310°

Crysis 3 - PC Graphics Comparison [Low, Medium, High, Very High]

DSOGaming writes: "Crysis 3 has been unlocked on various regions and PC gamers have already put Crytek’s latest FPS title to the test. YouTube’s member ‘ResetLoad’ has made a comparison between the various graphical preset options."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Pandamobile4074d ago

Christ, that still looks better than 95% of games of the last 2 years on low settings.

ritsuka6664074d ago (Edited 4074d ago )

Still Crysis 3 better than all exclusives PS3 games in low specs =^^=

Anyway, i can't wait for play this game.. looks better than Crysis 2 for sure.

4074d ago
Letros4074d ago (Edited 4074d ago )

lol KZ2 that game was a pile of mediocrity

classic2004074d ago

Too bad it its not as good as any PS3 game or even the original crysis. This game is a fun tech demo but its still a good game but nothing special.

Most PC gamers already dislike cryteck for crysis 2

Pandamobile4074d ago

@classic

You haven't played the game, so don't be so quick do dismiss it as a tech demo. Every Crysis game so far has been stellar (yes, even though Crysis 2 was a bit of a departure from the first it was still, overall a very solid game). The third installment is shaping up quite well too, with more emphasis on what made Crysis 1 awesome (large, open-ended levels and dynamic gameplay).

Stop talking out of your ass.

TheFirstClassic4074d ago

@Letros Killzone 2 was one of the best shooters this gen. Considering the critical and consumer reception, I would say there aren't many people who agree with you.

deadfrag4074d ago (Edited 4074d ago )

Another great graphic tech demo,but a piece of crap of a game in the gameplay department!

llMurcielagoll4074d ago (Edited 4074d ago )

@ritsuka666 TROLOLOLOLLLOOOLOLOLOL much?

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4073d ago
ZoyosJD4074d ago

Minimum requirements are the 400 or equivalent series which wasn't even available till 2010 and yet console hardware from 2005 can run it just fine.

Five years of advancement in PC tech only to be on par with consoles. Not exactly efficient.

Maybe you should consider the implications of how that effects a standardized hardware format that could be unveiled any time now...

Pandamobile4074d ago

The PC version uses DX11, and DX11 cards have been around for 4 years, so the console versions are below PC low settings and are locked at 720p and 30 FPS. Running the game at 1080p already requires 2x more computation power than what consoles are capable of. I'm really not sure what exactly you're trying prove here besides your very limited knowledge of computer hardware.

landog4073d ago (Edited 4073d ago )

@zoyos

if you consider sub hd, covered in jaggies, screen tearing, low res textures and awful performance to be as you put it

"console hardware from 2005 can run it just fine"

i would not call that fine, i'd call that chocking on tech it cannot handle like nearly all console games from the last 5 years, resolutions are dipping lower and lower, anti aliasaing is almost never used, or its some awful blur filter after effect, performance is tanking

the truth is, every major multiplat game on console is just the pc version at the LOWEST possible settings, with draw distance reduced, no anti aliasing, no dynamic shadows, no ssao, nothing

Sarcasm4074d ago

Definitely more polished looking than the Beta.

ZoyosJD4074d ago

Your not proving your point well, as DX 10 and 11 features have been implemented on the DX9 cards on consoles. Lighting, motion blur, depth of feild, wet and refective serfaces, tesselation. Any reasonable 2005 pc wouldn't even run crysis 2 720p30fps even in DX9 mode, yet consoles can handle crysis 3 with DX 11 features. The only noticable difference you'll see is FPS and resolution and only if you have a GTX460 or higher card. And 2x the power is 18 months, not 5 years of technological development. Where does 3.5 years of progess go? Face the facts, this game would be a 5 min strees test for a bottom of the barrel 2009 DX 11 GPU in 1080p at anything above low.

I'm not saying that the extra cash for a new card and 5 year wait is not worth it for some like yourself, but the only thing your proving is your resolve to ignore how extensive console coding optimization plays a role in their longevity and reasonable pricing per performance.

DomceM4074d ago

Zoyos leave the tech talk to the big boys. ok?

So much misinformation in that post and flawed thinking that its pointless to even get into it.

Autodidactdystopia4073d ago

you know that you can tesselate using a cell phone processor right?

the difference is all of those features you just mentioned are Hardware accelerated, meaning that it was designed to run those effects and 100s of times faster using compute shader hardware tesselators, more rop's, for addressing higher resolutions, and upwards of 1000 cuda/stream cores to do it with.

not to mention the raw clock speed advantage.

DoomeDx4073d ago

I dont get this guy.
Hes moving and running around in all direction to compare graphics..

Why not stand still, and transit to the other settings..

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4073d ago
4074d ago Replies(7)
PS4isKing_824074d ago

@letros crisis is the definition of mediocrity.

Graphics is all it has going for it.
Ps3's worst game is better than all 3 crisis games combined.

Pc nerds and their graphics lol

ExCest4074d ago

Woah, way to bring personal insults to the equation you stupid idiot.

Eldyraen4074d ago

Surely someone with that name and icon wouldn't be a bit biased...

edgeofsins4074d ago

The first Crysis has very fun gameplay. It isn't all about the graphics. Customize your gun in real time, awesome physics, grab people and use super strength to throw them far, etcetera. The 2nd wasn't terrible but it didn't feel that fun to me.

