620°

What Did You Notice in the #PlayStation2013 Video?

PlayStation Euporia writes - "As PlayStation revealed what could possibly be the first promotional video for the PlayStation 4. As is the norm with promotional videos from any company, they are usually filled with dozens of “Easter Eggs” that can hint to various announcements or features. Let’s take a look at what we could see or hear in the latest PlayStation promotional video."

Read Full Story >>
playstationeuphoria.com
konnerbllb4099d ago

Looks like we might have an announcement soon.

LackTrue4K4099d ago

anybody noticed that the lights hitting the ps symbols, the light that hit the O was yellow not red?!? just like all the others where ment to match the ones on the controllers....

blackbeld4099d ago

Yep,

Be the first and win the war. PS2 was launched a year before came cube and xbox.

Denethor_II4099d ago

"Yep,

Be the first and win the war. PS2 was launched a year before came cube and xbox."

I don't think the PS3 could compete with the Wii because of the price point, even if it had launched first. And it has now surpassed the 360 so your statement is not necessarily true.

Ritsujun4099d ago (Edited 4099d ago )

PS4 announcement with the announcements of Uncharted4,Killzone4,Resistanc e4,GodOfWar4

and... inFAMOUS3 on PSVITA and inFAMOUS4 on PS4

i came from 20 Feb 2013, now bow before me

Sarcasm4099d ago

It's an ad, not a Kojima trailer. Some people just digging too deep.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4099d ago
Donnieboi4099d ago

Quote from article that made me stop reading:

"As many of you know, the idea of having announcements at E3 might not be as likely due to rumors that the next-gen consoles would be announced before E3"

I don't think they'll wait until E3 either, but I sure as hell know that "rumors" don't have the power to dictate what Sony will or won't do. The author gives rumors too much credibility.

syanara4099d ago

Rumors do have credibility as they show the market criticisms as well as consumer thoughts on new products, Additionally everything about the article should be circumstantial based entirely on the title of the article as there is no "Absolute" evidence that this is PlayStation 4 at all. Purely a rumor and speculation article that is given for the entertainment and discussion value. Nothing here is meant to be taken seriously.

aCasualGamer4099d ago (Edited 4099d ago )

I agree with you that every rumor should be taken with a grain of salt, but there is always some truth to the rumors. There is a reason the industry is becoming more secretive as we entered 2013 and rumors are unfolding.

No titles, have been announced for 2013 fall. That is a first, there is always some titles announced for fall usually, and now there is none. That has to mean both Microsoft and Sony have "unannounced" titles for fall that they are keeping a closed lid on til the right moment.

GTA V getting a September launch just proves this. Rockstar wants their last "BIG" game release for a PS3/360 title to be grand finale. Just before gamers buy their new consoles they get to enjoy one last big supper.

Sony aren't ignorant, they know there are millions of fans listening and reading every word that's said about PS4 on the web and that fans are waiting. So, them releasing a "announcement" video tease is deliberate and a good PR strategy. Now... is it just a PR strategy or is their really an announcement of new hardware come 20th feb? Who knows?

Time will tell my friends. Just wish it was the 20th already.

bigtrucknd4099d ago Show
morkendo234099d ago

was disappointed instead of console all i seen was X,O,triangle,square.

nothing more.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4099d ago
Bumpmapping4099d ago

Greatness PS=Gods gift to gamers.

EverydayGuy4099d ago

I say humanity gift to itself.

Conzul4099d ago

And on the 8th day, God created Playstation, that man might be happy after making woman happy.

Good_Guy_Jamal4099d ago

At one point I could have sworn I saw something that looked like this http://www.gameranx.com/img... and I instantly went from 6 to midnight, excuse my crudeness.

AznGaara4099d ago

Yeah, while switching from button to button symbol you can definitely see a rectangular shape that doesn't fit in with the thickness of the square, x, triangle and O buttons.

mi_titan274099d ago

i noticed that too. it also looked like a blue light on the top left front

Gamer394099d ago

"..The company wants to reach back to one PlayStation which was at the top of its game during the PS2 era.."

I hope, my one favorite console ps2.

Show all comments (92)
60°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

60°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

170°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot10h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

Duke194h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke1919m ago(Edited 16m ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

mandf1h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor3h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave2h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor13m ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

Duke1918m ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai2h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris1h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (17)