150°

Slightly Mad Studios declares Project CARS as 'the racing game with the most advanced graphics'

DSOGaming writes: "Slightly Mad Studios has released a new set of community screenshots for its upcoming racing game, Project CARS. As always, the following shots look spectacular and as the company states, the shots below show off the most advanced graphics in simulation racing, including stunning lighting effects, realistic dynamic clouds, detailed 3D trees and plenty of other details that will blow you away. Project CARS is currently planned for a March 2013 release. Enjoy!"

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Jio4269d ago

If you're a real racing fan, go for the PC version. The console versions won't look anything like that probably. I'll be upgrading my PC right before release!

Belking4269d ago

yea but no one wants to play a racing sim on a PC.

4269d ago
specialguest4269d ago (Edited 4269d ago )

Real racing sim enthusiast play their racing sim games on PC. Games like GT5 and Forza are child's play. I'm not saying PC racing sims are better all around games, but it's more realistic and are real sims.

Sure, you could play your GT5 on a 50inch screen with your steering wheel setup attached to your coffee table sitting 6 feet away, but that's really nothing.

Here's a video of how PC racing sim players play, and this 3 monitor/racing chair/steering wheel is not uncommon or extreme either:

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

This video below is extreme. Resolution 9600x1080. Immersive enough?
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

ChickeyCantor4269d ago

"Im going to have to agree...I play GT5 on a 50 inch big screen with my steering wheel set up rihgt in front so it feels like im IN the game. Very awesome. "

So then what is my PC doing hooked up to my 52" tv?

PC gaming is awesome!

4269d ago
Puddlejumper754269d ago

@cmonbereal, Too bad you couldnt follow the advice of your name.
1%? way to pull numbers out of thin air.

You say its awesome to play a racing game on a 50inch screen using a racing wheel? I can do that using my PC and it didnt cost me a million to do so..In fact it didnt cost me any more than it did you.

I'm sure many people feel their Kia is great but they wouldnt argue that its better than a Ferrari simply because they cannot afford a Ferrari.

"Its all about immersion"
Someone points out a deeper experience on another platform
"It's all about cost."

What it really is is someone needs to justify their limited experience.

It's like someone who never went to anywhere but Mcdonalds yet thinks they are getting the ultimate in fine dining.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4269d ago (Edited 4269d ago )

dumb comment.. pc has about 5 upcomming racing sims and xbox has 1 & ps3 has 1.. Don't talk if you don't know anything..
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

pc has more racing sims than consoles so if you like racing sims console are not the best to play on. Monitor or hdtv. 360, ps3 or wheel controller. Take your pick. Oh yeah you can't..

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4269d ago
Grap4269d ago

is this the final name?? because it's sucks.

PiccoloGR4269d ago

nope, it's not the final game. They might keep it though as most people already know it as pCars

MadLad4269d ago (Edited 4269d ago )

@Belking

Why is that?

morkendo234269d ago

they say FORZA is better compare to PROJECT CARS im sure it is not.

Bonerrr4269d ago

I play the Beta almost every day and it's still not a patch on Forza. It's physics suffer the same problem at GT5, over exaggerated over steer.... turning the car into a car and the back end slides no matter what. It feels like NFS Shift.
Oh wait, same studio............

4269d ago Replies(1)
CGI-Quality4269d ago

Forza is definitely not the "go to" sim for comparison. GT is not only highly recommended by sim enthusiasts, but actual racers as well, just based on the feel of the cars.

That said, I'm thinking the PC version of Project CARS is going to be something very special!

Lvl_up_gamer4269d ago (Edited 4269d ago )

GT5 has a very limited amount of cars that have an interior view. If you are looking for a "true sim-like" experience, the first thing you MUST have is an interior view. It's not "sim" if you are driving out of your car.

Only reason I end up playing more Forza 4 than my GT5 is simply I don't have an interior view for some of the cars in my garage.

No Interior View in the Bugatti Veyron? That right there is a crime.

