300°

Capcom Responds To BBB Complaints: No Distinction Between DLC And Disc-Locked Content

Gaming Blend "After consumers filed complaints with the Better Business Bureau regarding Capcom's latest antics, the company actually responded to some of these complaints and their response has always been the same: There's no distinction between downloadable content and disc-locked content. In other words, expect to get screwed some more in future releases."

Read Full Story >>
cinemablend.com
Kamikaze1354401d ago

So basically there is no difference between locking out content that's been completed for months or developing later on and charging for it. Fantastic, Capcom.

Yi-Long4401d ago (Edited 4401d ago )

... so just vote with your wallet.

I NEVER buy any of their games on day 1 for full price. Just wait for a 'complete' release, IF you're even still interested in the game by then.

It's not like Capcom is still making brilliant must-have games anyway.

grailly4401d ago

yeah, buying on release date is most of the time a mistake. I bought mass effect 3 two days ago for 22£ new.

on topic:
What capcom says, is, from a business stand point true... if they developed content with the intent of selling it as DLC putting it or not on the disk does not change anything. They would not have developed that content if they weren't going to sell it separately. When the content is done and where it is stored should not have any importance, if anything they are saving the consumer the download...

i'll admit it feels really wrong towards the consumer, though. The truth is, capcom should be working harder on how this information gets out to us.

HammockGames4401d ago (Edited 4401d ago )

Agree w/ Yi-Long.

Wait for the "Mega Super Ultimate Gold Edition" of whatever game Capcom is selling and you'll avoid most DLC charges.

Unfortunately, that may mean waiting until like the 3rd edition of a given game * cough * SF4 * cough * but we all know it's coming. Capcom - on disc DLC or not - never intends the first release to be complete or even able to become complete (designed obsolescence).

Sad. Predictable. And ridiculous.

SilentNegotiator4401d ago

Don't buy their games, but remember; dopes will always buy stuff with "resident evil" or "Street Fighter" on them.

Keep filing complaints with the BBB. Eventually they will be noticed and suffer the consequences for their practices.

hay4401d ago (Edited 4401d ago )

After three SF4s, two RE5s, two MvCs it's should be obvious to wait. But from Capcoms point of view, it's huge revenew boost for them, so it's worth to continue this business model.

If there wouldn't be demand, there wouldn't be supply. People buy this stuff, hence it'll continue.

I'm not defending Capcom. I hate what they do. But untill all most of us realize what's going on, it won't change.

Boody-Bandit4401d ago (Edited 4401d ago )

This is a broken record of hypocrisy on sites like this that is completely out of control. You want to thumb your nose at Capcom, GREAT. But only do so if you are doing the same for nearly every other developer in the industry since they are ALL doing it.

Most top franchise titles have DLC created along side of the games themselves. At nearly every game show when new games are announced the developer talks about their DLC plans months, sometimes years, before the game is released.

The only thing Capcom is doing differently is cutting out the middle man (Sony & Microsofts XBL & PSN) that charges them for uploading it to their services and it DOES save space on our hard drives. So you should be equally frustrated with Sony and MS for the cost they charge the devs & publishers.

Also what is all this BS blathering about them releasing SFIV, SSFIV, SFIVAE, RE5 RE5G, etc? How is that any different than GOTY, Ultimate or Complete editions (ex: the latest 2 that come to mind Dirt 3 & Mortal Kombat) that a ton of other developers are also doing a year (give or take a few months) after the release of their titles? It isn't. These devs and publishers are laughing their asses off the way to the bank and have been since this crap started.

You people, the media, members of gaming forums and sites like this are aiming down the sites at Capcom. Again, that's fine, BUT do it to all of them are you are ALL hypocrites.

DLC has been completely out of control this entire generation and although we may ALL be fed up with it? For every one of us hating on it there are hundreds that can't wait to pull out their wallets and buy it. Dont you guys remember Kotick (CEO of Activison) and the remarks he made regarding DLC? Exactly.

All DLC that requires payment SUCK. With that I agree, but trying to categorize them under the level of absurdity, is well, absurd. IT ALL SUCKS! I feel most DLC should be a perk (FREE) for purchasing their titles in the first place.

