and try to figure out if that's how I would play it, and enjoy it? Go..."ooh! That's pretty. I should buy!" I don't know what fantasy world this is, but I don't live in it. My gaming time and my gaming money are both precious to me and in short supply. I rely on trusted game reviews to help me not waste my time or money. Watching gameplay videos on youtube doesn't tell me squat compared to someone who's job it is to play an entire game and provide an informed opinion.

There's nothing wrong with listening to reviewers you trust or who's likes and dislikes you've found match your own. I never make a game purchase unless I've at least considered my review sources. Too many games, too little time.

WarThunder4077d ago (Edited 4077d ago )

@darkride66, pffff

I enjoyed games that got 5-6 scores more than games that got 9-10 scores and this says a lot....
if some "opinion/review" said the game is not good, that does not mean its not good for you or for anyone else....
Because "pro reviews" i missed a lot of great game like Warhawk, Vanquish, Folklore... if i go with what "pro reviews" say, i should say COD is the best game. I wasted my money on Halo 3 because of the high review scores it got...

Saying a game sucks because of some reviews/opinions without playing the game, this shows how stupid that person is.

Those so called "pro reviews" don't have a better opinion then your own opinion.

DigitalSmoke4077d ago

Don't excuse yourself to me for not reading reviews, cause i don't care.
But you should, because you bought a mediocre title, bored much maybe?

Now...saying its better then Battlefield just blows you right to the shit list when it come's to rationality son.

Anon19744077d ago

"I enjoyed games that got 5-6 scores more than games that got 9-10 scores and this says a lot."

To me it says you have no standards. In my 30 years of playing videogames, the general rule of thumb is if a game see's a bunch of 5 review scores, there's reasons for it. That's not to say there isn't fun to be had with some of these games, but is it going to be as great an experience as a game that's getting 8's and 9's? Probably not.

But hey, for some reason they keep making Scary Movie sequels. Justin Bieber is a huge hit. As is Nickleback and Britney Spears. Millions like them, just as your bound to find some games that you like among the 5's and 6's.

No where did I say game reviewer opinions are any more valid than yours or mine. In fact, I specifically stated I don't just trust any reviewer. After years I find those that match my specific tastes and use those to help me make informed purchasing decisions.

If you want to go play mediocre games and find fun in them, more power to you. If you like them, that's what's important, but don't insult the millions who like to make informed decisions just because you'll play whatever's thrown in front of you. If you can't make a point without insulting anyone who doesn't agree with you right out of the gate...it's time to rethink your point.

jetlian4077d ago (Edited 4077d ago )

your opinion is no different than his dark. A few journalist have no more say than anybody else. If he likes it he likes it.

Titanic and avatar both sucked as movies yet they are the highest grossing movies. His standards are just different than yours.

This looks better than c1 and c2 to me. Im liking the bow... Electric and explosions too. Alien weapons and forest are a bonus

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4077d ago
NYC_Gamer4077d ago

The game lacks a real story and characters that gamers could give a damn about

kwyjibo4077d ago

So did the original though, and that was never a problem because the gameplay was great.

Sadly, it looks like they've not improved on it.

Campy da Camper4077d ago

Exactly. The game is forgettable. Unless u play on PC for eye candy this is a waste if you spent 60 bones. Glad I red boxed it. Going back tom

EbeneezerGoode4077d ago

Yeah Crysis 1 and warhead had weak story/characters for sure but they DID have gameplay, new style gameplay that felt exciting and empowering... along with stunning graphics.

I have to reserve judgement on C3 as I won't be able to play it for sometime (on PC) but if it's more like C2 than C1 then I already know it will be disappointing compared to the original.

Seriously Crysis 1 is a sublime game and warhead (though more linear) isn't bad either.

Crytek should have stuck with PC only and focussed their strengths there. They are doing nobody any favours by spreading themselves so thinly (except making more money but pleasing less people)

Show all comments (32)
140°

EA’s best multiplayer games have now shut down for good

Battlefield Bad Company 2, Dead Space 2, Crysis 3, and a handful other EA games have finally had their online services shut down.

