150°

Microsoft & Sony Rivalry Blocking Defiance Cross-Platform Multiplayer

Dealspwn.com reports: "Having spent several hours getting to grips with Defiance, it's clear that Trion's ambitious cooperative MMO shooter currently allows for smooth cross-platform play between PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 versions. However, Microsoft and Sony aren't willing to set aside their bitter rivalry for long enough to make it work at launch - if ever.

"There will not be cross-platform play," Trion Worlds Senior Producer Robert Hill told us during a lengthy interview scheduled for publication later today. "We do it right now."

Read Full Story >>
dealspwn.com
AngelicIceDiamond4140d ago

I dunno why, I think the idea is great. 2 systems cooperating and intertwining in a MMO is a good idea.

Fanboys would have a chance to get along with one an other and work as a team. But MS and Sony doesn't want that. Instead they rather keep the tension and both fanboys at bay Or they don't want any possible cross promotion.

Whatever the case is its too bad on MS and Sony's part.

MikeMyers4140d ago

Well, I guess that settles it. We will all just have to continue seeing the rivalries here on the forums. Yay.

darthv724140d ago

why they didnt have more crossplatform games.

Unreal was a game that pitted pc vs ps3 but could have added in 360 vs pc vs ps3 for even more interesting play. A shame they cant settle whatever differences keep such things from happening.

I seem to recall it had something to do with mod support or the availability of current patches that would need to be made available to all platforms at the same time.

Ms and sony have different approval processes for such things but the PC side is much quicker to respond. Or something like that.

MikeMyers4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

Different types of communities between the PC and consoles. You also get into the mix with people using a mouse/keyboard against those with a controller. I know the PS3 supports it but I imagine most people use the dualshock. The PC is also more quick because it doesn't have all the mandates put in place. Microsoft has their set of rules, Sony has theirs.

Microsoft really dropped the ball since they also run Windows. They look to finally be tying Windows 8 into one unified service across different hardware. Apple has done it with iTunes by making it very familiar for everyone. That's one of the knocks with Android and how you have various operating systems and not cohesive.

Plus with Xbox Live it really backlashed on the PC. You can't really charge for Live on the PC because Microsoft does not control the PC gaming market. Some may argue against any fee but they can get away with it more on the console because it's a closed platform.

I don't ever see Playstation and Xbox running on the same server. I think it would be fun but it's not going to happen. Correct me if I'm wrong but Dust 514 I think only shares the same universe but PC and PS3 players don't play directly with one another.

elhebbo164140d ago

i dunno, i think the tension would actually get worse. there is always gonna be one immature fanboy who's gonna say 'my controller is better' or 'the graphics look better from this side' then the whole in-game chat session goes to shit.

Skips4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

Wasn't Sony ok with the cross platform MP for Counter Strike or something. But Valve was the one that ultimately pulled the plug (For good reasons).

I could be wrong, but that's what I heard.

violents4140d ago

Ps3 has already gone cross platform with games like dust 514. I think MS just doesn't want to play nice so its a no go.

Ben_Grimm4140d ago

MS did cross platform with games like Shadowrun. I think Sony just doesn't want to play nice so it's a no go.

violents4140d ago

so then we'll agree to disagree then?

Welshy4140d ago

That's not true at all @Ben_Grimm

Dust 514 interacts directly with EVE Online servers, Portal 2 allowed you to play with PC players and Counterstrike was penned to have cross platform but Valve pulled the plug in the polishing stages as KB&M users were too accurate in comparison to pads and would unbalance online matches.

Let's not forget, that despite both running Via PSN, the Vita can play PS3 users too which is still technically cross platform.

Not to mention the fact that XBL being a paid service, 360 users who didn't have gold would feel (rightfully) aggrieved that both PC and PS3 guys get to play each other at no extra cost but they have to cought up another £40 to Microsoft for the privelage.

XBL being paid and PSN being free is the major block on cross platform MS/Sony games in my opinion.

JBSleek4140d ago

PS3 has one cross platform game and that came isn't really cross platform actually as PC isn't Dust and it just has some effect on it.

violents4140d ago

actually It has a few that are ps3/vita. That is technically cross platform as well.

SmokingMonkey4140d ago

Portal2 is cross platform betwixt PSN and Steam.

DonMingos4140d ago

final fantasy XIV, Portal 2...

Saryk4140d ago

One game wouldn't make everything just peachy. Besides I would like to see someone take their thunder!

hkgamer4140d ago

its probably microsoft not allowing it.
its kinda hard to justify xbox live when other platforms do it for free.

ffxi had crossplay but you didnt need xbox live gold membership to play it. and i dont think microsoft liked that.

another reason for this is releasing patch updates, would be a pain to release for sony, ms and pc at the same time

Hicken4140d ago

Seeing how strict they are with their online, you can bet it's Microsoft and not Sony. I remember them saying something like, "We can't guarantee the quality of online gaming on another console, and we don't want to expose our consumers to that," or something to to that extent.

Which sounds to me like, "We'd be screwed if our consumers started realizing they could get the same quality of online gaming elsewhere for free."

Ben_Grimm4140d ago

Of course it's all MS's fault coming from Hicken and the lot.

Even though MS has allowed cross platform games before in the past with Shadowrun, Universe at War: Earth Assault and I believe Lost Planet: Colonies(??).

But yea its most likely MS's fault, lord knows Sony can do no wrong.

