210°

New information on Call of Duty Black Ops II released

Just a month away from the Call Of Duty Black Ops II November 13th release date and crucial information on the game’s online multiplayer has already surfaced. The new Call of Duty, set in 2025, will return with a new arsenal that will fling the player into the center of the game’s futuristic warfare. From expansions on the games well-received zombie mode to a new ability to stream from inside of the game, we have all of the juicy info below.

Read Full Story >>
masonicgamer.com
tallkidoPL4207d ago

why cod games still dont have dedicated servers and are using 4 years old engine?

ninjahunter4207d ago

ACTUALLY. They upgrade the engine with each cod release, kind of like valve uses their 8 year old engine. and to be able to afford servers for, what was it? 10 million people across the entire world? They would go bankrupt before the year was over. Sure BF3 has servers, but dice doesnt have enough servers for even 1/100th the daily community, most BF3 servers are rented by clans and such which could be deadly to the very strict competitiveness of COD(modding and such).

If you havent noticed its hard to develope games at 60fps and include split screen. and Servers do cost a lot of money monthly(Millions in the case of COD).

tallkidoPL4207d ago

Yep its hard to get 60fps on old engine,doesnt matter if its modified or not.They make billions and they cant afford dedicated servers lol

dillydadally4206d ago

Actually, you're correct about the engine, but not dedicated servers. That's the reason they tell you, but they are lying to your face. They say that for PR reasons because if they told you the truth you'd be mad.

You see, the cost of servers scales with sales, meaning that CoD does have more players and would cost more, but that's because they sold a lot more copies and MADE a lot more money. The cost for servers for one person would be the same portion of the profits from selling the game to that one person that BF spends. BF has to find something to compete on and needs larger server sizes to be fun, so they do servers with a portion of the sales from the game. Besides, there's no reason CoD couldn't allow clan servers - they do on PC and it works fine. I know id get a server.

In truth, they don't have servers because it would hurt profits more than not having them - everyone still buys the game with the awful P2P system. What reason do they have to change?

XB1_PS44206d ago

A lot of companies use the same engine for new games on the same gen. It's not always neccesary to rebuild an entire engine when it's a lot easier to make an addition to the engine to make it do what they need it to.

The dedicated serves aren't neccesary to me. I barely lag on Blops, but when I do, I leave the game and find another one. I don't complain about it.

Also, with dedicated servers, it makes it easer to find a high ping lobby and use the lag to your advantage. Which is annoying all in it's own.

No matter what they do, some people will always find something to complain about.

dillydadally4206d ago

I'm sorry sofresh but its obvious you don't understand lag at all. First, what you said about rarely experiencing lag is blatantly untrue - you just apparently aren't aware of its effects. CoD tries to hide the lag by smoothing out frames. If there's skipping frames, that means you're lagging REALLY bad.

Instead, the lag is manifested by things like you losing one on one gun battles when on your screen you shot first, you getting killed after reaching the safety of cover, your first bullet not registering, etc. These aren't things that some people don't experience because they are inherent in the p2p networking method they use. In other words its impossible for you to never have lag - you just aren't trained to notice how its screwing you over.

Second, having dedicated servers does not mean they can choose a server in a server list - there would still be matchmaking.

Third, no one would want to join a game with a poor connectiontion because it would not have the same effect as a lag switch - instead they just wouldn't be able to hit anything.

Last, unlike the engine, which i agree with you about, this is a very real reason to complain. They could add dedicated servers and fix the problems easily, but don't because it would cut into their profits and their greedy. And its blatantly untrue that it would bankrupt them. Its true that bf doesn't sell as much, but that is a benefit for CoD - they make a lot more money. The price to host servers scales with sales, meaning they sell more game copies and they'd take the same portion of that profits bf does to create servers.

XB1_PS44206d ago

@dillydadally Obvious? Really? I do know what lag is. :) I get anywhere from 20-35 kills per game. I have 100's, if not up to a thousand hours into the cod franchise. I know what bullet lag is, and I know what rubberbanding is. I rarely experience enough lag to make me upset about my bullet placement though.. I do sometimes get corner shot, but just barely.

Regarding dedicated server matchmaking. You're right, I didn't factor that in.

Also, if the multiplayer coding is the same as black ops 1, then lag sometimes helps you out. It makes bad use of lag compensation, which makes the hitbox and the player model in seperate places. So you could be shooting the character, but the hitbox is somewhere else. Host disadvantage. :)

Hazmat134207d ago

so no storyline info? fiddlesticks. "players control a VTOL" STAG is in this game? someone get the Saints! lol

Swiggins4207d ago

VTOL doesn't describe the make or model of the plane, but rather the means of take off.

VTOL states for Vertical Take Off and Landing, which essentially means that any VTOL aircraft has the ability to take off from a stationary position, like a helicopter, before then moving forward and flying traditionally.

Other VTOL Aircraft include the famous Harrier Jet and the newer American Aircraft the F-35 Lightning II.

Blastoise4207d ago

"Call of Duty: Black Ops II will now features ‘leagues,’ a matchmaking system that pairs players together based on their skill rating. The seasonal ladders in the game permit players to move up the ranks as they win matches, placing them all in different divisions. This feature capitalizes on the popularity of the Call of Duty series, separating its huge player-base and perhaps allowing more inexperienced players to give the game another chance if they find themselves ready to quit too soon."

