460°

Final Fantasy Versus XIII Name Change Hinted by Amazon Japan

GC: Square Enix may very well call Final Fantasy Versus XIII something else by the time it is finished.

Read Full Story >>
gamechup.com
Smurf14137d ago

Final Fantasy Type-1? Lol.

Ranma14137d ago (Edited 4137d ago )

they will change it to:

"Final Fantasy 13: Why don't you love lightning ?"

If we've learnt anything, its that SE loves shoving lightning down out throats

crxss4137d ago

so sick of the XIII roman numerals... come on SE, they need to move away from that travesty and move on. the less a connection there is between Versus and XIII the better.

but that's not gonna happen unfortunately...

MariaHelFutura4136d ago

Ironically in more ways than one, you're correct.

Wolfbiker4136d ago (Edited 4136d ago )

XIII has its fans and some of us look forward to the conclusion to Lightning's tale.

I know its hard for some to believe but its true.

Xof4136d ago

I did love Lighning.

It was XIII's gameplay and level design I hated.

oricon4136d ago

Its funny that you say SE loves shoving lightning down our throats since in FFXII-2 even though she was in front cover she was only playable for a very small portion in the game.

Awesome_Gamer4136d ago

I actually liked Lightning as a character, but I hated XIII's gameplay and level design.

pixelsword4136d ago (Edited 4136d ago )

Not lightning; what they want to give us is Multiplicity, the hint is in the name itself.

It'll probably change from
Final Fantasy Versus XIII

to

Final Fantasy XIII PS3 Versus 360 Verusu Wii U.

4136d ago
sikbeta4136d ago

At this point, S-E better push it to Next-Gen Consoles, because a year from now, no one will care about this game when XBX3+PS4 are out...

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4136d ago
CaJuaLFeatPuFF4137d ago (Edited 4137d ago )

Final Fantasy- I Will Never Come Out

iMaim4137d ago

@sithsylar
That's not how the joke works.

pixelsword4136d ago (Edited 4136d ago )

It depends if she strapped anything on for him or not.

;)

Ezz20134137d ago (Edited 4137d ago )

guys guys the game was finished 5 years ago

but what hold it back all that time
some of dev's there wanted it to be "Final Fantasy:i will never come out"
instead of "Final Fantasy:Versus XIII"

while the others wanted it's name to be "Final Fantasy:square enix trolling you"

and since then they can't decide

Lord_Sloth4137d ago

Better be Final Fantasy 15 and it better come out in 2014 at the latest!

4137d ago
NeXXXuS4136d ago

I actually like the Versus XIII part more just because it says "Versus" as if it's going against Final Fantasy XIII to prove that it's better.

Root4136d ago

God I hope it will be called FF15, it looks more like a FF game then FF13 despite it being more like Kingdom Hearts and thats saying a lot about how crap and differnt FF13 was.

Imagine FF15 being exclusive to one platform again, nothing holding it back. Least then they'll see that more platforms dosent always mean more sales.

turgore4136d ago

You can paint a horse with stripes and it won't make a zebra.

FF XV needs to be a proper sequel.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4136d ago
IAmLee4137d ago

I don't think anyone cares about XIII anymore, they're pushing to hard to make Lightning an Iconic character. I'd much rather X HD than this mess anyday.

Kurisu4136d ago

And that will be the reason for the name change. Versus really needs to differentiate itself from XIII so consumers know that they aren't getting more of the same (Lightning). Ignis Philosophy, maybe? :p

MariaHelFutura4136d ago

They should call it Final Fantasy: Forever

badz1494136d ago

how about Final Fantasy: WHATEVER! sounds?

pixelsword4136d ago

More like Final Fantasy: Never

Irishguy954136d ago

Final Fantasy

Will be considered another revamp of the franchise since the other revamp FFXIII ****ed it all up even worse

FACTUAL evidence4136d ago

It should be called, Final fantasy: Fan's Fantasy. Cuz at this rate it's only a fantasy.

showtimefolks4136d ago

so it will not be exclusive to ps3 and won't even come out for current system/systems.

make it a next gen title, i seriously doubt it will live up to the hype. its games like versus,last guardian and half-life 3 for example where fans have such high expections that its better to never come out lol.

i hope one way or another we get a confirmation or whether this title will ever be released or just a pip dream

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4136d ago
trikster404137d ago

Final Fantasy Should-Have-Been-The-Real-13?

Final Fantasy Never-Gonna-Happen?

