190°

Who cares if Wii U is less powerful than PS3? Not Nintendo...

Tech innovation gets people excited, but it’s the software that really sells Nintendo consoles, argues CVG's John Dean

Read Full Story >>
computerandvideogames.com
slavish4399d ago (Edited 4399d ago )

face it nintendo has ditched cutting edge tech a while back. I know from forums Nintendo fans are disappointed if this rumor is true but its a step up from wii and thats all Nintendo cares about. if you own a wii and a ps3 or 360 i could see them skipping the wii-u. The sad thing is wii-u will be in the same spot as the wii now and lose most 3rd party support. when next xbox and ps4 come using next gen engines(UE4) wii-u will be left in the dust again.

VanillaBear4399d ago (Edited 4399d ago )

"The sad thing is wii-u will be in the same spot as the wii now and lose most 3rd party support. when next xbox and ps4 come using next gen engines(UE4) wii-u will be left in the dust again. "

Exactly

Nintendo don't seem to know where they are going with this, they want the core audience, then they want to keep the casual audience....for gods sake Nintendo it's one or the other. How are you guys suppose to get good third party support when developers will look at the Nextbox and PS4 and decide to focus on games for them instead. I don't want third party games to not achieve their true potential because the Wii U can't keep up.

People keep saying "I'm not bothered" but fail to realise this is next gen consoles, it's supposed to be a least more powerful then current consoles. Do people really want a game to be dumbed down because it has to be made for the Wii U aswell, hey it might not happen but it's a thing to think about.

dedicatedtogamers4399d ago

Nintendo consoles will never have a good amount of 3rd party support. There. I said it. It has been that way since the N64, and it hasn't changed, not even with the Wii. It doesn't matter if the WiiU is 10x more powerful than the PS3. Look at all the half-hearted crap that devs gave to the Wii while they spent the millions made on Just Dance and fitness games to fund PS3/360/PC AAA titles. Maybe it's a conspiracy. I don't know, but all I know is that you shouldn't buy a Nintendo console if you want the same sort of 3rd-party support that Sony and Microsoft get on their consoles.

Ryo-Hazuki4399d ago

it's simple. It's about being the cheapest console so they can have a bigger install base. Happen this gen too...PS3 was like $600 for the 60GB Xbox was $400 and Wii launched at $250. It's all about the price

Titanz4399d ago (Edited 4399d ago )

You can only imagine what Next gen will be like.

dark-hollow4399d ago (Edited 4399d ago )

Its a RUMOR! A frickinn RUMOR!!!!

Facts /=/ rumors!!!!

So we deny all the sources from NON ANONYMOUS DEVS like epic and crytic who praised the wii u hardware and come believe this, one, single rumor???
Wtf???

MOST of the early leaks predicts a chip from the radeon 4xxx series with multi core CPU which BLOWS THE PS3 OUT OF THE WATERRRR!

Remember the rumors about how the 3ds is on par with the 360? Nothing is concrete till Nintendo rise the curtain of the wii u.

Again, how the wii u is weaker when the OLD e3 2011 UNDERCLOCKED models were able to run that gorgeous Zelda demo, in FULL HD, IN 60 FRAMES PER SECOND!!!!
That and its known that early tech demos doesn't show the console full potential.

LX-General-Kaos4399d ago

I couldn't agree more.

Voted Well Said

Moncole4399d ago

People think its true because its something bad about Nintendo

BubloZX4399d ago

"Again, how the wii u is weaker when the OLD e3 2011 UNDERCLOCKED models were able to run that gorgeous Zelda demo, in FULL HD, IN 60 FRAMES PER SECOND!!!!
That and its known that early tech demos doesn't show the console full potential"

The ps3 was suppose to use 2 cells and 512 x ram with 256v ram but because of cost issues they where cut. If nintendo does it it will be because of cost issues.
Remeber rumor is a rumor. If the Wii U is more powerful it'll be no surprise. If not still no surprise. And you do realise running a zelda game in HD at 60fps isn't that hard. Look at God of War 3. Both those games aren't very open world. and Zelda games never have tons of enemies on the screen at once either.

4398d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4398d ago
dedicatedtogamers4399d ago

Going non-cutting-edge sure seemed to work out pretty well for the Wii and DS. And then going "cutting edge" (relatively speaking) with the 3DS led to a very rocky start for the handheld.

Nintendo will always, always, always have its loyal fans. Whether the WiiU is less powerful than the PS3 or less powerful than a PS1, it doesn't matter. Most Nintendo fans will still buy it.

StraightPath4399d ago (Edited 4399d ago )

as long as its producing quality games it wont even matter if its more or less powerful then ps3 or xbox 360.

3ds is less powerful then vita and destorying vita to bits. well so far 3ds has much better games leaving vita for catch up game with one or two games available so far.

ds was less pwoerful then the psp, psp died long time ago while ds produced a libary of amazing games.

wii was a upgraded ps2 again number 1 in this generation due to its innovation not power. plus it had great games too. however due to its power multiplatforms games were not ported or a few downgraded.

if wii u is equal to ps3 and xbox 360 it will just make it easier for devs. but this will be a problem when ps4 and xbox 720 come out.

Trunkz4398d ago (Edited 4398d ago )

@StraightPath

Disagrees aren't from Fanboys btw, just some stuff you said was oddly wrong.

3DS has been out much longer then the Vita, so it had better have some good games out.

