100°
3.5

Fable: The Journey Review | Destructoid

Jim Sterling writes, "It's yet another motion control game masquerading as something adventurous and bold, but frequently exposing itself for the shallow, monotonous, borderline broken experience it actually is. While some elements of Fable: The Journey really do work, and no effort has been spared to make this look and feel like a quality product, the reality is that no amount of polish can hide the inherent faultiness of the product. The Journey wants so desperately to impress you, but it can only ever ruin your day.

And it's on-rails."

Read Full Story >>
destructoid.com
Afterlife4209d ago

The Fable franchise is dead after this.

guitarded774209d ago

IGN liked it. Destructoid is known for giving obscenely low scores to decent games (not great games) to get attention. I doubt we'll see another Fable game until the next MS console, but the Fable franchise is far from dead.

Irishguy954209d ago (Edited 4209d ago )

Ign are known for rating GTA4 very high

+ Lol at Microsoft and Kinect//

StreetsofRage4209d ago

GTA4 rated high? Uuuuuuum, I don't get what you're saying. GTA4 is an amazing game.

Yeah IGN and a few other better known sites liked it. Still going to be the first Fable I skip.

fei-hung4209d ago (Edited 4209d ago )

IGN, Destructoid, Gamespot, Edge and most the others do this. I can't say any of them are not guilty of it at some point or another.

Although I disagree with you, it is only to an extent as Jim has a habit or tearing a game to shreds by exaggerating how bad it is if it doesn't live up to what it could have / should have been or if he thinks the developers are taking the piss.

As a gamer, I can't blame him for this, but I can understand why fans or loyalists of a game or franchise may be aggravated by this.

Edit: I find Machinima and Angry Joe pretty good for reviews and give far better reasons for their scores.

EVILDEAD3604209d ago

EGM gave it a 90%..

These are same guys who gave Witcher 2 a 4.5 simply because it was on the 360..glad I didnt listen to them then and they hold nmo weight now.

You can see through all of the excessively low scores that are getting thrown around for 'certain' games on thes little sites.

But hey it's his opinion. It'll be fun to read these after playing gthe game to see if it's REALLY this horrible unreedeemable software or the writer and the site is simply..you know

Evil

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4209d ago
QuantumWake4209d ago

I like Gamer Limit's review of it:

"Due to the unresponsive controls, you're going to have a lot of frustrating moments where you'll want to throw a controller against the wall - only you are the controller, which could end pretty badly for yourself."

http://gamerlimit.com/2012/...

lol

Bimkoblerutso4209d ago (Edited 4209d ago )

It's just not right writing a review without finishing the game. It may or may not ultimately affect the score, but it's a matter of retrospection. There have been several games I've disliked playing through quite a bit, but looked back on more favorably because of a late-game mechanic or a satisfying ending or an incredible boss fight.

SilentNegotiator4209d ago (Edited 4209d ago )

How would that have validated a game with such a long stretch of unenjoyable, broken gameplay?

Would it have deserved a 4, then? Would you play through a terrible game for a boss fight or interesting late-game mechanic?

If the game were less....crap for the first several hours, hey, I'd agree you with. But this is a cut and dry bad game. The last ENTIRE HALF of the game could not POSSIBLY make the first half worth it, unless it was an entirely different game.

Bimkoblerutso4209d ago (Edited 4209d ago )

I feel like I answered all of your questions in my original comment. It may or may not affect the score. That's not the point.

Reviews are comprehensive, or at least as comprehensive as they possibly can be. I feel like if you failed to complete something as essential as the main story, you may well be in your rights to dislike what you played, but not within your rights to "review" the game and affix an overall score.

And just to be clear, I don't care what game they're reviewing. I feel like you might be harboring a modicum of bias on the subject because of the game we're talking about, but in reality the game looks just as terrible to me as it does to everyone else. That doesn't affect my opinion.

Bigpappy4209d ago (Edited 4209d ago )

I agree with Bim. Jim Sterling made it clear that he does not care from motion control and hates the fact that the game is on rails. Then he ends up not finishing the game. How about given the game to someone else to rewiew. Hire someone just to review motion control games.

Would you want Halo fanboy reviewing LBP then giving it a 1/10 because it had too much jumping so he could not finish?

fei-hung4209d ago

I think Jim is more pissed about the promises made before, during and after the reveal of the game as supposed to marking it down for being a motion control game.

I have not come across a single review for this game where they haven't complained about how it controls and how frustrating it is when the controls do not work as intended.

It also doesn't help being part of the Fable brand which is known to be a AAA franchise.

I would assume people expected a lot more from this Kinect game than the many which came before.

SilentNegotiator4209d ago

Sock it to 'em, Jim.

1) Built upon a lie (it's absolutely on rails)
2) Not lazy or without direction...just bad
3) Bad aim in combat
4) Few enemies and attacks
5) Can play itself at times

DigitalRaptor4209d ago

Now that Peter M is gone from Lionhead, it looks like they're more than happy to continue his legacy of making promises they just cannot keep.

The "on rails" thing is just a complete and shameful lie though.

