180°
6.5

Sly Cooper: Thieves in Time Review | PlayStation LifeStyle

PSLS: For the most part, Sly Cooper: Thieves in Time is successful. It delivers a competent and varied platforming experience that will appeal to fans of the franchise. That said, don’t expect an earth-shatteringly new or innovative game. Thieves in Time plays it extremely safe and doesn’t veer too far from the platforming norm. If you’re partial to the Sly universe, you’ll find plenty to love, but those who aren’t die-hard fans will likely see through the game’s skin-deep charm.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
LOGICWINS4087d ago

Nice review. My copy's in the mail :)

TrendyGamers4087d ago

I'll be checking this out soon!

LOGICWINS4087d ago

I've never gotten a "cross buy" title before, how does that work? Will I get a voucher in the box?

TrendyGamers4087d ago

Nope. You have to put the game into your PS3, go to it on the XMB, and click on 'Disc Benefits'.

Sev4087d ago

I can confirm this to be true.

LOGICWINS4087d ago

Oh okay thanks! I hope Sony does this with more games. It would make way more people buy a Vita knowing they'll get two games for the price of one =D

dbjj120884087d ago

I didn't know either so thanks for asking!

izumo_lee4087d ago

Also remember it is 2 games for only $40, which pardon the pun a definite steal.

Anyways about the review the negatives minus the one about gimmicky controls/camera feel like nitpicks to me personally. How come when some games stay true to the formula they are sometimes regarded as negatives now? I sometimes can't grasp the thinking when it comes to stuff like this.

LOGICWINS4087d ago (Edited 4087d ago )

"How come when some games stay true to the formula they are sometimes regarded as negatives now?"

Simple answer to a simple question. Because certain games stay true to their formula, they will always cater to that niche fanbase that made the franchise popular in the first place. The lack of change, while good for pre-existing fans of the game, does little to promote new fans of the franchise.

Therefore, if a game can only appeal to a niche audience, no one in good conscience can give it a "superb" recommendation to all gamers, because chances are that it won't appeal to most.

A 6.5 score for the rest of the world likely translates to an 8.5 for a Sly fan. Either way, if you know your already getting the game..the score shouldn't matter to you.

izumo_lee4087d ago

Look Logicwins you have some great points sometimes but i have to disagree with you here.

I find what you are saying hard to swallow honestly. It has worked for Mario, God of War, Call of Duty & these games aren't considered niche at all. Their simple gameplay dynamics are what makes fans come back to these game time & time again. Change it too much & they are no longer the same game.

All i am saying is that reviews shouldn't take a game staying true to its roots as a negative & knock the game for it. Why can't a mechanic that has worked well in 3 games all of a sudden not work in 2013? My mind is sometimes flabbergasted by what some of these reviewers come up with as excuses at times.

DigitalAnalog4087d ago (Edited 4087d ago )

"Therefore, if a game can only appeal to a niche audience, no one in good conscience can give it a "superb" recommendation to all gamers, because chances are that it won't appeal to most."

This is a horrible statement. How can you give so much credence with "mainstream" titles in comparison to the "niche"? I thought the game should be judged by it's merits and so you use such strawman to give validity to reviewers in favor of "mainstream"titles. This is review hijacking at it's worst and to support such actions is disgraceful.

By your "logic" Dark Souls and Demon's souls should get extremely low scores because - according to you - cannot be recommended to ALL gamers because chances are it won't appeal to most. Your ideal review scenario would have all the dumbed down, COD-fied AAA-backing titles being GOTY candidates since each of them are CATERED to the mainstream gamer.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4087d ago
dbjj120884087d ago

$40? Cross buy? Ehhhhh... maybe.

knifefight4087d ago

Friends With Disc Benefits.

Thatguy-3104087d ago

Such a low score because it stuck to what it does best? Ok just knowing how it stuck to how the originals played makes it a guarantee buy for me.

TongkatAli4087d ago

It needed more COD elements /s

Merrill4087d ago

Well they gave dead space 3 a 9.0, so it seems you're correct.

majiebeast4087d ago

Yeah and when they change the formula, its always how they should stick to it. As developer you just cant win.

smashcrashbash4087d ago

Ignore it.Only PlayStation games get penalized for sticking with tried and true formulas.In their case that is called monotony and sameness.For Halo and Mario that is called being classic and 'if it ain't broken don't fix it'.And any complaints about it being the same game falls on deaf ears.

testerg354087d ago

Damn this xbox 360 site for reviewing Sly and being biased against the Playstation! Oh wait...

