160°

EA: ‘I get hurt when I see BioWare & DICE criticised’ – Moore

EA’s Peter Moore has given a rare insight into his views on the gaming populace, backlash aimed squarely at him, as well as criticism hurled at BioWare and DICE. The EA COO has also spoken out regarding the company’s policy of DLC and service subscriptions like Battlefield 3′s Battlelog.

Yi-Long4257d ago (Edited 4257d ago )

... with DLC, or when they release unfinished games (Mass Effect 3), or sequels that are lazy quick cash-ins (Dragon Age 2).

If that hurts Peter Moore, it should be very easy for him to change the greedy policies in that company into something that will bring out love, respect, and admiration from the gamers.

Everybody loves Team Meat, for instance. Why!? Value for money, and free DLC. They released a brilliant game, and they did it out of a love for gaming, and they keep rewarding those who bought it with free DLC.

pandehz4257d ago

Its sad that no one puts forward complaints and issues in a orderly manner and have to take it out personally on devs and certain individuals.

We all know there are many ppl involved in the decision making process but in our rude method of criticism a lot of ppl are negatively affected.

Im sad for the person, and once again I get disagreed for my personal feelings as if that can actually be disagreed lol

cleft54257d ago

No they get hated on for trying to be a successful company. Nothing is free in this world and for as much as people complain about dlc they certainly run out and buy all the COD and Battlefield DLC right away. It disturbing how we demand more of Bioware, yet so many other companies get a pass. Oh and the Binding of Issac DLC cost money to get.

DarkSymbiote4257d ago

"Sometimes I feel sorry for gamers whose world was cartridges. I sense on the boards there is a pining for the old times."

Or maybe we just like complete games... It is not that hard to understand.

matgrowcott4257d ago

Except a lot of old games would have hugely benefited from DLC. If all you're going to judge previous generations on is the top tier games, of course things are going to look worse this generation when you take every single game into account. Look at the lower-mid tier games that were released over the last 30 years though and the majority were short, buggy and are now massively viewed through rose-tinted glasses.

Not every game today is a Chrono Cross, a Final Fantasy, a Zelda or a Metroid, but I swear some gamers forget that that wasn't ever true.

h311rais3r4257d ago

Well that and teh interwebs wasn't as filled with crybabies.

CrimsonessCross4257d ago

Exactly. Games in those eras also DID NOT NEED patches and updates constantly and we had the community actually helping keep a game alive, which is unheard of anymore.

I would bring up the expansions and sequels conversation but, in a way, they're both getting the job done. *shrugs* it depends, but I guess i'd say modern exp/seq's have less (new) content.

Hufandpuf4257d ago

Yes they did. Only the games made by really talented devs did not need patches.

I remember playing games on playstaion and n64 that work have the WEIRDEST game breaking bugs.

HammadTheBeast4257d ago

He's such an ass. Just because the older gamers can't be taken advantage of like the 8-9 year olds tat they milk their franchises off of, the feel that they are "pining for cartridge days". How about we get free expension packs like before? How about complete games for once.

zeal0us4257d ago

If we don't criticized these companies they will keep falling in the same holes. Not only that but they will think what they are doing is right when it could be hurting them.

amaguli4257d ago

And I get hurt whenever a professor criticizes a paper I worked hard on. You know what I do about it? Listen to their criticism and use it to improve on my next paper.

DARK WITNESS4257d ago

exactly and that is probably the biggest problem off all.. they really are not getting the message at all.

pompombrum4257d ago (Edited 4257d ago )

That's where you're wrong though.. the message is loud and clear in EA's opinion, people rather criticize with their keyboards than with their wallets. As long as this remains true, EA have no reason to listen.

DARK WITNESS4257d ago

yes and no...

I know what you mean.. As gamers we don't vote enough with our wallets, not as much as we should..

but in some cases where we have, more often then not the publishers have just shutdown the studio.

For a very long time I stopped buying ea games and I only started again with the first dead space and mirrors edge.

Now they have gone back to the old ways, I don't see myself buing into ea again. I skipped on ME3 even though I bought 1 and 2 on launch when they came out.

I guess there are just not enough of us that care enough to make a difference and even when the sales start to go down, they will find every reason under the sun to blame the poor sales on except their business model.