Elem1874071d ago

If gameplay matters, then why do you play a ps3 and not a Nintendo?

Nintendo is by far the most creative and innovative company when it comes to gameplay.... PC has the eye candy and Nintendo has the gameplay.

What is the reason people buy Playstations and XBox's?? console fangirls say its because the graphics are better.... Not from my vantage point.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4071d ago
floetry1014074d ago

Looks like DX11 has officially arrived.

Dat low setting.

Thefreeman0124074d ago

I don't know what half of those effects mean but it's a shame that crysis isn't an open world game like Gary cry other wise I'd be sold.

Bathyj4074d ago

You shouldnt let that deter you.

Farcry 3 is a great game but it doesnt mean all games should be open world. You can run around for 10 minutes before you bump into 4 guys, kill them in 30 seconds then go on another hike to find more.

Not knocking the game, I loved it, just saying there is room for 2 schools of thought.

Show all comments (65)
140°

EA’s best multiplayer games have now shut down for good

Battlefield Bad Company 2, Dead Space 2, Crysis 3, and a handful other EA games have finally had their online services shut down.

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
OtterX127d ago

I had no idea that Bad Company 2 was still running, and only now that I know, I want to jump on! 😥

SonyStyled127d ago

I was able to find games in the Vietnam dlc on ps3 the last week. There were articles on here about the server closure when it was announced in April

DaReapa127d ago

BF1943 is the only online MP game that I was genuinely interested in. Been playing since launch 14 years ago. Hate that I couldn't put in as much time to play as I'd hoped for during the final week.

Inverno127d ago

I got really into 43 when I bought Bf3, and preferred it. Everything that I disliked or found annoying about Bf3, wasn't an issue in 43. Too bad they never bothered releasing it on PS4 or PC.

1nsomniac127d ago (Edited 127d ago )

Dead Space 2...... I wasn't even aware that had multiplayer. Nevermind that it was apparently one of their best multiplayers!

anast126d ago

Once people stop buying micros, these companies close the doors.

Xenial126d ago

Dead Space 2 multiplayer had been hanging on for years - I'd boot my PS3 up to see some familiar names in lobbies. This will definitely be missed!

100°

EA has finally removed SecuROM from Crysis 3

Electronic Arts has released a new update for the PC version of Crysis 3 that removes its SecuROM protection system.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
370°

The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn & more running in 8K/30fps on NVIDIA GeForce RTX3090

Bang4BuckPC Gamer tested Crysis 3, The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn and Final Fantasy XV, with all of them running with 30fps in 8K.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
RazzerRedux1275d ago

Yep. Wait a couple of years and get this level of performance on a RTX 4070 or 4080 at a much lower price.

Killer73nova1274d ago

And wait a couple more years for rtx 5070 or 5080 at a much much lower price

Yung-T1275d ago (Edited 1275d ago )

That headline is a tad misleading.
The rig stated in that YouTube video is extremely high-end (ryzen 3950x oc, 32gb etc) and utilizing special water-cooling solutions, loops with pumps etc.

This rig easily costs 5k+ and a normal pc with a RTX 3090 wouldn't get close to these framerates or sustainable temperatures.

Aggesan1274d ago

Who has a "normal" pc with a RTX 3090?

Yung-T1274d ago (Edited 1274d ago )

There's still a difference between a high-end GPU+CPU and a custom-made water cooling system including a Waterloop&pumps etc though, it allows for much higher performance due to the better temperature management that would fry the GPU&CPU with normal builds.

lonewolf101274d ago

That's why people need to read the articles, most headlines are just to get you to click.

Rainbowcookie1274d ago

You would think yes, but honestly does it happen often 🤣 enough

I_am_Batman1274d ago (Edited 1274d ago )

Most of the threads of the 3950x were barely utilized and none of the games that were tested allocated more than ~12.5GB of system memory. Gaming at 8k is pretty much as GPU bound as you can get so you won't need a water cooled high-end CPU or 32GB of memory.

Psychotica1274d ago (Edited 1274d ago )

How does the cost of the PC make the headline misleading?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1274d ago
Father__Merrin1274d ago

Mega powerful video card but the games you can play on that card are all available elsewhere. I want to see compelling pc only goty material titles ASAP

Psychotica1274d ago

And where else can you run them in 8K or even in 4K with the same level of performance?

averagejoe261274d ago

Who cares? Nobody has 8k screens and the majority don't even have 4k screens.

This push for pointless high resolution is ruining progress. Give us better framerates, lighting, physics, etc. Stop wasting power on needles 8k.

lonewolf101274d ago

@averagejoe26

There are people with 8k monitors though.

Bender65021274d ago

And still we can't escape 30fps.

JCOLE131951274d ago

I mean given the fact the games are running at 8K it doesn’t surprise me...

MrDead1274d ago

DLSS 2.0 no doubt has a big part in this too, The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn and Death Stranding run like a dream on my 3080, 4k ultra set to 60fps no drops or stutters and the system runs very quiet. Playing Borderlands 3 on badass settings, Red Dead or Division 2 on 4k ultra all run great (Red Dead has a few drops below 60fps) but my PC is working a lot harder on games that don't utilise DLSS, my room warms up nicely when playing those games.

Show all comments (19)