Final Fantasy 19?

We are about as likely to see this game as we are a FF7 remake...

4137d ago Replies(3)
sithsylar4137d ago

Final Fantasy MIA...... (sorry)

Treian4137d ago

the game doesn't exsist...

knifefight4137d ago

Maybe the decision on the new name has taken up their last 4 years of development.

badz1494136d ago

THAT would be HILLARIOUS if true LOL!

Show all comments (91)
80°

Final Fantasy XV Review – A Royal Road Trip

Gary Green said: With my fondness for (most) Final Fantasy games and my side goal of finishing off games in my collection with loose ends, a return to Final Fantasy XV seemed inevitable. It also serves as my third Final Fantasy platinum trophy after VII and VIII, a reasonable substitute since Final Fantasy IX is nigh on impossible to master.

Read Full Story >>
pslegends.com
150°

Final Fantasy 15 director reveals why he left Square Enix, and announces he's working on 2 new JRPGs

Final Fantasy 15's director has revealed why he left Square Enix back in 2018.

Hajime Tabata famously resigned from Square Enix two years after Final Fantasy 15 shipped in 2016. In a special livestream at the time, Tabata announced his decision to resign from the company, cancelling three of four new story-focused DLC episodes for Final Fantasy 15 in the process.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
Knightofelemia131d ago

FF15 is like FF13 its subjective people either like it or hate it.

raWfodog131d ago

I liked it. I haven’t played the royale edition yet but I’ll get around to it one day.

gold_drake131d ago

no no, 15 wasnt trash.

15 had a tremendous difficult development.

FinalFantasyFanatic129d ago

I really believe 13 was better put together and more complete than 15 ever was.

EternalTitan130d ago

Found the pathetic troll.
How is your jobless life going?
Dot worry, you will never get a job or a girlfriend haha!

Hofstaderman131d ago

Man inherited a train wreck and was expected to release this game in under two years after it spent a better part of a decade in development hell. At one point there was even plans to make FFXIII Versus a musical. He did what he could.

TheColbertinator131d ago

I didn't care much for XV and I always wanted the original vision of Versus XIII but I think the dev team did what they could to salvage the project

Inverno130d ago

And yet people still blame him for the game turning out the way it did, rather than SE for the horrible mismanagement of 13 and Namura for being overly ambitious.

Dwarrior131d ago

Whatever the behind-the-scenes went on over the many years, at the end of the day it was a radical change in direction that I could not go along with. Also why I never bought 16.

gold_drake131d ago

this is also why Sakaguchi (spelling) left.

460°

There are very good reasons why FFXVI didn't sell as much as FFXV

Final Fantasy XVI’s launch was very different than Final Fantasy XV’s and the two mainline game releases are difficult to compare for a number of reasons.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
closed_account289d ago

While it seems really cool and people seem to really be enjoying it, I'm in the mood for a real jrpg right now, not an action game.

This is the first mainline Final Fantasy game I didn't pick up at launch since the original FF7 on PS1.

I'll certainly get it eventually, just not in the mood for this right now. Personal taste.

FallenAngel1984289d ago

“I'm in the mood for a real jrpg right now, not an action game.”

Implying that action RPGs aren’t real JRPGs?

closed_account289d ago (Edited 289d ago )

If I can't control the party, it's not for me. I actually really like how FF7 Remake handled combat, being able to choose to straight up action it, or slow down time for more strategic party control...regardless of how I felt about them bloating the story.

If this satisfies your jrpg itch, then cool, have at it! The story experience looks amazing though, which is why I'll probably pick it up Black Friday.

shinoff2183289d ago

You know what he's trying to say. Most of us learned of jrpg during the golden age of jrpgs and they were very very different. While I'm liking ff16 it doesn't really feel well jrpgish at all.

FallenAngel1984289d ago

@ OtterX

Props to you if you don’t like the game. Not here to say you’re wrong for not enjoying it

Just saying JRGGS come in various ways and it’s disingenuous to say one is less real than another

@ shin

JRPGs have a large variety. Even during the golden age there were plenty of quality action RPGs. It’s absurd to say there’s only one way to design a game in a genre that has so many design principles

closed_account288d ago

@FallenAngel1984 lol, yea I'm not going to dive into a semantics debate. enjoy the game, I'll catch up with it later. cheers, mate.

shinoff2183287d ago

Fallenangel

That's not what I'm saying at all. I enjoy action rpgs just as much. Star ocean is one of my favorite series. The year star ocean 6 released I've even said it was my personal game of the year. Im not thrilled they changed the combat in ff particularly, but combat aside ff16 didn't feel jrpgish at all.

