110°

Insomiac Games making an iOS game? Hiring Programmers

Insomniac Games have posted a job listing where they are hiring for some iOS programmers.

Read Full Story >>
gamechup.com
Godchild10204098d ago

This is what they have come to... Their first multiple platform title hasn't release yet and now they are developing IOS titles, I guess I might have to pick up an Ipod touch.

4098d ago Replies(4)
shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4098d ago

Next gen AAA phone title.

64 players + and deep story!
Probably not though..

morkendo234098d ago (Edited 4098d ago )

while you at it INSOMNIAC try making a full fledge RATCHET AND CLANK GAME WILL YA!!!

"ALL 4 ONE" sucked, "FULL FRONTAL ASSAULT" sucked. try making something close to "UP YOUR ARSENAL" "GOING COMMANDO"

dont be like EA with N4S one crapfest after another.criterion games made it worst combining Burnout engine to it and auto fu'king log...

DOMination-4098d ago

Im watching my gf play most wanted right now and I've been sat there thinking how the he'll the game got such good reviews. Its a technical mess, the world feels lifeless, there's absolutely no narrative or personality that the original had in regards to the 15 drivers.. Even the soundtrack is terrible and criterion are usually good at that. And seriously.. Rubber banding needs to die already. At least at that level when its so obvious.

Glad to see Im not the only one

hotrider124098d ago (Edited 4098d ago )

Agree, criterion games is a technical mess, it feel like burnout through an through. you would think at least a list to climb as the original MOSTWANTED had. the game by far sucks as morkendo above said it is craptastical.
what was EA thinking adding auto-log to the format???

Skate-AK4098d ago

Maybe it's a companion app for Fuse.

-MD-4098d ago

I would be hesitant to dump more time and money into an app for a game that's sure to bomb.

landog4098d ago

i havent really LOVED a game by them since ps2

i like ratchet future tools, it was pretty good, nothing compared to going commando or up your arsenal, resistance was mehhh.....part 1 and 2 were pretty good, 3 was a 7/10 at best for me

i wish they would go back to the going commando formula for r and c and i think resistance has potential as a franchise,

i think they will do some cool things next gen, they just haven't wowed me this gen at all

juandren4098d ago

And here I was, thinking I'm the only one who didn't like Resistance. I see it as the "bottom of the barrel" of PS3 exclusives

Knushwood Butt4098d ago

I loved FoM and R2 myself.

R3? Not so much.

abzdine4098d ago

end of glory for this ex-great developer

CommonSenseGamer4098d ago (Edited 4098d ago )

If there games had sold and I mean really sold, on PS3 I dare say they would have remained exclusive. However, the Resistance franchise was solid but definitely not AAA. Basically Kill zone set a standard on PS3 that no other FPS ON Sony's console came close to.

Unlimax4098d ago

After reading the main title for this report .. This is what happen to me

http://alltheragefaces.com/...

Activi$ion .. Give them back Spyro Before they start doing something much stupid than this .

KMCROC544098d ago

That be cool if Activision got them to make a multi platform spyro or crash seeing how Act. Owns the IPs.
would definitely buy those games.

Show all comments (23)
120°

Report: Marvel's Spider-Man 2 Villain DLC Spotted in Debug Menu

Marvel's Spider-Man villain DLC potentially spotted via the debug menu that surfaced from the New Game+ title update released recently.

60°

Video Game Leaks Suck For Everyone, Gamers Included

Ahmed from eXputer writes "Video game leaks have become a major cause of concern for Triple-A studios, as they're becoming increasingly malicious and dangerous."

240°

Adding First-Party Games to PS Plus Negatively Impacts Sales, Sony Data Confirms

In a leaked Sony Interactive Entertainment presentation, the company declares that including first-party games on PS Plus has had a “big” effect on “traditional sales.” As an example, the company mentioned that Horizon Forbidden West‘s sales “flat-lined” immediately after being added to PS Plus.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
XiNatsuDragnel124d ago

That's smart Sony knows what's up with that.

Reaper22_122d ago

They are just stating the obvious. Of course a game is not gonna sell as much when gamers can get it for a fraction of the cost because of subscription service. On the other hand, a subscription service can extend the life of a game by making it available to gamers who want to play it but not necessarily willing to pay full price.

What works for Microsoft doesn't necessarily have to work for Sony and vice-versa. I'm glad we have some variety. Personally, I don't want 2 consoles who are doing the exact same thing.

Crows90122d ago

Price cuts do the same thing your describing. Subscriptions aren't bringing anything new to the table.

Crows90122d ago

It's not that smart. In fact...it's not smart at all. A dumbass could figure that out. If you give a game for free or for peanuts...why would anyone pay a lot for it instead?

It's like if you had the whopper menu at 7.99 and then the whopper menu at 1.99
Same damn whopper! What item you think most will choose?

The only ones that will choose 7.99 option are those oblivious to the 1.99 option.