One last thing. I know a ton of gamers. Most of which all complain about DLC saying they refuse to buy it for game X and guess what happens? Yup, they buy it. That is why these rapist (Devs n Publishers) are now and will always get away with it.

Edit: Pound disagree until your fingers bleed but do so by proving me wrong that ALL devs and publishers are not milking the gamer dry with planned DLC, season passes and any other way they can garner more $ from the consumer after we purchase their games. You can't. I'm 100% spot on with what I wrote so you are disagreeing out of ignorance.

VanillaBear4401d ago (Edited 4401d ago )

@Yi-Long

Totaly agree man

Can we PLEASE do this with RE6

Were smart guys, we know deep down that RE is still going towards action and the COD crowd and they've totaly overdone everything in RE6, building onto the complaints instead of getting rid of them (Co-op, action, chapter select, smart enemies that can hold guns). We all know that it won't be RE and if we keep buying the games they'll think it's fine to screw over their loyal RE fanbase for new fans who probably don't even give a crap about the franchise, plus we know DLC we be on the disc somewhere.

Not buying RE6 day 1 would hurt Capcom.....A LOT

But your still going to get idiots giving Capcom what they want.

Rainstorm814401d ago

@ brutally honest

DLC isnt the problem, some companies like rockstar or bethesda actually does it right, and the DLC actually feels like and extension of the game and not content extracted from the game for the sake of having DLC.

The problem is the DLC that rapes gamers just for the sake of lining CEOs pockets.

Honestly i have a gripe with all companies that paticipate in the "Milking DLC" and i just dont buy it

Boody-Bandit4401d ago (Edited 4401d ago )

Exactly my point Raiinstorm.
Most devs have been doing this all generation and Capcom did it with SFIV, SSFIV and RE5 but NOW it's a problem. Why now? Why wasn't it made such a big deal out of with past iterations of their games? Where is the uproar with Activision, Epic, EA, DICE, etc and so on?

Just look at the articles about COD Elite service. I remember more people defending, significantly more, than upset over it. Now a lot of devs are doing season passes. Look at Forza 4. That season pass does not cover all DLC for the game. How pathetic is that? Although I will say some diehard Forza fans on forzamotorsport.net claim that is the main reason why F4 is not selling as well as F3 did. If only that trend would continue with all devs that milk their DLC to death.

Seriously, DLC (ALL nickel and diming) is completely out of control and it's getting worse. All I am saying is I want to see this same out rage with ALL developers that milk DLC to death before the game is released and months after. The problem is, like I pointed out, we are in the extreme minority. Most will pull out their wallets like sheep and purchase what ever these greedy devs and publishers throw their way. They know this, thrive on it and it's not going to change any time soon if ever.

Personally I think it's going to get much worse. Some of my friends have turned that backs on gaming because of these practices. I honestly don't blame them. Some of this DLC with certain titles and the way it's implemented, segregates games. Leaving friends disconnected from parties because of what DLC they do or do not own.

I have zero issue with any one complaining about DLC, I think it SUCKS TOO, but my problem is where was the out rage this whole generation? Weren't people paying attention to past games from Capcom?

I see more people defend this trash (DLC, Season passes, pay to play online subscriptions, etc), other than Capcom, than attack it. All I am saying is keep it going on don't aim your sites on one being worse than the other.

And I do agree with you, certain devs get it right and I don't mind paying them for their DLC.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4401d ago
Lucretia4401d ago

@Graily, You know your right.

and while we consumers can just say (Why dont they just keep it off the disc and make everyone download it so it doesnt look so shady?) they won't do that because of money. psn charges for every MB doownloaded i think, so imagine that price hit on them.

BUT, i would love to see a bunch of in-game unlockables, there arent even any unlockable costumes in games anymore, its all dlc

4401d ago Replies(2)
hulk_bash19874401d ago (Edited 4401d ago )

F@ck Crapcom and their shady business morals.

Smashbro294401d ago

How many more times must this be explained? They will sell what they will sell at least this way they aren't lying and its easier on us.

Also, its another team that works on DLC with a totally different budget so yes, they didn't have time to fix the 360 pair play issue. I'm positive the team would if they were given more money but they aren't working for free.

grailly4401d ago

understanding economics and business dynamics isn't an easy task when surrounded by haters lol.