Physics wise GT5 and Forza 4 are ever so similar to each other. Both games run off of outdated hardware where numbers and formulas are suppose to equal real life physics. Both have their strong points but to say GT5 is the "go to" game for sim racing....I would have to disagree simply because if I want to truly submerge myself into a sim, there better be an interior view in the car I am racing with.

Belking4269d ago (Edited 4269d ago )

@specialguest
You just proved my point as to why people don't wanna play racing games on the PC with that video. How many people do you know with that type of setup? Probably none. Sorry, but more people prefer to play their games on consoles nowadays. Plus, you don't need that ridiculous setup to enjoy the game. That video was not even close to an average PC gamers setup...but nice try though. This is the reason why console games are so popular. You only have to buy hardware once and not keep adding like you have to for the PC.

linkratos4269d ago

There is also the option to just hook up the PC to the bigscreen. Computers are capable of that you know. I don't even PC game, but the arguments against it are pretty pathetic.

Puddlejumper754269d ago

PS3 fanboys... They are constantly proving that they are swimming on the shallow end of the gene pool.
Seriously both of them got owned yet rather than admit it, this kid is like " See thats proof nobody wants to do that." If nobody wanted to do it then that video wouldnt exist.

Just poor people with limited funding trying to justify their limited lifestyle..

If he owned a bicycle he'd argue its better in every way than a Harley simply because he cant afford a Harley so it must be inferior to what he can afford.

Show all comments (25)
170°

Why did EA Kill Project CARS?

This video explains why we think Electronic Arts didn't see a future in the sim racing title Project CARS and promptly cancelled the fourth instalment.

Jin_Sakai521d ago

After the last installment I’d say most hardcore fans left. It’s just not that good anymore so I can’t really blame EA this time.

masterfox521d ago

because it was always a project and it never got finished :D

ChubbyBlade519d ago

Every game is a project. Your joke doesn’t make sense

InUrFoxHole519d ago

It makes perfect sense. It's obviously a play on the title. Jesus christ you must be a blast at parties.

ApocalypseShadow520d ago (Edited 520d ago )

Ask Bullfrog or Black Box or Tiburon or Studio 33 or Criterion or any of the previously acquired developers who made racing games as competition, or as developers of EA games, then eventually dissolved into oblivion or reassigned. Just ask them. They'll tell you why.

ApocalypseShadow519d ago

Oh. I forgot. Even Code Masters were absorbed into Criterion. Another racing developer EA took over.

Every racing developer either absorbed by EA or eventually destroyed by them. They either kill competition or have them in the end make Need 4 Speed for them.

MadLad519d ago

EA only cancels projects for one reason.
They didn't see enough money in it.

Kombatologist519d ago (Edited 519d ago )

Not when it's because it didn't meet some crazy margin. It's like if something doesn't make EA a billion dollars on day one (I'm exaggerating that figure of course), they swiftly put it out to pasture.

SurgicalMenace519d ago (Edited 519d ago )

Much like if you're spending money on what's a bad investment for your desired goals, you'd do away with it, if you're wise. We should try to get away from thinking we know more about business than individuals that have been doing it for decades. Perhaps you could benefit from going into business instead of wasting all of your talents in comment sections. It's clear that you're the missing piece that EA's been looking for.

MadLad518d ago

I've made a good amount of money betting on underdog investments over the years.

EA sets unrealistic expectations of their more niche developers, yet continue to fund absolute blunders like DICE and the Battlefield series year after year.

dumahim519d ago

EA butted in and messed with the formula and act shocked when it doesn't work out.

Show all comments (16)
90°

Original Project CARS creator trying to re-hire EA team

Ian Bell, the founder of Slightly Mad Studios, is aiming to hire former Project CARS employees to work on his upcoming GTR Revival project.

Sgt_Slaughter523d ago

If it's just going to be another sim-cade that doesn't do either one correctly then no thanks.

Project CARS 2 was a step in the right direction but the physics still aren't where they should have been, so what did they do for PC3? Go completely arcade. That killed the franchise.

220°

EA dropping Project CARS

From GI.biz: "EA is dropping Project CARS, GamesIndustry.biz can reveal.