Myself being a Nintendo fan, I don't want an underpowered console, nor do I want a super powered one that will cost $500-$600 at launch, the goal I'd like to see is balance. If they make the Wii-U more powerful then the PS3, the PS4/720 is more powerful then the Wii-U, i'd be fine with this.

If there's one thing Nintendo has learned from the 3DS launch is that non Hardcore fans won't buy it if it's too expensive. They will either launch the console and let the hardcore fans buy it first then price drop in time for christmas again, or they will pull a Wii and go cheap. Because of the sales of the 3DS, i think they just might pack in a little more power into the Wii-U, but I'm not buying it if it cannot support 4 Wii-U controllers... Nobody should have to "shotgun" on who gets to use the 1 Wii-U controller, kids will be fighting over who gets to use it. I'd like to be able to play something like Goldeneye with 4 Wii-U controllers thus nobody can look off of my screen, multiplayer this way would have new endless possibility's.

Ck1x4398d ago

@Trunk Jr: I think what nintendo learned from the 3ds was not only do they need the right pricing but the need compelling software at launch and consistent amounts of it throughout the consoles lifespan. I think if the wiiu supports 2 wiipads that should be very compelling enough for developers to make some great games. And unlike most people believe, I think the gpu and cpu are powerful enough to stream and generate great grafics across the system and tablet controllers, that's not the issue. I think whether or not nintendo is willing to put enough fast RAM in this thing will determine what its truly capable of in the end

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4398d ago
ps360wiihdera4399d ago (Edited 4399d ago )

Neither do I. Don't give a s*it for visuals as long as they're pretty and contemporary... Only moronic fanboys get excited over minute details!

Hope we see a WOW or StarCraft II for the Wii U!

LX-General-Kaos4399d ago (Edited 4399d ago )

Nintendo have a well know rep to march to the beat of their own drum, and create an experience that they feel will be healthy for gaming. Nintendo games are made with innovation and worldclass game design first. Not to harness the epic power of some super graphics chip. With Nintendo in house exclusive games on each Nintendo console. You can easily see the vision of gameplay over graphics unfold right before your very eyes.

The Nintendo Wii U entertainment console will be no different. Superior graphics or not. The innovative industry leading tech will still break new ground and drive the industry forward. The Nintendo 3DS has proven it to be true and so will the Nintendo Wii U. Nintendo loyal fans that invest in Nintendo products will continue to be greatly rewarded with worldclass exclusive AAA content.

Ever since the beginning of console gaming, the Nintendo experience has always set the bar very high for competing games and consoles. There is a golden standard in place that is very hard to match. From 2D, to 3D, to 120 frames per second in 4D.. The Nintendo exclusive experience will remain legendary.

Rated E For Everyone

Hicken4399d ago

Just a note: Nintendo wasn't around at the beginning.

lionelglitchy4399d ago

nintendo have been involved with console/handheld gaming since 1974,that is pretty much forever when you talk about gaming

PopRocks3594398d ago

@Hicken

Maybe not, but Nintendo saved the home console market with the NES and changed the market as we know it.

browngamer414399d ago

Well this all VERY Speculative especially considering that the only sources that are saying the Wii-U is underpowered are un-named and unconfirmed..Major developers have already gone on RECORD praising the power of the Wii-U..sounds like B.S. to me.

limewax4399d ago

Not to mention there are PS3/360 games currently being created for the Wii-U. If they were never inclined to downgrade the games for a Wii, then why start now. They already have 3rd party support so I really doubt it is actually true

StanSmith4399d ago

I care if it is more expensive than a PS3 or 360. If it isn't then i'll still pick one up.

f7897904399d ago (Edited 4399d ago )

I'm sure it will be $250 and everyone will go "Oh next-gen for the same price as current consoles!" Then they'll either be oblivious or very disappointed that the power is the same as current consoles.

I won't buy the WiiU because of the lack of everything but Nintendo's first party games.

Show all comments (84)
80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple1016d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref5d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde5d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander19725d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville5d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff21834d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos4d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
isarai5d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref5d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan5d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis0074d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander19725d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

5d ago Replies(3)
Einhander19725d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

5d ago
5d ago
Zeref5d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde5d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander19725d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander19725d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier5d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto5d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff21834d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto4d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
Hofstaderman5d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts5d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts4d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic4d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
90°

Nintendo's War Against Player-Made Content Will Hurt The Company In The End

Danish from eXputer: "Nintendo has historically gone against player-made content and emulation of its games. This has done much to harm the company's image."

XiNatsuDragnel12d ago

I agree nintendo hire some these folks to help in your games it'll help imo.

banger8811d ago

They need to stop announcing these mods and fan remakes until they're finished. Finish it, upload it, and then if Nintendo dmca's it tough shit. Once it's online, people can share it around, even if the original download gets taken down.

Jingsing11d ago

True, but most modders need constant admiration during the process to motivate them.

PRIMORDUS11d ago

Yup, once it's a torrent nothing can be done Nintendo is helpless at that point. But it would be wise if they just had a site on the dark web, it's also easy to use with Tor and no one will bother you.

mastershredder10d ago

This is all coming from the mouth of short-sighted fandom and grifting madness.
No.... it wont. There is a clear defined reason why they don't. This is nothing new. Make your own shi7 from your own original ideas especially if you are trying to capitalize of it it. Duh.

Yeah, hire people that have zero respect or understanding for an established process. Wow. Yep. Totally makes sense.

shinoff218310d ago

Those guys that made that sonic game got a gig from sega or something along those lines and that game was dope as hell. One of the best sonics as of late.