I say good day!

Fez

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 46130

Beating a dead horse...

Fez|4324d ago |Blog Post|13|

Last night I went to the cinema to see Snow White and the Huntsman, an alright film let down by Kristen Stewart trying to be enthusiastic and uplifting. During the film, a particular scene struck me and the bias against certain forms of entertainment became apparent.

In the scene, Snow White is locked in her tower when the Queen orders her brother to fetch her. As he enters, he sits next to a horizontal Snow White, strokes her leg and says something along the lines of "my sister won't let me near you" and the clear and unambiguous suggestion of rape is complete. As the film progresses we see two men and seven male dwarves striving to protect Snow White.

In case you havn't guessed, this is not unlike the E3 tomb raider controversy. Except when a google search for "snow white and the huntsman controversy" is performed, we see people are more concerned that the dwarves weren't played by real life little people. Whereas a search for "tomb raider controversy" brings up the same tired articles.

How is it possible that a variation of a children's fairytale, rated as a 12A in cinemas not receive the same criticism that a video game, which will probably be rated at least a 15, gets?

Personally I don't have a problem with either situation because they are both quite realistic and ultimately both characters go on to kick some ass but surely there has to be consistency between mediums. The uproar surrounding the developers comment about the "player wanting to protect Lara" was misplaced. Who wouldn't want to protect someone who has just been threatened with rape. Of course people may argue that this makes the character weak and is therefore a negative stereotype which is usually reserved only for women. I feel that in the context of the Tomb Raider reboot and origin story the situation will help to shape an awesome female protagonist. At the same time though, I would like to see some strong heroines who are strong just for the sake of it. Basically, it would be nice to see Joss Whedon make a video game :D

SeekDev4324d ago

Honestly, I haven't been following the Tomb Raider controversy at all because I already know what I think. And that is, the TR trailer did nothing wrong and wasn't controversial in the smallest sense of the word. Compared to other forms of media, the Tomb Raider trailer was equivalent to Barney, imo.

Hufandpuf4322d ago

They having killing in a child's fairytale too. Where's the controversy for that?

I think people get hung up on stupid things. If the scene in the game doesn't bother you, then don't try to tell others just to have it justified. The devs won't change a thing anyway nor do they care.

Kratoscar20084322d ago

I dont get the Fuss, Women get raped around the world and its showed in movies and books, how something that actually happens couldnt happened to Lara, those are villians not little teddie bears.

It makes me mad that there is a lot of people that want the games to be more hollywood esque media and when a game like this point towards that, it gets bashed.

StayStatic4322d ago

Games seem to get targeted and treated more harshly sometimes , not particularly fair but when you have ass hats like that Jack Thompson causing a fuss , it's no surprise.

If Crystal Dynamics give into this social media bull crap and cut out what will essentially be one of the reasons to make you give a dam about the character and want to survive the entire game ... then I will not buy it.

smashcrashbash4322d ago

The point is that it's so obvious. Beat Lara to a pulp and then she miraculously rises above the MEN that kidnapped her and hurt her. It's practically a mirror for a story on the Lifetime Network. It's lazy writing.Why aren't there any women abusing her too? They could have found other ways to show Lara gaining strength without any of this. Lara is beaten up by bad MEN and to defeat the bad MEN she has to become a strong WOMAN. There doesn't seem to be any subtly or depth to the theme. I could be wrong and maybe there is more to it but knowing how developers work these days, I am doubtful.

Show all comments (13)
30°
9.0

Sons Of Valhalla Review — Short But Unforgettable Journey | eXputer

Sons of Valhalla is an exceptional 2D side-scroller action game that challenges players' strategic approach and skills management.

100°

Atari Is Reviving The 'Infogrames' Publishing Label

The armadillo returns.

Read Full Story >>
nintendolife.com
Aphrodia1h ago

I personally do remember Infogrames in the years prior to merger. They really did have a portfolio that stuck out and I enjoyed. I wonder what value they see in reviving it now though?

Hofstaderman28m ago

Ah...the nostalgia...V-Rally, Hogs of War 2, Driver.

140°

PlayStation auto-play patent shows a feature to skip grindy sections of games

Sony is apparently experimenting with an AI tool that will play the game for you when you are grinding away. A PlayStation patent for “auto-play” mode would simulate your gameplay style in certain environments and apply them to skip that section completely. This technology would likely be built directly into the cloud-based PlayStation Network and be a new feature that subscribers would have access to.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
Christopher6h ago

Hah! Either will never happen or publishers will charge you to use this AI. This concept would only exacerbate the problem we already have with GaaS.

gold_drake6h ago

doesnt that concept already exist tho?

buy dlc to get a ahead in games? money, weapon and exp dlc come to mind but yeh. one more thing for them.to potentially charge for.

Christopher5h ago

Usually, for GaaS/Seasonal games, you'll have to perform actions to earn specific in-game currency to buy things for events. Then they sell the currency with real cash or a third-currency to then buy the in-game currency items (it's honestly truly bloated to hide that they're cheating you out of money). With this, they'll just give you items if you do something 50 times or the like and then charge you to have the game play it for you. It's better, right? No currency shenanigans, just play the game and we reward you! But, the truth is they'll inflate the amount of times you have to play through content just to get the same thing.

jambola2h ago

Why?
Why not just remove the Grindy part?

I hope it's not an excuse to make them worse, but optional if you pay

Eonjay2h ago

This IGN blogger mode will allow 'reviewers' to play games like rest of us.
I will never forget watching GamingBolts spoiler video for Horizon FW and realizing they never played it. Made me wonder if they play games at all.

Skuletor1h ago

As if most modern games don't hold your hand enough already.

Profchaos49m ago

Reminds me of those 24 hours races in gran Turismo 4 having your PlayStation play for you.

But realistically if you have to use any of these for Grundy games there's a bigger underlying problem of the game not respecting your time in the first place.

Grind for game length is a real problem in my view

Show all comments (8)