70°

What To Change For Far Cry 4

Far Cry 3 is out and it is awesome. From a good and enjoyable story, to amazing characters and to thrilling gameplay, Far Cry 3 is easily one of the best games of the 2012. With an initial delay from its original release date to a time so late within the year, that it seemed like Far Cry 3 would be horrible. To our surprise though, that time was used correctly and in the end we received a great game. Right now Far Cry 3 is sitting at a 91% on metacritic with about 1.43mm sold to date.

Though for all the things that Far Cry 3 does correct, which is a ton of things, there are a couple of aspects that need to be addressed. So lets take a look at what those areas are.

Read Full Story >>
psaddiction.com
JR_Texx4136d ago

Yes Far Cry 3 was awesome, but the endings were lacking in well an ending, So far cry 4 should give that :)

Root4136d ago

"Story Co-Op"

No, it got a seperate co-op camapaign that should be enough, can we please just keep it single player focused in the campaign

For me it has to be a bigger map...bigger the better I say

I would like planes and helicopters to come into it and other vehicles in the game to find as easter eggs.

KrisButtar4136d ago

i loved the single player, but i was thinking how cool it would have been to have the option of it being co-op

Root4136d ago

Games like this though don't need co-op, if your thinking that when playing then maybe the game isn't really for you. If you want to play with friends go play on a game built up around co-op like L4D or Borderlands...we have FUSE coming up aswell.

It's like when people complain about it not being in the Elder Scrolls for example despite knowing how buggy Bethesdas games already are. Some things are just not meant to be.

Lets not forget it's not that easy to add co-op in an open world game, people think developers can just throw it in there when it takes a lot of work to get it going and if it's an open world game it's going to take a lot of resources from the single player...the core part of the game which most open world games are built up on.

If a new ip came out and it was an open world game WITH co-op elements then fair enough but Far Cry wasn't.

Mutant-Spud4135d ago

Yeah look at Borderlands 2, in public co-op people just run off and do whatever they want which makes boss battles hard if only two people are following the missions, a huge open world isn't always fun . The co-op in FC3 is fine because it follows a popular, linear format, they've done a decent job and if they release some more co-op DLC I'll probably buy it.

Mutant-Spud4136d ago

So basically Just Cause in FPS, I'd buy that.
I'd like more urban areas, as in Dead island, for all it's shortcomings that game did a good job with the environments.

Root4136d ago

Pretty much to be honest

I wouldn't mind a cover system...but not the typical cover system in FPS, the one which was used in Deus Ex Human Revolution was great when it went into third person.

I think it would be nice to have an urban area, maybe a small modern city with a shopping center, hotels, gambling places, horse racing etc. I wouldn't mind if they give us the option to upgrade the clothes we're wearing aswell like for example buying better shoes from a sports shop would give us a speed boost....or buying moutain gear would allow us to climb or climb things quicker. I suppose though they could go into things you could upgrade though the more you do it like the muscle/stamina thing in San Andreas.

sergeantcorn4128d ago

planes and choppers are cool, but sometimes they can be a bit overkill, like saints row, once you have an f-69 VTOL you were indestructible, but i guess maybe a chopper with no guns or anything on it would be cool, maybe something you get literally right at the end before or after the very last mission. but yeah, i agree with the no co op and bigger map.

starchild4136d ago

I'm not worried about it. I'm sure they'll come up with some great stuff. Farcry 3 is outstanding.

Vladplaya4136d ago

How about making a proper continued story for the FarCry1? You know, the game that started this all and that was fking awesome, except every other FarCry game after that had absolutely nothing to do with the first FarCry game other than just stealing its name for sales?

aliengmr4136d ago (Edited 4136d ago )

Snow. Make it somewhere with lots of snow and ice.

Show all comments (18)
70°

Our Favorite Villains in Gaming - Roundtable

There have been plenty of great villains in video games over the years. Now it's time for the VGU crew to name a few of their favorites.

90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox402d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever400d ago (Edited 400d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88400d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai401d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle400d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE400d ago (Edited 400d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy399d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE399d ago (Edited 399d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
120°

Far Cry 3 Is One Of The Most Important Games Of Our Time

TheGamer Writes "Far Cry 3 is a time capsule of what game design was like in the early '00s"

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Knushwood Butt484d ago

Beat it twice; once on PS3, and once a couple of months ago on PS5.

Doesn't Far Cry 2 have some of the things they are talking about here? Diamond hunting, healing, malaria medication?

shinoff2183483d ago (Edited 483d ago )

I believe 2 did. I highly doubt it was the only game like that though. I imagine the writer isn't old enough to have played part 2 but I also feel it wasn't the first game to introduce stuff like that

They bring up mass effect 2. I felt mass effect 1 was better. It just seem cut down. The citadel was a joke in part 2 compared to 1. How do you cut back on that.

Profchaos483d ago

Having just replayed the entire me trilogy yeah I think 1 was my favourite I think 2 had better cover and shooting mechanics but everything else in 1 was better

jznrpg483d ago (Edited 483d ago )

Mass Effect 1 was the best . It played like an RPG . The other games were more shooter and lost the feel the first game had unfortunately

gurp483d ago (Edited 483d ago )

I played it on PC when it came out, might play it again some time
Far Cry 3 is the best of the series, it was ahead of it's time

Palitera483d ago

It seems the blogger didn’t even play RDR1 if he thinks FC3 brought these elements to the AAA table. Tiktokers always have a new surprise. Smh

Sgt_Slaughter483d ago

"Far Cry 3 is a time capsule of what game design was like in the early '00s"

>Came out in 2012

Okay then

BrainSyphoned483d ago

If we are going to talk early 2000's game design how about start in the year 2000 with games that are a far cry better than something released 12 years later.
"Chrono Cross, Baldur's Gate II, Diablo II, Dragon Quest VII, Final Fantasy IX, The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, and Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2, along with new intellectual properties such as Deus Ex, Jet Set Radio, Perfect Dark, The Sims and Vagrant Story."
The article names things Ubisoft has shoved into games to dumb them down and then claims we should rush off to play it. Maybe instead look back at it as the death of originality from Ubisoft and gaming in general.

glennhkboy483d ago

Far Cry 3 & Assassin's Creed VI: Black Flag are 2 of the very best games from Ubisoft. All Ubisoft games since then are all just copying these 2 games.

ChubbyBlade483d ago

This isn’t an early 2000s game…you’re about a decade to early on that one.

Show all comments (13)