StreetsofRage4209d ago (Edited 4209d ago )

Yeah this site always gives crappy reviews. But cmon now, like anybody is surprised by this? I'm a huge Fable fan. Absolutely loved the first 3 and I predicted this. Al though, their are good reviews for this game from better sites.

Show all comments (24)
90°

Top 10 Worst Kinect Games

Alex S. from Link-Cable writes: "A few days ago, Microsoft announced that they were officially discontinuing their Kinect motion-sensing accessory. What was once considered a chief-rival to Nintendo’s Wii revolution and an integral part of the Xbox One’s launch has come to an end, and we here at Link-Cable… couldn’t be happier. The Kinect, while sporting impressive technology never managed to live up to its full potential and most of the games released for the device either had shoe-horned in support or barely functioned as intentioned, in part because of the device’s very specific ideal conditions. So as the Kinect sails off into sunset, we’ve decided to remember the worst of times and look back at the Top 10 Worst Kinect games."

Read Full Story >>
link-cable.com
RyanDJ2348d ago

Kinect, for me, is easily worth owning for two things: Dance Central for me acting like an idiot and having fun, and Kinect Party for my kids when they want to have easy-access stupid fun at like a kid's party. Those were the only games I have enjoyed on it, and they couldn't be done any other way (well, I guess that KP is EyeToy-level work). But my hope is that when motion control falls away, we'll get a proper DDR again.

andrewsquall2347d ago (Edited 2347d ago )

Yet for 150 quid it is and was most certainly not worth owning for solely those 2 games, that you have to pay money for also.

Now far be it from me to tell you what is worth it or not worth it to you. But if that is what is worth it to you, I don't want to know what ISN'T worth it lol.

RyanDJ2346d ago

It was worth it to buy one used for half price and get one of those two games for free. ;)

datriax2347d ago

All of them are tied for 1st place.

darthv722347d ago

Star wars wouldnt be so bad if it didnt have.... the dancing. Ughhh that dancing.

They should do a list of 10 best kinect games as well. I'm sure fruit ninja and gun stringer would be on there. Those are actually fun to play.

180°

15 Xbox Games With Absolutely Horrible Sequels

When an original game becomes a hit, it can be difficult to re-configure its secret sauce into an equally enjoyable sequel.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Christopher2514d ago

Would you say absolutely horrible hyperbole? :D

4Sh0w2513d ago (Edited 2513d ago )

Halo 5?....pffft to each his own but Halo 5 is a great game, every Xbox owner I know enjoyed it, the campaign was nice I like the teamwork concept and the multiplayer keeps 'em coming back with great gameplay & modes so much content, 343 did a helluva job.

Christopher2513d ago

@4Show: Uh... going to assume that's a comment intended for someone else.

spicelicka2513d ago

Not Halo 5. It had a bad story COMPARED to past games but it didn't have a bad story overall. The gameplay was top notch, and multiplayer is still one of the best on the market right now. Custom games browser is the single greatest thing 343 did which I'm grateful for.

ninsigma2513d ago

Nah it really was a bad campaign. MP was great but seriously, that was a hugely terrible story mode.

spicelicka2512d ago

The story maybe, but some of the missions were extremely fun. The Sangehlios ones are right up there with the best missions in the franchise.

Kingthrash3602513d ago

Halos mp was great but became boring quicker than most.
The story. Naw that was bad and it's marketing was a lie. Made it seem like old master chief was gunna fight that new fake master chief but the conflict ended up being a one punch cgi sequence.
Not to mention fighting the same boss over and over and over....plus add the no split screen mp and whala! You got the worst canon halo ever made

brich2332513d ago

Compared to Halo 4, Halo 5's story was trash and not memorable at all.

ninsigma2512d ago

That's not really saying much though cuz that was pretty bad as well.

ninsigma2512d ago

Agreed on sanghelios. That was one of the very few times it actually felt like halo.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2512d ago
Aenea2513d ago

And another article with 15 items from this website *shakes head*

MadLad2513d ago

Halo 5, FarCry 2, Dragon Age 2, Nuts and Bolts, and Gears of War: Judgement were all far from bad games. Hell, even Crackdown 2 was pretty fun.

There's a difference between a lesser sequel, and a bad game.

rlow12512d ago

With a Title that says "horrible sequels", most of these are far from that. Better title should be disappointing sequels. But I'm sure they went with the former to get clicks and bring in the fanboys.

Show all comments (15)
oSHINSAo2961d ago

i miss a Black and White game so much

Bahamut2961d ago (Edited 2961d ago )

Good times. Back when Lionhead Studios actually meant something. Black and White was awesome, Fable was great, Fable 2 was real good, then it all went downhill from there.

They had such big aspirations and goals, it's a shame that it came to this. I knew it wouldn't last when Peter Molyneux left. Say what you want about the man, but he had vision. True he never followed up on 75% of what he said, but nevertheless the heart of Lionhead Studios came from him.

Imalwaysright2961d ago

Who wouldn't miss being a god?

gangsta_red2961d ago

If someone asks you if you're a god, you say yes.

2961d ago