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
OtterX131d ago

I had no idea that Bad Company 2 was still running, and only now that I know, I want to jump on! 😥

SonyStyled131d ago

I was able to find games in the Vietnam dlc on ps3 the last week. There were articles on here about the server closure when it was announced in April

DaReapa131d ago

BF1943 is the only online MP game that I was genuinely interested in. Been playing since launch 14 years ago. Hate that I couldn't put in as much time to play as I'd hoped for during the final week.

Inverno130d ago

I got really into 43 when I bought Bf3, and preferred it. Everything that I disliked or found annoying about Bf3, wasn't an issue in 43. Too bad they never bothered releasing it on PS4 or PC.

1nsomniac130d ago (Edited 130d ago )

Dead Space 2...... I wasn't even aware that had multiplayer. Nevermind that it was apparently one of their best multiplayers!

anast130d ago

Once people stop buying micros, these companies close the doors.

Xenial130d ago

Dead Space 2 multiplayer had been hanging on for years - I'd boot my PS3 up to see some familiar names in lobbies. This will definitely be missed!

100°

EA has finally removed SecuROM from Crysis 3

Electronic Arts has released a new update for the PC version of Crysis 3 that removes its SecuROM protection system.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
370°

The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn & more running in 8K/30fps on NVIDIA GeForce RTX3090

Bang4BuckPC Gamer tested Crysis 3, The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn and Final Fantasy XV, with all of them running with 30fps in 8K.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
RazzerRedux1278d ago

Yep. Wait a couple of years and get this level of performance on a RTX 4070 or 4080 at a much lower price.

Killer73nova1278d ago

And wait a couple more years for rtx 5070 or 5080 at a much much lower price

Yung-T1278d ago (Edited 1278d ago )

That headline is a tad misleading.
The rig stated in that YouTube video is extremely high-end (ryzen 3950x oc, 32gb etc) and utilizing special water-cooling solutions, loops with pumps etc.

This rig easily costs 5k+ and a normal pc with a RTX 3090 wouldn't get close to these framerates or sustainable temperatures.

Aggesan1278d ago

Who has a "normal" pc with a RTX 3090?

Yung-T1278d ago (Edited 1278d ago )

There's still a difference between a high-end GPU+CPU and a custom-made water cooling system including a Waterloop&pumps etc though, it allows for much higher performance due to the better temperature management that would fry the GPU&CPU with normal builds.

lonewolf101278d ago

That's why people need to read the articles, most headlines are just to get you to click.

Rainbowcookie1278d ago

You would think yes, but honestly does it happen often 🤣 enough

I_am_Batman1278d ago (Edited 1278d ago )

Most of the threads of the 3950x were barely utilized and none of the games that were tested allocated more than ~12.5GB of system memory. Gaming at 8k is pretty much as GPU bound as you can get so you won't need a water cooled high-end CPU or 32GB of memory.

Psychotica1278d ago (Edited 1278d ago )

How does the cost of the PC make the headline misleading?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1278d ago
Father__Merrin1278d ago

Mega powerful video card but the games you can play on that card are all available elsewhere. I want to see compelling pc only goty material titles ASAP

Psychotica1278d ago

And where else can you run them in 8K or even in 4K with the same level of performance?

averagejoe261278d ago

Who cares? Nobody has 8k screens and the majority don't even have 4k screens.

This push for pointless high resolution is ruining progress. Give us better framerates, lighting, physics, etc. Stop wasting power on needles 8k.

lonewolf101278d ago

@averagejoe26

There are people with 8k monitors though.

Bender65021278d ago

And still we can't escape 30fps.

JCOLE131951278d ago

I mean given the fact the games are running at 8K it doesn’t surprise me...

MrDead1278d ago

DLSS 2.0 no doubt has a big part in this too, The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn and Death Stranding run like a dream on my 3080, 4k ultra set to 60fps no drops or stutters and the system runs very quiet. Playing Borderlands 3 on badass settings, Red Dead or Division 2 on 4k ultra all run great (Red Dead has a few drops below 60fps) but my PC is working a lot harder on games that don't utilise DLSS, my room warms up nicely when playing those games.

Show all comments (19)