Good_Guy_Jamal4087d ago

Yeah somehow I don't see PLAYSTATION lifestyle giving Halo and Mario great scores for sticking to their formulas. In fact I don't see PLAYSTATION Lifestyle giving Halo and Mario any scores. . .for some strange reason.

dafegamer4086d ago

@good_guy_jamal
playstation lifestyle only reviews playstation games smartone

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4086d ago
Sketchy_Galore4087d ago

Obviously I haven't played it yet but it sounds like it deserves a little more if the only major complaint is that it sticks too close to the formula people know and love from the old games. Not that I'm dismissing that as a complaint. Considering we quite recently got a package of three full Sly games that don't even look dated thanks to how well the cartoony art style lends itself to HD, getting one more Sly game on another disc that just looks a little better doesn't seem so exciting comparatively. Still though, it's another effing Sly Cooper game. How could anyone not buy it?

Show all comments (35)
100°

Should Sly Cooper Return For The PS5?

After Sly Cooper Thieves in Time was released on PS3 in 2013, Sanzaru Games has not had the chance to revisit the raccoon and his gang.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
PhoenixUp1577d ago

Is it law that every Sly game from Sly 2 onwards end on a massive cliffhanger? I wouldn’t be as anxious for a Sly 5 if they just gave Sly 4 a succinct ending.

On another note we still have yet to hear anything about how that Sly Cooper television series is coming along.

BlaqMagiq11576d ago

Duh. It's been almost 7 years. It NEEDS a new one.

Elda1576d ago

Why not If they know fans of the games want it bad enough.

Show all comments (10)
170°

Sly Cooper: Thieves in Time Lead Designer: ‘We Would Love to Come Back to That World’

Sly Cooper: Thieves in Time Lead Designer talks about his passion for the project, how they would love to return the world of Sly Cooper, and how the first episode of the DLC is completely written.

Read Full Story >>
theplaystationbrahs.com
Jin_Sakai1581d ago (Edited 1581d ago )

“So all I can is that if you guys want more Sly Cooper let Sony know. We are always ready to dig into that and it was a great franchise to work on. It was a great project.“

Everyone flood Sony and let them know! I’d love to have a new Sly game on PS5.

Sciurus_vulgaris1582d ago

I would love for the cliffhanger ending to get a conclusion.

Rude-ro1581d ago

This!
This game got massacred with reviews for no reason what so ever other than it was sonys swan songs along with god of war ascension of which also got hit.

Sciurus_vulgaris1581d ago

I actually think Thieves in Time was better than Sly Cooper 3 and I’m surprised it reviewed worse than its predecessor.

BlackIceJoe1582d ago

I'd be done for a new game being a launch, or near launch game for the PS5.

Segata1582d ago

I really liked these games. Please bring him back.

Chaos_Order1582d ago

Incoming unpopular opinion!

I thought Thieves in Time was decent, but a bit of a letdown to be honest. Sly 3 ended perfectly, giving a conclusion of sorts for the main 3 characters while still leaving a little room for imagination, and had some of the best moments from the entire series, (The fight with General Tsao, anyone?) then Thieves in Time comes along with its lame villain, destroys Penelope's character, (I legitimately thought she was being brainwashed or something. Plus, why the boss fight in that crappy little mech suit when she's a master combatant and tech wiz?) and logic that makes no sense even in a cartoon world, such as Sly purposely being sent to prison so he can break out by... Throwing the one ton iron ball he's chained to to break through the wall? When he's never showed this type of strength before, and never displays a similar feat ever again? Plus I thought the levels were better designed in earlier games, and the cast of controllable characters in 3 was much more diverse and interesting. Sucker Punch were the true masters of this series.

Show all comments (14)
60°

A Look at All of the Stealth Games Available on Vita

VGChartz's Adam Cartwright: "The stealth genre is one that some would argue doesn’t even exist – many titles include stealth elements, but actually fit into one of a number of other genres like action, platformer, or third-person shooter. Ever since the breakout success of the Metal Gear franchise (in particular Metal Gear Solid), though, the genre seems on much more stable footing and it demonstrated that you can have a veritable blockbuster on your hands relying only on stealth mechanics as the main gameplay element.

In recent years we’ve seen other things like Assassin’s Creed, Hitman and Splinter Cell continue to push the genre forward, although it still has somewhat limited appeal. Thankfully, the Vita has a healthy selection of stealth games available (and even more with backwards-compatibility), meaning if you’re looking to do some sneaking on the go then you’ll be well served with the console."

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com