The Slightly Mad Studios-developed series was launched in 2015, with EA confirming today that it has made the decision to "stop further development and investment" in the franchise.

The announcement was made internally and it's unclear at this stage to which extent staff could be affected. EA said that employees working on Project CARS will be moved into "suitable" roles "wherever [they] can.""

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Terry_B525d ago

Typical for EA. They buy studios that created nice games..and are sooner or later destroying them and move the people to work on the old same 5+ EA series.

italiangamer525d ago

They will put the developers on the 1000th Need for Speed for the rest of their entire careers, just like Criterion.

SurgicalMenace525d ago

To be fair, it's not EAs fault it falls directly on the consumer. Everytime these companies choose to drop a series they're met with backlash though the gamers didn't support said series enough to justify its continuation. Attempting to paint every company as evil all because they're in it to succeed is ridiculous. They have to make money just like each of us typing in this section. If a job wasn't supporting you well you'd quit and find a new one, this is the same mentality concerning series.

TheColbertinator524d ago

@SurgicalMenace

No it is their fault. They don't listen to fans and burn the franchise to the ground by introducing elements that nobody wanted instead of increasing support for said respected franchises.

I order a steak, they make a steak. 1st sale
I order a steak again, they vomit on my steak and charge me more for it. No sale.

EA in a nutshell.

Tapani524d ago

@TheColbinator Well how do you think they make the billions then?

Their fans ARE buying their games. You are just not their focus group, and I can guarantee their customer insights team is more thorough and detailed in their reaearch than any N4G commentors’ opinion on the matter. Otherwise EA would not exist as a company, and they’d be bankrupt.

deleted525d ago

The one that still hurts the most though was Criterion w the Burnout series. Acquired Criterion's tech for their own existing IP, then shut em down. It's basically parasitic. I sure do miss Burnout's crash mode!

Hofstaderman524d ago

Sounds eerily similar to another large unnamed corporation hey. I believe some EA bigwigs shifted to that company back in the day, would explain the similarities.

rlow1524d ago

Must be talking about Sony

peppeaccardo525d ago

and instead they come out with that piece of shit of Need for Speed which looks like an Anna & Barbera cartoon. C'mon .... PC2 was my go to game for VR racing and the first one i played for tens of hours. i was so lookiing forward to PC4 after that failure of PC3 ... what a shame EA, they are bombing all the good games and stick to the garbage ones. EA when you think you have reached maximum of disappointment they top it off with style .... screw them!

SurgicalMenace525d ago

Need for Speed continues to sell so why would they get rid of what's producing what they need to maintain stability?

EazyC525d ago

What they did to this series was idiotic. The premise was great -- a sim/simcade game that GENUINELY got developed in line with its community. There is a huge gap in the market for this...I mean, PD hasn't listened to fans at all over the last year with regard to simple Gran Turismo 7 tweaks. Sim racing fans are screaming for a title where they actually give a shit about their users.

Project Cars 2 was genuinely on to something, it just needed some refinement. But instead they followed up by selling off to EA with a braindead GRID clone with Project Cars 3. Again...idiotic.

SurgicalMenace525d ago

Well since you're the authority on properly managing a million dollar company, why don't you just call them to let them know of your divine wisdom?

Hardcore sim racers are the ones who are competing acrossed the globe, no company in their right mind would focus on a forever moving casual market. They have to focus on those dedicated to supporting their efforts. Notice how you're speaking from a perspective of self opposed to the collective. Perhaps they sold out because they, like us, needed the money knowing that they could reinvest it into something new. PC was a decent racer but very few people mainlined it over GT or Forza.

EazyC524d ago

I'm not a divine authority but I notice a pattern where these huge corporations turn completely tone deaf of what the "average fan" wants.

vallencer524d ago

Hate to break it to you but project cars 3 was published by Bandai in 2020. EA didn't buy codemasters, which owned slightly mad studios, until 2021. Either way the sales were super poor for the game and it's not surprising EA would just drop the game. BUT it still sucks because it's one less sim racing game on the market. Especially because the first 2 were really good.

Tzuno525d ago

and focuses more on cartoon network games

Show all comments (19)