420°

Head2Head: Call Of Duty Black Ops II Screenshot Comparison Wii U/PS3/Xbox 360

Lens of Truth Writes "Welcome back for another exciting Head2Head! This time we take a closer look at Activision’s Call of Duty Black Ops II for the PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 and the Nintendo Wii U Now that the Wii U is out and ready to battle the question remains, hows does this version stack up to the rest? Well come take a look us as we compare one of the most anticipate game release this year against the new competition!"

Read Full Story >>
lensoftruth.com
GraveLord4167d ago

PC > 360 > PS3 > Wii U
Saved you the trouble.

aceitman4167d ago

whats funny is the ps3 and 360 look the same now, but the wii u looks like the ps3 from the 1st batch of ps3 vs 360 . the ps3 looked washed out, now it doesnt. what the hell is going on . i have both versions, my son the 360 me ps3 they look identicle and the color contrast is the same , so someone help me and tell me what this website is doing .

RudeSole Devil4167d ago

Na the PS3 version looks a little less washed out than the Xbox 360 version and the Wii u looks even more washed out. But the limited RGB range on the PS3 and Wii U are adjustable through your tv so no big deal.

meetajhu4166d ago (Edited 4166d ago )

lol@ low resolution console owners trying to defend there console. I own Ps3 and 360 and the Console's HD version of the game runs at 800x600(4:3) 862x720(16:9) rofl! While the PC runs at native 1920x1080@120hz or higher.

aPerson4166d ago

@meetajhu

Enjoy your virginity.

JellyJelly4166d ago

Wouldn't it be more interesting to compare how the games look in motion though? Looking at static screen grabs isn't really telling.

ProjectVulcan4166d ago (Edited 4166d ago )

PC > > > > 360 = Wii U > PS3

Fixed.

Wii U has clearer textures because it has none of that nasty PS3 blur filter. PS3 does appear to win in one shot but if you scroll down to see the FULL sliding version (of the zoomed face shot) it doesn't really if you compare the guy's uniform lapels and strangely his sideburn hair. Much sharper on Wii U. Everything else Wii U is much sharper, and about on par with 360. PS3 just needs to lose the horrendous blur filter.

You'll say Wii U has more resolution but we still don't actually know that. I would bet that it hasn't. Technically PS3 and 360 are also both 720p, its the OTHER axis missing a bunch of pixels.

metroid324166d ago (Edited 4166d ago )

Everyone on here tries to go against the facts the wiiu version of Black ops 2 is superior in speed/gameplay/graphics look it up even on GAME website UK it said the wiiu version is the best the series has ever looked in terms of textures/lighting/shadows END OF all the screen shot comparisons in the world mean nothing as it's confirmed GET IT CONFIRMED only this site is full of people that don't get it when a developer is making the game says its superior on wiiu IT IS ??????????????????? Fucking Plums.

ProjectVulcan4166d ago (Edited 4166d ago )

How is it a fact that Wii U has better game play? It's the same game as on all the other platforms. Massive facepalm. None of what you claimed as a fact is actually a fact.

Getting your information from a website selling you a game? That's ridiculous.

I have no idea why you replied such nonsense to my post. I already made it clear that Wii U beats PS3 on this game visually. However it doesn't beat 360 and unless it has more resolution which is UNCONFIRMED then it is equal. No better. No worse.

Gamer19824165d ago

You blind? Look at the third image on the article and look at his nose the WiiU version is missing a LOT of detail. Why? Because of the CPU restrictions.

ProjectVulcan4165d ago (Edited 4165d ago )

I think you are blind. Fact is, CPU performance will not dictate texture quality anyway....The third image is probably taken at a slightly different point which is why the facial expression is different and the lighting is slightly changed on his face easily explaining the difference.

Because of this if you look elsewhere, like the guy's buttons on his lapels or his sideburns on the right side they are much sharper on Wii U. All the fine details like individual strands of hair. What is a blurry fuzz on Ps3 is defined strands on Wii u. But thats the same in every shot, every shot you look at Wii U is plainly sharper and crisper overall than the PS3 version.