HammadTheBeast4257d ago

Your professor wouldn't critisize you if gave him the whole paper on the due date, instead of cutting out the middle and promising him you'll give it to him in a couple months as DLC.

matgrowcott4257d ago

Right, but how about if you had two professors and they both told you opposite things? What if you had a thousand professors debating over your paper and each one thought they were the one true expert?

What if you had large groups of professors that all felt they had the way of fixing your paper despite the fact that you'd already been given top marks and everybody not obsessed with the problems of your paper thought it was more than passable?

Your analogy only works if there's only one opinion and unfortunately everybody on sites like these knows - doesn't think, KNOWS - that they are the only person who can fix the industry. They don't stop for a second to ask why they're not getting listened to, they just presume the developers don't know what they're doing. They certainly don't look at the bigger picture and they don't understand that just because a game doesn't appeal to them doesn't mean it is useless to everybody.

amaguli4257d ago

Ok, let's say I submitted my work to be reviewed by a large group of professors. Couldn't I just acknowledge the ones that praised my work, and to the ones that criticized me say "Well you're stupid, you don't get it"?

Shouldn't we be accountable to acknowledge the ones that criticize us more than the ones that praise us? Acknowledging criticism is what makes us improve our work. I know for a fact that if I could I would just listen to the professors that tell me my work is good enough, but that is doing a huge disservice to myself.

I admit my analogy is not perfect, but what are you going to do? It's just a matter of perspective. I view criticism as a positive and can be a way for improvement, and not all criticism is trolling.

pandaboy4257d ago (Edited 4257d ago )

Note also that many of the professors who praised the work had a financial obligation to do so. The ones who gave the lower score had no ulterior motive.

matgrowcott4257d ago

@Amaguli

Nobody is ignoring the criticism, that's not my point. Developers always watch forums and message boards to see what people are thinking. The problem is, the internet is a mess of opinions (good and bad) and selfishness and vocal minorities and it just isn't as simple as you made it out to be.

Here we go: group A will quite happily criticize game A for being boring, not having enough story and for being ugly, whereas group B will criticize game A for being short, unrealistic and lacking innovation.

Group C love the game and want it to stay exactly how it was. So the developer takes Game A and creates Game A-2. It fixes the graphics, has a better story, more interesting characters and new features not found in any other game.

Group A is still complaining, because they feel the lack of new features wasn't what was wrong with the old game and that the new features make the game harder to play. Group B is disappointed because they feel more work has been placed into story and graphics, and that the gameplay now lacks that special something that interested them in the first place.

Worse though, group C is pissed off as well, because it's not the game they originally bought and they feel they're the people that made Game A a success in the first place.

So what do the developers fix now? They've taken on board criticism from the vocal groups and created a game they feel fixes many of the original's issues, but they've created new issues and alienated everybody by doing so.

Whatever they do, they're going to continue displeasing almost everybody who has the time and energy to complain because, in short, the people complaining all think their opinion is the only one and can't admit that the game was never meant for them in the first place. Really they just want something else entirely, but they want Game A (and its sequels) to be that something else. They want the developers to want their sales, whether the product is aimed at them or not.

Which is why so many people complain about the multitude of Disney games on the PlayStation store. One developer, Disney Interactive, massively supports the digital space and sells a ton of games (they're super popular amongst families) and both Sony and Disney are attacked by gamers because "nobody wants Disney games, where are the classics I want?"

amaguli4257d ago

@matgrowcott

I am going to assume you are talking about Dragon Age II just for the sake of argument.

First off, I assume that we can agree with the fact that you cannot please everybody. It's a fact that no matter how hard a developer works on a game, there will always be a group of people that will complain about something.

Dragon Age II is a perfect example of Bioware trying to please everyone and satisfy every complaint people had with Dragon Age: Origins. The graphics were improved, the story was more focused, the gameplay was streamlined, the difficulty was less challenging, so on and so forth.

However, how many of the things did Bioware fixed actually need fixing? Was the gameplay so difficult in the Origins that it was necessary to streamline everything? Was the level up tree so complex in Origins that it required to be gimped? Was it necessary to have the majority of the story take place in one location?

I honestly don't know how Bioware went about with addressing the criticisms of Origins. Maybe they just went down a checklist of the top 5 complaints that people had. I can admit that I don't know and only Bioware knows why the did what they did.