MadLad287d ago

When you're basically just a spectacle fighter, first and foremost, then just call yourself that. It's like jokingly arguing GTA San Andreas was an RPG because they had a couple skill trees in it, and you can get fat.

--Onilink--287d ago

While FF16 is absolutely a Final Fantasy game (setting, characters, story, etc) it is barely an RPG, and its not just about combat.

If you want an example of an Action RPG with combat that is just as action focused as this one, while still feeling like an RPG, just look at Tales of Arise.

I’m still loving the game, but it is like 5% RPG, maybe 10% if I’m feeling generous. And what little RPG elements it has, are pretty scaled down.

Which makes it interesting in the fact that fans of the series might choose to skip it because of the little RPG in it (I would still heavily recommend it though) and non fans of the series might also skip it because it keeps being labeled as an RPG, when its basically an Action Adventure game

--Onilink--287d ago

@Otter

Interestingly enough, if you did choose to get into a semantics debate, it would honestly just make it even less of an RPG haha, as there is practically zero ROLE PLAYING in the game.
Its a linear story, a defined character with defined choices and dialog, no ability to customize your build or jobs/classes, cant modify (or use) your party members, equipment is basically irrelevant, leveling is almost as irrelevant, skills are practically based on preference as there is no elemental advantages, etc

I dont get why people seem hesitant to say this game really isn’t an RPG, its an Action Adventure game with some very light RPG mechanics (and which game doesn’t have them these days).

It doesnt mean the game is bad just because its not an RPG, if anything, it might help bring people over that DONT like RPGs

closed_account287d ago (Edited 287d ago )

@--Onilink-- ha yea, I did end up engaging in the semantics more today. (below) Yesterday I had kids running around the living room, couldn't focus enough to engage. X'D

But yea, you hit the nail on the head - it's not "enough" of a jrpg for me. It's watered down, and I was never a big fan of DMC games. I still want to experience the story eventually though.

GhostScholar287d ago

I’m my opinion jrpgs are typically turn based and not real time. People will deny that but ask how many peoples favorite jrpgs are turn based and like 99 percent would be. It’s not insignificant

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 287d ago
Pyrofire95287d ago

Do you mean a turn based combat game?

closed_account287d ago (Edited 287d ago )

No, it doesn't even have to be turn based. I love Tales games even. Just JRPG elements like switching between characters, buffing, finding enemy elemental weaknesses etc.

Back in the 90's we would have called this an action rpg, as it distinguishes the playstyle. I was recently playing through Secret of Evermore again on SNES, and while I love it, it was considered more action oriented:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

Even the Zelda devs don't call Zelda n rpg, they call it an action-adventure game with rpg elements.

At the end of the day, it's just semantics. Yes, it is a jrpg in the sense of leveling up etc... but it's very much an action jrpg. That's all I'm saying. If you want to call it a classic jrpg, then cool. Go for it, I'm not going to stop you. 👍

Amplitude287d ago

@OtterX: It's N4G man you gotta fight in the comments, not be nice to people. You'll figure it out

closed_account287d ago

Oh man, I deal with enough screaming kids at home. I'm willing to let this one go. 😂

Shane Kim287d ago (Edited 287d ago )

It's not about that. It's that he is factually wrong. If this isn't an rpg, then what would you call Uncharted or Tomb Raider?

closed_account287d ago

@Shane Kim - I answered above. It's an action rpg. We had them back in the 90's. I gave an example. But I concede, it's still a "classic jrpg", it's just a matter of acknowledging the sub-genre.

What do you call Zelda?

Shane Kim287d ago

An action rpg is an rpg, so I don't k ow what the discussion is.

I have only played the original NES and SNES Zelda games, wich I would call action adventure games.

MadLad287d ago

@shane

Notice how Bioshock has puzzle elements, but we don't call it a puzzle game. Mafia had a racing segment, but nobody would compare it to Forza.

If a title has any sort of element that fits even the remote criteria of a certain genre, it's disingenuous to associate it with that genre.
Again, if I sold you a copy of Bioshock and told you it was a puzzle game, you'd go home and end up either highly confused, or genuinely annoyed.