Even if as you claim PS3 wins this one shot which it simply doesn't, Wii U wins every single other shot for fidelity against PS3. Every single one.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4165d ago
Lior4166d ago

Ps3 has a much better colour contrast and the textures are much crisper, I am really surprised that this wii cannot even top 2006 hardware honestly

andibandit4166d ago

The ps3 version is utter crap, have you even tried it?. As soon as you turn the camera everything becomes as blurred as sh.t

Norrison4166d ago

BO2 looks better than killzone on PC

ape0074165d ago

KZ3 hhhh wjo the hell play that crap

KZ2 is miles better, KZ3 tries to be CoD

ginsunuva4166d ago

shit > shitty > shittier > shittiest

Saved ya'll the trouble.

DoomeDx4166d ago

Why is LoT comparing the the cutscenes? They look EXACLY the same because its pre-rendered. the only diffrence you see if the colors. lol

More gameplay, less loading-screen cutscenes

TheBardsSong4166d ago (Edited 4166d ago )

Except the Wii U looks better than the PS3 in every screenshot except the extreme closeup of the black man. It has much cleaner textures and a better draw distance.

Anon19744165d ago

Yeah, THAT'S exactly what we needed. Another contestant in these absurd pissing contests.

"But if you pause the game and squint just so, you'll see a jaggy on the rock shadow in the lower left hand corner."

I'll never forget that guy from Lens of Truth claiming they're the only site that has the "balls" to call out developers for the good of the entire gaming community. Uh-huh, because turning gamers into pixel counters and then setting them at each other's throats with unverifiable images really helps build the gamer community.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4165d ago
YoungPlex4167d ago

Not bad for a launch PORT but will wait until eurogamer does a full analysis. Either way it goes the game is mostly the same, only differences are some face textures and shadows, which isn't bad for a launch port. My real concern is the amount of players actually playing on the Wii U, which should grow as the days, weeks and months, go on!

chukamachine4167d ago

Reading the comments underneath shows how little people actually know about graphics.

The WII U has the exactly the same textures as PS3/360.

But the Wii u is running in a higher rez with aa.

PS3 has lower rez with blurfilter aa

360 has lower rez with msaa.

legend9114166d ago

That and the engine can be optimized on the Wii U.

SilentNegotiator4166d ago

http://forum.beyond3d.com/s...

Wii U and 360 are both running at 880x720p with 2xAA. Ps3 is running at the same resolution, but with post-AA.

a_squirrel4165d ago

I'd say the crappy WiiU port looks better than the crappy Ps3 port.

It reminds me of COD on PC. Crappy looking regardless, it's just more obvious because everything isn't blurred so much.

mcstorm4166d ago

You know they all look like the same game to me who would of thought it?

I love how people keep defending the version of the game on the console they like the most.

Just buy the version of the game you want and you are happy. For me im getting it on the WiiU just to have some FPS online action on my wiiu.

Neonridr4167d ago

are you kidding me? The Wii U has MUCH sharper details over the PS3. Look at the stars on the generals hat, or the textures on the truck in the distance. Everything is so blurry on the PS3, whereas at least on the Wii U it is sharper. The only thing I see the Wii U is missing is some wrinkles on the generals face, but that could be because the screenshot isn't from exactly the same moment (as indicated by the lack of any smoke from the PS3 version in the background vs the Wii U having the smoke).

They all look pretty much the same though. We could nitpick for hours over all this stuff with no real conclusion. People see what they want to see I guess.

HateFanboys4166d ago

"People see what they want to see I guess"

You're seeing what you wanna see

Computersaysno4166d ago (Edited 4166d ago )

Far as I can tell he is just seeing what is actually there and everyone who disagrees needs an eye test. Wii U is sharper than PS3. Deal with it.

You would have to be registered blind to not see that fact.

Honestly someone could post on here that liquid water is wet and get disagrees. Accept. Facts.

Dropdeadll4166d ago (Edited 4166d ago )

Yeah, your right Wii U looks sharper then PS3. Wii U screens look really bright but that can be easily adjusted on the TV settings.

Gamer19824165d ago

Sharper because of AA but the CPU lets the WiiU down look at his nose in the 3rd pic its lacking detail the PS3 version and 360 version has.