What I can say is that I am happy that I don't have to deal with what they have to go through. It must be very difficult and frustrating. You just have prioritize and gauge the intensity of the issues, but in the end the developer has to do what they feel is best for their game.

matgrowcott4257d ago

@Amaguli

Dragon Age II is a great example. I remember the Mass Effect crowd being annoyed by Dragon Age's traditional gameplay, I remember people being disappointed by the story and the fact that your choices/origins didn't really matter and I remember general things like graphics bugging others.

So Bioware tried to balance things out as best they could in a sequel and all the same people complained but for different reasons. Worse, all the same people, despite complaining endlessly about it prior to the sequel's release, are now saying "the original was perfect, why bother changing it?"

I think, generally, developers are quite smart about how much they give into fans and about where and who they gauge complaints from. I think sometimes though that complaints are so loud, whether valid or not, that it's impossible not to think that it's a major problem. Loads of people complained about Mass Effect 3's ending, then loads of people complained when it was "fixed". How do you win in this situation?

As a side note, it's nice to come to some sort of friendly conclusion on N4G (and the internet as a whole). Bubbles for you, sir.

amaguli4257d ago

@matgrowcott

I extend the same compliment to you too my good sir.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4257d ago
zekk4257d ago

but your professor probably doesnt send u death threats.....

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4257d ago
DARK WITNESS4257d ago

Generational....

One of the first things I will teach my kid and hope to God he learns it well is when you recognise you are being ripped off and when to simply say No!!

Games were doing just fine last gen and that was not that long ago.

It's simple.. the publishers have got greedier and greedier, which is what most people tend to do when they see a golden goose.

for most dev's there really is not much else they can do about it but defend the publishers... so they make up excuses to try and make it sound like all this milking is part of the plan and it's great value and we the gamers are stupid.

I don't mind dlc when it's done right, but all this crap with online passes and season passes etc.. I am sorry but naa. The companies need a good tongue lashing or they will just carry on with this crap.

Show all comments (41)
430°

Microsoft Will Be Debating Right Now Whether Xbox Consoles Have a Future, Says Peter Moore

It feels like the video game console is at a crossroads. With Xbox Series X and S floundering in the ‘console war’, Sony suggesting PlayStation 5 is approaching the second half of its life after missing sales targets, and uncertainty around the release of the Nintendo Switch 2, there is growing concern that the traditional video game console business could be under threat.

TheEnigma31342d ago

It's obvious that MS is leaving the console biz. MS may have tons of money, but that doesn't mean they want to keep losing money on the gaming division to prove a point. Thanks Phil

crazyCoconuts41d ago

It's likely but not entirely obvious. The messaging is leaving a lot open to interpretation, and they haven't forked over their crown jewels to PS just yet.
It's POSSIBLE that the upcoming Xbox exclusives do so well they see an uptick in console sales and... change their mind??

Michiel198941d ago

I feel like it's way too late in the console cycle for that, by the time some of them are out we are 1 year further. I think a better bet is to maybe make them with next gen in mind and make them cross gen between this and the next as to give their next console a great launch if the games turn out well. I feel that's their best bet to stay in the console business.

GamerRN41d ago

You should pray they don't exit. If they do, you will see the collapse of the gaming industry.

Aloymetal41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Here we go again with that false sense of relevancy for the xbox platform.
I told you yesterday that the gaming industry was fine before MS entered the space and it will continue to do even better when they're finally gone. MS is/are not the ones keeping this industry healthy, far from it and most won't even bat an eye if they're gone.
...And Having lots of money doesn't mean success it just means you can keep failing for a long time.

SeTTriP41d ago

Xbox was spearheading the collapse of gaming.

MrBaskerville41d ago

They will just leave room for another competitor. Maybe someone who is more succesful at competing.

UltimateOwnage41d ago

Nah. We might see some real competition again. Maybe from a company that actually loves gaming. Like Sega.

helicoptergirl41d ago

Ridiculous. Acting like MS are the linchpin holding everything down and if they let go, then gaming will be ruined and prices will soar astronomically and creativity will be stifled and thwarted at every turn. It's a fallacy. I'm not saying it's preferrable to have MS out of the console space, but I am saying that all this fearmongering over what will happen if MS were to bow out is overexaggerated and overblown.

andy8541d ago

Collapse? It was here before Xbox and it'll be here long after. What exactly do they do to benefit it? Barely any game output, theyve taken studios and made them worse and they've hurt it trying to make everyone move to streaming.