Yi-Long4401d ago

... is never really a good businessmodel when we're talking long-term.

Short-term, yeah it has it's benefits, but more and more gamers are catching on and will refuse to buy such games for full-price.

DLC has made me spend less on those games and it's developers, cause I now refuse to buy those at full price, and at times I even lose interest in the game completely so I won't even pick it up a year later when it's 20 bucks and including all the DLC, cause I already moved on.

grailly4401d ago

and you're right to react this way, if you're not happy don't buy. I hate people that buy, then complain.

but that's not the point that kyosuke_sanada was making. the problem is that capcom fails to see that their audience feels screwed over. They don't see the difference between releasing dlc on the disc or later via download, because business-wise it's the SAME. That content was developed to be sold separately and would never have existed otherwise.

for all we know every DLC is ready before release of the disc game and companies just put them for download later, it's just the public relations that are better in those cases.

ThatArtGuy4401d ago

I wouldn't use Reggie as the main picture for this article. One thing that Nintendo HASN'T done this gen is milk DLC. That's definitely something I can respect them for.

xPhearR3dx4401d ago

You're right. Instead, they milk the shit out of their franchises from 20 years ago.

ChickeyCantor4401d ago

But that's milk that hasn't gone sour.
25+ years isn't an easy job.

Like it or not, their IP might be reused, the software is still top-notch.
Preference is a different topic.

xPhearR3dx4401d ago

@sidar

It went sour a long time ago.

According to critics Mario for example is still top-notch and sells millions. Critics also say COD is still top-notch and it continues to sell millions. The name sells the game, not the software itself. Look at the Pokemon games. They're still the same damn game they were 10 years ago and it still sells millions.

kanetheking4401d ago

xPhearR3dx

pokemon is not the same game from 10 years ago if you think that your being silly.

ronin4life4401d ago

I thought the exact same thing. ^_^;

I_LOVE_MYSELF4401d ago

I just don't support Capcom.
I'm not trying to be part of a huge protest and mass boycott. I just simply don't like their antics and shady ways. It doesn't bother me that much if I'm being completely honest since I'm not the biggest Capcom fan in the first place, but I do feel for all the fans who support them and feel betrayed. If a game supports these cheap tactics I simply either don't get the DLC or don't buy the game in the first place. There is no shortage on games I have yet to play and deserve my attention more than Capcoms titles.

Show all comments (51)
60°

Dragon's Dogma 2 continues Capcom's hot streak on Metacritic

Dragon's Dogma 2 continues Capcom's hot streak of favorably reviewed games as the studio lands first on Metacritic's top publishers ranking.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
190°

Capcom Is 'Aware' of Dragon's Dogma 2 Frame Rate Issues on PC

Responding to a query about frame rate problems from IGN, Capcom said in a statement that performance issues on PC may be linked to the heavy amount of CPU demanded from NPCs in the game.

"In Dragon's Dogma 2, a large amount of CPU usage is allocated to each character and dynamically calculates the impact of their physical presence in various environments. In certain situations where numerous characters appear simultaneously, the CPU usage can be very high and may affect the frame rate," a Capcom representative told IGN. "We are aware that in such situations, settings that reduce GPU load may currently have a limited effect; however, we are looking into ways to improve performance in the future."

just_looken29d ago

What a load of bull there blaming the npc load for there poor performance? the new hitman games has way more going on beyond that they are saying any pc cpu is not powerful enough?

In the article it is also stated a ign reviewr got motion sickness playing ps5/pc version but still enjoyed it? like wow if that was me i would knock it down alot and asked for a patch asap.

So those about to play thank denuvo get a barf bucket if your on pc play 720p because like cites skyline its going to be a unoptimized cpu mess.

Man those on series s/steam deck/rog ally rip :(

just_looken29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Just putting up a pcgamer review

"its janky has bugs poor performance need lots of updates 89/100"
https://youtu.be/WKjZKfAivh...

Gameing bolt unstable frame rate rate below 30fps but that is great??????
https://youtu.be/s9rnh2250X...