Show all comments (79)
130°

These Call of Duty games are officially dead as servers go offline

Following the Wii U and 3DS servers being taken offline, Call of Duty Black Ops 2 and Ghosts are officially dead.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
90°

Call of Duty players are playing this game for the last time before it's taken offline

Call of Duty players are jumping into Black Ops 2 for the final time before its Wii U servers go offline for good.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
250°

Xbox backwards compatibility sends old Call of Duty games back into the Top Five | UK Monthly Charts

GTA 5 and Red Dead Redemption 2 leap up due to summer sales

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
shadowT248d ago

Xbox $70 billion bet paid out

fr0sty248d ago

Guess that's what happens when there's no good new games to play...

4Sh0w248d ago (Edited 248d ago )

Well regardless of exclusives, or whatever else there is to play on Xbox or ps, CoD has has still been the top selling game on ps platform since forever also.....so no surprise that the most popular game franchise on any console could easily have a revival due to servers coming back online...this is just credit to xbox backwards compatibility & thats good thing for Xbox gamers.

wiz7191248d ago

@Frosty orrrr maybe it’s a breath of fresh air to be able to go back to the peak of the series .. and it’s beem great lol

mkis007248d ago

It's going to take 10 years for xbox to generate that much profit...

Rhythmattic248d ago

Why worry when they have OS, Server and Background Data in their hands...
Gaming is just the small piece, at the top left in a few K piece jigsaw.

EasilyTheBest247d ago

If you buy a house with cash for 1 million dollars you still own the house. Microsoft don't need to make the money back.

Rhythmattic245d ago

But its not money back, its about how it goes missing.

jznrpg248d ago

Shooters is what Xbox people play most of the time and that’s about it by the numbers and sales of games.

shinoff2183248d ago

Atkeast older gamers nostalgia is good. Jeez.

Jin_Sakai248d ago

Mostly because the new CoD games are garbage. The old games were much better.

Rutaprkl248d ago

Agree 100%. Cod 4, WaW, Black ops 1 & 2, those were the days.

Rhythmattic248d ago

For MP, Unreal tournament , QIII Arena (loved the UT mod) FTW!

RaidenBlack247d ago

Unreal Tournament and Quake III were simply amazing ... CoD's and CoD-likes' rise killed the arena shooter popularity ...
Unreal Tournament 2004 is my favorite in the series.
Didn't enjoy Unreal Tournament III, Quake Champions that much.
Too bad Epic cancelled Unreal Tournament 2014 becoz of Fortnite

Rhythmattic247d ago (Edited 247d ago )

I got hooked on the QIII Urban Terror mod (and my work colleagues I introduced them to)... LAN Sessions at the closing of the doors at work, into the night , sinking beers and eating pizza..... Good times.

thesoftware730248d ago

Wow, good games never get old I guess.

CoD will always be a beast of a franchise, and how awesome is it that you can just boot it up or pop it into your Xbox and play, MS BC is really a neat feature.

CrimsonWing69248d ago

Shows you that backwards compatibility is a worthwhile feature.

1Victor247d ago

@crimson:” Shows you that backwards compatibility is a worthwhile feature.”
I agree it’s worthy at the start of the generation when there’s few new generation games but halfway through the generation it’s not a feature.
Now it’s good that this game is finding a renewed life for its fan but it shows a mayor flaw in new games release when a close decade old game is toppling the charts

CrimsonWing69247d ago

I don't know if I understand what you mean. It's a feature regardless of the time into the generation.

Let's take Armored Core 6 for example. Let's say I'm interested in checking out the previous Armored Core games, sure would be nice if I could play them on my current-gen console.

We're about 3 years into current-gen and old games are hitting in the top 5 for sales charts in the month.

I do get where you're coming from with older games possibly being better than the newer games, but the feature stays the feature. I can only speak for myself, but when there's a lull in game releases or nothing great is out, I like to go back to old titles. It's just nice to not have to have a bunch of consoles out to do so.

I think moving forward it'll be less and less of an issue as like with the PS5 you can access most all of the PS4 games, but I like going back to PS1 and PS2. Would be awesome to kind of make backwards compatibility a prioritized feature moving forward. Hell, Sony was the first to implement it.

Show all comments (26)