Bathyj41d ago

Haha.
I'm actually laughing in real life at that

Why exactly?
What are Microsoft contributing to the industry that will be missed?

They're just taking a slot that should belong to someone better.

My vote is for Valve and a Steambox.

GamerRN41d ago

Since you guys clearly don't understand how this all works, I won't explain it to you. You guys will simply see it if it happens, then you'll quietly sit there acting like you saw it coming.

But you can research what Pachter and the other analysts have stated...
🤷

DarkZane41d ago

If anything, Xbox leaving the industry is actually what will save it and make it thrive. They don't contribute anything good to the industry and if anything, any bad practices today, they're the ones responsible.

Take a time machine, go back in the past and erase Xbox from existence, you'd come back to a present where the industry is much better. Remove Sony and/or Nintendo though, there is likely not going to be anything left.

InUrFoxHole41d ago

@Aloy
With competition sony has failed to deliver a diverse generation. Has shifted focus to Gaas, has put the support of their vr platform into the hands of PC, has jacked up the price of their service, is moving you into day and date on PC... Be careful what you close your eyes to. If you wish for MS to be gone, sony is heading in the same direction with less funding

IRetrouk41d ago

Didn't when sega switched it up🤷🏻‍♂️

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 41d ago
Lightning7741d ago

Have fun waiting till 2040 somethin.

Charlieboy33341d ago

Have fun waiting till 2040 for Xbox to make a great game

itsmebryan41d ago

@theenigma
The same can be said if not worst about Sony. Who lose $2 billion of value, lose 26% of there operating income, missed sales goal by 4 million, and has no 1st party games coming out till next year? Console sales are not helping Sony. They are a much smaller company and how long can they afford to lose so much money?

Bathyj41d ago

They are not losing money. They make profit. They bring in more then they spend. It's a business thing. Get a grown up to explain it to you.

You know a dropping stock price is not like that actually had to give 2 billion to someone. That didn't sell their shares. And failed to meet sales expectations? Still sold over 20 million in a year. You must be dizzy from all that spin.

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Just making up stuff to feel better? I dont blame you.

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Whats crazy is that when some xbox fans were cheering the acquisition of a large part of the multiplatform gaming, they didn’t realize they were cheering on what was to pave the way for xbox to leave console space.

Oh the irony. Karma?

StormSnooper41d ago

True ^
Yup, they celebrated taking games away from others even though they weren’t getting anything they wouldn’t have got anyway. Now it turns out it was all a plan to end Xbox as a console. Heh 🤦

Profchaos41d ago

Exactly right everyone thinks Microsoft is willing to bankroll an underperforming division simply because they can afford it however that's not how these companies operate they might bankroll something for a year or two while not gets established however now is the time they bare expecting a return on the investment and it's clear Xbox is underperforming.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 41d ago
rlow142d ago

Good article and this is not a duplicate. The link that @Maximus Prime shared is just a small portion of the full interview. This post is the full interview.

Times are changing quick, the same ol way the industry been is changing. Where people play is changing.

ChasterMies42d ago

“What I think Phil is doing is setting up some smoke signals that we're thinking very differently”

I’m surprised how slowly Microsoft is moving toward Xbox as a software platform. They usually don’t care so much about upsetting their customers with unpopular changes like they do with every other version of Windows.

badz14941d ago

yeah like they just very recently removed support for Android apps on W11 without much of a warning. simply because they claimed that not many are using them. Sony got a huge flak when removing OtherOS support form the PS3, I think the same should be happening to MS to for removing the apk support. such a dick move!

FinalFantasyFanatic41d ago

That is surprising, I know big companies can't move fast, but they're moving at a glacial pace, everything they've done with Xbox for the past decade has been moving at such a slow pace. I suppose they have money to burn with how big the company is.

derek42d ago

This "console market hasn't grown narrative " is overblown. The market has grown just not as fast as say smartphones. But so what? There is still money to be made in the business and just because Microsoft has failed doesn't mean the entire industry is facing sudden collapse. Gaming will be fine, every industry has to go through periods of restructuring. AAA games are made becuase its what attracts gamers the most and is where they spend the most money. (Demand/supply) Microsoft abandoning hardware should have happened years ago, they clearly lost interest at a base level in producing games and/or paying 3rd parties to back during the tail end of the 360 generation. Tired of hearing about the future of gaming, just make great games and/or invest in one's made by other to attract people to your platform.