Hedstrom121d ago (Edited 121d ago )

Yea! And to make more money if you are selling the 1.99 whooper you will have to lower the quality and make the ingredients as cheap as possible and take away the sallad and cheese. But you could pay extra to get that.

proudly_X123d ago

Clank was profitable after all

DarkZane122d ago

Would have been a lot worst if it was on PS Plus day one.

FIELDMARSHALL_P121d ago

How much does Sony or Xbox pay the devolpers to put the games on the services? Do they take that into account for profit, I don't know just asking. If we pay for online giving out some games is cool either platform. The companies must think it helps in some sort of capacity for accepting the deal I would think.

purple101122d ago

Oh dam
I even commented on someone who said it wasn’t.

Load of hallabaloo on the site indeed

REDGUM122d ago

To add to you're point, this is what I don't understand about the MS subscription service. If you're getting all the day one released games for next to nothing by using thier service how on earth are the developers supposed to make enough money back to create their next game/s?
Myself, and I might be of the few, but I prefer to purchase a game from a store or digital store at the recommended price, or wait for a discount if not completely sold on what I've seen of a game so far and get what I paid for than pay monthly, yearly etc subscription & get everything while the games themselves become less in all aspects due to less funds/resources. (Not sure if I've explained that properly or not)
If every company goes down the subscription based path in the future I see gaming overall dying to some degree for the non diehards I mean. Putting up older games etc that are inc in the service fees I agree with but not day one releases. Again, just an opinion.

Hedstrom121d ago

@REDGUM
You lower the quality of the games to make the process of making them as cheap as possible. You make them like f2p games with season passes and microtransactions. And over time you will make subscription more and more expensive.

BlackCountryBob123d ago

Also really interesting to see through to one of the sites they link to (Resetera) that the 2 cross gen titles in Miles Morales and Ghosts of Tsushima sold over 40% each of their first year in year 2, almost double what even the best performing games like GOW 2018 and Spider-Man did. Kinda seeing the cold hard numbers makes it really clear why they did cross gen games and remastered some of the later PS4 games to PS5 Directors Cuts.

Glemt123d ago

"“In year 1, Horizon Zero Dawn and Horizon Forbidden West were very comparable,” the presentation reads. “HFW was included into PS Plus at the start of Year 2. HFW saw an enormous influx of PS Plus players, but at the cost of flat-lining the game activations from retail sales.”"

So, the data shows there were fewer traditional sales, but it doesn't show us anything about how many people joined PS+? It does say there was an influx of HFW players, but it doesn't state how many of these players owned PS+ to begin with.

To conclude that it negatively sales is correct, but it doesn't mean less money is made. We cannot draw that conclusion until we know how many more people joined PS+ because of HFW.

mkis007122d ago

Well each ps plus account is only good for what? $15 per month max if they go monthly? There are a lot of reasons why even if a million new signups happened loosing out on the $60 gamesales is a worse.

Glemt122d ago

I think that's a good assumption, but that's what I was referring to. It's an assumption. If someone comes with hard data, we need the complete picture. The way it sits now we might draw the right conclusions, but we've proven nothing.

Crows90122d ago

If sales flat lines and subscriptions don't equal the same as said purchasable game then no matter how you spin it...less money is made on that game per player

TheCaptainKuchiki122d ago

MS's bet is that although it lowers traditional sales, it makes the services more appealing and millions of new people will subscribe if they see that good games are added to the service. And in the end, the subscription profit (not revenue) will outpace that of the traditional sales.

However even after 6 years they still haven't reached that point lmao

Shane Kim122d ago

Sadly it's just Netflix of gaming. They saturate the service with garbage just to keep releases on a regular basis and to keep players hooked to the service. It won't be sustainable in the long run.

Reaper22_122d ago

There are some really good games on gamepass. That's the problem with you guys who only think one way. I'm playing Remnant 2, Dead space remake, Tomb Raider, Forza, Far cry 5, Gears Judgement, Mass Effect 3 and MLB The Show. Now please tell me which one of those are garbage?
You sound like a hater or is it you are jealous at the success of Mictosoft with gamepass.

Crows90121d ago

@reaper

Far cry 5 and mass effect 3...also gears judgment was horrible

DEEHULK88119d ago

Netflix is the ONLY streaming service that is making a profit right now. In fact others are back to licensing their content to Netflix because that's a great revenue stream for them.

Crows90122d ago

Except that works for MS because most of their games barely break 1 million in sales ... They know this and try to throw shade and brag about how great subscriptions are because they were already not making much money at all.

Reaper22_121d ago

Nah, that's not true. Their games do sell. Games are getting more expensive to make and sometimes selling millions still don't make up for losses. Services like gamepass can be good for developers and the publishers. Games do sell on gamepass.

Crows90121d ago (Edited 121d ago )

@reaper

Nope. It is true. Just look at estimated sales for lots of their games across the board. Except for major titles like GTA most games barely sell on Xbox. At least back when physical was the majority...now with mostly digital maybe it has changed but their audience hasn't gotten bigger.

A few outliers but the majority barely sold.

DEEHULK88119d ago

If they didn't put their games on PC and Gamepass day 1 their games would be on the charts like the 360 days, but they don't want to do that and that's okay.

Show all comments (44)