I'm confused, is this a choice, or will every match I'm in always be against people with a K:D or Win to loss ratio that's the same as mine?

tallkidoPL4207d ago

yep its a choice,we know no1 will play it...we not make it so theres no other choice iw is so stupid...

WeskerChildReborned4207d ago

Treyarch is making the game....

FullMetalTech4207d ago (Edited 4207d ago )

Its seems its only if you want to join ladders. so its definately a choice. But dont know of the whole matchmaking system is based it.

LoneCastaway4206d ago

wow this information is so new, i didn't know this!
[be advised: SARCASM!]
rather well summarized though...

dillydadally4206d ago

Yeah, someone needs to flag this article for a misleading title. There's nothing in the entire article that hasn't been clearly revealed and detailed for like 5 months now.

130°

These Call of Duty games are officially dead as servers go offline

Following the Wii U and 3DS servers being taken offline, Call of Duty Black Ops 2 and Ghosts are officially dead.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
90°

Call of Duty players are playing this game for the last time before it's taken offline

Call of Duty players are jumping into Black Ops 2 for the final time before its Wii U servers go offline for good.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
250°

Xbox backwards compatibility sends old Call of Duty games back into the Top Five | UK Monthly Charts

GTA 5 and Red Dead Redemption 2 leap up due to summer sales

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
shadowT249d ago

Xbox $70 billion bet paid out

fr0sty249d ago

Guess that's what happens when there's no good new games to play...

4Sh0w249d ago (Edited 249d ago )

Well regardless of exclusives, or whatever else there is to play on Xbox or ps, CoD has has still been the top selling game on ps platform since forever also.....so no surprise that the most popular game franchise on any console could easily have a revival due to servers coming back online...this is just credit to xbox backwards compatibility & thats good thing for Xbox gamers.

wiz7191249d ago

@Frosty orrrr maybe it’s a breath of fresh air to be able to go back to the peak of the series .. and it’s beem great lol

mkis007249d ago

It's going to take 10 years for xbox to generate that much profit...

Rhythmattic248d ago

Why worry when they have OS, Server and Background Data in their hands...
Gaming is just the small piece, at the top left in a few K piece jigsaw.

EasilyTheBest248d ago

If you buy a house with cash for 1 million dollars you still own the house. Microsoft don't need to make the money back.

Rhythmattic246d ago

But its not money back, its about how it goes missing.

jznrpg249d ago

Shooters is what Xbox people play most of the time and that’s about it by the numbers and sales of games.

shinoff2183249d ago

Atkeast older gamers nostalgia is good. Jeez.

Jin_Sakai249d ago

Mostly because the new CoD games are garbage. The old games were much better.

Rutaprkl248d ago

Agree 100%. Cod 4, WaW, Black ops 1 & 2, those were the days.

Rhythmattic248d ago

For MP, Unreal tournament , QIII Arena (loved the UT mod) FTW!

RaidenBlack248d ago

Unreal Tournament and Quake III were simply amazing ... CoD's and CoD-likes' rise killed the arena shooter popularity ...
Unreal Tournament 2004 is my favorite in the series.
Didn't enjoy Unreal Tournament III, Quake Champions that much.
Too bad Epic cancelled Unreal Tournament 2014 becoz of Fortnite

Rhythmattic248d ago (Edited 248d ago )

I got hooked on the QIII Urban Terror mod (and my work colleagues I introduced them to)... LAN Sessions at the closing of the doors at work, into the night , sinking beers and eating pizza..... Good times.

thesoftware730249d ago

Wow, good games never get old I guess.

CoD will always be a beast of a franchise, and how awesome is it that you can just boot it up or pop it into your Xbox and play, MS BC is really a neat feature.

CrimsonWing69249d ago

Shows you that backwards compatibility is a worthwhile feature.

1Victor248d ago

@crimson:” Shows you that backwards compatibility is a worthwhile feature.”
I agree it’s worthy at the start of the generation when there’s few new generation games but halfway through the generation it’s not a feature.
Now it’s good that this game is finding a renewed life for its fan but it shows a mayor flaw in new games release when a close decade old game is toppling the charts

CrimsonWing69248d ago

I don't know if I understand what you mean. It's a feature regardless of the time into the generation.

Let's take Armored Core 6 for example. Let's say I'm interested in checking out the previous Armored Core games, sure would be nice if I could play them on my current-gen console.

We're about 3 years into current-gen and old games are hitting in the top 5 for sales charts in the month.

I do get where you're coming from with older games possibly being better than the newer games, but the feature stays the feature. I can only speak for myself, but when there's a lull in game releases or nothing great is out, I like to go back to old titles. It's just nice to not have to have a bunch of consoles out to do so.

I think moving forward it'll be less and less of an issue as like with the PS5 you can access most all of the PS4 games, but I like going back to PS1 and PS2. Would be awesome to kind of make backwards compatibility a prioritized feature moving forward. Hell, Sony was the first to implement it.

Show all comments (26)