hiroyukisanada41d ago

@derek Right! It's so obvious that all Xbox has needed to do is create great first party games like every successful console has done since the original Nintendo. It's not rocket science lol I have lost so much respect for Microsoft over the last 10 years and their rabid fanboys that do not represent their base as a whole. Literally just MAKE Great games and people will invest in your platform. It's not rocket science or excuses. It really is that simple lol
This victim mentality that Phil has instilled this generation has really turned me off the brand for good. Really enjoyed OG Xbox and, while I couldn't wholeheartedly support 360 due to that atrocious failure rate, they had some killer games and services. Ever since Gears of War judgement dropped in 2011 and they shifted completely to Kinect, it's been so bad.

Ninver41d ago

It all started going down hill after Don Matrick stated "stick with the xbox 360 if your don't have any internet.

That man singlehandedly destroyed the xbox brand then jumped ship as it was sinking 😂

DarXyde41d ago

Ninver,

Don had the look of a sleazy businessman, but I don't understand why that moment gets a bad rep.

They were super honest in that moment, and I have to say, it sucks that this is the direction the company would take, but it was such a mask off moment that really highlights their plan.

Nowadays, you have Phil, who isn't direct but is very much still going in the same direction.

What it comes down to, at least from my observation, is Don and Phil were/are just the messengers. Don took a dive following the backlash, so they repackaged the messaging approach with a new person to make it seem like the company is taking a new approach. Nothing has really changed.

So I don't think Mattrick did anything that he wasn't asked to do by his own higher-ups.

He's like a landmark really. Just a reference to a point in time when things got bad. In reality, it was Microsoft's vision for Gen 8 going forward that destroyed them, not Mattrick.

That's my read of things, anyway.

badz14941d ago

Don was honest, Phil is sleazy! don't blame just Don for that downfall, Phil was part of the team back then too. the one announcing the price for the xbone on stage was Phil, remember?

LucasRuinedChildhood41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Reminds me of when the Wii U's poor sales led to speculation that consoles are dead. It's so repetitive and annoying.

Some people act like we're all about to switch over to cloud gaming when the internet infrastructure and data caps alone would take decades to accommodate such a change.

Google Stadia was shut down and died a horrific death just 1 year ago. lol

darthv7241d ago

If you are looking to something like the PS2 as the measuring stick... keep in mind that there was a percentage of units sold that were replacements for bad lasers and then you had others buy replacements because of model revisions. I'd venture a guess and say the real market saturation point is somewhere between 125-140m. And yes that includes handhelds because even those have users who invested in different variants over the coarse of their lifetime.

You can't truly use units sold as a measure of individual owners. you are right though, the market has certainly grown from something like the 8/16bit era to today, but nowhere near as quickly or as large as the smartphone/tablet market. You figure there are entire swaths of people who dont play consoles/handhelds but they do play on their phones.

crazyCoconuts41d ago

Agreed. I think if you look at the number of concurrent players playing the popular games of the time, it's always breaking records, not decreasing. Sure there are ppl that play on their phones, but a crap ton of kids and adults are sitting down at their computers or consoles to play. Are they all playing the same kinds of games i used to play? not really. But that doesn't mean consoles/computers are going away - they're gonna play games.

343_Guilty_Spark41d ago

It’s grown based on what. What PS console has ever hit 200 million? Even with Xbox doing poorly it’s the same customers who were already going to buy a PS console

derek41d ago

@353, Console sales are not the end goal but the gateway they're not the only measure of growth. You sell consoles to sell games and subscriptions to your platform and that has grown substantially since the ps1/ps2 generations. Revenue and profits have grown meaning the business has grown. Sony's concern is with their margins which have shrunk recently (some from the cost of producing a ps5 not decreasing like in past cycles, some from paying off the bungie purchase, some from growing development costs). So they cut jobs and will look to were they can save on development. Not saying that decision will be proven correct but this is a normal but unfortunate part of the business cycle and its happening across tech. You're talking about the addressable market, but as Layden said if you want to attract new people to console gaming then different games will have to be made then your traditional gta, cod, GoW etc that will interest them.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 41d ago
CrimsonWing6941d ago

They don’t. TVs have Gamepass and everything’s on PC.