This is a Final Fantasy game. It should be sold as a Final Fantasy game. The caveat being it's an entirely different experience than people have in their head when they hear Final Fantasy, and RPG/JRPG should be nowhere near the marketing for it, because it's 100% about the action and a linear story.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 287d ago
Rocketisleague287d ago

Understand what you're saying lad, for me though this is what was missing from ff since ff10. As it is my favourite franchise alongside maybe metal gear...ffs have just missed the mark in quality since ps2 era.

For me ff 16 is starting to finally hit the full potential of ff. You don't watch those long summon cutscenes anymore. You play them.

Gregero287d ago

100% the reasons I'm not getting it either. No full party control and just looks too linear for me. I'll wait for FFVII remake part 2. I'm playing FFIX again for the first time in a long time and it's perfect.

Rocketisleague287d ago

Ff7 remake was much more linear than this, this is the 3rd most open one

closed_account287d ago

FFIX is one of my favorites! I hope they do a more lighthearted stylized one again some day.

I want to see Final Fantasy Tactics revitalized too. I adore the world of Ivalice. Moreso in Tactics & Tactics Advance games.

andy85287d ago

See the the thing is, FFIX is pretty linear and so are most of the older ones until late in the game. You're on a set path from area to area with no deviation like FFXVI. It's only once you get to disc 3 it starts to open up

Tapani287d ago

I can recommend Dragon Quest XI, Nier Replicant, Nier Automata, Valkyrie Chronicles IV, Persona 5 Royal, Persona 4 The Golden, Dark Souls I-III, Elden Ring, Chained Echoes, Shin Megami Tensei: Nocturne, FFX/X-2, Monster Hunter World & Rise, Ni no Kuni I & II.

On top of that you have the classic versions with great mods to make them better than the PS1 versions: Chrono Trigger, FFVI, FFIV, FFVII, FFVIII, FFIX and Chrono Cross.

closed_account287d ago

Solid lineup! You have great taste.

HomoLuden286d ago

Same here, not buying as I want a jrpg not an actionn game as of now.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 286d ago
lodossrage289d ago (Edited 289d ago )

Well,

FF15 launched on more platforms than FF16
FF15 cost less to buy than FF16
The PS4 install base was bigger when FF15 released compared to the PS5 for FF16

shinoff2183289d ago (Edited 289d ago )

The install base was alot bigger if I recall. I'm not reading the article but if it's implying it's ps5 exclusive as the reason sure maybe it would've sold a little more but out of the million sold of ff15 on xbox one I have a hard time believing all one million sales came at launch

_Decadent_Descent287d ago

I love how people downvote you as if you're not stating objective facts that certainly make a difference.

MrNinosan287d ago

And what matters most was when the games where released. FFXV during Black Week, and FFXVI during summer.

andy85287d ago

And FFXVI released on a Thursday and XV on a Tuesday

TheKingKratos287d ago (Edited 287d ago )

And just like that... you made that article completely worthless .

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 287d ago
repsahj288d ago (Edited 288d ago )

I don't understand, Tales of Arise is a jrpg. It's also an action rpg, it even has less jrpg elements than FF16. The impact of PS5 exclusive is really strong.

goldwyncq288d ago

Less JRPG elements? That’s just flat out wrong. Arise has party member switching, status ailments, and elemental weaknesses, which XVI doesn’t have.

--Onilink--287d ago

No one that has played both games would ever say that Tales of Arise has less RPG elements. If anything, as you say, its the perfect example of being able to do heavy action combat and still being an RPG

MrCrimson288d ago

The FF16 numbers are quite good.

shinoff2183287d ago

That's not completely true repsahj. I'm sure it's having an affect but I'm a ps fan. Loved tales of arise, star ocean 6, ff16 doesn't seem jrpg or rpgish much. Some of us long time since ff1 back on nes fans have real complaints and to brush it off to the side as a console exclusive thing is just ridiculous

repsahj286d ago

I understand I'm also an RPG fan since SNES. My first ff is FF3. And also tales is one of my fave series. But for me, Arise is my least favorite Tales. Yes, the graphics are superb but everything else is just ok to me, but I still accept it. That's what I'm saying with FF16, even the change when done right is very ok to me.

Viryu287d ago

I'm currently somewhere in the middle of FF XVI I think, and so far I'm enjoying it. Problem when comparing the two is there is a lack of bromance in FFXVI and it's less open worldish. In FF XVI the accompanying characters feel more like accessories that don't bring much to your playthrough outside of cut scenes.

Pyrofire95287d ago

As far as I've seen it has been tho.

Show all comments (76)