ALLWRONG4140d ago

"We'd be screwed if our consumers started realizing they could get the same quality of online gaming elsewhere for free."

You mean like charging people for downloading in the background?

Outside_ofthe_Box4140d ago (Edited 4140d ago )

***"You mean like charging people for downloading in the background?"***

LOL What are you talking about? People have been downloading stuff in the background way before PS+ started. My Ni No Kuni demo downloaded in the background. What are you smoking lol?

I find it hilarious that you see a problem with downloading things in the background being a premium feature, but online multiplayer for a game you already paid for being a premium feature is okey-dokey for you LOL.

MS does have more to lose doing cross platform MP, but I doubt Sony wants to do it either. What do Sony and MS gain from doing it besides making their gamers happy? Nothing. Yeah I know both have done it before, but with the PS360 cross-platform play both companies actually risk losing their customers to their direct competitors.

DonMingos4140d ago

I am all in for cross platform multiplayer.

Would love to play some co-op (aliens colonial marines) with some friends that only have the other console.

Plus, what better place for fanboys to settle their differences than on the battleground of a game. Would love some team deathmatch between team PS3, team Xbox360 and Team WiiU. That would be the kind of rivalry that makes sense in the gaming community

Blues Cowboy4140d ago

Agreed, such a move would massively benefit us gamers. Problem is that shareholders are the priority...

hkgamer4140d ago

funny how you included nintendos console... i totally forgot about them...

Show all comments (35)
170°

Defiance and Defiance 2050 Are Being Shut Down

After 8 years of Defiance and 3 years of Defiance 2050, both titles are being sunsetted on April 29, 2021.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
MadLad1148d ago

I had a good time with the original Defiance years back, honestly.

Silly gameAr1148d ago

Me too. I remember putting a lot of hours into it before it went free to play. After, it went f2p, I didn't play it near as much, but it makes me nostalgic.

darthv721148d ago

I liked the show and picked up a sealed collectors edition of the 360 game for $5 at a thrift store a couple years ago.

isarai1148d ago

It had a good run honestly, way better than it had any business being, especially for it to be part of a tv series

boing11148d ago

Yeah, I'm surprised it went for so long too. Tried the game but didn't click for me. I liked the TV series, though.

isarai1148d ago

I gave it about a dozen hours, was fun even tho MMOs aren't my thing. But to even keep me around that long is impressive lol

psynetik1231148d ago

Paid $11 for this POS way back and I still felt ripped off

70°

gamigo Confirms Trion Worlds Acquisition

gamigo confirmed that it has acquired major assets from Trion Worlds, known for online and console MMO games such as Rift, Defiance, Trove and ArcheAge.

Read Full Story >>
worthplaying.com
280°

Defiance Dev:Main Difference Between PS4 Pro & Xbox One X Is Resolution,Game Runs Over 60fps On Both

"Making sure to accommodate the 4K resolution is both a benefit and a hurdle with game development," says Defiance dev.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Babadook72175d ago

Usually pro has the higher or more stable fps. Hopefully that trend doesn’t happen again this game.

thrust2175d ago

Xbox X a lot more powerful allways the better 3rd party games, The truth hurts 👍

bluefox7552174d ago

@thrust Yeah, the newer, more expensive hardware seems to play games a little better. Shocking, right? Personally, I like 60fps on most games, so I go for the best version, on PC, not X.

RobLoPR2174d ago

@bluefox... so PC is cheaper than Xbox One X?

rdgneoz32174d ago

"allways the better 3rd party games"

Because it has no good first party games since they all get delayed or canned?

Realms2174d ago

@ thrust

No the truth is that a good PC runs circles around the X but some of you constantly try to make it seem like the X is better than PC wrong.

@ RobLoPR

You gotta love the goal posting the argument isn't about price point the argument is where you can get the best performance and the answer is PC. MS fanboys love taunting the power card the only problem is that a good PC can and always will outperform consoles.

iplay1up22174d ago

That is not true. Time and time again the X has been the best platform for 3rd party games. Usually FPS on the X are higher too. Just look at Assassins Creed Origins X compared to Pro Digital Foundry has.

Next Gen it wont matter. I just don't know what Sony and Microsoft are planning for next gen. This is the first MAJOR mid gen upgrade for a console. I just paid $499 for Xbox One X, and Pro is $399. If next gen starts in 2019. What kind of power will the consoles have? What price?BTW, not only does the X have more power than pro, but also a 4K BluRay player. Which Pro doesn't have. That is what makes the X $100 more than pro.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2174d ago
Cmv382175d ago

Oh we're talking hardware, because I was going to list some other differences.

nowitzki20042175d ago

I seen an article in gameinformer that MS will be releasing an Xbox One F. $899 with 8% increase over Xbox One X. First time I seen or heard anything about it. Is it true or was it a joke?

AnubisG2175d ago

Never heard of that. Most likely a joke.

nowitzki20042175d ago (Edited 2175d ago )

I didnt have time to read through it, but I really wouldnt be surprised so did not know how to take it lol.

I think its May 2018 issue.. Spiderman on cover.

slavish02175d ago

this is a last gen game it should be 4k60

2174d ago
PS3_Noob2174d ago (Edited 2174d ago )

If X could do 60fps compared to Pro 30fps may be it would matter more. Otherwise both can do well over 1080P which is more than enough. Games is what matters most.

Show all comments (20)