Show all comments (76)
220°

EA Hopes to Use Generative AI to Drive Monetization and Make Development 30% More Efficient

Today Electronic Arts CEO Andrew Wilson provided a look into his ideas for the use of generative AI in the company's development processes.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
thorstein43d ago

I wonder what the next buzz word they'll slap in front of AI to make it sound exciting next? "Generative" as if it's creating its own content. Lol.

Cacabunga43d ago

EA is already dying a painful death..

peppeaccardo43d ago

i have a better idea .. why the whole exec team doesn't get replaced by chat bots ?

just_looken43d ago

Though i agree the ai thing is already in other forms of media there have been ai translations/scripts/voice over and even full ai commercials aired on tv. Ubisoft has created a ai game creator story/vo/music except the building of the game

The new unreal engine has auto terrain creation tools

In the world of greed in which it is winning without any major blow back ai is our future.

everyone want's biden dead on the mic or a criminal instead of a woman and now we are getting ai everything because no one will stop watching/playing ai created media.

GamerRN43d ago

Maybe they should just focus on making good games?

Just a thought...

Kiryu199242d ago

Exactly EA are just pure evil. When they are beating Bank of America to be voted the worst company to work for that’s saying a lot

Good thing I don’t buy their games day one and wait for deep deep sale years after launch (the select few games I am actually interested in)

Gaming is making so much money yet the greed of these companies is never ending

CEO’s and people on board making millions yet cutting jobs to those who are actually making the products

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 42d ago
Knightofelemia43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

EA is still a shady shitty company even with or without the help of Skynet. All they will use AI for is new ways to milk loot boxes and come up with the same sports title with a different year on the label. They are one company I truly do hate with a passion. They single handedly ruined some great franchise with their death touch. ME, Dead Space, Alice Returns, Dante's Inferno.

Stuart575643d ago

EA layoffs followed by 'Generative AI to Drive Monetization'

I knew it. Wonder what AI salary looks like? Nothing.

ChasterMies43d ago

I having a feeling that most of the layoffs in the industry are based on the idea that AI will do the same job for less.

DarXyde42d ago

Very likely, yes.

Made worse by the fact that the execs aren't changing their compensations.

My deepest fear at this point is that we are now in the capitalism endgame.

At this point, we really should just burn AI to the ground. Executives cannot be trusted to do the right thing.
How are those people expected to support families if everything gets automated?

Barlos43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

And take away creativity, and people's jobs as we've been seeing. Got it.

No thanks. I want my games created by people, not AI.

CobraKai43d ago

Exactly. If or when games start becoming more AI than people, im done with gaming. AI and companies like EA can suck donkey d***k.

just_looken43d ago

Though i agree remember this is no ps3/360 era were we got up to 3 games in one generation from on developer like gears/halo/bioware/sony/ms

The people today are pro esg/sweet baby for the most part AAA gaming is imploding right now.

We should be stepping back re evaluate everything as a whole this year xmen 97 written/directed by a woman that is nuts and its also being made by a group reshaping bodies to be less sexual like wtf. A dam famous cartoon from the 90's is being rebuilt with millions spent to be worse in everyway.

Gaming/movies/tv shows made today are worse than what we had 7years ago ai won't change this but that ai is also being made by these groups so either way we are screwed.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Eonjay42d ago

Don't be of afraid of women. Sexy characters in games and movies still exist. Got my Stellar Blade on preorder!!! Everything all the time doesn't need to be sexual...that's stupid, childish and dull.

Chocoburger43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

EA doesn't want to lose their title of worst gaming company ever, always trying their best to remain the champs!
What's sad is that they have so much potential to be a decent publisher.

SSX Tricky / SSX 3
Def Jam Vendetta / Fight for New York
NBA Street
NFL Steet
Mirror's Edge
Bad Company
Burnout 3 / 4 / 5

Remember when EA used to be awesome? It's all over with now. Unpolished, if not out-right broken games these days. Endless monetization and gambling in their sports games, and let's not forget wasting hours of your life trying to unlock characters or equipment using "surprise boxes!"

Show all comments (37)
80°

EA And Sony Layoffs, Entertainment News And More Skewedcast

Gareth, Justin, and JoeyZ look at Layoff news for EA and Sony and reasons behind the downturn in the industry and more.