"PlayStation 3's new 4000 model to follow the curse Microsoft once followed, Grand Theft Auto V emerges among the darkness, Battlefield 4 is officially announced along with beta details, ZombiU to possibly take advantage of Microsoft's SmartGlass feature, and much more gaming news and nonsense that listeners have come to expect with Unscripted Access."
-TheGamerAccess.com
Grand Theft Auto V was released on PC on the 14th of April 2015. That means the game will be nine years old in four days, and it’s still among the most-played titles on Steam. With a 24-hour peak of 145K players, it’s as popular as Baldur’s Gate 3, Apex: Legends, and Destiny 2.
The freedom to explore large areas, approach objectives in multiple ways, and stumble across amusing distractions will always be an excellent format for video games, but some do it better than others. To celebrate the formula and parse the best from the best, have a look at the best open-world games of all time so far.
Red Dead Redemption 2 and GTA 5 are both classics, but movement and general interaction sometimes feels like you're possessed by a fridge.
Rockstar need to learn that 12 years of work and 5000 employees doesn’t account for one persons opinion on the internet…
The controls of RDR2 felt a but cluncky indeed, but it’s not as bad as some make it out to be. At no point did I get the feeling my experience with the game was held back or ruined by the controls.
But it can never hurt to optimize them a bit, sure.
Red Dead Redemption felt clunky at first but I got used to it fairly quick. I thought 2 was easier to control but it could be my experience with the first game helped me out. Great games
I wouldn't call Rockstar games characters clunky instead they feel like they move with Weight they are not twitch controls press x to instantly snap onto cover the characters instead move like a actor would ducking behind cover they are exposed while they get there.
'The Gamer Access is back again with more details on the new PS3 model and we discuss why the new model may take Sony down the path that once cursed Microsoft.'
Okay, so have I entered the twilight zone here? I watch conspiracy theories with great interest, particularly those that come with verifiable proof from legitimate sources and the one thing that always strikes me is the constant promotion of 'myth' and 'misinformation'. It's almost as if they foresee historians as their future apologists.
Well, here we are again (on something that's not quite as serious as 911 for arguments sake) and myths are being written right under our noses. First we had the ignoring of the obvious Kinect/PSEYe similarity and the press concentrated on the Wii, recently we had the 'smartglass' threat to WiiU which seems to overlook the obvious PS3/Vita combo as the real threat, and now this.
To suggest that Sony could make the same mistake as MS by going down the 'slim' route, is totally discarding history... a history, I might add, that was written by Sony themselves. We had a PS1 slim, a PS2 slim and now a PS3 superslim. I think if this IS a mistake then Sony can legitimately claim that they succeeded or failed on their OWN strategy and that MS were never in the reckoning.
So can we stop this? Can we open our eyes to what the press is trying to do here? History is there to be seen providing we look at it now and don't wait for the press to offer a somewhat manipulated version
i would buy this super slim, think about how cool my systen would run without that big drive in thier im sure can get about %20 or more less heat and noise.
anybody want a 320g slim ps3 3.55??
These people sound like xbox fanboys/girls. The fact they don't even know how easy it is to buy 500gb hdd for a ps3 and for cheap unlike xbox speaks volumes. Also that 16gb model could be ssd for faster downloads or installs you never know.
Theyre not gonna top the looks of the PS3 slim. The new super slim is fugly compared to the fat boy and the regular slim.