200°

Xbox 720 vs Used Games: Microsoft Asks Gamers If They Prefer Physical Copies or Digital Downloads

GR - "Prepping to announce the next Xbox at E3 this year, Microsoft has put up a poll on its official Facebook page to garner the reactions of gamers about their purchasing habits."

Read Full Story >>
gameranx.com
Nyxus4091d ago

I will always prefer physical.

blackbeld4091d ago

Yep, for example if I own a lot of great games digital and I finished it. So now I want to sell it cause i don't play those games anymore.

The question is how I gonna sell it? With physical I can sell but digital it's not possible unless I sell my account and that is crazy.

.

Welshy4091d ago

I like to actually OWN something.

Despite it literally being the same thing, the fact i can stick the game on a shelf and play whenever i want is a freedom i don't feel with digital distribution.

I don't like just having a file sitting on my hard drive for £40 that is subject to 3rd party rules and DRM.

I get that a console itself is technically DRM, but i can take FIFA to a mates house for a few beers and a tourny, i can't do that with a file on an HDD and i'll always buy physical so long as it's available.

Scenarist4091d ago

not only that.. but when the next system comes out i want to be SURE i can play my old games on it... unlike the wii u (atm)

dasbeer884091d ago

It's amazing that for the first time in history, Microsoft asks gamers for their opinion and advice.

blackbeld4091d ago (Edited 4091d ago )

@Above

Really amazing! This is Breaking News!

Not only gamers but overall. They ignore with even windows 8 metro style. And now they ask opinion from gamers? How come?

Maybe they are really desperate this time.

Campy da Camper4091d ago (Edited 4091d ago )

What they might not be saying is that future physical copies could be system locked. Just because they offer discs doesn't mean they dont get rid of playing used copies. I'm not dissing them but it is a possibility.

mananimal4091d ago

@dasbeer88

There not really asking, but getting a feel for how much work they & others still need to do to convince the masses to buy into "Digital Distrubution" imo.

adorie4091d ago

Seems like there was some kind of truth to the rumor that Microsoft wanted to go with digital only-games. For them to be asking "gamers" their opinions about this matter seems really positive to me. They still care...

delboy4091d ago

It's a trick question, think about it.

OhMyGandhi4091d ago

I like something I can actually hold, something tactile. I suppose (in a more dramaticcontext)it's like knowing that you have cash stuffed in a mattress instead of a bank account, there is that degree of safety in knowing that it's there, and cannot be taken away.

omi25p4091d ago

I love having a collection of games.

deSSy27244091d ago

Me too on consoles, but on PC i prefer Steam because of very good "Steam deals".

morkendo234091d ago

I like to own my "PHYSICAL" games.
compare to non-physical data.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4091d ago
Relientk774091d ago (Edited 4091d ago )

There is nothing like a physical copy, the disc, box, and instructions. I go for complete copies and always have ever since my first video games.

There is no value in a digital copy, my complete retail copies of old games are worth way more than a digital copy will ever be.

NeverEnding19894091d ago

I used to say the same things about music. Now I buy 90% of my music digitally. I haven't seen the latest CD sales, but I'm assuming they're continuing to fall while digital is continuing to rise.

Like it or not, I'm betting within 10 years most gaming will be done digitally. You should still be able to buy your physical copy, but the industry will change. Publishers will soon be counting more on digital sales than physical sales, etc.

sway_z4091d ago

Sadly it is more probable than not...but now is not that time ;/

extermin8or4091d ago

No music is such a small file size, whereas games are so much larger and although compression techniques improve every generation, at the start of a new generation the file sizes tend to be massive....

TheSaint4090d ago

That's different, you can't play Xbox 360 on the move.

fermcr4091d ago

If Microsoft goes only digital and no used copies... buy buy Microsoft, you can keep your console.

Gazondaily4091d ago (Edited 4091d ago )

Bye bye*

I doubt they'll go all digital. This poll should have made it clear to them even if they didn't know already.

inFAMOUS_KRATOS4091d ago

i agree digital is almost a cheat, because you really don't own it.

ACEMANWISE4091d ago

Physical copies that aren't controlled.

IAMERROR4091d ago

Shouldn't you be focusing on PS3 news? bwahahaha
I miss gamepro :(

ACEMANWISE4091d ago

PS3 news thread died last month. I'm searching for a new, and active forum to post news and videos.

P.S. List 3 AAA 360 exclusive titles released this year :)

IAMERROR4091d ago

Released? or going to be released? well... ummmmm GOW:J? I'll admit you win this time Acey *shakes fist angrily in the air* I will get you next time!

Ripsta7th4090d ago

@ACEMANWISE why the hell would MS release 3 AAA exclusives when they are about to release their new console? clearly MS has all their studios focusing new hardware

ACEMANWISE4090d ago

The PS3 is still getting excellent releases this year. The PS4 is well into development.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4090d ago
Show all comments (52)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot12h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke196h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke192h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot16m ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf4h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor5h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave4h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor2h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot13m ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke192h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai4h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris4h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (21)