Man have we dropped that quality bar for acceptable performance/optimization

a person's view on performance using a high end pc
https://youtu.be/nL9EvGTPbA...

andy8529d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Am I hearing that right, that reviewer with a 4090 is getting drops into the 20s when there's several NPC on screen. Sorry but there's zero excuse for that. BG3 had hundreds at a time on screen and that's a pretty game. What an absolute piss poor engine

just_looken29d ago

@andy

Yes the is correct but every review is giving it a past and or saying that its great that the performance is like the first ps3/xbox one game.

2012 20-30fps 2024 20-30fps dragons dogma keeping things the same reviewers like that apparently

just_looken29d ago

IGN put up a video showing the 4090 struggling aswell as console performance all versions are like the first game with fps issues.Remember dlss 3.0 can almost double your fps like that cyber punk video so without dlss on your looking at 30fps on the most powerful gpu that is out right now.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Cacabunga29d ago

Capcom where is Deep Down???

Tapani29d ago

@andy85 At launch BG3 dropped to under 30fps at the final chapter on 4090. I played the game at launch and had that experience. And that was with a 5800X3D. Everything watercooled and fine-tuned CPU/GPU and memory at 32GB with good timings, and a fast SSD etc.

just_looken29d ago

@tapani

I am sorry are we comparing a AA game with a small budget with alot going on 24/7 to a AAA game funded buy the billion dollar capcom?

You are right yes but that was patched and that team loves there community but if the first dogma said anything we should expect a patch or 2 but that is it.

andy8528d ago

@Tapani indeed but that was hundreds of NPCs. Not a few. It's piss poor

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 28d ago
lellkay29d ago

Can they be aware of the need for 60fps on consoles plz

just_looken29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Oh no kidding that "pro" model better have a 60fps mode.

But that ps5 pro PSSR will no doubt be a hold back as i see very few devs make a fsr/dlss/pssr game like really sony why did you spend millions to make upscale tech on the 6800 when amd already has fsr 3.0 just sitting there.

I remember the ps4 pro patches that dwindle over time yes new games had the modes but they were not standard and that was without the base ps4 using another upscale tech.

Edit:

In tldr form devs now make fsr upscale for ps5/xbox PSSR upscale tech on ps5 pro game then dlss/fsr upscale tech pc version and we also have intels xess just insane workload

Eonjay29d ago

'Oh no kidding that "pro" model better have a 60fps mode.'

Perhaps but only if Capcom addresses the issues first. substantially more powerful hardware is struggling.

Furesis29d ago

I mean it's not helping but this is something more than that. Plenty of games with denuvo that work fine

just_looken29d ago

That could be also taxing for sure sense the ps5 also supports that dreadful drm

This is also running off the RE engine remember those re vids with the denuvo drm on/off

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

MrDead29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Project Zomboid a simple looking isometric game has a similar problem as the Zombies are CPU heavy. If this is the issue GPU tweeks won't do anything, you need less calculations per NPC or more static NPCs

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH29d ago

Well that’s just great…looks like I’ll be holding off on buying this on PC until it’s fixed. If I wanted low frame rates I’d just buy it in console smh…

100°

Capcom Boosts Starting Salaries in Japan by Over 25%

Capcom Boosts Starting Salaries in Japan by Over 25%! Strategic move to attract top talent and align with industry trends amid economic inflation.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
43d ago
rlow143d ago

Well there is a lot of laid off talent out there. Very smart of them to target that. Plus if it’s in Japan, that’s a great place to live.

aaronaton43d ago

"Won't someone think of the shareholders!!" wwwaaaahhh

Eonjay43d ago

It funny with this news, their stock price took a small hit. But you know what... thats like too damn bad. We have to stop letting shareholders run the industry into the ground.

FinalFantasyFanatic42d ago

Seriously, you have to spend money to make money, I think some companies and share holders forget that, If you don't pay enough, you can't attract the best talent, or possibly even enough staff for the company to function properly.

Eonjay43d ago

I really approve of Capcom for doing this and will show my appreciation by supporting them. There are a few Capcom games I need to get... and this includes Dragon's Dogma 2. Support companies that support the people working in the industry over shareholders! REMEMBER: Shareholder's don't make games!

Darkegg42d ago

25% sounds like a lot, but it's from $1,560 to $2000 per month. That's $24,000 a year. Unless u became a monk, that is below poverty line.